Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

AJNR Awards, New Junior Editors, and more. Read the latest AJNR updates

Research ArticleNeurointervention

Multicenter Evaluation of a Self-Expanding Carotid Stent System with Distal Protection in the Treatment of Carotid Stenosis

M.D. Hill, W. Morrish, G. Soulez, A. Nevelsteen, G. Maleux, C. Rogers, K.E. Hauptmann, A. Bonafé, R. Beyar, L. Gruberg and J. Schofer for the MAVErIC International Investigators
American Journal of Neuroradiology April 2006, 27 (4) 759-765;
M.D. Hill
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
W. Morrish
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
G. Soulez
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
A. Nevelsteen
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
G. Maleux
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
C. Rogers
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
K.E. Hauptmann
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
A. Bonafé
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
R. Beyar
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
L. Gruberg
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
J. Schofer
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Fig 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 1.

    The Interceptor distal embolic protection device. A, Closed (0.0039-inch crossing profile). B, Open, showing the 1800-μm proximal openings.

  • Fig 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 2.

    Percent diameter stenosis in carotid arteries over time, as determined by sonography evaluation (core laboratory analysis). prox, proximal; dist, distal. The following criteria were used for determination of %DS: PSV (peak systolic velocity) ≤ 125 cm/s: <49% DS; PSV > 125 cm/s and EDV (end diastolic velocity) ≤ 140 cm/s: 50%–79% DS; PSV > 125 cm/s and EDV > 140 cm/s: 80%–99% DS; no flow in ICA: 100% DS.

  • Fig 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 3.

    Particulate size distribution results compared with GuardWire+ positive controls.

  • Fig 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 4.

    H&E staining of particulate demonstrating diverse cellular elements including macrophages and foam cells (200×).

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1:

    Definitions of high-risk patients

    Anatomic Risk FactorsComorbidity Risk Factors
    Group AGroup B
    Previous carotid endarterectomyPatients >80 years of ageNYHA class III or IV heart failure
    Contralateral carotid artery occlusion
    Previous radical neck dissection or radiation therapy to neck regionMI within previous 6 weeks
    Target lesion above C2 (level of jaw)COPD with FEV1 <30% predicted
    Low cervical carotid lesions
    DissectionUnstable angina (according to Braunwald classification)
    Inability to extend neck (ie, cervical osteoarthritis, mobility limitations)History of liver failure with elevated prothrombin time
    Tandem lesions ≥70% stenosisElective CABG scheduled minimally 30 days after the carotid stenting procedure
    Contralateral laryngeal palsy
    At risk for wound infection
    TracheostomySevere renal failure defined as a serum creatine >2 mg/dL
    • Note:—Patients are at high risk if they have (1) one or more anatomic risk factors, (2) one co-morbidity (group A) risk factor, or (3) one or more co-morbidity (group B) risk factors. NYHA indicates New York Heart Association; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; FEV1, forced expiratory volume in 1 second; CABG, coronary artery bypass grafting.

    • View popup
    Table 2:

    Patient baseline characteristics

    Patient characteristics (n = 51)
        Age ± SD (y)69 ± 11
        Male, n (%)43 (84.3)
        Hypertension, n (%)36 (70.6)
        Hypercholesterolemia, n (%)33 (64.7)
        Diabetes, n (%)12 (23.5)
        Current smoker, n (%)5 (9.8)
        Family history of cardiovascular disease, n (%)15 (29.4)
    Risk factors for carotid endarterectomy
        Previous carotid endarterectomy, n (%)15 (29.4)
        Contralateral carotid artery occlusion, n (%)14 (27.5)
        Previous radical neck dissection or radiation therapy in neck region, n (%)6 (11.8)
        Target lesion above C2 (level of jaw), n (%)2 (3.9)
        Low cervical carotid lesions, n (%)2 (3.9)
        Dissection, n (%)0 (0.0)
        Inability to extend the neck, n (%)2 (3.9)
        Tandem lesions ≥70% stenosis, n (%)6 (11.8)
        Contralateral laryngeal palsy, n (%)0 (0.0)
        At risk for wound infection, n (%)0 (0.0)
        Tracheostomy, n (%)2 (3.9)
        Patients >80 years of age, n (%)8 (15.7)
        Myocardial infarction within previous 6 weeks, n (%)1 (2.0)
        Unstable angina (according to Braunwald classification), n (%)5 (9.8)
        Severe renal failure (serum creatinine >2 mg/dL), n (%)0 (0.0)
        Elective coronary artery bypass grafting scheduled (≥30 days after procedure), n (%)1 (2.0)
        New York Heart Association class III or IV heart failure, n (%)7 (13.7)
        COPD with FEV1 <30% predicted, n (%)2 (3.9)
        History of liver failure with elevated prothrombin time0 (0.0)
    • Note:—COPD indicates chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; FEV1, forced expiration volume in 1 second.

    • View popup
    Table 3:

    Lesion and angiographic characteristics as assessed by core laboratory

    N
    Preprocedure diamater stenosis (%DS)
        Mean ± SD62.37 ± 10.4645
        Range (min, max)41.81, 81.19
    Postprocedure diameter stenosis (%DS)
        Mean ± SD21.16 ± 13.3748
        Range (min, max)−5.73, 51.38
    Target lesion vessel (%)
        Common carotid artery105
        Internal carotid artery9046
        External carotid artery00
    Acute gain (mm)42.11 ± 14.4042
    • View popup
    Table 4:

    Cumulative incidence of major adverse events

    MAECumulative Incidence n (%)
    In-hospital30 Days6 Months12 Months
    Death1 (2.0)1 (2.0)1 (2.0)2 (3.9)
    MI (Q wave/non-Q wave)1 (2.0)1 (2.0)1 (2.0)3 (5.9)
    Stroke2 (3.9)2 (3.9)3 (5.9)3 (5.9)
    Total3 (5.9)*3 (5.9)*4 (7.8)6 (11.8)†
    • Note:—MI indicates myocardial infarction.

    • * One patient experienced MI and death.

    • † One patient experienced MI and death.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 27 (4)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 27, Issue 4
April 2006
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Multicenter Evaluation of a Self-Expanding Carotid Stent System with Distal Protection in the Treatment of Carotid Stenosis
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
M.D. Hill, W. Morrish, G. Soulez, A. Nevelsteen, G. Maleux, C. Rogers, K.E. Hauptmann, A. Bonafé, R. Beyar, L. Gruberg, J. Schofer
Multicenter Evaluation of a Self-Expanding Carotid Stent System with Distal Protection in the Treatment of Carotid Stenosis
American Journal of Neuroradiology Apr 2006, 27 (4) 759-765;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
Multicenter Evaluation of a Self-Expanding Carotid Stent System with Distal Protection in the Treatment of Carotid Stenosis
M.D. Hill, W. Morrish, G. Soulez, A. Nevelsteen, G. Maleux, C. Rogers, K.E. Hauptmann, A. Bonafé, R. Beyar, L. Gruberg, J. Schofer
American Journal of Neuroradiology Apr 2006, 27 (4) 759-765;
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgments
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • New Ischemic Brain Lesions on Diffusion-Weighted MRI after Carotid Artery Stenting with Filter Protection: Frequency and Relationship with Plaque Morphology
  • Evaluation of the Medtronic Exponent Self-Expanding Carotid Stent System With the Medtronic Guardwire Temporary Occlusion and Aspiration System in the Treatment of Carotid Stenosis: Combined From the MAVErIC (Medtronic AVE Self-expanding CaRotid Stent System with distal protection In the treatment of Carotid stenosis) I and MAVErIC II Trials
  • Endarterectomy and Stenting for Asymptomatic Carotid Stenosis: A Race at Breakneck Speed
  • Crossref
  • Google Scholar

This article has not yet been cited by articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

More in this TOC Section

  • A Retrospective Study in Tentorial DAVFs
  • Proximal Protection Devices for Carotid Stenting
  • Rescue Reentry in Carotid Near-Occlusion
Show more NEUROINTERVENTION

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editor's Choice
  • Fellows' Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Video Articles

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

More from AJNR

  • Trainee Corner
  • Imaging Protocols
  • MRI Safety Corner
  • Book Reviews

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcasts
  • AJNR Scantastics

Resources

  • Turnaround Time
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Submit a Video Article
  • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Statistical Tips
  • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Author Policies
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • News and Updates

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Board Alumni
  • Alerts
  • Permissions
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Advertise with Us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Feedback
  • Terms and Conditions
  • AJNR Editorial Board Alumni

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire