Velocity Measurements in the Middle Cerebral Arteries of Healthy Volunteers Using 3D Radial Phase-Contrast HYPRFlow: Comparison with Transcranial Doppler Sonography and 2D Phase-Contrast MR Imaging

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Lotz J,
   2. Doker R,
   3. Noeske R,
   4. et al

   . In vitro validation of phase-contrast flow measurements at 3 T in comparison to 1.5 T: precision, accuracy, and signal-to-noise ratios. J Magn Reson Imaging 2005;21:604–10

   CrossRefPubMed
2. 2.↵
   1. Korosec F,
   2. Turski P

   . Velocity and volume flow rate measurements using phase contrast magnetic resonance imaging. International Journal of Neuroradiology 1997;3:293–318
3. 3.↵
   1. Baledent O,
   2. Fin L,
   3. Khuoy L,
   4. et al

   . Brain hydrodynamics study by phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging and transcranial color Doppler. J Magn Reson Imaging 2006;24:995–1004

   CrossRefPubMed
4. 4.↵
   1. Yamashita S,
   2. Isoda H,
   3. Hirano M,
   4. et al

   . Visualization of hemodynamics in intracranial arteries using time-resolved three-dimensional phase-contrast MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 2007;25:473–78

   CrossRefPubMed
5. 5.↵
   1. Markl M,
   2. Hennig J

   . Phase contrast MRI with improved temporal resolution by view sharing: k-space related velocity mapping properties. J Magn Reson Imaging 2001;19:669–76

   CrossRef
6. 6.↵
   1. Sodickson DK,
   2. Manning WJ

   . Simultaneous acquisition of spatial harmonics (SMASH): fast imaging with radiofrequency coil arrays. Magn Reson Med 1997;38:591–603

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
7. 7.↵
   1. Griswold MA,
   2. Jakob PM,
   3. Heidemann RM,
   4. et al

   . Generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisitions (GRAPPA). Magn Reson Med 2002;47:1202–10

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
8. 8.↵
   1. Hope TA,
   2. Hope MD,
   3. Purcell DD,
   4. et al

   . Evaluation of intracranial stenoses and aneurysms with accelerated 4D flow. J Magn Reson Imaging 2010;28:41–46. Epub 2009 Jul 3

   CrossRef
9. 9.↵
   1. Wu Y,
   2. Chang W,
   3. Johnson K,
   4. et al

   . Fast whole brain 4D contrast enhanced MR angiography with velocity encoding using undersampled radial acquisition and highly constrained projection reconstruction: image quality assessment in volunteer subjects. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 2010 Nov 24. [Epub ahead of print]
10. 10.↵
    1. Peters DC,
    2. Korosec FR,
    3. Grist TM,
    4. et al

    . Undersampled projection reconstruction applied to MR angiography. Magn Reson Med 2000;43:91–101

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
11. 11.↵
    1. Mistretta CA

    . Undersampled radial MR acquisition and highly constrained back projection (HYPR) reconstruction: potential medical imaging applications in the post-Nyquist era. J Magn Reson Imaging 2009;29:501–16

    PubMedWeb of Science
12. 12.↵
    1. Velikina JV,
    2. Johnson KM,
    3. Wu Y,
    4. et al

    . PC HYPR flow: a technique for rapid imaging of contrast dynamics. J Magn Reson Imaging 2010;31:447–56

    CrossRefPubMed
13. 13.↵
    1. Johnson K,
    2. Lum D,
    3. Turski P,
    4. et al

    . Improved 3D phase contrast MRI with off-resonance corrected dual echo VIPR. Magn Reson Med 2008;60:1329–36

    CrossRefPubMed
14. 14.↵
    1. Mistretta CA,
    2. Wieben O,
    3. Velikina J,
    4. et al

    . Highly constrained backprojection for time-resolved MRI. Magn Reson Med 2006;55:30–40

    CrossRefPubMed
15. 15.↵
    1. Gu T,
    2. Korosec FR,
    3. Block WF,
    4. et al

    . PC VIPR: a high-speed 3D phase-contrast method for flow quantification and high-resolution angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2005;26:743–49

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
16. 16.↵
    1. Moftakhar R,
    2. Aagaard-Kienitz B,
    3. Johnson K,
    4. et al

    . Noninvasive measurement of intra-aneurysmal pressure and flow pattern using phase contrast with vastly undersampled isotropic projection imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2007;28:1710–14

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
17. 17.↵
    1. Turk AS,
    2. Johnson KM,
    3. Lum D,
    4. et al

    . Physiologic and anatomic assessment of a canine carotid artery stenosis model utilizing phase contrast with vastly undersampled isotropic projection imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2007;28:111–15

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
18. 18.↵
    1. Brodsky EK,
    2. Lu A,
    3. Thornton FJ,
    4. et al

    . Using multiple half-echoes to improve sampling efficiency and fat suppression in time-resolved MRA. In: Proceedings of the 11th Annual Meeting of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. July 10–16, 2003:74
19. 19.↵
    1. Nett E,
    2. Johnson K,
    3. Francois C,
    4. et al

    . Analysis platform for hemodynamic function in congenital heart disease. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2009;11(suppl 1):P212

    CrossRef
20. 20.↵
    1. Wetzel S,
    2. Meckel S,
    3. Frydrychowicz A,
    4. et al

    . In vivo assessment and visualization of intracranial arterial hemodynamics with flow-sensitized 4D MR imaging at 3T. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2004;28:433–38
21. 21.↵
    1. Lotz J,
    2. Meier C,
    3. Leppert A,
    4. et al

    . Cardiovascular flow measurement with phase-contrast MR imaging: basic facts and implementation. Radiographics 2002;22:651–71

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
22. 22.↵
    1. Oktar SO,
    2. Yücel C,
    3. Karaosmanoglu D,
    4. et al

    . Blood-flow volume quantification in internal carotid and vertebral arteries: comparison of 3 different ultrasound techniques with phase-contrast MR imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2006;27:363–69

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
23. 23.↵
    1. Stadlbauer A,
    2. van der Riet W,
    3. Globits S,
    4. et al

    . Accelerated phase-contrast MR imaging: comparison of k-t BLAST with SENSE and Doppler ultrasound for velocity and flow measurements in the aorta. J Magn Reson Imaging 2009;29:817–24

    CrossRefPubMed
24. 24.↵
    1. Seitz J,
    2. Strotzer M,
    3. Wild T,
    4. et al

    . Quantification of blood flow in the carotid arteries: comparison of Doppler ultrasound and three different phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging sequences. Invest Radiol 2001;36:642–47

    CrossRefPubMed
25. 25.↵
    1. Malek A,
    2. Alper S,
    3. Izumo S

    . Hemodynamic shear stress and its role in atherosclerosis. JAMA 1999;282:2035–42

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
26. 26.↵
    1. Cunningham K,
    2. Gotlieb A

    . The role of shear stress in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis. Lab Invest 2005;85:9–23

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
27. 27.↵
    1. Hoi Y,
    2. Meng H,
    3. Woodward SH,
    4. et al

    . Effects of arterial geometry on aneurysm growth: three-dimensional computational fluid dynamics study. J Neurosurg 2004;101:676–81

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
28. 28.↵
    1. Stalder AF,
    2. Russe MF,
    3. Frydrychowicz A,
    4. et al

    . Quantitative 2D and 3D phase contrast MRI: optimized analysis of blood flow and vessel wall parameters. Magn Reson Med 2008;60:1218–31

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
29. 29.↵
    1. Chang W,
    2. Wentland A,
    3. Johnson K,
    4. et al

    . Calculation of wall shear stress in the middle cerebral arteries of healthy volunteers using PC-VIPR, a fast whole-brain undersampled 3D-radial PC-MRA technique. In: Proceedings of the 18th Annual Meeting of the International Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Stockholm, Sweden; May 1–7, 2010
30. 30.↵
    1. Johnson K,
    2. Markl M

    . Improved SNR in phase contrast velocimetry with five-point balanced flow encoding. Magn Reson Med 2010;63:349–55

    CrossRefPubMed
31. 31.↵
    1. Wood N,
    2. Weston S,
    3. Kilner P,
    4. et al

    . Combined MR imaging and CFD simulation of flow in the human descending aorta. J Magn Reson Imaging 2001;13:699–713

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
32. 32.↵
    1. van Zijl P

    . 32-channel coil boosts 3.0T neuroimaging at Kennedy Krieger. Field Strength 2009;9:14–18