Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
  • Special Collections
    • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)
    • 2024 AJNR Journal Awards
    • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcast
    • AJNR Scantastics
    • Video Articles
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Author Policies
    • Fast publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Submit a Case for the Case Collection
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Other Publications
    • ajnr

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
  • Special Collections
    • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)
    • 2024 AJNR Journal Awards
    • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcast
    • AJNR Scantastics
    • Video Articles
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Author Policies
    • Fast publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Submit a Case for the Case Collection
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

Welcome to the new AJNR, Updated Hall of Fame, and more. Read the full announcements.


AJNR is seeking candidates for the position of Associate Section Editor, AJNR Case Collection. Read the full announcement.

 

Research ArticleSPINE

In Vivo High-Resolution MR Imaging of Neuropathologic Changes in the Injured Rat Spinal Cord

T. Weber, M. Vroemen, V. Behr, T. Neuberger, P. Jakob, A. Haase, G. Schuierer, U. Bogdahn, C. Faber and N. Weidner
American Journal of Neuroradiology March 2006, 27 (3) 598-604;
T. Weber
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
M. Vroemen
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
V. Behr
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
T. Neuberger
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
P. Jakob
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
A. Haase
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
G. Schuierer
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
U. Bogdahn
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
C. Faber
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
N. Weidner
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Fig 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 1.

    In vivo MR imaging of intact spinal cord at 17.6T. Panels A and B show sagittal scans through the thoracic spinal cord (section thickness, 239 μm; FOV, 40 × 30 mm; in-plane resolution, 156 × 117 μm; TR, ∼200 milliseconds, depending on heart rate; TE, 4.4 milliseconds). Panels C and D display axial scans through the thoracic spinal cord (section thickness, 500 μm; FOV, 17.7 × 35.5 mm; in-plane resolution, 69 × 69 μm; TR and TE, as above). Scale bar, 2 mm. A, A more lateral sagittal scan depicts primarily white matter (lower signal intensity) with some longitudinally oriented more hyperintense structure, reflecting the gray matter of the lateral ventral horn. CSF appears hyperintense, vertebral bodies are hypointense. B, Most of the spinal cord parenchyma displayed here represents gray matter (hyperintense) surrounded by white matter tracts (hypointense) in a paramedian sagittal scan through the spinal cord. C, An axial scan through the thoracic spinal cord allows the clear distinction between the typical butterfly appearance of the spinal cord gray matter and the surrounding hypointense white matter. Also of note, spinal roots can be clearly identified at this level. D, A subsequent scan more caudally shows the spinal cord in cross-section away from the spinal root entry zone.

  • Fig 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 2.

    Axial ex vivo MR imaging scans of contused rat spinal cord. Axial sections of ex vivo MR imaging show microscopy grade visualization of morphologic changes in the injured rat spinal cord 4 weeks after contusion injury at midthoracic level (2D multisection spin-echo; section thickness, 300 μm; FOV, 6 × 6 mm; in-plane resolution, 23 × 23 μm; TE, 7.5 milliseconds; TR, 2 seconds). Scale bar, 1 mm. Panels A–L show consecutive sections in the rostral-caudal direction. In rats the dorsal columns contain not only ascending proprioceptive projections, which are located in the dorsal half of the dorsal column. The crossed corticospinal tract projects in the ventral half of the dorsal columns, unlike humans, where most corticospinal axons are located in the lateral columns. A–F, In sections rostral to the contusion site, the spinal cord morphology is still maintained with a clear differentiation of white and gray matter. Note the hypointensity in the dorsal part of the dorsal columns (arrowheads) identical to ascending proprioceptive projections. G–I, At the lesion center, the spinal cord diameter is reduced and gray and white matter can no longer be separated. Hypointensities located in the center (G) reflect hemosiderin deposits. J–L, Caudal to the lesion, the gray-white matter contrast is preserved. Both in rostral and caudal scans (B–D and J–L) hyperintense signals are found in the dorsal columns consistent with cystic defects (see also Fig 3). Hypointensities in axial scans rostral to the lesion correspond to ascending sensory projections, whereas in caudal scans they represent the area of the corticospinal tract (J–L, arrowheads).

  • Fig 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 3.

    Sagittal ex vivo MR imaging scans of contused rat spinal cord and corresponding histology. Midthoracic contusion injury 4 weeks postlesioning; same specimen as Fig 2 (2D multisection spin-echo; section thickness, 208 μm; FOV, 20 × 6 mm; in-plane resolution, 23 × 78 μm; TE, 7.5 milliseconds; TR, 2 seconds). Scale bar, 2 mm. A–D, Ex vivo MR imaging scans from lateral to medial. E–H, Corresponding Nissl-stained sections. I–L, Corresponding GFAP immunostained sections. M–P, Corresponding collagen type III immunostained sections. Homogenous hyperintensities at the injury center (A) correspond to cystic lesion defects in histologic sections (E, I, and M). In other sections. mixed hypo-/hyperintensities in the lesion center (B and C, arrows) are associated either with cystic lesion defects, hemosiderin deposits, or fibrotic scar formation (F, N, G, and O, arrows). A hypointensity following the path of the dorsal corticospinal tract caudal to the lesion—corresponding to hypointensities in the dorsal columns in axial MR images (Fig 2)—is highlighted by arrowheads (B).

  • Fig 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 4.

    Sagittal in vivo MR imaging scans of contused rat spinal cord and corresponding histology. In vivo MR imaging in adult rats at 2 and 8 weeks after thoracic contusion injury displays signal intensity changes, which parallel the ex vivo MR imaging data (2D multisection gradient-echo; A–C, section thickness, 311 μm; FOV, 30 × 30 mm; in-plane resolution, 117 × 117 μm; TE, 4.4 milliseconds; TR, ∼200 milliseconds, depending on heart rate; D–F, section thickness, 300 μm; FOV, 40 × 25 mm; in-plane resolution, 156 × 98 μm; TE, 3.7 milliseconds; TR, 200 milliseconds, depending on heart rate). Scale bar A–F, 5 mm; G–O, 1 mm. Consecutive sagittal MR images are shown at 2 weeks (A–C) and 8 weeks (D–F) postinjury with corresponding histologic Nissl (G–I) and Prussian-blue (J–L) –stained sections, and sections processed for ED1 immunohistochemistry (macrophages, monocytes; M–O), all from the same animal. Arrows in A and B highlight the site of the impact. Hypointensities along ascending and descending axon projections in the dorsal columns (B and E) correlate with hemosiderin deposits (K) rather than macrophage/monocyte infiltration (O; respective areas are indicated by arrowheads). These changes increase from 2 weeks (C) until 8 weeks (G) postinjury. The clear reduction in cord diameter over time (B vs E and C vs F) corresponds to the atrophy seen in histologic sections (G–O).

  • Fig 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 5.

    Axial in vivo MR imaging scans of contused rat spinal cord. In vivo MR axial scans in adult rats 6 weeks postinjury (2D multisection gradient-echo; section thickness, 370 μm; FOV, 20 × 20 mm; in-plane resolution, 78 × 78 μm; TE, 4.2 milliseconds; TR, ∼200 milliseconds, depending on heart rate). Scale bar, 2 mm. Scans rostral to the contusion (A–C), at the lesion center (D–G), and caudal to the lesion (H). The clear differentiation between white and gray matter disappears over subsequent sections. At the lesion center, hypointensities are surrounded by hyperintensities, which are less pronounced toward the cord surface (E and F). The dorsal aspect of the spinal cord at the lesion site appears more homogenously hyperintensive, most likely representing cystic changes (D and E, arrowheads). Signs of atrophy are present in the dorsolateral spinal cord (E and F).

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1:

    Time table of in vivo MR imaging (MRI) scans for each animal

    Animal No.First MRI Scan (Days PostinjurySecond MRI Scan (Days Postinjury)Third MRI Scan (Days Postinjury)Histology
    1182539No*
    2182539‡No*
    363858No*
    4238—Yes†
    5213§58‖Yes†
    • * Animals died during or shortly after last MRI scan.

    • † Animals sacrified one day after the last MRI scan.

    • ‡ Illustrated in Fig 5.

    • § Illustrated in Fig 4A–C.

    • ‖ Illustrated in Fig 4D–F.

    • View popup
    Table 2:

    Comparison of spatial resolutions in previous rat spinal cord injury in vivo MR imaging studies*

    Voxel Volume (nl)In-Plane Resolution (μm)Section Thickness (μm)Field StrengthCoil TypeStudy
    2.2578 × 7837017.6TSurface coilPresent study
    12.278 × 15610001.9TImplantedFord et al11
    304780 × 7805001.5TSurface coilGuizar-Sahagun et al12
    17.376 × 7630004.7TSurface coilFraidakis et al13
    76195 × 19520002.1TSurface coilFukouka et al14
    Information not provided28002TSurface coilOhta et al15
    80200 × 20020004.7TBirdcage coilMetz et al16
    12.7130 × 9810002TImplantedBilgen et al17
    8.178 × 10410007TImplantedNarayana et al18
    • * If one study used different resolutions, the highest resolution is quoted.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 27 (3)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 27, Issue 3
March, 2006
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
In Vivo High-Resolution MR Imaging of Neuropathologic Changes in the Injured Rat Spinal Cord
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
T. Weber, M. Vroemen, V. Behr, T. Neuberger, P. Jakob, A. Haase, G. Schuierer, U. Bogdahn, C. Faber, N. Weidner
In Vivo High-Resolution MR Imaging of Neuropathologic Changes in the Injured Rat Spinal Cord
American Journal of Neuroradiology Mar 2006, 27 (3) 598-604;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
In Vivo High-Resolution MR Imaging of Neuropathologic Changes in the Injured Rat Spinal Cord
T. Weber, M. Vroemen, V. Behr, T. Neuberger, P. Jakob, A. Haase, G. Schuierer, U. Bogdahn, C. Faber, N. Weidner
American Journal of Neuroradiology Mar 2006, 27 (3) 598-604;
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Crossref
  • Google Scholar

This article has not yet been cited by articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

More in this TOC Section

  • Bern Score Validity for SIH
  • MP2RAGE 7T in MS Lesions of the Cervical Spine
  • Deep Learning for STIR Spine MRI Quality
Show more Spine

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editors Choice
  • Fellow Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

Special Collections

  • Special Collections

Resources

  • News and Updates
  • Turn around Times
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Author Policies
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Submit a Case
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • Get Peer Review Credit from Publons

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcast
  • AJNR SCANtastic
  • Video Articles

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Alerts
  • Feedback
  • Advertise with us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Permissions
  • Terms and Conditions

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire