3T High-Spatial-Resolution Contrast-Enhanced MR Angiography of the Intracranial Venous System with Parallel Imaging

References

1. ↵
   Kirchhof K, Welzel T, Jansen O, et al. More reliable noninvasive visualization of the cerebral veins and dural sinuses: comparison of three MR angiographic techniques. Radiology 2002;224:804–10

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
2. Farb IF, Scott JN, Willinsky RA, et al. Intracranial venous system: gadolinium-enhanced three-dimensional MR venography with auto-triggered elliptic centric-ordered sequence-initial experience. Radiology 2003;226:203–09

   PubMed
3. ↵
   Rollins N, Ison C, Reyes T, et al. Cerebral MR venography in children: comparison of 2D time-of-flight and gadolinium-enhanced 3D gradient-echo techniques. Radiology 2005;235:1011–17

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
4. ↵
   Hu HH, Campeau NG, Huston J, et al. High-spatial-resolution contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the intracranial venous system with fourfold accelerated two-dimensional sensitivity encoding. Radiology 2007;243:853–61

   CrossRefPubMed
5. ↵
   Nael K, Fenchel M, Salamon N, et al. Three-dimensional cerebral contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance venography at 3.0 Tesla: initial results using highly accelerated parallel acquisition. Invest Radiol 2006;41:763–68

   CrossRefPubMed
6. ↵
   Stevenson J, Knopp EA, Litt AW. MP-RAGE subtraction venography: a new technique. J Magn Reson Imaging 1995;5:239–41

   PubMed
7. ↵
   Liang L, Korogi Y, Sugahara T, et al. Evaluation of the intracranial dural sinuses with a 3D contrast-enhanced MP-RAGE sequence: prospective comparison with 2D-TOF MR venography and digital subtraction angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2001;22:481–92

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
8. ↵
   Ayanzen RH, Bird CR, Keller PJ, et al. Cerebral MR venography: normal anatomy and potential diagnostic pitfalls. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2000;21:74–78

   Abstract/FREE Full Text