Immediate and Midterm Results following Treatment of Recently Ruptured Intracranial Aneurysms with the Pipeline Embolization Device

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Molyneux A,
   2. Kerr R,
   3. Stratton I,
   4. et al

   . International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomised trial. Lancet 2002; 360: 1267– 74

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
2. 2.↵
   1. Taschner CA,
   2. Thines L,
   3. El-Mahdy M,
   4. et al

   . GDC 360 degrees for the endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms: a matched-pair study analysing angiographic outcomes with GDC 3D coils in 38 patients. Neuroradiology 2009; 51: 45– 52

   CrossRefPubMed
3. 3.↵
   1. Moret J,
   2. Cognard C,
   3. Weill A,
   4. et al

   . Reconstruction technic in the treatment of wide-neck intracranial aneurysms: long-term angiographic and clinical results—apropos of 56 cases [in French]. J Neuroradiol 1997; 24: 30– 44

   PubMedWeb of Science
4. 4.↵
   1. Sluzewski M,
   2. van Rooij WJ,
   3. Beute GN,
   4. et al

   . Balloon-assisted coil embolization of intracranial aneurysms: incidence, complications, and angiography results. J Neurosurg 2006; 105: 396– 99

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
5. 5.↵
   1. White PM,
   2. Lewis SC,
   3. Nahser H,
   4. et al

   . HydroCoil Endovascular Aneurysm Occlusion and Packing Study (HELPS trial): procedural safety and operator-assessed efficacy results. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2008; 29: 217– 23

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
6. 6.↵
   1. Geyik S,
   2. Ertugrul O,
   3. Yavuz K,
   4. et al

   . Comparison of bioactive coils and bare platinum coils for treatment of intracranial aneurysms: a matched-pair analysis. J Neurosurg 2010; 112: 709– 13

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
7. 7.↵
   1. Katsaridis V,
   2. Papagiannaki C,
   3. Violaris C

   . Guglielmi detachable coils versus Matrix coils: a comparison of the immediate post-treatment results of the embolization of 364 cerebral aneurysms in 307 patients: a single-center, single-surgeon experience. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2006; 27: 1841– 48

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
8. 8.↵
   1. Yavuz K,
   2. Geyik S,
   3. Saatci I,
   4. et al

   . WingSpan stent system in the endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms: clinical experience with midterm follow-up results. J Neurosurg 2008; 109: 445– 53

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
9. 9.↵
   1. Weber W,
   2. Bendszus M,
   3. Kis B,
   4. et al

   . A new self-expanding nitinol stent (Enterprise) for the treatment of wide-necked intracranial aneurysms: initial clinical and angiographic results in 31 aneurysms. Neuroradiology 2007; 49: 555– 61

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
10. 10.↵
    1. Lylyk P,
    2. Cohen JE,
    3. Ceratto R,
    4. et al

    . Combined endovascular treatment of dissecting vertebral artery aneurysms by using stents and coils. J Neurosurg 2001; 94: 427– 32

    PubMedWeb of Science
11. 11.↵
    1. Fiorella D,
    2. Albuquerque FC,
    3. Deshmukh VR,
    4. et al

    . Usefulness of the Neuroform stent for the treatment of cerebral aneurysms: results at initial (3–6-mo) follow-up. Neurosurgery 2005; 56: 1191– 201, discussion 1201–02

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
12. 12.↵
    1. Fiorella D,
    2. Kelly ME,
    3. Albuquerque FC,
    4. et al

    . Curative reconstruction of a giant midbasilar trunk aneurysm with the Pipeline embolization device. Neurosurgery 2009; 64: 212– 17, discussion 217

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
13. 13.↵
    1. Fiorella D,
    2. Albuquerque F,
    3. Gonzalez F,
    4. et al

    . Reconstruction of the right anterior circulation with the Pipeline embolization device to achieve treatment of a progressively symptomatic, large carotid aneurysm. J NeuroInterv Surg 2010; 2: 31– 37

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
14. 14.↵
    1. Kamran M,
    2. Yarnold J,
    3. Grunwald IQ,
    4. et al

    . Assessment of angiographic outcomes after flow diversion treatment of intracranial aneurysms: a new grading schema. Neuroradiology 2011; 53: 501– 08

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
15. 15.↵
    1. Kulcsar Z,
    2. Ernemann U,
    3. Wetzel SG,
    4. et al

    . High-profile flow diverter (Silk) implantation in the basilar artery: efficacy in the treatment of aneurysms and the role of the perforators. Stroke 2010; 41: 1690– 96

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
16. 16.↵
    1. Lubicz B,
    2. Collignon L,
    3. Raphaeli G,
    4. et al

    . Flow-diverter stent for the endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms: a prospective study in 29 patients with 34 aneurysms. Stroke 2010; 41: 2247– 53

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
17. 17.↵
    1. Lylyk P,
    2. Miranda C,
    3. Ceratto R,
    4. et al

    . Curative endovascular reconstruction of cerebral aneurysms with the Pipeline embolization device: the Buenos Aires experience. Neurosurgery 2009; 64: 632– 42, discussion 642–43, quiz N636

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
18. 18.↵
    1. Szikora I,
    2. Berentei Z,
    3. Kulcsar Z,
    4. et al

    . Treatment of intracranial aneurysms by functional reconstruction of the parent artery: the Budapest experience with the Pipeline embolization device. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2010; 31: 1139– 47

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
19. 19.↵
    1. Nelson PK,
    2. Lylyk P,
    3. Szikora I,
    4. et al

    . The Pipeline embolization device for the intracranial treatment of aneurysms trial. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011; 32: 34– 40

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
20. 20.↵
    1. Meckel S,
    2. Singh TP,
    3. Undren P,
    4. et al

    . Endovascular treatment using predominantly stent-assisted coil embolization and antiplatelet and anticoagulation management of ruptured blood blister-like aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011; 32: 764– 71

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
21. 21.↵
    1. Tahtinen OI,
    2. Vanninen RL,
    3. Manninen HI,
    4. et al

    . Wide-necked intracranial aneurysms: treatment with stent-assisted coil embolization during acute (<72 hours) subarachnoid hemorrhage—experience in 61 consecutive patients. Radiology 2009; 253: 199– 208

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
22. 22.↵
    1. Katsaridis V,
    2. Papagiannaki C,
    3. Violaris C

    . Embolization of acutely ruptured and unruptured wide-necked cerebral aneurysms using the Neuroform 2 stent without pretreatment with antiplatelets: a single center experience. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2006; 27: 1123– 28

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
23. 23.↵
    1. Kim BM,
    2. Chung EC,
    3. Park SI,
    4. et al

    . Treatment of blood blister-like aneurysm of the internal carotid artery with stent-assisted coil embolization followed by stent-within-a-stent technique: case report. J Neurosurg 2007; 107: 1211– 13

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
24. 24.↵
    1. Park JH,
    2. Park IS,
    3. Han DH,
    4. et al

    . Endovascular treatment of blood blister-like aneurysms of the internal carotid artery. J Neurosurg 2007; 106: 812– 19

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
25. 25.↵
    1. Lee BH,
    2. Kim BM,
    3. Park MS,
    4. et al

    . Reconstructive endovascular treatment of ruptured blood blister-like aneurysms of the internal carotid artery. J Neurosurg 2009; 110: 431– 36

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
26. 26.↵
    1. Meling TR,
    2. Sorteberg A,
    3. Bakke SJ,
    4. et al

    . Blood blister-like aneurysms of the internal carotid artery trunk causing subarachnoid hemorrhage: treatment and outcome. J Neurosurg 2008; 108: 662– 71

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
27. 27.↵
    1. Fiorella D,
    2. Woo HH,
    3. Albuquerque FC,
    4. et al

    . Definitive reconstruction of circumferential, fusiform intracranial aneurysms with the Pipeline embolization device. Neurosurgery 2008; 62: 1115– 20, discussion 1120–21

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
28. 28.↵
    1. Wanke I,
    2. Forsting M

    . Stents for intracranial wide-necked aneurysms: more than mechanical protection. Neuroradiology 2008; 50: 991– 98

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
29. 29.↵
    1. Augsburger L,
    2. Farhat M,
    3. Reymond P,
    4. et al

    . Effect of flow diverter porosity on intraaneurysmal blood flow. Klin Neuroradiol 2009; 19: 204– 14

    CrossRefPubMed
30. 30.↵
    1. Kallmes DF,
    2. Ding YH,
    3. Dai D,
    4. et al

    . A new endoluminal, flow-disrupting device for treatment of saccular aneurysms. Stroke 2007; 38: 2346– 52

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
31. 31.↵
    1. Kallmes DF,
    2. Ding YH,
    3. Dai D,
    4. et al

    . A second-generation, endoluminal, flow-disrupting device for treatment of saccular aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2009; 30: 1153– 58

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
32. 32.↵
    1. Byrne JV,
    2. Beltechi R,
    3. Yarnold JA,
    4. et al

    . Early experience in the treatment of intra-cranial aneurysms by endovascular flow diversion: a multicentre prospective study. PLoS One 2010; 5: pii:e12492
33. 33.↵
    1. Kulcsar Z,
    2. Wetzel SG,
    3. Augsburger L,
    4. et al

    . Effect of flow diversion treatment on very small ruptured aneurysms. Neurosurgery 2010; 67: 789– 93

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
34. 34.↵
    1. Kulcsar Z,
    2. Houdart E,
    3. Bonafe A,
    4. et al

    . Intra-aneurysmal thrombosis as a possible cause of delayed aneurysm rupture after flow-diversion treatment. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011; 32: 20– 25

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
35. 35.↵
    1. Cebral JR,
    2. Mut F,
    3. Raschi M,
    4. et al

    . Aneurysm rupture following treatment with flow-diverting stents: computational hemodynamics analysis of treatment. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011; 32: 27– 33

    Abstract/FREE Full Text