Improvement of Clinical Language Localization with an Overt Semantic and Syntactic Language Functional MR Imaging Paradigm

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Petrella JR,
   2. Shah LM,
   3. Harris KM,
   4. et al

   . Preoperative functional MR imaging localization of language and motor areas: effect on therapeutic decision making in patients with potentially resectable brain tumors. Radiology 2006;240:793–802

   CrossRefPubMed
2. 2.↵
   1. Pelletier I,
   2. Sauerwein HC,
   3. Lepore F,
   4. et al

   . Non-invasive alternatives to the Wada test in the presurgical evaluation of language and memory functions in epilepsy patients. Epileptic Disord 2007;9:111–26

   PubMed
3. 3.↵
   1. Loring DW,
   2. Meador KJ

   . Pre-surgical evaluation for epilepsy surgery. Saudi Med J 2000;21:609–16

   PubMed
4. 4.↵
   1. Wada J,
   2. Rasmussen T

   . Intracarotid injection of sodium amytal for the lateralization of cerebral speech dominance: 1960. J Neurosurg 2007;106:1117–33

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
5. 5.↵
   1. Szaflarski JP,
   2. Holland SK,
   3. Jacola LM,
   4. et al

   . Comprehensive presurgical functional MRI language evaluation in adult patients with epilepsy. Epilepsy Behav 2008;12:74–83

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
6. 6.↵
   1. Weber B,
   2. Wellmer J,
   3. Schur S,
   4. et al

   . Presurgical language fMRI in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy: effects of task performance. Epilepsia 2006;47:880–86

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
7. 7.↵
   1. Foki T,
   2. Gartus A,
   3. Geissler A,
   4. et al

   . Probing overtly spoken language at sentential level: a comprehensive high-field BOLD-fMRI protocol reflecting everyday language demands. Neuroimage 2008;39:1613–24. Epub 2007 Oct 26

   CrossRefPubMed
8. 8.↵
   1. Swanson SJ,
   2. Sabsevitz DS,
   3. Hammeke TA,
   4. et al

   . Functional magnetic resonance imaging of language in epilepsy. Neuropsychol Rev 2007;17:491–504

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
9. 9.↵
   1. Gracco VL,
   2. Tremblay P,
   3. Pike B

   . Imaging speech production using fMRI. Neuroimage 2005;26:294–301

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
10. 10.↵
    1. Edward V,
    2. Windischberger C,
    3. Cunnington R,
    4. et al

    . Quantification of fMRI artifact reduction by a novel plaster cast head holder. Hum Brain Mapp 2000;11:207–13

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
11. 11.↵
    1. Jezzard P,
    2. Matthews PM,
    3. Smith SM

    1. Brammer MJ

    . Head motion and its correction. In: Jezzard P, Matthews PM, Smith SM eds. Functional MRI: An Introduction to Methods. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 2001:243–50
12. 12.↵
    1. Genovese CR,
    2. Lazar NA,
    3. Nichols T

    . Thresholding of statistical maps in functional neuroimaging using the false discovery rate. Neuroimage 2002;15:870–78

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
13. 13.↵
    1. Walter B,
    2. Blecker C,
    3. Kirsch P,
    4. et al

    . MARINA: an easy to use tool for the creation of MAsks for Region of INterest Analyses. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Functional Mapping of the Human Brain, New York. June 19–22, 2003
14. 14.↵
    1. Fernandez G,
    2. de Greiff A,
    3. von Oertzen J,
    4. et al

    . Language mapping in less than 15 minutes: real-time functional MRI during routine clinical investigation. Neuroimage 2001;14:585–94

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
15. 15.↵
    1. Tzourio-Mazoyer N,
    2. Landeau B,
    3. Papathanassiou D,
    4. et al

    . Automated anatomical labeling of activations in SPM using a macroscopic anatomical parcellation of the MNI MRI single-subject brain. Neuroimage 2002;15:273–89

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
16. 16.↵
    1. Papathanassiou D,
    2. Etard O,
    3. Mellet E,
    4. et al

    . A common language network for comprehension and production: a contribution to the definition of language epicenters with PET. Neuroimage 2000;11:347–57

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
17. 17.↵
    1. Humphries C,
    2. Binder JR,
    3. Medler DA,
    4. et al

    . Time course of semantic processes during sentence comprehension: an fMRI study. Neuroimage 2007;36:924–32

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
18. 18.↵
    1. Haller S,
    2. Radue EW,
    3. Erb M,
    4. et al

    . Overt sentence production in event-related fMRI. Neuropsychologia 2005;43:807–14

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
19. 19.↵
    1. Price CJ,
    2. McCrory E,
    3. Noppeney U,
    4. et al

    . How reading differs from object naming at the neuronal level. Neuroimage 2006;29:643–48

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
20. 20.↵
    1. Price CJ,
    2. Wise RJ,
    3. Warburton EA,
    4. et al

    . Hearing and saying: the functional neuro-anatomy of auditory word processing. Brain 1996;119:919–31

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
21. 21.↵
    1. Demonet JF,
    2. Chollet F,
    3. Ramsay S,
    4. et al

    . The anatomy of phonological and semantic processing in normal subjects. Brain 1992;115:1753–68

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
22. 22.↵
    1. Petersen SE,
    2. Fox PT,
    3. Posner MI,
    4. et al

    . Positron emission tomographic studies of the cortical anatomy of single-word processing. Nature 1988;331:585–89

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
23. 23.↵
    1. Deblaere K,
    2. Backes WH,
    3. Hofman P,
    4. et al

    . Developing a comprehensive presurgical functional MRI protocol for patients with intractable temporal lobe epilepsy: a pilot study. Neuroradiology 2002;44:667–73

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
24. 24.↵
    1. Seghier ML,
    2. Lazeyras F,
    3. Pegna AJ,
    4. et al

    . Variability of fMRI activation during a phonological and semantic language task in healthy subjects. Hum Brain Mapp 2004;23:140–55

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
25. 25.↵
    1. Sakai KL,
    2. Hashimoto R,
    3. Homae F

    . Sentence processing in the cerebral cortex. Neurosci Res 2001;39:1–10

    PubMedWeb of Science
26. 26.↵
    1. Amunts K,
    2. Schleicher A,
    3. Burgel U,
    4. et al

    . Broca's region revisited: cytoarchitecture and intersubject variability. J Comp Neurol 1999;412:319–41

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
27. 27.↵
    1. Springer JA,
    2. Binder JR,
    3. Hammeke TA,
    4. et al

    . Language dominance in neurologically normal and epilepsy subjects: a functional MRI study. Brain 1999;122:2033–46

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
28. 28.↵
    1. Vikingstad EM,
    2. George KP,
    3. Johnson AF,
    4. et al

    . Cortical language lateralization in right-handed normal subjects using functional magnetic resonance imaging. J Neurol Sci 2000;175:17–27

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
29. 29.↵
    1. Palmer ED,
    2. Rosen HJ,
    3. Ojemann JG,
    4. et al

    . An event-related fMRI study of overt and covert word stem completion. Neuroimage 2001;14:182–93

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
30. 30.↵
    1. Gaillard WD,
    2. Balsamo L,
    3. Xu B,
    4. et al

    . Language dominance in partial epilepsy patients identified with an fMRI reading task. Neurology 2002;59:256–65

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
31. 31.↵
    1. Forn C,
    2. Ventura-Campos N,
    3. Belenguer A,
    4. et al

    . A comparison of brain activation patterns during covert and overt paced auditory serial addition test tasks. Hum Brain Mapp 2008;29:644–50

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
32. 32.↵
    1. Barch DM,
    2. Sabb FW,
    3. Carter CS,
    4. et al

    . Overt verbal responding during fMRI scanning: empirical investigations of problems and potential solutions. Neuroimage 1999;10:642–57

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
33. 33.↵
    1. Shuster LI,
    2. Lemieux SK

    . An fMRI investigation of covertly and overtly produced mono- and multisyllabic words. Brain Lang 2005;93:20–31

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
34. 34.↵
    1. Grabowski TJ,
    2. Bauer MD,
    3. Foreman D,
    4. et al

    . Adaptive pacing of visual stimulation for fMRI studies involving overt speech. Neuroimage 2006;29:1023–30

    CrossRefPubMed
35. 35.↵
    1. Huang J,
    2. Francis AP,
    3. Carr TH

    . Studying overt word reading and speech production with event-related fMRI: a method for detecting, assessing, and correcting articulation-induced signal changes and for measuring onset time and duration of articulation. Brain Lang 2008;104:10–23

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
36. 36.↵
    1. Frackowiak RS,
    2. Friston KJ,
    3. Frith CD,
    4. et al

    1. Friston KJ

    . Experimental design and statistical parametric mapping. In: Frackowiak RS, Friston KJ, Frith CD, et al., eds. Human Brain Function. 2nd ed. London: Elsevier Academic Press; 2004:599–632
37. 37.↵
    1. Rutten GJ,
    2. Ramsey NF,
    3. van Rijen PC,
    4. et al

    . Reproducibility of fMRI-determined language lateralization in individual subjects. Brain Lang 2002;80:421–37

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
38. 38.↵
    1. Beisteiner R,
    2. Lanzenberger R,
    3. Novak K,
    4. et al

    . Improvement of presurgical patient evaluation by generation of functional magnetic resonance risk maps. Neurosci Lett 2000;290:13–16

    CrossRefPubMed
39. 39.↵
    1. Roessler K,
    2. Donat M,
    3. Lanzenberger R,
    4. et al

    . Evaluation of preoperative high magnetic field motor functional MRI (3 Tesla) in glioma patients by navigated electrocortical stimulation and postoperative outcome. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2005;76:1152–7

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
40. 40.↵
    1. Haberg A,
    2. Kvistad KA,
    3. Unsgard G,
    4. et al

    . Preoperative blood oxygen level-dependent functional magnetic resonance imaging in patients with primary brain tumors: clinical application and outcome. Neurosurgery 54:902–14, 2004, discussion 14–15

    CrossRefPubMed
41. 41.↵
    1. Aldenkamp AP,
    2. Boon PA,
    3. Deblaere K,
    4. et al

    . Usefulness of language and memory testing during intracarotid amobarbital testing: observations from an fMRI study. Acta Neurol Scand 2003;108:147–52

    CrossRefPubMed
42. 42.↵
    1. Binder JR,
    2. Swanson SJ,
    3. Hammeke TA,
    4. et al

    . A comparison of five fMRI protocols for mapping speech comprehension systems. Epilepsia 2008;49:1980–97

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
43. 43.↵
    1. Friederici AD

    . Towards a neural basis of auditory sentence processing. Trends Cogn Sci 2002;6:78–84

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
44. 44.↵
    1. Thivard L,
    2. Hombrouck J,
    3. du Montcel ST,
    4. et al

    . Productive and perceptive language reorganization in temporal lobe epilepsy. Neuroimage 2005;24:841–51

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
45. 45.↵
    1. Seghier ML

    . Laterality index in functional MRI: methodological issues. Magn Reson Imaging 2008;26:594–601

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
46. 46.↵
    1. Wellmer J,
    2. Weber B,
    3. Weis S,
    4. et al

    . Strongly lateralized activation in language fMRI of atypical dominant patients: implications for presurgical work-up. Epilepsy Res 2008;80:67–76

    CrossRefPubMed
47. 47.↵
    1. Kurthen M,
    2. Helmstaedter C,
    3. Linke DB,
    4. et al

    . Interhemispheric dissociation of expressive and receptive language functions in patients with complex-partial seizures: an amobarbital study. Brain Lang 1992;43:694–712

    CrossRefPubMed
48. 48.↵
    1. Rutten GJ,
    2. Ramsey NF,
    3. van Rijen PC,
    4. et al

    . FMRI-determined language lateralization in patients with unilateral or mixed language dominance according to the Wada test. Neuroimage 2002;17:447–60

    CrossRefPubMed
49. 49.↵
    1. Stippich C,
    2. Rapps N,
    3. Dreyhaupt J,
    4. et al

    . Localizing and lateralizing language in patients with brain tumors: feasibility of routine preoperative functional MR imaging in 81 consecutive patients. Radiology 2007;243:828–36

    CrossRefPubMed
50. 50.↵
    1. Lehericy S,
    2. Cohen L,
    3. Bazin B,
    4. et al

    . Functional MR evaluation of temporal and frontal language dominance compared with the Wada test. Neurology 2000;54:1625–33

    Abstract/FREE Full Text