References

1. ↵
   Rothwell PM, Eliasziw M, Gutnikov SA, et al. Analysis of pooled data from the randomised controlled trials of endarterectomy for symptomatic carotid stenosis. Lancet 2003;361:107–16

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
2. Endarterectomy for asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis: Executive Committee for the Asymptomatic Carotid Atherosclerosis Study. JAMA 1995;273:1421–28

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
3. Randomised trial of endarterectomy for recently symptomatic carotid stenosis: final results of the MRC European Carotid Surgery Trial (ECST). Lancet 1998;351:1379–87

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
4. ↵
   Barnett HJ, Taylor DW, Eliasziw M, et al. Benefit of carotid endarterectomy in patients with symptomatic moderate or severe stenosis: North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Collaborators. N Engl J Med 1998;339:1415–25

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
5. ↵
   Buskens E, Nederkoorn PJ, Buijs-Van Der Woude T, et al. Imaging of carotid arteries in symptomatic patients: cost-effectiveness of diagnostic strategies. Radiology 2004;233:101–12

   PubMedWeb of Science
6. ↵
   Kent KC, Kuntz KM, Patel MR, et al. Perioperative imaging strategies for carotid endarterectomy: an analysis of morbidity and cost-effectiveness in symptomatic patients. JAMA 1995;274:888–93

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
7. ↵
   Willinsky RA, Taylor SM, TerBrugge K, et al. Neurologic complications of cerebral angiography: prospective analysis of 2,899 procedures and review of the literature. Radiology 2003;227:522–28

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
8. Grzyska U, Freitag J, Zeumer H. Selective cerebral intraarterial DSA: complication rate and control of risk factors. Neuroradiology 1990;32:296–99

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
9. ↵
   Citron SJ, Wallace RC, Lewis CA, et al. Quality improvement guidelines for adult diagnostic neuroangiography: cooperative study between ASITN, ASNR, and SIR. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2003;14 (9 pt 2):257–62
10. ↵
    Wardlaw JM, Chappell FM, Best JJ, et al. Non-invasive imaging compared with intra-arterial angiography in the diagnosis of symptomatic carotid stenosis: a meta-analysis. Lancet 2006;367:1503–12

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
11. ↵
    FDA. Gadolinium-based contrast agents for magnetic resonance imaging scans. Available at: http://www.ismrm.org/special/FDA%20gadolinium1206.pdf. Accessed September 13, 2007
12. ↵
    Fellner C, Lang W, Janka R, et al. Magnetic resonance angiography of the carotid arteries using three different techniques: accuracy compared with intraarterial x-ray angiography and endarterectomy specimens. J Magn Reson Imaging 2005;21:424–31

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
13. ↵
    Patel SG, Collie DA, Wardlaw JM, et al. Outcome, observer reliability, and patient preferences if CTA, MRA, or Doppler ultrasound were used, individually or together, instead of digital subtraction angiography before carotid endarterectomy. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2002;73:21–28

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
14. ↵
    Fox AJ. How to measure carotid stenosis. Radiology 1993;186:316–18

    PubMedWeb of Science
15. ↵
    North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial: methods, patient characteristics, and progress. Stroke 1991;22:711–20

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
16. ↵
    Rothwell PM, Pendlebury ST, Wardlaw J, et al. Critical appraisal of the design and reporting of studies of imaging and measurement of carotid stenosis. Stroke 2000;31:1444–50

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
17. ↵
    Rothwell PM. Analysis of agreement between measurements of continuous variables: general principles and lessons from studies of imaging of carotid stenosis. J Neurol 2000;247:825–34

    CrossRefPubMed
18. ↵
    Hájek J, Idák ZB, Sen PK. Theory of Rank Tests. London, UK: Academic Press;1999
19. ↵
    Ihaka R, Gentleman RR. A language for data analysis and graphics. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics 1996;5:299–314

    CrossRef
20. ↵
    Bretz F, Hothorn T, Westfall P. On multiple comparisons in R. R News 2002;2:14–17
21. ↵
    De Marco JK, Nesbit GM, Wesbey GE, et al. Prospective evaluation of extracranial carotid stenosis: MR angiography with maximum-intensity projections and multiplanar reformation compared with conventional angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1994;163:1205–12

    PubMed
22. Lell M, Fellner C, Baum U, et al. Evaluation of carotid artery stenosis with multisection CT and MR imaging: influence of imaging modality and postprocessing. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2007;28:104–10

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
23. ↵
    Vanninen RL, Manninen HI, Partanen PK, et al. How should we estimate carotid stenosis using magnetic resonance angiography? Neuroradiology 1996;38:299–305

    PubMed
24. ↵
    Anzalone N, Scomazzoni F, Castellano R, et al. Carotid artery stenosis: intraindividual correlations of 3D time-of-flight MR angiography, contrast-enhanced MR angiography, conventional DSA, and rotational angiography for detection and grading. Radiology 2005;236:204–13

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
25. ↵
    Muhs BE, Gagne P, Wagener J, et al. Gadolinium-enhanced versus time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography: what is the benefit of contrast enhancement in evaluating carotid stenosis? Ann Vasc Surg 2005;19:823–28

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
26. ↵
    Nederkoorn PJ, Elgersma OE, van der Graaf Y, et al. Carotid artery stenosis: accuracy of contrast-enhanced MR angiography for diagnosis. Radiology 2003;228:677–82

    PubMedWeb of Science
27. Alvarez-Linera J, Benito-Leon J, Escribano J, et al. Prospective evaluation of carotid artery stenosis: elliptic centric contrast-enhanced MR angiography and spiral CT angiography compared with digital subtraction angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2003;24:1012–19

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
28. ↵
    Patel MR, Kuntz KM, Klufas RA, et al. Preoperative assessment of the carotid bifurcation: can magnetic resonance angiography and duplex ultrasonography replace contrast arteriography? Stroke 1995;26:1753–58

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
29. ↵
    U-King-Im JM, Graves MJ, Cross JJ, et al. Internal carotid artery stenosis: accuracy of subjective visual impression for evaluation with digital subtraction angiography and contrast-enhanced MR angiography. Radiology 2007;244:213–22. Epub 2007 May 16

    CrossRefPubMed
30. ↵
    Bartlett ES, Walters TD, Symons SP, et al. Carotid stenosis index revisited with direct CT angiography measurement of carotid arteries to quantify carotid stenosis. Stroke 2007;38:286–91

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
31. ↵
    Lell MM, Anders K, Uder M, et al. New techniques in CT angiography. Radiographics 2006;26 (suppl 1):45–62

    CrossRef
32. ↵
    Lev MH, Romero JM, Gonzalez RG. Flow voids in time-of-flight MR angiography of carotid artery stenosis? It depends on the TE! AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2003;24:2120

    FREE Full Text
33. Heiserman JE. Flow voids and carotid MR angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2003;24:1727 , author reply 1727

    FREE Full Text
34. ↵
    Nederkoorn PJ, van der Graaf Y, Eikelboom BC, et al. Time-of-flight MR angiography of carotid artery stenosis: does a flow void represent severe stenosis? AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2002;23:1779–84

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
35. ↵
    Anderson CM, Saloner D, Tsuruda JS, et al. Artifacts in maximum-intensity-projection display of MR angiograms. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1990;154:623–29

    CrossRefPubMed
36. ↵
    Yucel EK, Anderson CM, Edelman RR, et al. AHA scientific statement: magnetic resonance angiography—update on applications for extracranial arteries. Circulation 1999;100:2284–301

    FREE Full Text
37. ↵
    Anderson CM, Lee RE, Levin DL, et al. Measurement of internal carotid artery stenosis from source MR angiograms. Radiology 1994;193:219–26

    PubMedWeb of Science
38. ↵
    Korogi Y, Takahashi M, Nakagawa T, et al. Intracranial vascular stenosis and occlusion: MR angiographic findings. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1997;18:135–43

    Abstract
39. ↵
    Saba L, Caddeo G, Sanfilippo R, et al. Efficacy and sensitivity of axial scans and different reconstruction methods in the study of the ulcerated carotid plaque using multidetector-row CT angiography: comparison with surgical results. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2007;28:716–23

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
40. ↵
    Mallouhi A, Chemelli A, Judmaier W, et al. Investigation of cerebrovascular disease with MR angiography: comparison of volume rendering and maximum intensity projection algorithms—initial assessment. Neuroradiology 2002;44:961–67

    CrossRefPubMed