Differences in CT Perfusion Summary Maps for Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke Generated by 2 Software Packages

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Klotz E,
   2. Konig M

   . Perfusion measurements of the brain: using dynamic CT for the quantitative assessment of cerebral ischemia in acute stroke. Eur J Radiol 1999; 30: 170– 84

   CrossRefPubMed
2. 2.↵
   1. Wintermark M,
   2. Flanders AE,
   3. Velthuis B,
   4. et al

   . Perfusion-CT assessment of infarct core and penumbra: receiver operating characteristic curve analysis in 130 patients suspected of acute hemispheric stroke. Stroke 2006; 37: 979– 85

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
3. 3.↵
   1. Murphy BD,
   2. Fox AJ,
   3. Lee DH,
   4. et al

   . Identification of penumbra and infarct in acute ischemic stroke using computed tomography perfusion-derived blood flow and blood volume measurements. Stroke 2006; 37: 1771– 77

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
4. 4.↵
   1. de Lucas EM,
   2. Sanchez E,
   3. Gutierrez A,
   4. et al

   . CT protocol for acute stroke: tips and tricks for general radiologists. Radiographics 2008; 28: 1673– 87

   CrossRefPubMed
5. 5.↵
   1. Eastwood JD,
   2. Lev MH,
   3. Azhari T,
   4. et al

   . CT perfusion scanning with deconvolution analysis: pilot study in patients with acute middle cerebral artery stroke. Radiology 2002; 222: 227– 36

   PubMedWeb of Science
6. 6.↵
   1. Miles KA,
   2. Griffiths MR

   . Perfusion CT: a worthwhile enhancement? Br J Radiol 2003; 76: 220– 31

   FREE Full Text
7. 7.↵
   1. Lui YW,
   2. Tang ER,
   3. Allmendinger AM,
   4. et al

   . Evaluation of CT perfusion in the setting of cerebral ischemia: patterns and pitfalls. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2010; 31: 1552– 63

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
8. 8.↵
   1. Dorn F,
   2. Liebig T,
   3. Muenzel D,
   4. et al

   . Order of CT stroke protocol (CTA before or after CTP): impact on image quality. Neuroradiology 2012; 54: 105– 12

   CrossRefPubMed
9. 9.↵
   1. Wintermark M,
   2. Maeder P,
   3. Thiran JP,
   4. et al

   . Quantitative assessment of regional cerebral blood flows by perfusion CT studies at low injection rates: a critical review of the underlying theoretical models. Eur Radiol 2001; 11: 1220– 30

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
10. 10.↵
    1. Konstas AA,
    2. Goldmakher GV,
    3. Lee TY,
    4. et al

    . Theoretic basis and technical implementations of CT perfusion in acute ischemic stroke. Part 1. Theoretic basis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2009; 30: 662– 68

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
11. 11.↵
    1. Kudo K,
    2. Sasaki M,
    3. Yamada K,
    4. et al

    . Differences in CT perfusion maps generated by different commercial software: quantitative analysis by using identical source data of acute stroke patients. Radiology 2010; 254: 200– 09

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
12. 12.↵
    1. Kudo K,
    2. Sasaki M,
    3. Ogasawara K,
    4. et al

    . Difference in tracer delay-induced effect among deconvolution algorithms in CT perfusion analysis: quantitative evaluation with digital phantoms. Radiology 2009; 251: 241– 49

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
13. 13.↵
    1. Zussman BM,
    2. Boghosian G,
    3. Gorniak RJ,
    4. et al

    . The relative effect of vendor variability in CT perfusion results: a method comparison study. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2011; 197: 468– 73

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
14. 14.↵
    1. Konstas AA,
    2. Goldmakher GV,
    3. Lee TY,
    4. et al

    . Theoretic basis and technical implementations of CT perfusion in acute ischemic stroke. Part 2. Technical implementations. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2009; 30: 885– 92

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
15. 15.↵
    1. Konstas AA,
    2. Lev MH

    . CT perfusion imaging of acute stroke: the need for arrival time, delay insensitive, and standardized postprocessing algorithms? Radiology 2009; 254: 22– 25
16. 16.↵
    1. Schaefer PW,
    2. Mui K,
    3. Kamalian S,
    4. et al

    . Avoiding “pseudo-reversibility” of CT-CBV infarct core lesions in acute stroke patients after thrombolytic therapy: the need for algorithmically “delay-corrected” CT perfusion map postprocessing software. Stroke 2009; 40: 2875– 78

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
17. 17.↵
    1. Kamalian S,
    2. Maas MB,
    3. Goldmacher GV,
    4. et al

    . CT cerebral blood flow maps optimally correlate with admission diffusion-weighted imaging in acute stroke but thresholds vary by postprocessing platform. Stroke 2011; 42: 1923– 28

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
18. 18.↵
    1. Wintermark M,
    2. Maeder P,
    3. Verdun FR,
    4. et al

    . Using 80 kVp versus 120 kVp in perfusion CT measurement of regional cerebral blood flow. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2000; 21: 1881– 84

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
19. 19.↵
    1. Sanelli PC,
    2. Lev MH,
    3. Eastwood JD,
    4. et al

    . The effect of varying user-selected input parameters on quantitative values in CT perfusion maps. Acad Radiol 2004; 11: 1085– 92

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
20. 20.↵
    1. Serafin Z,
    2. Kotarski M,
    3. Karolkiewicz M,
    4. et al

    . Reproducibility of dynamic computed tomography brain perfusion measurements in patients with significant carotid artery stenosis. Acta Radiol 2009; 50: 226– 32

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
21. 21.↵
    1. Fiorella D,
    2. Heiserman J,
    3. Prenger E,
    4. et al

    . Assessment of the reproducibility of postprocessing dynamic CT perfusion data. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2004; 25: 97– 107

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
22. 22.↵
    1. Yoo AJ,
    2. Barak ER,
    3. Copen WA,
    4. et al

    . Combining acute diffusion-weighted imaging and mean transmit time lesion volumes with National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score improves the prediction of acute stroke outcome. Stroke 2010; 41: 1728– 35

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
23. 23.↵
    1. Schramm P,
    2. Schellinger PD,
    3. Fiebach JB,
    4. et al

    . Comparison of CT and CT angiography source images with diffusion-weighted imaging in patients with acute stroke within 6 hours after onset. Stroke 2002; 33: 2426– 32

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
24. 24.↵
    1. Wintermark M,
    2. Fischbein NJ,
    3. Smith WS,
    4. et al

    . Accuracy of dynamic perfusion CT with deconvolution in detecting acute hemispheric stroke. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2005; 26: 104– 12

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
25. 25.↵
    1. Stoel BC,
    2. Bode F,
    3. Rames A,
    4. et al

    . Quality control in longitudinal studies with computed tomographic densitometry of the lungs. Proc Am Thorac Soc 2008; 5: 929– 33

    CrossRefPubMed