Detection of Intracranial Atherosclerotic Steno-Occlusive Disease with 3D Time-of-Flight Magnetic Resonance Angiography with Sensitivity Encoding at 3T

References

1. ↵
   Sacco RL, Kargman DE, Gu Q, et al. Race-ethnicity and determinants of intracranial atherosclerotic cerebral infarction: the Northern Manhattan Stroke Study. Stroke 1995;26:14–20

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
2. Suh DC, Lee SH, Kim KR, et al. Pattern of atherosclerotic carotid stenosis in Korean patients with stroke: different involvement of intracranial versus extracranial vessels. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2003;24:239–44

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
3. ↵
   Liu HM, Tu KY, Yip PK, et al. Evaluation of intracranial and extracranial carotid steno-occlusive diseases in Taiwan Chinese patients with MR angiography: preliminary experience. Stroke 1996;27:650–53

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
4. ↵
   Heiserman JE, Drayer BP, Keller PJ, et al. Intracranial vascular stenosis and occlusion: evaluation with three-dimensional time-of-flight MR angiography. Radiology 1992;185:667–73

   PubMedWeb of Science
5. ↵
   Korogi Y, Takahashi M, Mabuchi N, et al. Intracranial vascular stenosis and occlusion: diagnostic accuracy of three-dimensional, Fourier transform, time of flight MR angiography. Radiology 1994;193:187–93

   PubMedWeb of Science
6. ↵
   Campeau NG, Huston J 3rd, Bernstein MA, et al. Magnetic resonance angiography at 3.0 Tesla: initial clinical experience. Top Magn Reson Imaging 2001;12:183–204

   CrossRefPubMed
7. ↵
   Al-Kwifi O, Emery DJ, Wilman AH. Vessel contrast at three Tesla in time of flight magnetic resonance angiography of the intracranial and carotid arteries. Magn Reson Imaging 2002;20:181–87

   CrossRefPubMed
8. ↵
   Pruessmann KP, Weiger M, Scheidegger MB, et al. SENSE: sensitivity encoding for fast MRI. Magn Reson Med 1999;42:952–62

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
9. ↵
   Willinek WA, Gieseke J, von Falkenhausen M, et al. Sensitivity encoding (SENSE) for high spatial resolution time of flight MR angiography of the intracranial arteries at 3T. Fortschr Roentgenstr 2004;176:21–26
10. ↵
    Gaa J, Weidauer S, Requardt M, et al. Comparison of intracranial 3D-TOF-MRA with and without parallel acquisition techniques at 1.5T and 3T: preliminary results. Acta Radiol 2004;45:327–32

    PubMed
11. ↵
    Gibbs GF, Huston J 3rd, Bernstein MA, et al. Improved image quality of intracranial aneurysms: 3.0-T versus 1.5-T time of flight MR angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2004;25:84–87

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
12. ↵
    Majoie CB, Sprengers ME, van Rooij WJ, et al. MR angiography at 3T versus digital subtraction angiography in the follow-up of intracranial aneurysms treated with detachable coils. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2005;26:1349–56

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
13. ↵
    Willinek WA, Born M, Simon B, et al. Time of flight MR angiography: comparison of 3.0-T imaging and 1.5-T imaging—initial experience. Radiology 2003;229:913–20

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
14. ↵
    Anderson CM, Saloner D, Tsuruda JS, et al. Artifacts in maximum-intensity-projection display of MR angiograms. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1990;154:623–29

    CrossRefPubMed
15. ↵
    Korogi Y, Takahashi M, Nakagawa T, et al. Intracranial vascular stenosis and occlusion: MR angiographic findings. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1997;18:135–43

    Abstract
16. ↵
    Oelerich M, Lentschig MG, Zunker P, et al. Intracranial vascular stenosis and occlusion: comparison of 3D time-of-flight and 3D phase-contrast MR angiography. Neuroradiology 1998;40:567–73

    CrossRefPubMed
17. ↵
    Fox A, Eliasziw M, Rothwell PM, et al. Identification, prognosis, and management of patients with carotid artery near occlusion. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2005;26:2086–94

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
18. ↵
    Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977;33:159–74

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
19. ↵
    Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986;8476:307–10
20. ↵
    Fürst G, Saleh A, Wenserski F, et al. Reliability and validity of noninvasive imaging of internal carotid artery pseudo-occlusion. Stroke 1999;30:1444–49

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
21. ↵
    Fürst G, Hofer M, Steinmetz H, et al. Intracranial stenoocclusive disease: MR angiography with magnetization transfer and variable flip angle. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1996;17:1749–57

    Abstract
22. ↵
    Bash J, Villablanca P, Jahan R, et al. Intracranial vascular stenosis and occlusive disease: evaluation with CT angiography, MR angiography, and digital subtraction angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2005;26:1012–21

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
23. ↵
    Stock KW, Radue EW, Jacob AL, et al. Intracranial arteries: prospective blinded comparative study of MR angiography and DSA in 50 patients. Radiology 1995;195:451–56

    PubMedWeb of Science
24. ↵
    Elgersma OE, Wust AF, Buijs PC, et al. Multidirectional depiction of internal carotid arterial stenosis: three-dimensional time-of-flight MR angiography versus rotational and conventional digital subtraction angiography. Radiology 2000;216:511–16

    PubMedWeb of Science
25. ↵
    Kwon SU, Cho YJ, Koo JS, et al. Cilostazol prevents the progression of the symptomatic intracranial arterial stenosis: the multicenter double-blind placebo-controlled trial of cilostazol symptomatic intracranial arterial stenosis. Stroke 2005;36:782–86

    Abstract/FREE Full Text