Neuroradiologic Applications with Routine C-arm Flat Panel Detector CT: Evaluation of Patient Dose Measurements

References

1. ↵
   Groh BA, Siewerdsen JH, Drake DG, et al. A performance comparison of flat-panel imager-based MV and kV cone-beam CT. Med Phys 2002;29:967–75

   CrossRefPubMed
2. ↵
   Zellerhof M, Scholz B, Röhrnschopf E, et al. Low contrast 3D-reconstruction from C-arm data. Progress Biom. Opt Imag Proc SPIE 2005;5745 (I):646–55

   CrossRef
3. ↵
   Kalender WA. Computed Tomography. 2nd ed. New York: Wiley-VCH;2005
4. ↵
   Daly MJ, Siewerdsen JH, Moseley D, et al. Intraoperative cone-beam CT for guidance of head and neck surgery: assessment of dose and image quality using a C-arm prototype. Med Phys 2006;33:3767–80

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
5. ↵
   Fahrig R, Dixon RL, Payne T, et al. Dose and image quality for a cone-beam C-arm CT system. Med Phys 2006;33:4541–50

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
6. ↵
   Kalender WA, Kyriakou Y. Flat-detector CT (FD-CT). Eur Radiol 2007;1:828–37
7. Jaffray DA, Siewerdsen JH, Wong J, et al. Flat-panel cone-beam computed tomography for image-guided radiation therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2002;53:1337–49

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
8. ↵
   Heran NS, Song JK, Namba K, et al. The utility of DynaCT in neuroendovascular procedures. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2006;27:330–32

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
9. ↵
   Richter G, Engelhorn T, Struffert T, et al. Flat panel detector angiographic CT for stent-assisted coil embolization of broad-based cerebral aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2007;10:1902–08
10. ↵
    Engelhorn T, Rennert J, Richter G, et al. Myelography using flat panel volumetric computed tomography: a comparative study in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine 2007;15:32:E523–27
11. ↵
    Doerfler A, Wanke I, Egelhof T, et al. Aneurysmal rupture during embolization with Guglielmi detachable coils: causes, management, and outcome. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2001;22:1825–32

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
12. ↵
    Doelken M, Struffert T, Richter G, et al. Flat-panel detector volumetric CT for visualization of subarachnoid hemorrhage and ventricles: preliminary results compared to conventional CT. Neuroradiology 2008;50:517–23

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
13. ↵
    Shope T, Gagne R, Johnson G. A method for describing the doses delivered by transmission x-ray computed tomography. Med Phys 1981;8:488–95

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
14. Dixon RL, Munley ML, Bayram E. An improved analytical model for CT dose simulation with a new look at the theory of CT dose. Med Phys 2005;32:3712–28

    CrossRefPubMed
15. ↵
    Boone JM. The trouble with CTDI100. Med Phys 2007;34:1364–72

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
16. ↵
    Leitz W, Axelson B, Szendro G. Computed tomography dose assessment- a practical approach. Rad Prot Dosimetry 1995;57:377–80

    Abstract
17. Nakonechny KD, Fallone BG, Rathee S. Novel methods of measuring single scan dose profiles and cumulative dose in CT. Med Phys 2005;32:98–109

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
18. ↵
    McCollough CH, Schueler BA. Calculation of effective dose. Med Phys 2000;27:828–37

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
19. ↵
    Mori S, Endo M, Nishizawa K, et al. Enlarged longitudinal dose profiles in cone-beam CT and the need for modified dosimetry. Med Phys 2005;32:1061–69

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
20. ↵
    Deak P, Van Straten M, Schrimpton P, et al. Validation of Monte Carlo tool for patient-specific dose simulations in multi-slice computed tomography. Eur Radiol 2008;18:759–72

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
21. ↵
    Schueler BA, Kallmes DF, Cloft HJ. 3D Cerebral angiography: radiation dose comparison with digital subtraction angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2005;26:1898–901

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
22. ↵
    Bundesamt für Strahlenschutz, Diagnostische Referenzwerte für radiologische Untersuchungen, Bundesanzeiger 2003;143:17503–10