Evaluation of Automatic Measurement of the Intracranial Volume Based on Quantitative MR Imaging

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Nopoulos PC,
   2. Aylward EH,
   3. Ross CA,
   4. et al

   . Smaller intracranial volume in prodromal Huntington's disease: evidence for abnormal neurodevelopment. Brain 2011;134:137–42

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
2. 2.↵
   1. Jack CR Jr.,
   2. Wiste HJ,
   3. Vemuri P,
   4. et al

   . Brain beta-amyloid measures and magnetic resonance imaging atrophy both predict time-to-progression from mild cognitive impairment to Alzheimer's disease. Brain 2010;133:3336–48

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
3. 3.↵
   1. Palm WM,
   2. Saczynski JS,
   3. van der Grond J,
   4. et al

   . Ventricular dilation: association with gait and cognition. Ann Neurol 2009;66:485–93

   CrossRefPubMed
4. 4.↵
   1. Relkin N,
   2. Marmarou A,
   3. Klinge P,
   4. et al

   . Diagnosing idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus. Neurosurgery 2005;57:S4–16, discussion ii-v

   PubMed
5. 5.↵
   1. Desikan RS,
   2. Cabral HJ,
   3. Fischl B,
   4. et al

   . Temporoparietal MR imaging measures of atrophy in subjects with mild cognitive impairment that predict subsequent diagnosis of Alzheimer disease. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2009;30:532–38

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
6. 6.↵
   1. Fjell AM,
   2. Amlien IK,
   3. Westlye LT,
   4. et al

   . Mini-mental state examination is sensitive to brain atrophy in Alzheimer's disease. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord 2009;28:252–58

   CrossRefPubMed
7. 7.↵
   1. Henneman WJ,
   2. Sluimer JD,
   3. Barnes J,
   4. et al

   . Hippocampal atrophy rates in Alzheimer disease: added value over whole brain volume measures. Neurology 2009;72:999–1007

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
8. 8.↵
   1. Zhao GJ,
   2. Li DK,
   3. Wolinsky JS,
   4. et al

   . Clinical and magnetic resonance imaging changes correlate in a clinical trial monitoring cyclosporine therapy for multiple sclerosis. The MS Study Group. J Neuroimaging 1997;7:1–7

   PubMed
9. 9.↵
   1. Barnes J,
   2. Ridgway GR,
   3. Bartlett J,
   4. et al

   . Head size, age and gender adjustment in MRI studies: a necessary nuisance? Neuroimage 2010;53:1244–55

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
10. 10.↵
    1. Jovicich J,
    2. Czanner S,
    3. Han X,
    4. et al

    . MRI-derived measurements of human subcortical, ventricular and intracranial brain volumes: reliability effects of scan sessions, acquisition sequences, data analyses, scanner upgrade, scanner vendors and field strengths. Neuroimage 2009;46:177–92

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
11. 11.↵
    1. Pengas G,
    2. Pereira JM,
    3. Williams GB,
    4. et al

    . Comparative reliability of total intracranial volume estimation methods and the influence of atrophy in a longitudinal semantic dementia cohort. J Neuroimaging 2009;19:37–46

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
12. 12.↵
    1. Ambarki K,
    2. Wåhlin A,
    3. Birgander R,
    4. et al

    . MR imaging of brain volumes: evaluation of a fully automatic software. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32:408–12

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
13. 13.↵
    1. Warntjes JB,
    2. Dahlqvist O,
    3. Lundberg P

    . Novel method for rapid, simultaneous T1, T2*, and proton density quantification. Magn Reson Med 2007;57:528–37

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
14. 14.↵
    1. Warntjes JB,
    2. Leinhard OD,
    3. West J,
    4. et al

    . Rapid magnetic resonance quantification on the brain: optimization for clinical usage. Magn Reson Med 2008;60:320–29

    CrossRefPubMed
15. 15.↵
    1. Ambarki K,
    2. Israelsson H,
    3. Wåhlin A,
    4. et al

    . Brain ventricular size in healthy elderly: comparison between Evans index and volume measurement. Neurosurgery 2010;67:94–99, discussion 99

    CrossRefPubMed
16. 16.↵
    1. West J,
    2. Warntjes JB,
    3. Lundberg P

    . Novel whole brain segmentation and volume estimation using quantitative MRI. Eur Radiol 2012;22:998–1007

    CrossRefPubMed
17. 17.↵
    1. Lehmann M,
    2. Douiri A,
    3. Kim LG,
    4. et al

    . Atrophy patterns in Alzheimer's disease and semantic dementia: a comparison of FreeSurfer and manual volumetric measurements. Neuroimage 2010;49:2264–74

    CrossRefPubMed
18. 18.↵
    1. Buckner RL,
    2. Head D,
    3. Parker J,
    4. et al

    . A unified approach for morphometric and functional data analysis in young, old, and demented adults using automated atlas-based head size normalization: reliability and validation against manual measurement of total intracranial volume. Neuroimage 2004;23:724–38

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
19. 19.↵
    1. Keihaninejad S,
    2. Heckemann RA,
    3. Fagiolo G,
    4. et al

    . A robust method to estimate the intracranial volume across MRI field strengths (1.5T and 3T). Neuroimage 2010;50:1427–37

    CrossRefPubMed
20. 20.↵
    1. Ashburner J,
    2. Friston KJ

    . Unified segmentation. Neuroimage 2005;26:839–51

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
21. 21.↵
    1. West J,
    2. Warntjes JB,
    3. Lundberg P

    . Segmentation and volume estimation on a sub-voxel basis using quantitative MR: a validation study. In: Proceedings of the 18th Annual Meeting of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Stockholm, Sweden. May 1–7, 2010:3898
22. 22.↵
    1. Heister D,
    2. Brewer JB,
    3. Magda S,
    4. et al

    . Predicting MCI outcome with clinically available MRI and CSF biomarkers. Neurology 2011;77:1619–28

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
23. 23.↵
    1. Brewer JB,
    2. Magda S,
    3. Airriess C,
    4. et al

    . Fully-automated quantification of regional brain volumes for improved detection of focal atrophy in Alzheimer disease. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2009;30:578–80

    Abstract/FREE Full Text