Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

AJNR Awards, New Junior Editors, and more. Read the latest AJNR updates

Research ArticleBrain

Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Mapping of the Hippocampus and the Amygdala in Pharmaco-Resistant Temporal Lobe Epilepsy

P.M. Gonçalves Pereira, E. Oliveira and P. Rosado
American Journal of Neuroradiology March 2006, 27 (3) 671-683;
P.M. Gonçalves Pereira
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
E. Oliveira
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
P. Rosado
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Fig 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 1.

    A, Highlight of a T1-weighted sagittal scout imaging from a control subject with the tilted coronal diffusion partitions superimposed. With this protocol, at least 7 diffusion partitions can be quantified for ADC over the hippocampus (one at the transition tail-body, 4 at the level of the body, and 2 at the level of the head). For the amygdala analysis, at least 2 sections can be used. B and C, Diffusion maps in the coronal plane parallel to the posterior comissure-obex line from the same subject. Regions of interest are placed over the hippocampus (B) and amygdala (C). Note the lateral ventricle on the right side of the left hippocampus (B, arrowhead) and its appearance underneath both amygdalae (C).

  • Fig 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 2.

    Scatterplots show the intraobserver variability (P.M.G.P.) of repeated measurements in the assesement of the right and left ADC values of the hippocampus (A) and right and left ADC values of the amygdala (B) in 10 control subjects. The limits of agreement between the first and second measurements are expressed as the mean difference between measurements: (first measurement − second measurement) ± 2 SD. Inserts in the lower left corner show the association between the first (x axis) and second (y axis) measurements. The same test was applied to the other variables (not shown), and the results were comparable. Mean indicates mean difference; +2 SD, mean difference +2 SD; −2 SD, mean difference −2SD.

  • Fig 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 3.

    Tilted coronal sections from a patient with right HS illustrating the morphologic (A) and signal intensity (C) characteristics of a damaged right hippocampus. Compare with the diffusion-weighted image (B), where the right hippocampal atrophy can also be identified. T1-weighted (A) used for volumetry, (B) diffusion-weighted, and (C) FLAIR image. The left side of the images correspond to the right side of the patient.

  • Fig 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 4.

    Tilted coronal sections from a different patient than the one presented in Fig 3 with imaging criteria for right amygdala sclerosis. Panels A and C illustrate the morphologic and signal intensity characteristics of a damaged right amygdala, respectively. Compare with the diffusion-weighted image (B), where the right amygdala atrophy can also be identified. T1-weighted (A) used for volumetry, (B) diffusion-weighted, and (C) FLAIR image. The left side of the images correspond to the right side of the patient.

  • Fig 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 5.

    99% confidence ellipses for HADC (A) and AMYADC (B).

  • Fig 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 6.

    Scatterplots show the correlations between the ipsilateral and contralateral ADC values of the hippocampus and amygdala. Closed circles and solid trendline refer to the ipsilateral values; open circles and scattered trendline refer to the contralateral values. ripsi, Pearson correlation coefficient for ipsilateral values; rcontra, Pearson correlation coefficient for contralateral values; n, number of patients.

  • Fig 7.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 7.

    Scattergram displaying the association between the ipsilateral HADC (z axis, mm2/s × 10−3), age at onset (x axis, in years), and the duration of TLE (y axis, in years).

  • Fig 8.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 8.

    HADC asymmetry index against outcome. The AI is significantly greater for patients in class IA than for those in class IB-III (Student t test: P = .01; 2-tailed). Horizontal bars represent ± 3 SDs from control mean.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1:

    Statistics for quantitative hippocampal MR imaging data (HADC, HCVOL, HCT2, and HCSI)

    HippocampusControls (n = 20)Right TLE (n = 29)Left TLE (n = 26)
    ADC (mm2/s 105) (HADC)
        Right hippocampus0.87 ± 0.03 (0.83–0.93)1.03 ± 0.14 (0.83–1.34)†§0.86 ± 0.05 (0.83–0.96)
        Left hippocampus0.88 ± 0.03 (0.84–0.93)0.85 ± 0.06 (0.76–1.04)1.01 ± 0.15 (0.80–1.39)†§
        A.I.1.3 ± 1.2 (0.02–3.9)17.6 ± 10.8 (2.7–44.7)§15.2 ± 12.5 (0.3–38.5)§
    Volume (mm3) (HCVOL)
        Right hippocampus3611 ± 350 (3050–4450)§2591 ± 587 (1449–3843)†§3354 ± 399 (2251–3947)‡
        Left hippocampus3488 ± 320 (3077–4246)3434 ± 400 (2295–4118)2427 ± 763 (1218–3660)†§
        A.I.3.8 ± 2.2 (0.8–7.5)30.9 ± 17.2 (4.1–77.8)‡36.1 ± 24.0 (0.2–78.7)§
    T2 (ms) (HCT2)
        Right hippocampus83.1 ± 2.3 (78.7–86.3)92.8 ± 5.7 (80.8–109)†§85.0 ± 4.1 (72.6–92.4)
        Left hippocampus82.6 ± 2.8 (78.1–87.0)85.3 ± 3.2 (78.9–93.2)‡93.2 ± 7.3 (79.8–110.3)†§
        A.I.1.7 ± 1.0 (0.5–3.5)9.2 ± 5.0 (0.8–24.9)§9.6 ± 7.9 (0.6–27.7)§
    NAA/(Cho + CRE) (ppm) (HCSI)
        Right hippocampus0.79 ± 0.05 (0.72–0.92)0.56 ± 0.12 (0.33–0.79)†§0.64 ± 0.14 (0.46–1.03)§
        Left hippocampus0.78 ± 0.06 (0.66–0.87)0.64 ± 0.08 (0.42–0.81)§0.52 ± 0.11 (0.37–0.76)†§
        A.I.3.5 ± 3.1 (0.11–11.2)16.9 ± 17.3 (1.6–62.0)§21.4 ± 12.0 (0.9–39.3)§
    • Note:—TLE indicates temporal lobe epilepsy; ADC, apparent diffusion coefficient; A.I., asymmetry index; NAA/(Cho + Cre), N-acetyl-aspartate to choline and creatine ratio, or HCSI. All values are expressed as mean ± 1 SD (range).

    • *Significantly different from the contralateral side at α level of .05.

    • † Significantly different from the contralateral side at α level of .01.

    • ‡ Significantly different from the correspondent control side at α level of .05.

    • § Significantly different from the correspondent control side at α level of .01.

    • View popup
    Table 2:

    Statistics for quantitative amygdala MR imaging data (AMYADC, AMYVOL, and AMYT2)

    AmygdalaControls (n = 20)Right TLE (n = 29)Left TLE (n = 25)
    ADC (mm2/s × 105) (AMYADC)
        Right amygdala0.77 ± 0.02 (0.73–0.82)0.82 ± 0.04 (0.76–0.89)†§0.79 ± 0.03 (0.73–0.83)
        Left amygdala0.77 ± 0.03 (0.72–0.82)0.77 ± 0.03 (0.73–0.81)0.81 ± 0.05 (0.72–0.91 )*§
        A.I.2.5 ± 1.9 (0.5–5.2)6.3 ± 4.3 (0.1–16.1)§4.8 ± 4.5 (0.3–18.2)‡
    Volume (mm3) (AMYVOL)
        Right amygdala1870 ± 112 (1667–2045)1760 ± 216 (1401–2225)†‡1847 ± 158 (1640–2203)
        Left amygdala1877 ± 095 (1673–2052)1915 ± 173 (1615–2238)1743 ± 227 (1369–2100)‡
        A.I.4.1 ± 2.6 (0.7–10.1)11.1 ± 8.9 (2.4–26.4)§12.3 ± 8.8 (0.8–35.7)§
    T2 (ms) (AMYT2)
        Right amygdala79.9 ± 2.9 (74.4–84.8)86.3 ± 4.9 (76.1–94.7)†§806. ± 3.9 (73.5–87.6)
        Left amygdala79.8 ± 2.8 (73.2–84.1)81.4 ± 4.7 (72.9–93.9)85.0 ± 5.2 (74.6–96.1)†§
        A.I.2.3 ± 1.3 (0.3–4.9)6.7 ± 3.8 (0.8–14.4)§6.2 ± 4.8 (0.2–16.2)§
    • Note:—TLE indicates temporal lobe epilepsy; ADC, apparent diffusion coefficient; A.I., asymmetry index. All values are expressed as mean ± 1 SD (range).

    • * Significantly different from the contralateral side at α level of .05.

    • † Significantly different from the contralateral side at α level of .01.

    • ‡ Significantly different from the correspondent control side at α level of .05.

    • § Significantly different from the correspondent control side at α level of .01.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 27 (3)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 27, Issue 3
March, 2006
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Mapping of the Hippocampus and the Amygdala in Pharmaco-Resistant Temporal Lobe Epilepsy
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
P.M. Gonçalves Pereira, E. Oliveira, P. Rosado
Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Mapping of the Hippocampus and the Amygdala in Pharmaco-Resistant Temporal Lobe Epilepsy
American Journal of Neuroradiology Mar 2006, 27 (3) 671-683;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Mapping of the Hippocampus and the Amygdala in Pharmaco-Resistant Temporal Lobe Epilepsy
P.M. Gonçalves Pereira, E. Oliveira, P. Rosado
American Journal of Neuroradiology Mar 2006, 27 (3) 671-683;
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Patients and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Crossref
  • Google Scholar

This article has not yet been cited by articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

More in this TOC Section

  • Multimodal CT Provides Improved Performance for Lacunar Infarct Detection
  • Optimal MRI Sequence for Identifying Occlusion Location in Acute Stroke: Which Value of Time-Resolved Contrast-Enhanced MRA?
  • Evaluating the Effects of White Matter Multiple Sclerosis Lesions on the Volume Estimation of 6 Brain Tissue Segmentation Methods
Show more Brain

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editor's Choice
  • Fellows' Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Video Articles

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

More from AJNR

  • Trainee Corner
  • Imaging Protocols
  • MRI Safety Corner
  • Book Reviews

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcasts
  • AJNR Scantastics

Resources

  • Turnaround Time
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Submit a Video Article
  • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Statistical Tips
  • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Author Policies
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • News and Updates

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Board Alumni
  • Alerts
  • Permissions
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Advertise with Us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Feedback
  • Terms and Conditions
  • AJNR Editorial Board Alumni

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire