Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
  • Special Collections
    • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)
    • 2024 AJNR Journal Awards
    • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcast
    • AJNR Scantastics
    • Video Articles
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Author Policies
    • Fast publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Submit a Case for the Case Collection
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Other Publications
    • ajnr

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
  • Special Collections
    • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)
    • 2024 AJNR Journal Awards
    • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcast
    • AJNR Scantastics
    • Video Articles
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Author Policies
    • Fast publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Submit a Case for the Case Collection
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

Welcome to the new AJNR, Updated Hall of Fame, and more. Read the full announcements.


AJNR is seeking candidates for the position of Associate Section Editor, AJNR Case Collection. Read the full announcement.

 

Research ArticleHEAD & NECK

Evaluation of 4 Multisection CT Systems in Postoperative Imaging of a Cochlear Implant: A Human Cadaver and Phantom Study

B.M. Verbist, R.M.S. Joemai, W.M. Teeuwisse, W.J.H. Veldkamp, J. Geleijns and J.H.M. Frijns
American Journal of Neuroradiology August 2008, 29 (7) 1382-1388; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A1108
B.M. Verbist
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
R.M.S. Joemai
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
W.M. Teeuwisse
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
W.J.H. Veldkamp
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
J. Geleijns
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
J.H.M. Frijns
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Fig 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 1.

    Scoring of the visibility of electrode contacts and anatomic structures: on a MPR perpendicular to the modiolus of an MSCT image of the implanted human cadaver temporal bone, the cochlea is divided in 4 quadrants (white crosslines). The quadrants are numbered counterclockwise, and the round window niche is located in the first quadrant (I-IV). A quantitative score from 0 to 2 was given to each electrode contact according to its visibility. Cochlear structures, such as the inner and outer wall, were scored per quadrant. The kinking of the electrode is localized in the third quadrant (arrow). b indicates basal turn of the cochlea at the level of the round window; v, vestibule, *horizontal semicircular canal (SCC); **superior SCC.

  • Fig 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 2.

    Photograph (A) and 1 high-resolution optical image (B) of the PMMA phantom containing a cochlear implant.

  • Fig 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 3.

    MSCT of the PMMA phantom: 16 electrode contacts are numbered from the tip to the base: electrode numbers 1, 5, 10, and 15 are indicated.

  • Fig 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 4.

    MPR CT images of the human cadaver temporal bone along the plane of the electrode array on Aquilion-64 (A), Brilliance 64 (B), LightSpeed-64 (C) (also seen in Fig 1), and Sensation-64 (D). The upper set of images is displayed with W/L 3000/800 and shows cochlear anatomic structures, such as the semicircular canals, well in all of the scanners. The lower set of images shows the chosen manually adjusted window/level setting for visualization of the electrode contacts. This illustrates that a wide range of HUs is essential for visualization of the CI.

  • Fig 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 5.

    Graphic presentation of the mean differences over 4 observers (y-axis) between electrode position as manually indicated and the position in the computer model (in millimeters). Values are shown per electrode contact (x-axis) for each scanner (Aquilion-64, yellow; Brilliance-64, blue; LightSpeed-64, red; Sensation-64, green). See also Table 3.

  • Fig 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 6.

    Clinical implications of the PSF: the dotted curves depict the pixel value of a single electrode contact through the center. Summation of these curves renders a curve (black line). When the distance between 2 electrodes is larger than FWHM, the resulting curve still shows 2 maximum values, and the electrode contacts can be separated in the image (A). If the distance between 2 electrode contacts is smaller than FWHM, the resulting curve shows a single peak; the electrode contact cannot be visualized separately (B).

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1:

    Acquisition and reconstruction protocols and effective radiation dose for cochlear implant imaging on 64-section scanners

    VariableAquilion 64Brilliance 64LightSpeed 64Sensation 64
    Acquisition protocol
        Tube voltage, kV120140140120
        Tube current, mA200200335135
        Beam collimation, mm4 × 0.52 × 0.5532 × 0.62512 × 0.6
        Pitch0.750.50.5310.45
        Rotation time, s0.50.50.61.0
        Scan FOV240500320500
    Dose of acquisition protocol
        Effective dose, mSv1.42.01.81.3
    Reconstruction protocol
        Section thickness, mm0.50.550.60.6
        Section interval, mm0.30.30.30.3
        KernelFC84Filter DBonePlusU90u
        Reconstruction matrix5122768251225122
        Recon FOV PMMA phantom, mm100
        Recon FOV PSF phantom, mm50
        Recon FOV cadaver head, mm80
    • Note:—FOV indicates field of view; PMMA, polymethylmethacrylate; PSF, point spread function.

    • View popup
    Table 2:

    Results of the human temporal bone study

    Scoring ParametersScoring MethodAquilion 64Brilliance 64LightSpeed 64Sensation 64
    Overall impressionVAS7.8 (1.0)3.2 (1.0)3.0 (1.1)7.9 (0.7)
    Axial oblique MPR, distinction of electrode contactsQuantitative score23.2 (2.7)12.6 (4.4)8.0 (3.9)24.2 (4.8)
    Coronal oblique MPR, distinction of electrode contactsQuantitative score23.7 (3.6)14.2 (3.7)10.2 (3.3)25.6 (3.3)
    KinkingVAS6.1 (2.1)1.7 (1.5)1.3 (1.2)6.8 (2.0)
    Inner cochlear wall 4 quadrantsVAS6.9 (1.3)4.9 (1.5)4.1 (2.0)6.2 (1.1)
    6.6 (1.1)4.7 (1.3)4.3 (1.7)5.7 (1.4)
    6.2 (1.2)3.9 (1.5)3.9 (1.1)5.3 (1.5)
    6.4 (1.4)3.6 (1.7)3.9 (1.4)5.5 (1.9)
    Outer cochlear walls 4 quadrantsVAS7.7 (1.1)6.8 (1.4)5.5 (1.7)7.4 (0.9)
    7.6 (1.2)6.8 (1.1)5.5 (1.5)7.4 (1.0)
    7.1 (1.4)5.2 (1.7)4.6 (1.6)6.8 (1.8)
    6.6 (1.9)4.8 (1.8)4.1 (1.8)6.4 (1.9)
    • Note:—VAS indicates visual analogue scale; MPR, multiplanar reconstruction.

    • View popup
    Table 3:

    Results of PMMA phantom measurements

    Electrode ContactAquilion 64Brilliance 64LightSpeed 64Sensation 64
    10.07 (0.02)0.11 (0.02)0.07 (0.02)0.03 (0.01)
    20.05 (0.02)0.12 (0.01)0.09 (0.03)0.05 (0.02)
    30.09 (0.01)0.13 (0.00)0.09 (0.03)0.06 (0.01)
    40.10 (0.02)0.09 (0.02)0.14 (0.02)0.08 (0.02)
    50.12 (0.02)0.07 (0.01)0.10 (0.04)0.09 (0.02)
    60.11 (0.02)0.09 (0.03)0.12 (0.01)0.09 (0.01)
    70.11 (0.03)0.09 (0.05)0.13 (0.02)0.10 (0.01)
    80.14 (0.03)0.07 (0.02)0.20 (0.04)0.13 (0.02)
    90.13 (0.03)0.08 (0.01)0.18 (0.03)0.13 (0.02)
    100.14 (0.02)0.10 (0.01)0.16 (0.03)0.12 (0.01)
    110.08 (0.01)0.10 (0.03)0.12 (0.02)0.08 (0.01)
    120.11 (0.01)0.13 (0.07)0.15 (0.02)0.10 (0.00)
    130.10 (0.02)0.15 (0.05)0.25 (0.10)0.09 (0.01)
    140.10 (0.01)0.10 (0.02)0.24 (0.11)0.11 (0.00)
    150.11 (0.01)0.12 (0.05)0.31 (0.15)0.10 (0.01)
    160.11 (0.00)0.16 (0.12)0.61 (0.35)0.12 (0.01)
    • Note:—PMMA indicates polymethylmethacrylate.

    • View popup
    Table 4:

    Results of PSF measurements

    VariableFWHM, in mm
    Aquilion 64Brilliance 64LightSpeed 64Sensation 64
    In-plane0.680.520.680.48
    Longitudinal0.810.840.980.70
    Ratio in-plane/longitudinal0.840.620.690.69
    • Note:—PSF indicates point spread function; FWHM, full width half maximum.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 29 (7)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 29, Issue 7
August 2008
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Evaluation of 4 Multisection CT Systems in Postoperative Imaging of a Cochlear Implant: A Human Cadaver and Phantom Study
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
B.M. Verbist, R.M.S. Joemai, W.M. Teeuwisse, W.J.H. Veldkamp, J. Geleijns, J.H.M. Frijns
Evaluation of 4 Multisection CT Systems in Postoperative Imaging of a Cochlear Implant: A Human Cadaver and Phantom Study
American Journal of Neuroradiology Aug 2008, 29 (7) 1382-1388; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A1108

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
Evaluation of 4 Multisection CT Systems in Postoperative Imaging of a Cochlear Implant: A Human Cadaver and Phantom Study
B.M. Verbist, R.M.S. Joemai, W.M. Teeuwisse, W.J.H. Veldkamp, J. Geleijns, J.H.M. Frijns
American Journal of Neuroradiology Aug 2008, 29 (7) 1382-1388; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A1108
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Purchase

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusions
    • Acknowledgments
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Cone-beam CT versus Multidetector CT in Postoperative Cochlear Implant Imaging: Evaluation of Image Quality and Radiation Dose
  • CT and MR Imaging Cochlear Distance Measurements May Predict Cochlear Implant Length Required for a 360{degrees} Insertion
  • Crossref (31)
  • Google Scholar

This article has been cited by the following articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

  • Pre-, Per- and Postoperative Factors Affecting Performance of Postlinguistically Deaf Adults Using Cochlear Implants: A New Conceptual Model over Time
    Diane S. Lazard, Christophe Vincent, Frédéric Venail, Paul Van de Heyning, Eric Truy, Olivier Sterkers, Piotr H. Skarzynski, Henryk Skarzynski, Karen Schauwers, Stephen O'Leary, Deborah Mawman, Bert Maat, Andrea Kleine-Punte, Alexander M. Huber, Kevin Green, Paul J. Govaerts, Bernard Fraysse, Richard Dowell, Norbert Dillier, Elaine Burke, Andy Beynon, François Bergeron, Deniz Başkent, Françoise Artières, Peter J. Blamey, Manuel S. Malmierca
    PLoS ONE 2012 7 11
  • Consensus Panel on a Cochlear Coordinate System Applicable in Histologic, Physiologic, and Radiologic Studies of the Human Cochlea
    Berit M. Verbist, Margaret W. Skinner, Lawrence T. Cohen, Patricia A. Leake, Chris James, Colette Boëx, Timothy A. Holden, Charles C. Finley, Peter S. Roland, J. Thomas Roland, Matt Haller, Jim F. Patrick, Claude N. Jolly, Mike A. Faltys, Jeroen J. Briaire, Johan H. M. Frijns
    Otology & Neurotology 2010 31 5
  • Pitch Comparisons between Electrical Stimulation of a Cochlear Implant and Acoustic Stimuli Presented to a Normal-hearing Contralateral Ear
    Robert P. Carlyon, Olivier Macherey, Johan H. M. Frijns, Patrick R. Axon, Randy K. Kalkman, Patrick Boyle, David M. Baguley, John Briggs, John M. Deeks, Jeroen J. Briaire, Xavier Barreau, René Dauman
    Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology 2010 11 4
  • Stimulation of the Facial Nerve by Intracochlear Electrodes in Otosclerosis
    Johan H. M. Frijns, Randy K. Kalkman, Jeroen J. Briaire
    Otology & Neurotology 2009 30 8
  • Automated assessment of low contrast sensitivity for CT systems using a model observer
    I. Hernandez-Giron, J. Geleijns, A. Calzado, W. J. H. Veldkamp
    Medical Physics 2011 38 S1
  • Imaging of cochlear implant electrode array with flat-detector CT and conventional multislice CT: comparison of image quality and radiation dose
    Tobias Struffert, Victoria Hertel, Yannis Kyriakou, Jens Krause, Tobias Engelhorn, Bernhard Schick, Heinrich Iro, Joachim Hornung, Arnd Doerfler
    Acta Oto-Laryngologica 2010 130 4
  • Assessing the Placement of a Cochlear Electrode Array by Multidimensional Scaling
    F. J. Vanpoucke, P. B. Boermans, J. H. Frijns
    IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering 2012 59 2
  • Cochlear Coordinates in Regard to Cochlear Implantation
    Berit M. Verbist, Raoul M. S. Joemai, Jeroen J. Briaire, Wouter M. Teeuwisse, Wouter J. H. Veldkamp, Johan H. M. Frijns
    Otology & Neurotology 2010 31 5
  • Scala-Tympani Phantom With Cochleostomy and Round-Window Openings for Cochlear-Implant Insertion Experiments
    Lisandro Leon, Matt S. Cavilla, Michael B. Doran, Frank M. Warren, Jake J. Abbott
    Journal of Medical Devices 2014 8 4
  • CT and MR Imaging Cochlear Distance Measurements May Predict Cochlear Implant Length Required for a 360° Insertion
    S.E.J. Connor, D.J. Bell, R. O'Gorman, A. Fitzgerald-O'Connor
    American Journal of Neuroradiology 2009 30 7

More in this TOC Section

  • Chondrosarcoma vs Synovial Chondromatosis: Imaging
  • NI-RADS for HEAD&NECK Cancer Recurrence
  • WHO Classification Update: Nasal&Skull Base Tumors
Show more HEAD & NECK

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editors Choice
  • Fellow Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

Special Collections

  • Special Collections

Resources

  • News and Updates
  • Turn around Times
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Author Policies
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Submit a Case
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • Get Peer Review Credit from Publons

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcast
  • AJNR SCANtastic
  • Video Articles

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Alerts
  • Feedback
  • Advertise with us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Permissions
  • Terms and Conditions

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire