Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
  • Special Collections
    • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)
    • 2024 AJNR Journal Awards
    • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcast
    • AJNR Scantastics
    • Video Articles
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Author Policies
    • Fast publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Submit a Case for the Case Collection
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Other Publications
    • ajnr

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
  • Special Collections
    • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)
    • 2024 AJNR Journal Awards
    • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcast
    • AJNR Scantastics
    • Video Articles
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Author Policies
    • Fast publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Submit a Case for the Case Collection
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

Welcome to the new AJNR, Updated Hall of Fame, and more. Read the full announcements.


AJNR is seeking candidates for the position of Associate Section Editor, AJNR Case Collection. Read the full announcement.

 

Research ArticleBrain
Open Access

Apparent Diffusion Coefficients of Metabolites in Patients with MELAS Using Diffusion-Weighted MR Spectroscopy

Z. Liu, D. Zheng, X. Wang, J. Zhang, S. Xie, J. Xiao and X. Jiang
American Journal of Neuroradiology May 2011, 32 (5) 898-902; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A2395
Z. Liu
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
D. Zheng
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
X. Wang
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
J. Zhang
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
S. Xie
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
J. Xiao
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
X. Jiang
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: DW-MR spectroscopy can detect the diffusion coefficients of NAA, Cr, PCr, and Cho and can, therefore, provide some useful information. The aims of this study were to probe the mechanisms underlying the pathogenesis of MELAS and to see whether DW-MR spectroscopy is a useful technique for other diseases besides cerebral infarction.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifteen healthy volunteers and 10 patients with MELAS were enrolled in the study. All were scanned on a 3T whole-body MR imaging scanner. Fifteen ADCs of the singlet metabolites in the gray matter of the healthy subjects, 10 ADCs of the singlet metabolites in the lesions, and 8 ADCs of the singlet metabolites in the nonaffected areas were used in the statistical analysis, respectively.

RESULTS: The metabolite ADCs of the nonaffected areas and the lesions in the patients were higher than those of the frontal gray matter in the healthy controls. There were significant differences between the metabolite ADCs of the nonaffected areas in patients and those in the healthy controls, and it was the same with the metabolite ADCs of the lesions and those of the healthy controls.

CONCLUSIONS: The increased ADC values of the metabolites reveal that MELAS is a mitochondrial neuronopathy and involves the entire brain. DW-MR spectroscopy is a very useful noninvasive technique, which can show some valuable information that conventional MR imaging cannot display. Thus, it can be applied to brain diseases besides cerebral infarction.

Abbreviations

ADC
apparent diffusion coefficient
ATP
adenosine triphosphate
Cho
choline
Cr
creatine
DW
diffusion-weighted
DWI
diffusion-weighted imaging
FLAIR
fluid-attenuated inversion recovery
MELAS
mitochondrial myopathy, encephalopathy, lactic acidosis, and stroke-like episodes
NAA
N-acetylaspartate
PCr
phosphocreatine
VOI
volume of interest

DWI can assess the diffusion of water molecules by applying the Stejskal-Tanner equation for calculating ADC value.1 DWI has become an indispensable tool for the early detection of acute cerebral ischemia and assists in the diagnosis of other brain diseases, including neoplasms, infections, and traumatic injury.2–5 Because water molecules can diffuse freely and exchange between both extracellular and intracellular compartments, the water ADC values reflect a weighted mean of the contributions from both.6 Therefore, DWI cannot distinguish the extracellular water diffusion coefficients from the intracellular ones.6,7

DW-MR spectroscopy can detect the diffusion of intracellular metabolites, NAA, Cr, PCr, and Cho, which are exclusively located in the intracellular space and exchange very slowly between the 2 compartments.8,9 Therefore, the detected metabolite ADCs are only attributed to diffusion in the intracellular space. However, due to the inherently low signal intensity–to-noise ratio, poor spatial resolution, pulse sequence unavailability, long scanning time, and limited brain coverage, DW-MR spectroscopy has not been widely used. As a result, there are few published studies and these focus mainly on healthy volunteers and patients with acute cerebral infarction.10–16 According to the published research, the ADCs of NAA, Cr, and Cho reduce significantly in the acute phase of cerebral ischemia.11,14–16 These studies have indicated that DW-MR spectroscopy is a useful noninvasive technique in detecting pathologic changes in the intracellular environment.

MELAS syndrome is one of the most common multisystem mitochondrial disorders, mainly affecting both the skeletal muscle and the central nervous system. It is characterized by a disorder in mitochondrial function due to point mutations of mitochondrial DNA, which impair ATP production.17,18 However, until now, the exact mechanism of MELAS has not been fully elucidated. There are 2 basic hypotheses: ischemic and metabolic.19 One theory is that the increased number of enlarged mitochondria in the vascular endothelial cells obstructs small cerebral arteries, leading to ischemic change.20,21 The other hypothesis is that neuronal hyperexcitability increases energy demand and brings about energy imbalance in particularly susceptible neurons, which induces neuronal energy failure and necrosis.17,22 Therefore, we applied DW-MR spectroscopy to probe the mechanisms underlying the pathogenesis of MELAS and to see whether it is a useful technique for other diseases besides ischemia.

Materials and Methods

Patients and Controls

This study was approved by our institutional review board. We used an 8-channel head coil to receive the signal intensity. The heads of the volunteers and patients were secured by using a vacuum pillow to hold them steady.

Ten patients with MELAS (6 males, 4 females; 12–43 years of age; mean age, 25 years) were enrolled. The diagnosis of MELAS syndrome was based on the clinical symptoms (seizures, dementia, and recurrent headache) and the finding of a mutation at the nucleotide position 3243 in the mitochondrial DNA by blood examination. All patients were in the interictal phase of MELAS.

Fifteen healthy patients without MELAS (9 males and 6 females; 15–41 years of age; mean age, 25 years) were enrolled to constitute an ideal age- and sex-matched population in the study. The criteria of the healthy control group were as follows: First, only healthy people without a history of headache, epilepsy, head trauma, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, or other significant medical conditions were selected. Second, those healthy subjects had normal findings on physical, neurologic, and mental state examinations and on brain MR images.

Pulse Sequence

The pulse sequence was implemented on a 3T whole-body MR imaging scanner (Signa HD; GE Healthcare, Milwaukee, Wisconsin). The gradient system in this scanner allows a maximum gradient strength of 40 mT/m and a slew rate of 150 T/m/s. The DW-MR spectroscopy sequence was based on a point-resolved proton spectroscopy composite technique23 using the ideas proposed by Ellegood et al12 and van der Toorn et al.24 There was a 90° sinc pulse for excitation and 2 optimized 180° sinc pulses for refocusing. Every 2 pairs of diffusion-weighting gradients were present around both 180° pulses in 3 directions simultaneously.24 Diffusion-weighting gradients were followed by crusher gradients in the x- and y-directions. Before excitation radio-frequency, there was a chemical shift selective suppression radio-frequency pulse sequence.25

In brief, 2 MR spectroscopy sequences with different b-values were compiled into a pulse sequence (DW-MR spectroscopy sequence). Therefore, a set of DW-MR spectroscopy series was obtained by a combination of 2 proton MR spectroscopy sequences localized to the same volume of interest. The first proton MR spectroscopy sequence had a b-value of 45 s/mm2, and the second had a b-value of 1050 s/mm2.

Postprocessing was conducted in the scanner by using Sage software (GE Healthcare), which consists of apodization with a Gaussian function, zero-filling, Fourier transformation, and zero-order phase correction. The spectra included an NAA peak (2.01 ppm), Cr and PCr peaks (3.0 ppm), and Cho-containing compound peaks (3.22 ppm). Peaks were fitted with a nonlinear least-squares fitting method assuming a Lorentzian line shape. A semilogarithmic plot of the peak heights against the b-values was fitted into the equation to obtain the ADC value.10,13,24

The ADC was calculated by using the following equation: Embedded Image where S(b1) and S(b2) are the signal intensities of the metabolites for the 2 MR spectroscopy sequences with different b-values, b1, and b2, and b is the factor of diffusion gradients.

MR Imaging Protocol

The MR imaging acquisition protocol included axial T2 FLAIR, T1 FLAIR, and DW-MR spectroscopy. The T2 FLAIR parameters were as follows: TR, 9600 ms; TE, 117 ms; and TI, 2400 ms. The T1 FLAIR parameters were the following: TR, 2300 ms; TE, 10 ms, and TI 960 ms. We used axial single-shot spin-echo echo-planar sequences to acquire DWI with the following parameters: TR/TE, 4000/70 ms; b=0; and 1000 s/mm2.

DW-MR spectroscopy parameters were the following: TR, 2000 ms; TE, 144 ms; NEX, 16; spectral width, 5000 Hz; and data points, 4096. In all cases, selected volume size was 2 × 2 × 2 cm3. B-values were 45 s/mm2 and 1050 s/mm2 in healthy subjects and in the patients with MELAS, respectively. Global shimming was performed with a standard nonselective shimming sequence. Then local shimming within the selected voxel was required to obtain a full width at half maximum of 2–5 Hz. The duration of a set of DW-MR spectroscopy series was 8 minutes 28 seconds.

The VOI was chosen in the following regions: the abnormal-intensity areas in the DWI or T2 FLAIR or T1 FLAIR images, the nonaffected frontal gray matter of the patients, and the frontal gray matter of healthy subjects. The nonaffected areas were referred to as the normal-appearing areas in all the above-mentioned conventional MR images. A VOI of a healthy volunteer and a set of sample spectra are shown in Fig 1. The VOI in the nonaffected areas and the lesions of the patients and the corresponding spectra are illustrated in Figs 2 and 3, respectively.

Fig 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 1.

A, A VOI is seen in the gray matter of the frontal lobe in a healthy subject. B, MR spectroscopy was performed with a set of b-values (b=45 s/mm2 and b=1050 s/mm2).

Fig 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 2.

A, A VOI is seen in the nonaffected frontal lobe in a patient with MELAS. B, MR spectroscopy was performed with a set of b-values (b=45 s/mm2 and b=1050 s/mm2).

Fig 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 3.

A, A VOI is seen in the previously affected area of the patient with MELAS. B, MR spectroscopy was performed with a set of b-values (b=45 s/mm2 and b=1050 s/mm2).

Fifteen ADCs of the singlet metabolites in the frontal gray matter of the healthy subjects, 10 ADCs of the singlet metabolites in the lesions, and 8 ADCs of the singlet metabolites in the normal-appearing frontal gray matter were used in the statistical analysis, respectively.

Results

In the nonaffected frontal gray matter of the patients with MELAS, the ADCs of Cho, Cr, and NAA increased 50%, 50%, and 67%, respectively, and statistically significant differences (P < .05) were presented by the independent samples t test, relative to controls (Table 1).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1:

ADC values (mean) of metabolites in the gray matter of healthy subjects and in nonaffected areas of patients with MELAS

Table 2 lists the ADCs of NAA, Cr, and Cho in the gray matter of healthy controls and in the lesions of the patients with MELAS. Compared with healthy controls, the ADC increases in the lesions were 35% for Cho, 55% for Cr, and 38% for NAA, and statistically significant differences (P < .05) were revealed by the independent samples t test (Table 2).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2:

ADCs (mean) of metabolites in the gray matter of healthy subjects and in lesions of patients with MELAS

Discussion

The results show that the metabolite ADCs of the healthy controls lie well within the range of the reported data and that there are only fine differences between ours and the published data in the healthy subjects.10–13 The fine differences are attributed to the different diffusion times used in the DW-MR spectroscopy. Longer diffusion times can cause smaller ADC values for a given b-value in the restricted environment.26,27

NAA is primarily located in neurons.28 Synthesis of NAA takes place in neuronal mitochondria via an ATP-related mechanism.29,30 Then NAA is carried into the cytoplasm through active transport. Both Cho and Cr are mainly located in the cytosol.31 In fact, the Cr-PCr system acts as a buffer for ATP homeostasis, and Cr increases in hypometabolic states and decreases in hypermetabolic states.32,33

In all cases in this study, the lactate peak was not present on MR spectroscopy. Because all these patients were in the interictal phase of MELAS, the quantity of lactate yielded by the brain cell was small; consequently, it was not detected by MR spectroscopy.

The major finding of this study is the ADC increases of 50%, 50%, and 67% for Cho, Cr, and NAA in the normal-appearing frontal gray matter of the patients with MELAS, compared with the healthy controls. There are some reasons for this result. First, brain cell swelling occurs during epilepsies or ischemia, both of which are 2 basic incentives for MELAS.34 Neurons or astrocytes need to consume excess energy to maintain ion homeostasis and membrane stabilization. Because mitochondria play a central role in producing ATP and because the ATP-generating capacity is low in neurons and astrocytes in patients with MELAS,35 mitochondrial defects can disturb ion homeostasis and destabilize brain cell membranes.36 As a result, ions accumulate in the cells; thus, water molecules enter the cells, which expand their volume and dilute the viscosity and decrease the tortuosity in the cytoplasm.37 Thus, ADCs of the metabolites in the nonaffected areas increase.

Second, due to the impaired oxidative phosphorylation, there may be disruption of the intracellular organelles. Under normal circumstances, these can restrict the diffusion of the metabolites. As a consequence, the ADC of the metabolites may rise. Third, because ATP generated in the mitochondria cannot satisfy the requirements for the synthesis and active transport of NAA,38,39 it cannot pass through the mitochondrial membrane and stays in the mitochondria. At the ultrastructural level, most mitochondria in the nonaffected neurons are enlarged.40 Therefore, the increase in the ADC of NAA is most pronounced among metabolites. Because the Cho concentration in astrocytes is twice that of neurons,9 the increased ADC of Cho manifests that the astrocytes may also be involved in the pathology. This result is consistent with the conclusion that there is widespread cellular dysfunction in MELAS, not confined to either neuronal or vascular derangement.41

Compared with healthy controls, the ADC increases in the lesions were 35% for Cho, 55% for Cr, and 38% for NAA as seen in Table 2. Because the old ischemia-like lesions of MELAS are characterized by laminar necrosis and extensive neuronal loss,42–44 some of the metabolites can leak into the extracellular space and the neuronal loss can lead to the expansion of the extracellular space, which augments the ADCs of the metabolites. As discussed above, there also may be disruption of intracellular organelles, which can increase the ADCs of the metabolites. Another reason is that much degenerative nuclear pyknosis in neurons is present in the cerebral cortex.41 The pyknotic nuclei are far smaller than the normal nuclei.45 Therefore, nuclear pyknosis can enlarge the intracellular space and consequently increase the ADCs of the metabolites. Furthermore, because the ATP cannot meet the energy needs, PCr is hydrolyzed to Cr to supply energy, which can increase the Cr ADC.46 There is little or no ATP generated in the cells in the lesions, so the PCr barely exists in the cells, and only Cr contributes to the peak at 3.02. On the other hand, there may be PCr in the cells in the normal-appearing areas. Therefore, the Cr ADC of the lesions increases more than in the other areas and is higher than that of the normal-appearing areas.

There are some limits to this study. First, there was no brain pathology in the patients with MELAS. If there was pathology, we could compare the ADC of the metabolites with the pathologic change and, consequently, could draw a more exact conclusion. Second, we do not know the serial metabolite ADCs of the patients.

Conclusions

DW-MR spectroscopy shows that there is an increase in the metabolite ADCs of the previously affected and the nonaffected areas in patients with MELAS, compared with those of healthy controls. Those results directly demonstrate that MELAS is a mitochondrial neuronopathy and involves the entire brain. Therefore, DW-MR spectroscopy can find some useful intracellular pathophysiologic information that conventional MR imaging cannot display. In conclusion, it is a very useful noninvasive technique for brain diseases apart from cerebral infarction.

Acknowledgments

We thank Qiuling Li, MS, and Xiaofang Wang, MS, for their advice in drafting the manuscript.

Footnotes

  • Z.L. and D.Z. contributed equally to this work.

  • This research was supported by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China.

Indicates open access to non-subscribers at www.ajnr.org

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Stejskal EO,
    2. Tanner JE
    . Spin diffusion measurements: spin echoes in the presence of a time dependent field gradient. J Chem Phys 1965;42:288–92
    CrossRef
  2. 2.↵
    1. Busza AL,
    2. Allen KL,
    3. King MD,
    4. et al
    . Diffusion-weighted imaging studies of cerebral ischemia in gerbils: potential relevance to energy failure. Stroke 1992;23:1602–12
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  3. 3.↵
    1. Schaefer PW,
    2. Grant PE,
    3. Gonzalez RG
    . Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of the brain. Radiology 2000;217:331–45
    CrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Liu Z,
    2. Liu X,
    3. Hui L,
    4. et al
    . The appearance of ADCs in the non-affected areas of the patients with MELAS. Neuroradiology 2011;53:227–32
    CrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Neumann-Haefelin T,
    2. Wittsack HJ,
    3. Wenserski F,
    4. et al
    . Diffusion- and perfusion-weighted MRI: the DWI/PWI mismatch region in acute stroke. Stroke 1999;30:1591–97
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  6. 6.↵
    1. Wick M,
    2. Nagatomo Y,
    3. Prielmeier F
    . Alteration of intracellular metabolite diffusion in rat brain in vivo during ischemia and reperfusion. Stroke 1995;26:1930–34
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  7. 7.↵
    1. Szafer A,
    2. Zhong J,
    3. Anderson AW,
    4. et al
    . Diffusion-weighted imaging in tissues: theoretical models. NMR Biomed 1995;8:289–96
    PubMed
  8. 8.↵
    1. Gujar SK,
    2. Maheshwari S,
    3. Bjorkman-Burtscher I,
    4. et al
    . Magnetic resonance spectroscopy. J Neuroophthalmol 2005;25:217–26
    CrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    1. Hajek M,
    2. Dezortova M
    . Introduction to clinical in vivo MR spectroscopy. Eur J Radiol 2008;67:185–93
    CrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. Posse S,
    2. Cuenod CA,
    3. Le Bihan D
    . Human brain: proton diffusion MR spectroscopy. Radiology 1993;188:719–25
    PubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. Harada M,
    2. Uno M,
    3. Hong F,
    4. et al
    . Diffusion-weighted in vivo localized proton MR spectroscopy of human cerebral ischemia and tumor. NMR Biomed 2002;15:69–74
    CrossRefPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    1. Ellegood J,
    2. Hanstock CC,
    3. Beaulieu C
    . Trace apparent diffusion coefficients of metabolites in human brain using diffusion weighted magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Magn Reson Med 2005;53:1025–32
    CrossRefPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    1. Ellegood J,
    2. Hanstock CC,
    3. Beaulieu C
    . Diffusion tensor spectroscopy (DTS) of human brain. Magn Reson Med 2006;55:1–8
    CrossRefPubMed
  14. 14.↵
    1. Merboldt KD,
    2. Horstermann D,
    3. Hanicke W,
    4. et al
    . Molecular self-diffusion of intracellular metabolites in rat brain in vivo investigated by localized proton NMR diffusion spectroscopy. Magn Reson Med 1993;29:125–29
    PubMed
  15. 15.↵
    1. Wick M,
    2. Nagatomo Y,
    3. Prielmeier F,
    4. et al
    . Alteration of intracellular metabolite diffusion in rat brain in vivo during ischemia and reperfusion. Stroke 1995;26:1930–33
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  16. 16.↵
    1. Abe O,
    2. Okubo T,
    3. Hayashi N,
    4. et al
    . Temporal changes of the apparent diffusion coefficients of water and metabolites in rats with hemispheric infarction: experimental study of transhemispheric diaschisis in the contralateral hemisphere at 7 Tesla. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2000;20:726–35
    PubMed
  17. 17.↵
    1. DiMauro S,
    2. Schon EA
    . Mitochondrial respiratory-chain diseases. N Engl J Med 2003;348:2656–68
    CrossRefPubMed
  18. 18.↵
    1. Hanna MG,
    2. Nelson IP,
    3. Morgan-Hughes JA,
    4. et al
    . MELAS: a new disease-associated mitochondrial DNA mutation and evidence for further genetic heterogeneity. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1998;65:512–17
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  19. 19.↵
    1. Iizuka T,
    2. Sakai F,
    3. Suzuki N,
    4. et al
    . Neuronal hyperexcitability in stroke-like episodes of MELAS syndrome. Neurology 2002;59:816–24
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  20. 20.↵
    1. Ohama E,
    2. Ohara S,
    3. Ikuta F,
    4. et al
    . Mitochondrial angiopathy in cerebral blood vessels of mitochondrial encephalomyopathy. Acta Neuropathol 1987;74:226–33
    CrossRefPubMed
  21. 21.↵
    1. Takahashi N,
    2. Shimada T,
    3. Murakami Y,
    4. et al
    . Vascular involvement in a patient with mitochondrial myopathy, encephalopathy, lactic acidosis, and stroke-like episodes. Am J Med Sci 2005;329:265–66
    CrossRefPubMed
  22. 22.↵
    1. Oppenheim C,
    2. Galanaud D,
    3. Samson Y,
    4. et al
    . Can diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging help differentiate stroke from stroke-like events in MELAS? J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2000;69:248–50
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  23. 23.↵
    1. Nicolay K,
    2. Braun KPJ,
    3. de Graaf RA,
    4. et al
    . Diffusion NMR spectroscopy. NMR Biomed 2001;14:94–111
    CrossRefPubMed
  24. 24.↵
    1. van der Toorn A,
    2. Dijkhuizen RM,
    3. Tulleken CA,
    4. et al
    . Diffusion of metabolites in normal and ischemic rat brain measured by localized 1H MRS. Magn Reson Med 1996;36:914–22
    PubMed
  25. 25.↵
    1. Haase A,
    2. Frahm J,
    3. Hanicke W,
    4. et al
    . 1H NMR chemical shift selective (CHESS) imaging. Phys Med Biol 1985;30:341–44
    CrossRefPubMed
  26. 26.↵
    1. Dreher W,
    2. Busch E,
    3. Leibfritz D
    . Changes in apparent diffusion coefficients of metabolites in rat brain after middle cerebral artery occlusion measured by proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Magn Reson Med 2001;45:383–89
    CrossRefPubMed
  27. 27.↵
    1. Assaf Y,
    2. Cohen Y
    . In vivo and in vitro bi-exponential diffusion of N-acetyl aspartate (NAA) in rat brain: a potential structural probe? NMR Biomed 1998;11:67–74
    CrossRefPubMed
  28. 28.↵
    1. Moffett JR,
    2. Namboodiri MA,
    3. Cangro CB,
    4. et al
    . Immunohistochemical localization of N-acetylaspartate in rat brain. Neuroreport 1991;2:131–34
    PubMed
  29. 29.↵
    1. Patel TB,
    2. Clark JB
    . Synthesis of N-acetyl-L-aspartate by rat brain mitochondria and its involvement in mitochondrial/cytosolic carbon transport. Biochem J 1979;184:539–46
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  30. 30.↵
    1. Arun P,
    2. Moffett JR,
    3. Namboodiri MA
    . Evidence for mitochondrial and cytoplasmic N-acetylaspartate synthesis in SH-SY5Y neuroblastoma cells. Neurochem Int 2009;55:219–25. Epub 2009 Mar 17
    CrossRefPubMed
  31. 31.↵
    1. Boulanger Y,
    2. Labelle M,
    3. Khiat A
    . Role of phospholipase A(2) on the variations of the choline signal intensity observed by 1H magnetic resonance spectroscopy in brain diseases. Brain Res Rev 2000;33:380–89
    CrossRefPubMed
  32. 32.↵
    1. Wyss M,
    2. Kaddurah-Daouk R
    . Creatine and creatinine metabolism. Physiol Rev 2000;80:1107–213
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  33. 33.↵
    1. Castillo M,
    2. Kwock L,
    3. Mukherji SK
    . Clinical applications of proton MR spectroscopy. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1996;17:1–15
    PubMed
  34. 34.↵
    1. Pasantes-Morales H,
    2. Tuz K
    . Volume changes in neurons: hyperexcitability and neuronal death. Contrib Nephrol 2006;152:221–40
    PubMed
  35. 35.↵
    1. Lindroos MM,
    2. Borra RJ,
    3. Parkkola R,
    4. et al
    . Cerebral oxygen and glucose metabolism in patients with mitochondrial m. 3243A4G mutation. Brain 2009:132(pt 12);3274–3284
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  36. 36.↵
    1. Iizuka T,
    2. Sakai F,
    3. Ide T,
    4. et al
    . Regional cerebral blood flow and cerebrovascular reactivity during chronic stage of stroke-like episodes in MELAS: implication of neurovascular cellular mechanism. J Neurol Sci 2007;257:126–38
    CrossRefPubMed
  37. 37.↵
    1. Yonemura K,
    2. Hasegawa Y,
    3. Kimura K,
    4. et al
    . Diffusion-weighted MR imaging in a case of mitochondrial myopathy, encephalopathy, lactic acidosis, and strokelike episodes. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2001;22:269–72
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  38. 38.↵
    1. Castillo M,
    2. Kwock L,
    3. Green C
    . MELAS syndrome: imaging and proton MR spectroscopic findings. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1995;16:233–39
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  39. 39.↵
    1. Ducreux D,
    2. Nasser G,
    3. Lacroix C,
    4. et al
    . MR diffusion tensor imaging, fiber tracking, and single-voxel spectroscopy findings in an unusual MELAS case. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2005;26:1840–44
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  40. 40.↵
    1. Katayama Y,
    2. Maeda K,
    3. Iizuka T
    . Accumulation of oxidative stress around the stroke-like lesions of MELAS patients. Mitochondrion 2009;9:306–13. Epub 2009 Apr 23
    CrossRefPubMed
  41. 41.↵
    1. Gilchrist JM,
    2. Sikirica M,
    3. Stopa E,
    4. et al
    . Adult-onset MELAS evidence for involvement of neurons as well as cerebral vasculature in strokelike episodes. Stroke 1996;27:1420–23
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  42. 42.↵
    1. Betts J,
    2. Jaros E,
    3. Perry RH,
    4. et al
    . Molecular neuropathology of MELAS: level of heteroplasmy in individual neurones and evidence of extensive vascular involvement. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol 2006;32:359–73
    CrossRefPubMed
  43. 43.↵
    1. Tanahashi C,
    2. Nakayama A,
    3. Yoshida M,
    4. et al
    . MELAS with the mitochondrial DNA 3243 point mutation: a neuropathological study. Acta Neuropathol 2000;99:31–38
    CrossRefPubMed
  44. 44.↵
    1. Mizukami K,
    2. Sasaki M,
    3. Suzuki T,
    4. et al
    . Central nervous system changes in mitochondrial encephalomyopathy: light and electron microscopic study. Acta Neuropathol 1992;83:449–52
    CrossRefPubMed
  45. 45.↵
    1. Burgoyne LA
    . The mechanisms of pyknosis: hypercondensation and death. Exp Cell Res 1999;248:214–22
    CrossRefPubMed
  46. 46.↵
    1. Liess C,
    2. Radda GK,
    3. Clarke K
    . Metabolite and water apparent diffusion coefficients in the isolated rat heart: effects of ischemia. Magn Reson Med 2000;44:208–14
    CrossRefPubMed
  • Received August 16, 2010.
  • Accepted after revision September 18, 2010.
  • Copyright © American Society of Neuroradiology
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 32 (5)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 32, Issue 5
1 May 2011
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Apparent Diffusion Coefficients of Metabolites in Patients with MELAS Using Diffusion-Weighted MR Spectroscopy
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
Z. Liu, D. Zheng, X. Wang, J. Zhang, S. Xie, J. Xiao, X. Jiang
Apparent Diffusion Coefficients of Metabolites in Patients with MELAS Using Diffusion-Weighted MR Spectroscopy
American Journal of Neuroradiology May 2011, 32 (5) 898-902; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A2395

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
Apparent Diffusion Coefficients of Metabolites in Patients with MELAS Using Diffusion-Weighted MR Spectroscopy
Z. Liu, D. Zheng, X. Wang, J. Zhang, S. Xie, J. Xiao, X. Jiang
American Journal of Neuroradiology May 2011, 32 (5) 898-902; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A2395
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Purchase

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Abbreviations
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusions
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • MELAS, an important consideration in the adult population presenting with unusual and recurrent stroke-like episodes
  • The Effect of Age and Cerebral Ischemia on Diffusion-Weighted Proton MR Spectroscopy of the Human Brain
  • Crossref (18)
  • Google Scholar

This article has been cited by the following articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

  • Primary Mitochondrial Disorders of the Pediatric Central Nervous System: Neuroimaging Findings
    Fabrício Guimarães Gonçalves, César Augusto Pinheiro Ferreira Alves, Beth Heuer, James Peterson, Angela N. Viaene, Sara Reis Teixeira, Juan Sebastián Martín-Saavedra, Savvas Andronikou, Amy Goldstein, Arastoo Vossough
    RadioGraphics 2020 40 7
  • In vivo diffusion MRS investigation of non‐water molecules in biological tissues
    Peng Cao, Ed X. Wu
    NMR in Biomedicine 2017 30 3
  • The Effect of Age and Cerebral Ischemia on Diffusion-Weighted Proton MR Spectroscopy of the Human Brain
    D.D. Zheng, Z.H. Liu, J. Fang, X.Y. Wang, J. Zhang
    American Journal of Neuroradiology 2012 33 3
  • Differentiating between axonal damage and demyelination in healthy aging by combining diffusion-tensor imaging and diffusion-weighted spectroscopy in the human corpus callosum at 7 T
    Francesca Branzoli, Ece Ercan, Romain Valabrègue, Emily T. Wood, Mathijs Buijs, Andrew Webb, Itamar Ronen
    Neurobiology of Aging 2016 47
  • Apparent diffusion coefficients of the five major metabolites measured in the human brain in vivo at 3T
    Dinesh K. Deelchand, Edward J. Auerbach, Małgorzata Marjańska
    Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 2018 79 6
  • Diffusion‐weighted chemical shift imaging of human brain metabolites at 7T
    Ayse Ece Ercan, Aranee Techawiboonwong, Maarten J. Versluis, Andrew G. Webb, Itamar Ronen
    Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 2015 73 6
  • In-vivo evaluation of neuronal and glial changes in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis with diffusion tensor spectroscopy
    Carolin Reischauer, Andreas Gutzeit, Christoph Neuwirth, Alexander Fuchs, Sabine Sartoretti-Schefer, Markus Weber, David Czell
    NeuroImage: Clinical 2018 20
  • Multiparametric characterization of white matter alterations in early stage Huntington disease
    Isaac M. Adanyeguh, Francesca Branzoli, Cécile Delorme, Aurélie Méneret, Marie-Lorraine Monin, Marie-Pierre Luton, Alexandra Durr, Emanoel Sabidussi, Fanny Mochel
    Scientific Reports 2021 11 1
  • MELAS, an important consideration in the adult population presenting with unusual and recurrent stroke-like episodes
    Alison Corr, Maria Gaughan, Joan Moroney, Seamus Looby
    BMJ Case Reports 2014 2014
  • Separation and quantification of lactate and lipid at 1.3 ppm by diffusion‐weighted magnetic resonance spectroscopy
    Anna M. Wang, Gilberto K.K. Leung, Karrie M.Y. Kiang, Danny Chan, Peng Cao, Ed X. Wu
    Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 2017 77 2

More in this TOC Section

  • Statin Therapy Does Not Affect the Radiographic and Clinical Profile of Patients with TIA and Minor Stroke
  • Optimal MRI Sequence for Identifying Occlusion Location in Acute Stroke: Which Value of Time-Resolved Contrast-Enhanced MRA?
  • SWI or T2*: Which MRI Sequence to Use in the Detection of Cerebral Microbleeds? The Karolinska Imaging Dementia Study
Show more Brain

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editors Choice
  • Fellow Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

Special Collections

  • Special Collections

Resources

  • News and Updates
  • Turn around Times
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Author Policies
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Submit a Case
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • Get Peer Review Credit from Publons

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcast
  • AJNR SCANtastic
  • Video Articles

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Alerts
  • Feedback
  • Advertise with us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Permissions
  • Terms and Conditions

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire