Parallel Imaging of the Cervical Spine at 3T: Optimized Trade-Off between Speed and Image Quality

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Boden SD,
   2. McCowin PR,
   3. Davis DO,
   4. et al

   . Abnormal magnetic-resonance scans of the cervical spine in asymptomatic subjects: a prospective investigation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1990;72:1178–84

   PubMed
2. 2.↵
   1. Lehto IJ,
   2. Tertti MO,
   3. Komu ME,
   4. et al

   . Age-related MRI changes at 0.1 T in cervical discs in asymptomatic subjects. Neuroradiology 1994;36:49–53

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
3. 3.↵
   1. Cote P,
   2. Cassidy JD,
   3. Carroll LJ,
   4. et al

   . The annual incidence and course of neck pain in the general population: a population-based cohort study. Pain 2004;112:267–73

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
4. 4.↵
   1. Radhakrishnan K,
   2. Litchy WJ,
   3. O'Fallon WM,
   4. et al

   . Epidemiology of cervical radiculopathy: a population-based study from Rochester, Minnesota, 1976 through 1990. Brain 1994;117 (Pt 2): 325–35

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
5. 5.↵
   1. Salemi G,
   2. Savettieri G,
   3. Meneghini F,
   4. et al

   . Prevalence of cervical spondylotic radiculopathy: a door-to-door survey in a Sicilian municipality. Acta Neurol Scand 1996;93:184–88

   PubMed
6. 6.↵
   1. Roemer PB,
   2. Edelstein WA,
   3. Hayes CE,
   4. et al

   . The NMR phased array. Magn Reson Med 1990;16:192–225

   PubMedWeb of Science
7. 7.↵
   1. Glockner JF,
   2. Hu HH,
   3. Stanley DW,
   4. et al

   . Parallel MR imaging: a user's guide. Radiographics 2005;25:1279–97

   PubMed
8. 8.↵
   1. Heidemann RM,
   2. Ozsarlak O,
   3. Parizel PM,
   4. et al

   . A brief review of parallel magnetic resonance imaging. Eur Radiol 2003;13:2323–37

   CrossRefPubMed
9. 9.↵
   1. Kurihara Y,
   2. Yakushiji YK,
   3. Tani I,
   4. et al

   . Coil sensitivity encoding in MR imaging: advantages and disadvantages in clinical practice. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2002;178:1087–91

   PubMedWeb of Science
10. 10.↵
    1. Larkman DJ,
    2. Nunes RG

    . Parallel magnetic resonance imaging. Phys Med Biol 2007;52:R15–55

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
11. 11.↵
    1. Pruessmann KP,
    2. Weiger M,
    3. Scheidegger MB,
    4. et al

    . SENSE: sensitivity encoding for fast MRI. Magn Reson Med 1999;42:952–62

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
12. 12.↵
    1. Romaneehsen B,
    2. Oberholzer K,
    3. Muller LP,
    4. et al

    . Rapid musculoskeletal magnetic resonance imaging using integrated parallel acquisition techniques (IPAT): initial experiences. Rofo 2003;175:1193–97

    PubMed
13. 13.↵
    1. Sodickson DK,
    2. Griswold MA,
    3. Jakob PM

    . SMASH imaging. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 1999;7:237–54

    PubMed
14. 14.↵
    1. Griswold MA,
    2. Jakob PM,
    3. Heidemann RM,
    4. et al

    . Generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisitions (GRAPPA). Magn Reson Med 2002;47:1202–10

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
15. 15.↵
    1. Noebauer-Huhmann IM,
    2. Glaser C,
    3. Dietrich O,
    4. et al

    . MR imaging of the cervical spine: assessment of image quality with parallel imaging compared to non-accelerated MR measurements. Eur Radiol 2007;17:1147–55

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
16. 16.↵
    1. Vogt FM,
    2. Antoch G,
    3. Hunold P,
    4. et al

    . Parallel acquisition techniques for accelerated volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination magnetic resonance imaging of the upper abdomen: assessment of image quality and lesion conspicuity. J Magn Reson Imaging 2005;21:376–82

    CrossRefPubMed
17. 17.↵
    1. Nölte I,
    2. Gerigk L,
    3. Brockmann MA,
    4. et al

    . MRI of degenerative lumbar spine disease: comparison of non-accelerated and parallel imaging. Neuroradiology 2008;50:403–09

    CrossRefPubMed
18. 18.↵
    1. Jakob PM,
    2. Griswold MA,
    3. Edelman RR,
    4. et al

    . Accelerated cardiac imaging using the SMASH technique. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 1999;1:153–57

    PubMed
19. 19.↵
    1. Seiberlich N,
    2. Ehses P,
    3. Duerk J,
    4. et al

    . Improved radial GRAPPA calibration for real-time free-breathing cardiac imaging. Magn Reson Med 2011;65:492–505

    CrossRefPubMed
20. 20.↵
    1. Held P,
    2. Dorenbeck U,
    3. Seitz J,
    4. et al

    . MRI of the abnormal cervical spinal cord using 2D spoiled gradient echo multiecho sequence (MEDIC) with magnetization transfer saturation pulse: a T2* weighted feasibility study. J Neuroradiol 2003;30:83–90

    PubMed
21. 21.↵
    1. Modic MT,
    2. Ross JS

    . Lumbar degenerative disk disease. Radiology 2007;245:43–61

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
22. 22.↵
    1. Morvan G

    . Imaging of lumbar stenosis [in French]. J Radiol 2002;83 (9 pt 2): 1165–75

    PubMed
23. 23.↵
    1. Blaimer M,
    2. Breuer F,
    3. Mueller M,
    4. et al

    . SMASH, SENSE, PILS, GRAPPA: how to choose the optimal method. Top Magn Reson Imaging 2004;15:223–36

    CrossRefPubMed
24. 24.↵
    1. Larkman DJ,
    2. Nunes RG

    . Parallel magnetic resonance imaging. Phys Med Biol 2007;52:R15–55

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
25. 25.↵
    1. Dietrich O,
    2. Reeder S,
    3. Reiser M,
    4. et al

    . Influence of parallel imaging and other reconstruction techniques on the measurement of signal-to-noise ratios. In: Proceedings of the 13th Scientifc Meeting and Exhibition of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Medicine, Miami, Florida. May 7–13, 2005
26. 26.↵
    1. Ruel L,
    2. Brugières P,
    3. Luciani A,
    4. et al

    . Comparison of in vitro and in vivo MRI of the spine using parallel imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2004;182:749–55

    PubMed
27. 27.↵
    1. Li T,
    2. Mirowitz SA

    . Comparative study of fast MR imaging: quantitative analysis on image quality and efficiency among various time frames and contrast behaviors. Magn Reson Imaging 2002;20:471–78

    CrossRefPubMed
28. 28.↵
    1. Nelles M,
    2. Konig RS,
    3. Gieseke J,
    4. et al

    . Dual-source parallel RF transmission for clinical MR imaging of the spine at 3.0 T: intraindividual comparison with conventional single-source transmission. Radiology 2010;257:743–53

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science