Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
  • Special Collections
    • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)
    • 2024 AJNR Journal Awards
    • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcast
    • AJNR Scantastics
    • Video Articles
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Author Policies
    • Fast publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Submit a Case for the Case Collection
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Other Publications
    • ajnr

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
  • Special Collections
    • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)
    • 2024 AJNR Journal Awards
    • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcast
    • AJNR Scantastics
    • Video Articles
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Author Policies
    • Fast publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Submit a Case for the Case Collection
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

Welcome to the new AJNR, Updated Hall of Fame, and more. Read the full announcements.


AJNR is seeking candidates for the position of Associate Section Editor, AJNR Case Collection. Read the full announcement.

 

Getting new auth cookie, if you see this message a lot, tell someone!
Research ArticleBRAIN

3D High-Spatial-Resolution Cerebral MR Venography at 3T: A Contrast-Dose-Reduction Study

A. Tomasian, N. Salamon, M.S. Krishnam, J.P. Finn and J.P. Villablanca
American Journal of Neuroradiology February 2009, 30 (2) 349-355; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A1319
A. Tomasian
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
N. Salamon
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
M.S. Krishnam
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
J.P. Finn
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
J.P. Villablanca
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Fig 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 1.

    3D volume-rendered images from full-dose (15 mL) (A) and half-dose (7.5 mL) (B) contrast-enhanced MRV show diagnostic image quality of most of the cerebral venous structures.

  • Fig 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 2.

    Half-dose CE-MRV. Sagittal (A) and axial (B) thin MIP images (TR/TE, 3.4/1.3 ms; flip angle, 25°) in a 28-year-old man with history of headache show filling defects within the superior sagittal sinus (A, large arrow) and transverse and sigmoid sinuses (B, small arrows) consistent with thrombosis. Note the high diagnostic quality of the vein of Galen (A, arrowhead), the basal vein of Rosenthal (A, small arrow), and the internal cerebral veins (A, thin large arrow).

  • Fig 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 3.

    Half-dose CE-MRV. A and B, Coronal (A) and sagittal (B) full-thickness MIP images (TR/TE, 3.4/1.3 ms; flip angle, 25°) in a 27-year-old man show cerebral arteriovenous malformation nidus (A and B, arrow) and a large draining vein to the superior sagittal sinus (A and B, arrowhead). C–E, DSAs confirm the findings on CE-MRV. Feeder artery (middle cerebral artery) (C, arrow), arteriovenous malformation nidus (D, arrow), and draining vein to the superior sagittal sinus (E, arrow) are clearly visualized.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1:

    Visualization of venous segments on full-dose and half-dose high-spatial-resolution CE-MRV (n = 640)*

    LocationReader 1Reader 2
    Full-Dose (half-dose) CE-MRVFull-Dose (half-dose) CE-MRV
    Mean ± SDMedianRangeMean ± SDMedianRange
    Superior sagittal sinus4.00 ± 0.00 (4.00 ± 0.00)4 (4)4–4 (4–4)4.00 ± 0.00 (4.00 ± 0.00)4 (4)4–4 (4–4)
    Inferior sagittal sinus3.45 ± 0.60 (3.40 ± 0.68)3.5 (3.5)2–4 (2–4)3.55 ± 0.60 (3.45 ± 0.69)4 (4)2–4 (2–4)
    Transverse sinus3.97 ± 0.16 (4.00 ± 0.00)4 (4)3–4 (4–4)4.00 ± 0.00 (4.00 ± 0.00)4 (4)4–4 (4–4)
    Sigmoid sinus3.97 ± 0.16 (3.97 ± 0.16)4 (4)3–4 (3–4)4.00 ± 0.00 (4.00 ± 0.00)4 (4)4–4 (4–4)
    Straight sinus3.95 ± 0.22 (3.90 ± 0.31)4 (4)3–4 (3–4)3.90 ± 0.31 (3.95 ± 0.22)4 (4)3–4 (3–4)
    Cavernous sinus3.72 ± 0.60 (3.70 ± 0.52)4 (4)2–4 (2–4)3.70 ± 0.65 (3.62 ± 0.59)4 (4)2–4 (2–4)
    Superior petrosal sinus3.05 ± 0.75 (2.97 ± 0.66)3 (3)1–4 (1–4)2.95 ± 0.71 (2.90 ± 0.67)3 (3)1–4 (1–4)
    Torcula herophili4.00 ± 0.00 (4.00 ± 0.00)4 (4)4–4 (4–4)4.00 ± 0.00 (4.00 ± 0.00)4 (4)4–4 (4–4)
    Cortical vein3.97 ± 0.16 (3.97 ± 0.16)4 (4)3–4 (3–4)3.92 ± 0.27 (3.95 ± 0.22)4 (4)3–4 (3–4)
    Vein of Galen3.95 ± 0.22 (3.90 ± 0.31)4 (4)3–4 (3–4)3.90 ± 0.31 (3.85 ± 0.37)4 (4)3–4 (3–4)
    Internal cerebral vein3.65 ± 0.53 (3.55 ± 0.64)4 (4)2–4 (2–4)3.62 ± 0.54 (3.52 ± 0.64)4 (4)2–4 (2–4)
    Middle cerebral vein3.25 ± 0.67 (2.37 ± 0.87)3 (2)2–4 (1–4)3.25 ± 0.71 (2.37 ± 0.84)3 (2.5)2–4 (1–4)
    Basal vein of Rosenthal3.40 ± 0.68 (3.20 ± 0.70)3.5 (3)2–4 (2–4)3.35 ± 0.75 (3.35 ± 0.67)3.5 (3)2–4 (2–4)
    Septal vein2.95 ± 0.60 (2.35 ± 0.81)3 (2)2–4 (1–4)2.95 ± 0.69 (2.35 ± 0.75)3 (2.5)2–4 (1–3)
    Superior cerebellar vein2.72 ± 0.60 (2.32 ± 0.76)3 (2.5)1–4 (1–3)2.82 ± 0.68 (2.37 ± 0.77)3 (3)1–4 (1–4)
    Posterior tonsillar vein2.87 ± 0.56 (2.37 ± 0.63)3 (2)2–4 (1–3)3.00 ± 0.60 (2.45 ± 0.68)3 (2.5)2–4 (1–4)
    Inferior vermian vein2.70 ± 0.73 (2.15 ± 0.74)3 (2)2–4 (1–3)2.85 ± 0.75 (2.25 ± 0.79)3 (2)2–4 (1–3)
    Superior ophthalmic vein3.62 ± 0.59 (3.55 ± 0.60)4 (4)2–4 (2–4)3.70 ± 0.52 (3.55 ± 0.55)4 (4)2–4 (2–4)
    Thalamostriate vein2.67 ± 0.73 (2.25 ± 0.74)3 (2)1–4 (1–3)2.62 ± 0.74 (2.22 ± 0.73)3 (2)1–4 (1–3)
    Internal jugular vein4.00 ± 0.00 (4.00 ± 0.00)4 (4)4–4 (4–4)4.00 ± 0.00 (4.00 ± 0.00)4 (4)4–4 (4–4)
    • Note:—CE-MRV indicates contrast-enhanced MR venography.

    • * The 4-point scale for evaluation of visualization of venous segments is as follows: grade 1, not visible; grade 2, partially visible, not sufficient for diagnosis; grade 3, generally homogeneous enhancement and continuity of venous structure, sufficient for diagnosis; and grade 4, excellent image quality with highly homogeneous and continuous enhancement with sharpness of vessel border allowing highly confident diagnosis. There was no significant difference in the vessel delineation scores assigned by the 2 readers (P > .05 for all segments). Analysis with the κ coefficient revealed excellent interobserver agreement for the full-dose (κ = 0.87) and half-dose (κ = 0.85) groups. Delineation scores were significantly lower for the small venous segments, including the middle cerebral, septal, superior cerebellar, inferior vermian, posterior tonsillar, and thalamostriate veins in the half-dose group compared with the single-dose group (P < .01 for all).

    • View popup
    Table 2:

    SNR and CNR in full- and half-dose CE-MRV*

    Full-Dose CE-MRVHalf-Dose CE-MRV
    SNRCNRSNRCNR
    Superior sagittal sinus611.5 ± 82.3501.3 ± 77.6322.2 ± 45.1291.3 ± 41.6
    Inferior sagittal sinus276.8 ± 31.2236.5 ± 29.3158.7 ± 23.3132.7 ± 21.5
    Straight sinus508.8 ± 77.6461.1 ± 70.9234.5 ± 32.6203.8 ± 28.8
    Transverse sinus532.9 ± 81.2479.2 ± 75.4302.2 ± 45.6269.3 ± 40.9
    Sigmoid sinus555.4 ± 84.6497.6 ± 79.4309.4 ± 48.1261.8 ± 43.3
    Vein of Galen490.7 ± 62.3434.2 ± 58.2224.4 ± 29.7194.4 ± 26.9
    Internal cerebral vein390.1 ± 58.8342.1 ± 50.8201.3 ± 31.3168.6 ± 30.2
    Internal jugular vein572.6 ± 81.1516.6 ± 72.9334.8 ± 44.5305.8 ± 40.8
    • Note:—SNR indicates signal intensity-to-noise ratio; CNR, contrast-to-noise ratio.

    • * All values are presented as mean ± SD. SNR and CNR values are significantly lower in the half-dose CE-MRV group compared with the single-dose CE-MRV group (P < .001 for all segments).

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 30 (2)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 30, Issue 2
February 2009
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
3D High-Spatial-Resolution Cerebral MR Venography at 3T: A Contrast-Dose-Reduction Study
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
A. Tomasian, N. Salamon, M.S. Krishnam, J.P. Finn, J.P. Villablanca
3D High-Spatial-Resolution Cerebral MR Venography at 3T: A Contrast-Dose-Reduction Study
American Journal of Neuroradiology Feb 2009, 30 (2) 349-355; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A1319

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
3D High-Spatial-Resolution Cerebral MR Venography at 3T: A Contrast-Dose-Reduction Study
A. Tomasian, N. Salamon, M.S. Krishnam, J.P. Finn, J.P. Villablanca
American Journal of Neuroradiology Feb 2009, 30 (2) 349-355; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A1319
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Purchase

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusions
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Diagnosis and Management of Cerebral Venous Thrombosis: A Statement for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association
  • Crossref (9)
  • Google Scholar

This article has been cited by the following articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

  • Diagnosis and Management of Cerebral Venous Thrombosis
    Gustavo Saposnik, Fernando Barinagarrementeria, Robert D. Brown, Cheryl D. Bushnell, Brett Cucchiara, Mary Cushman, Gabrielle deVeber, Jose M. Ferro, Fong Y. Tsai
    Stroke 2011 42 4
  • Imaging of cerebral venous thrombosis
    A. Ghoneim, J. Straiton, C. Pollard, K. Macdonald, R. Jampana
    Clinical Radiology 2020 75 4
  • Contrast enhanced pulmonary magnetic resonance angiography for pulmonary embolism: Building a successful program
    Scott K. Nagle, Mark L. Schiebler, Michael D. Repplinger, Christopher J. François, Karl K. Vigen, Rajkumar Yarlagadda, Thomas M. Grist, Scott B. Reeder
    European Journal of Radiology 2016 85 3
  • Accuracy of magnetic resonance venography in diagnosing cerebral venous sinus thrombosis
    Liansheng Gao, Weilin Xu, Tao Li, Xiaobo Yu, Shenglong Cao, Hangzhe Xu, Feng Yan, Gao Chen
    Thrombosis Research 2018 167
  • 3-T contrast-enhanced MR angiography with parallel imaging in cerebral venous and sinus thrombosis
    M. Lettau, M. Laible, R.J. Barrows, S. Heiland, M. Bendszus, S. Hähnel
    Journal of Neuroradiology 2011 38 5
  • Optimization of 3D phase contrast venography for the assessment of the cranio-cervical venous system at 1.5 T
    Mona Salehi Ravesh, Ulf Jensen-Kondering, Julia Juhasz, Sönke Peters, Monika Huhndorf, Joachim Graessner, Thomas W. D. Möbius, Marcus Both, Olav Jansen, Jan-Bernd Hövener
    Neuroradiology 2019 61 3
  • Background-Suppressed MR Venography of the Brain Using Magnitude Data: A High-Pass Filtering Approach
    Zhaoyang Jin, Ling Xia, Minming Zhang, Yiping P. Du
    Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine 2014 2014
  • Ischemic Stroke of Brain
    Christopher A. Stack, John W. Cole
    2018
  • Susceptibility Weighted Imaging in MRI
    Hans‐Joachim Mentzel, Guangbin Wang, Masahiro Ida, Jürgen R. Reichenbach
    2011

More in this TOC Section

  • Evaluating the Effects of White Matter Multiple Sclerosis Lesions on the Volume Estimation of 6 Brain Tissue Segmentation Methods
  • White Matter Alterations in the Brains of Patients with Active, Remitted, and Cured Cushing Syndrome: A DTI Study
  • Enhanced Axonal Metabolism during Early Natalizumab Treatment in Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis
Show more Brain

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editors Choice
  • Fellow Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

Special Collections

  • Special Collections

Resources

  • News and Updates
  • Turn around Times
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Author Policies
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Submit a Case
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • Get Peer Review Credit from Publons

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcast
  • AJNR SCANtastic
  • Video Articles

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Alerts
  • Feedback
  • Advertise with us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Permissions
  • Terms and Conditions

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire