Efficacy and Safety of Flow Diversion for Paraclinoid Aneurysms: A Matched-Pair Analysis Compared with Standard Endovascular Approaches

References

1. 1.↵
   1. D'Urso PI,
   2. Lanzino G,
   3. Cloft HJ,
   4. at el

   . Flow diversion for intracranial aneurysms: a review. Stroke 2011;42:2363–68

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
2. 2.↵
   1. Fiorella D,
   2. Lylyk P,
   3. Szikora I,
   4. et al

   . Curative cerebrovascular reconstruction with the Pipeline embolization device: the emergence of definitive endovascular therapy for intracranial aneurysms. J Neurointerv Surg 2009;1:56–65

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
3. 3.↵
   1. Aurboonyawat T,
   2. Schmidt PJ,
   3. Piotin M,
   4. et al

   . A study of the first-generation Pipeline embolization device morphology using intraoperative angiographic computed tomography (ACT). Neuroradiology 2011;53:23–30

   CrossRefPubMed
4. 4.↵
   1. Cebral JR,
   2. Mut F,
   3. Raschi M,
   4. et al

   . Aneurysm rupture following treatment with flow-diverting stents: computational hemodynamics analysis of treatment. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32:27–33

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
5. 5.↵
   1. Lylyk P,
   2. Miranda C,
   3. Ceratto R,
   4. et al

   . Curative endovascular reconstruction of cerebral aneurysms with the Pipeline embolization device: the Buenos Aires experience. Neurosurgery 2009;64:632–42, discussion 642–43

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
6. 6.↵
   1. Toni F,
   2. Cirillo L,
   3. Battaglia S,
   4. et al

   . 3T MRI in the evaluation of brain aneurysms treated with flow-diverting stents: preliminary experience. Neuroradiol J 2009;22:588–99
7. 7.↵
   1. Briganti F,
   2. Napoli M,
   3. Tortora F,
   4. et al

   . Italian multicenter experience with flow-diverter devices for intracranial unruptured aneurysm treatment with periprocedural complications—a retrospective data analysis. Neuroradiology 2012;54:1145–52

   CrossRefPubMed
8. 8.↵
   1. Byrne JV,
   2. Beltechi R,
   3. Yarnold JA,
   4. et al

   . Early experience in the treatment of intra-cranial aneurysms by endovascular flow diversion: a multicentre prospective study. PLoS One 2010;5:pii:e12492
9. 9.↵
   1. Lubicz B,
   2. Collignon L,
   3. Raphaeli G,
   4. et al

   . Flow-diverter stent for the endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms: a prospective study in 29 patients with 34 aneurysms. Stroke 2010;41:2247–53

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
10. 10.↵
    1. Nelson PK,
    2. Lylyk P,
    3. Szikora I,
    4. et al

    . The Pipeline embolization device for the intracranial treatment of aneurysms trial. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32:34–40

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
11. 11.↵
    1. Szikora I,
    2. Berentei Z,
    3. Kulcsar Z,
    4. et al

    . Treatment of intracranial aneurysms by functional reconstruction of the parent artery: the Budapest experience with the Pipeline embolization device. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2010;31:1139–47

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
12. 12.↵
    1. Bouthillier A,
    2. van Loveren HR,
    3. Keller JT

    . Segments of the internal carotid artery: a new classification. Neurosurgery 1996;38:425–32, discussion 432–33

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
13. 13.↵
    1. Roy D,
    2. Milot G,
    3. Raymond J

    . Endovascular treatment of unruptured aneurysms. Stroke 2001;32:1998–2004

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
14. 14.↵
    1. Crobeddu E,
    2. Lanzino G,
    3. Kallmes,
    4. et al

    . Review of 2 decades of aneurysm recurrence literature, Part 1: Reducing recurrence after endovascular coiling. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012 Mar 29. [Epub ahead of print]
15. 15.↵
    1. Crobeddu E,
    2. Lanzino G,
    3. Kallmes DF,
    4. et al

    . Review of 2 decades of aneurysm recurrence literature, Part 2: Managing recurrence after endovascular coiling. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012 Mar 15. [Epub ahead of print]
16. 16.↵
    1. Wakhloo AK,
    2. Lylyk P,
    3. Hartman M,
    4. et al

    . A new generation of flow-disruption device for endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms: preliminary clinical and angiographic results of a multicenter study. Stroke 2011;42:e100–e101
17. 17.↵
    1. Wakhloo AK,
    2. Lanzino G,
    3. Lieber BB,
    4. et al

    . Stents for intracranial aneurysms: the beginning of a new endovascular era? Neurosurgery 1998;43:377–79

    PubMedWeb of Science
18. 18.↵
    1. Aenis M,
    2. Stancampiano AP,
    3. Wakhloo AK,
    4. et al

    . Modeling of flow in a straight stented and nonstented side wall aneurysm model. J Biomech Eng 1997;119:206–12

    PubMed
19. 19.↵
    1. Kim M,
    2. Taulbee DB,
    3. Tremmel M,
    4. et al

    . Comparison of two stents in modifying cerebral aneurysm hemodynamics. Ann Biomed Eng 2008;36:726–41

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
20. 20.↵
    1. Kim YH,
    2. Xu X,
    3. Lee JS

    . The effect of stent porosity and strut shape on saccular aneurysm and its numerical analysis with lattice Boltzmann method. Ann Biomed Eng 2010;38:2274–92

    CrossRefPubMed
21. 21.↵
    1. Sadasivan C,
    2. Cesar L,
    3. Seong J,
    4. et al

    . Treatment of rabbit elastase-induced aneurysm models by flow diverters: development of quantifiable indexes of device performance using digital subtraction angiography. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2009;28:1117–25

    CrossRefPubMed
22. 22.↵
    1. Kallmes DF,
    2. Ding YH,
    3. Dai D,
    4. et al

    . A new endoluminal, flow-disrupting device for treatment of saccular aneurysms. Stroke 2007;38:2346–52

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
23. 23.↵
    1. Kallmes DF,
    2. Ding YH,
    3. Dai D,
    4. et al

    . A second-generation, endoluminal, flow-disrupting device for treatment of saccular aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2009;30:1153–58

    Abstract/FREE Full Text