Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

AJNR Awards, New Junior Editors, and more. Read the latest AJNR updates

Research ArticleBrainE
Open Access

Differentiation between Brain Glioblastoma Multiforme and Solitary Metastasis: Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis Based on Routine MR Imaging

X.Z. Chen, X.M. Yin, L. Ai, Q. Chen, S.W. Li and J.P. Dai
American Journal of Neuroradiology November 2012, 33 (10) 1907-1912; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A3106
X.Z. Chen
aFrom the Department of Neuroimaging (X.Z.C., L.A., S.W.L., J.P.D.), Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, P. R. China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
X.M. Yin
bRadiology Department (X.M.Y.), China Coal General Hospital, Beijing
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
L. Ai
aFrom the Department of Neuroimaging (X.Z.C., L.A., S.W.L., J.P.D.), Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, P. R. China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Q. Chen
cDepartment of Neuroimaging (Q.C.), Beijing Neurosurgical Institute Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
S.W. Li
aFrom the Department of Neuroimaging (X.Z.C., L.A., S.W.L., J.P.D.), Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, P. R. China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
J.P. Dai
aFrom the Department of Neuroimaging (X.Z.C., L.A., S.W.L., J.P.D.), Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, P. R. China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Fig 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 1.

    GBM with peritumoral T2 prolongation of grade I. Postcontrast axial T1WI shows a heterogeneously enhancing lesion in the right parietal lobe with a maximal diameter of 4.5 cm (A). On the same section as A, axial T2WI demonstrates medium peritumoral T2 prolongation, which is smaller in area than the tumor (B). Two ROIs are placed in the prolonged region (black ring), with 2 mirror ROIs in the contralateral region (white ring). On the section inferior to B, another 2 ROIs are positioned in the hyperintense region and, accordingly, 2 mirror ROIs are placed in the contralateral region (C). For this measurement, the mean value of signal intensity is 852.5 for the prolonged region and 231.5 for the intact contralateral region. Thus, the nSI is 3.68 (852.5/231.5).

  • Fig 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 2.

    Solitary MET with peritumoral T2 prolongation of grade I. Postcontrast axial T1WI shows a heterogeneously enhancing lesion in the left frontal and anterior parietal lobes with a maximal diameter of 3.94 cm (A). On the same section as A, axial T2WI demonstrates medium peritumoral T2 prolongation, which is smaller in area than the tumor (B). On this section, 2 ROIs are placed in the prolonged region (black ring), with 2 mirror ROIs in the contralateral area (white ring). On the section superior to B, another 2 ROIs with 2 mirror ROIs are positioned in the prolongation region and the contralateral region, respectively (C). For this measurement, the mean value of signal intensity is 818.0 for the prolonged region and 280.5 for the intact contralateral region, respectively. Thus, the nSI is 2.92 (818.0/280.5).

  • Fig 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 3.

    GBM with peritumoral T2 prolongation of grade II. Postcontrast axial T1WI reveals a ringlike enhancing lesion in the left frontal lobe with a maximal diameter of 4.05 cm (A). On the same section as A, axial T2WI demonstrates obvious peritumoral hyperintensity, which is larger in area than the tumor (B). Two ROIs are placed in the prolonged region (black ring), with 2 mirror ROIs in the contralateral side (white ring). On the section inferior to B, 2 additional ROIs are positioned in the prolonged region and, accordingly, 2 mirror ROIs are placed in the contralateral side (C). The nSI is 4.18 (692.5/165.5).

  • Fig 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 4.

    Solitary MET with peritumoral T2 prolongation of grade II. Postcontrast axial T1WI shows a ringlike enhancing lesion in the right frontal lobe with a maximal diameter of 3.6 cm (A). On the same section as A, axial T2WI demonstrates strong peritumoral T2 prolongation, which is larger in area than the tumor (B). On this section, 2 ROIs and 2 mirror ROIs are placed in the prolonged region (black ring) and contralateral area (white ring). On the section superior to A, another 2 ROIs with 2 mirror ROIs are positioned in the prolonged region and the contralateral region, respectively (C). The nSI is 2.75 (603.5/219.5).

  • Fig 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 5.

    Box-and-whisker plots. Thick horizontal line = mean; whiskers = ± SD. The final nSI of peritumoral T2 in GBM is significantly higher than that of solitary MET in grade I (P = .014), grade II (P = .017), and tumors as a whole without grading (P < .001).

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1:

    nSI from 2 radiologists

    Tumor1st Measurement2nd MeasurementPearson Correlative Analysis
    GBM3.1 ± 0.483.15 ± 0.5P < .001, r = .894
    MET2.73 ± 0.32.74 ± 0.35P < .001, r = .918
    Total2.98 ± 0.463.02 ± 0.45P < .001, r = .912
    • View popup
    Table 2:

    Final nSI of patients scanned by different MR scanners

    TumorGenesis Signa (n)Magnetom Trio (n)PValue
    GBM3.16 ± 0.48 (19)3.1 ± 0.49 (26).676
    MET2.85 ± 0.35 (11)2.61 ± 0.25 (10).098
    Total3.05 ± 0.46 (30)2.97 ± 0.48 (36).484
    • View popup
    Table 3:

    Sensitivity and specificity of final nSI of peritumoral T2 prolongation with high predictive power in differentiating GBM from solitary MET using ROC analysis

    Peritumoral T2 Prolongation GradingCutoff ValueSensitivitySpecificityAUC
    Grade I2.440.9740.4440.741
    Grade II3.0850.8570.9170.869
    Total2.880.6440.7620.725
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 33 (10)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 33, Issue 10
1 Nov 2012
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Differentiation between Brain Glioblastoma Multiforme and Solitary Metastasis: Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis Based on Routine MR Imaging
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
X.Z. Chen, X.M. Yin, L. Ai, Q. Chen, S.W. Li, J.P. Dai
Differentiation between Brain Glioblastoma Multiforme and Solitary Metastasis: Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis Based on Routine MR Imaging
American Journal of Neuroradiology Nov 2012, 33 (10) 1907-1912; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A3106

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
Differentiation between Brain Glioblastoma Multiforme and Solitary Metastasis: Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis Based on Routine MR Imaging
X.Z. Chen, X.M. Yin, L. Ai, Q. Chen, S.W. Li, J.P. Dai
American Journal of Neuroradiology Nov 2012, 33 (10) 1907-1912; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A3106
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Purchase

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • ABBREVIATIONS:
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusions
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Development and Validation of a Deep Learning-Based Model to Distinguish Glioblastoma from Solitary Brain Metastasis Using Conventional MR Images
  • Diagnostic Utility of Diffusion Tensor Imaging in Differentiating Glioblastomas from Brain Metastases
  • Crossref
  • Google Scholar

This article has not yet been cited by articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

More in this TOC Section

  • Enhanced Axonal Metabolism during Early Natalizumab Treatment in Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis
  • SWI or T2*: Which MRI Sequence to Use in the Detection of Cerebral Microbleeds? The Karolinska Imaging Dementia Study
  • Progression of Microstructural Damage in Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 2: A Longitudinal DTI Study
Show more Brain

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editor's Choice
  • Fellows' Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Video Articles

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

More from AJNR

  • Trainee Corner
  • Imaging Protocols
  • MRI Safety Corner
  • Book Reviews

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcasts
  • AJNR Scantastics

Resources

  • Turnaround Time
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Submit a Video Article
  • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Statistical Tips
  • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Author Policies
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • News and Updates

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Board Alumni
  • Alerts
  • Permissions
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Advertise with Us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Feedback
  • Terms and Conditions
  • AJNR Editorial Board Alumni

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire