Diagnostic Accuracy of 3D Time-of-Flight MR Angiography Compared with Digital Subtraction Angiography for Follow-Up of Coiled Intracranial Aneurysms: Influence of Aneurysm Size

References

1. ↵
   Brunereau L, Cottier JP, Sonier CB, et al. Prospective evaluation of time-of-flight MR angiography in the follow-up of intracranial saccular aneurysms treated with Guglielmi detachable coils. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1999;23:216–23

   CrossRefPubMed
2. Kahara VJ, Seppanen SK, Ryymin PS, et al. MR angiography with three-dimensional time-of-flight and targeted maximum-intensity-projection reconstructions in the follow-up of intracranial aneurysms embolized with Guglielmi detachable coils. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1999;20:1391–92

   FREE Full Text
3. ↵
   Anzalone N, Righi C, Simionato F, et al. Three-dimensional time-of-flight MR angiography in the evaluation of intracranial aneurysms treated with Guglielmi detachable coils. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2000;21:746–52

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
4. ↵
   Boulin A, Pierot L. Follow-up of intracranial aneurysms treated with detachable coils: comparison of gadolinium-enhanced 3D time-of-flight MR angiography and digital subtraction angiography. Radiology 2001;219:108–13

   PubMed
5. Weber W, Yousry TA, Felber SR, et al. Noninvasive follow-up of GDC-treated saccular aneurysms by MR angiography. Eur Radiol 2001;11:1792–97

   CrossRefPubMed
6. Michardiere R, Bensalem D, Martin D, et al. Comparison of MRA and angiography in the follow-up of intracranial aneurysms treated with GDC. J Neuroradiol 2001;28:75–83

   PubMed
7. ↵
   Leclerc X, Navez JF, Gauvrit JY, et al. Aneurysms of the anterior communicating artery treated with Guglielmi detachable coils: follow-up with contrast-enhanced MR angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2002;23:1121–27

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
8. ↵
   Okahara M, Kiyosue H, Hori Y, et al. Three-dimensional time-of-flight MR angiography for evaluation of intracranial aneurysms after endosaccular packing with Guglielmi detachable coils: comparison with 3D digital subtraction angiography. Eur Radiol 2004;14:1162–68

   PubMed
9. ↵
   Yamada N, Hayashi K, Murao K, et al. Time-of-flight MR angiography targeted to coiled intracranial aneurysms is more sensitive to residual flow than is digital subtraction angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2004;25:1154–57

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
10. ↵
    Masaryk TJ, Modic MT, Ross JS, et al. Intracranial circulation: preliminary clinical results with three-dimensional (volume) MR angiography. Radiology 1989;171:793–99

    PubMedWeb of Science
11. ↵
    Okahara M, Kiyosue H, Yamashita M, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance angiography for cerebral aneurysms in correlation with 3D-digital subtraction angiographic images a study of 133 aneurysms. Stroke 2002;33:1803–08

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
12. ↵
    Aprile I. Evaluation of cerebral aneurysms with MR-angiography. Rev Neuroradiol 1996;9:541–50
13. Huston J 3rd, Nichols DA, Luetmer PH, et al. Blinded prospective evaluation of sensitivity of MR angiography to known intracranial aneurysms: importance of aneurysm size. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1994;15:1607–14

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
14. ↵
    Ross JS, Masaryk TJ, Modic MT, et al. Intracranial aneurysms: evaluation by MR angiography. J Neuroradiol 1990;11:449–55
15. ↵
    Cottier JP, Bleuzen-Couthon A, Gallas S, et al. Intracranial aneurysms treated with Guglielmi detachable coils: is contrast material necessary in the follow-up with 3D time-of-flight MR angiography? AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2003;24:1797–803

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
16. ↵
    Jager HR, Ellamushi H, Moore EA, et al. Contrast-enhanced MR angiography of intracranial giant aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2000;21:1900–07

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
17. ↵
    Schuierer G, Huk WJ, Laub G. Magnetic resonance angiography of intracranial aneurysms: comparison with intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography. Neuroradiology 1992;35:50–54

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
18. ↵
    Moody AR, Pollock JG, O'Connor AR, et al. Lower-limb deep venous thrombosis: direct imaging of the thrombus. Radiology 1998;209:349–55

    PubMedWeb of Science
19. ↵
    Derdeyn CP, Graves VB, Turski PA, et al. MR angiography of saccular aneurysms after treatment with Guglielmi detachable coils: preliminary experience. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1997;18:279–86

    Abstract
20. ↵
    Edelman RR, Sungkee SA, Chien D. Improved time-of-flight MR angiography of the brain with magnetization transfer contrast. Radiology 1992;184:395–99

    PubMed
21. ↵
    Jung HW, Chang KY, Choi DS, et al. Contrast-enhanced MR angiography for the diagnosis of intracranial vascular disease: optimal dose of gadopentetate dimeglumine. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1995;165:1251–55

    PubMed