Quantitative Assessment of External Carotid Artery Territory Supply with Modified Vessel-Encoded Arterial Spin-Labeling

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Caplan LR,
   2. Hennerici M

   . Impaired clearance of emboli (washout) is an important link between hypoperfusion, embolism, and ischemic stroke. Arch Neurol 1998;55:1475–82

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
2. 2.↵
   1. Hofmeijer J,
   2. Klijn CJ,
   3. Kappelle LJ,
   4. et al

   . Collateral circulation via the ophthalmic artery or leptomeningeal vessels is associated with impaired cerebral vasoreactivity in patients with symptomatic carotid artery occlusion. Cerebrovasc Dis 2002;14:22–26

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
3. 3.↵
   1. Liebeskind DS

   . Collateral circulation. Stroke 2003;34:2279–84

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
4. 4.↵
   1. Powers WJ

   . Cerebral hemodynamics in ischemic cerebrovascular disease. Ann Neurol 1991;29:231–40

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
5. 5.↵
   1. Schomer DF,
   2. Marks MP,
   3. Steinberg GK,
   4. et al

   . The anatomy of the posterior communicating artery as a risk factor for ischemic cerebral infarction. N Engl J Med 1994;330:1565–70

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
6. 6.↵
   1. Yamauchi H,
   2. Kudoh T,
   3. Sugimoto K,
   4. et al

   . Pattern of collaterals, type of infarcts, and haemodynamic impairment in carotid artery occlusion. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2004;7:1697–701
7. 7.↵
   1. Rutgers DR,
   2. Klijn CJ,
   3. Kappelle LJ,
   4. et al

   . A longitudinal study of collateral flow patterns in the circle of Willis and the ophthalmic artery in patients with a symptomatic internal carotid artery occlusion. Stroke 2000;31:1913–20

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
8. 8.↵
   1. Vernieri F,
   2. Pasqualetti P,
   3. Matteis M,
   4. et al

   . Effect of collateral blood flow and cerebral vasomotor reactivity on the outcome of carotid artery occlusion. Stroke 2001;32:1552–58

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
9. 9.↵
   1. Bendszus M,
   2. Koltzenburg M,
   3. Burger R,
   4. et al

   . Silent embolism in diagnostic cerebral angiography and neurointerventional procedures: a prospective study. Lancet 1999;354:1594–97

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
10. 10.↵
    1. Henderson RD,
    2. Eliasziw M,
    3. Fox AJ,
    4. et al

    . Angiographically defined collateral circulation and risk of stroke in patients with severe carotid artery stenosis. Stroke 2000;31:128–32

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
11. 11.↵
    1. Kincaid MS

    . Transcranial Doppler ultrasonography: a diagnostic tool of increasing utility. Curr Opin Anesthesiol 2008;21:552–59

    CrossRef
12. 12.↵
    1. Markus HS

    . Transcranial Doppler ultrasound. Br Med Bull 2000: 56:378–88

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
13. 13.↵
    1. Hendrikse J,
    2. Petersen ET,
    3. van Laar PJ,
    4. et al

    . Cerebral border zones between distal end branches of intracranial arteries: MR imaging. Radiology 2008;246:572–80

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
14. 14.↵
    1. Lim CC,
    2. Petersen ET,
    3. Ng I,
    4. et al

    . MR regional perfusion imaging: visualizing functional collateral circulation. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2007;28:447–48

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
15. 15.↵
    1. van Laar PJ,
    2. Hendrikse J,
    3. Golay X,
    4. et al

    . In vivo flow territory mapping of major brain feeding arteries. Neuroimage 2006;29:136–44

    CrossRefPubMed
16. 16.↵
    1. van Laar PJ,
    2. Hendrikse J,
    3. Klijn CJ,
    4. et al

    . Symptomatic carotid artery occlusion: flow territories of major brain-feeding arteries. Radiology 2007;242:526–34

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
17. 17.↵
    1. van Osch MJ,
    2. Hendrikse J,
    3. Golay X,
    4. et al

    . Non-invasive visualization of collateral blood flow patterns of the circle of Willis by dynamic MR angiography. Med Image Anal 2006;10:59–70

    CrossRefPubMed
18. 18.↵
    1. Wintermark M,
    2. Sesay M,
    3. Barbier E,
    4. et al

    . Comparative overview of brain perfusion imaging techniques. Stroke 2005;36:e83–99

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
19. 19.↵
    1. Kansagra AP,
    2. Wong EC

    . Quantitative assessment of mixed cerebral vascular territory supply with vessel encoded arterial spin labeling MRI. Stroke 2008;39:2980–85

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
20. 20.↵
    1. Wong EC

    . Vessel-encoded arterial spin-labeling using pseudocontinuous tagging. Magn Reson Med 2007;58:1086–91

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
21. 21.↵
    1. Wu B,
    2. Wang X,
    3. Guo J,
    4. et al

    . Collateral circulation imaging: MR perfusion territory arterial spin-labeling at 3T. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2008;29:1855–60

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
22. 22.↵
    1. Garcia D,
    2. de Bazelaire C,
    3. Alsop D

    . Pseudo-continuous flow driven adiabatic inversion for arterial spin labeling. In: Proceedings of the 13th Annual Meeting of International Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Miami Beach, Florida. May 7–13, 2005
23. 23.↵
    1. Golub G,
    2. Kahan W

    . Calculating the singular values and pseudo-inverse of a matrix. Journal of the Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics 1965;2:205–24
24. 24.↵
    1. Wong EC,
    2. Kansagra AP

    . Improved separation of vascular territories in vessel encoded pseudo-continuous arterial spin labeling. In: Proceedings of Joint Annual Meeting of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine and the European Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine and Biology, Berlin, Germany. May 19–25, 2007
25. 25.↵
    1. Wong EC

    . Quantifying CBF with pulsed ASL: technical and pulse sequence factors. J Magn Reson Imaging 2005;22:727–31

    CrossRefPubMed
26. 26.↵
    1. Lu H,
    2. Clingman C,
    3. Golay X,
    4. et al

    . Determining the longitudinal relaxation time (T1) of blood at 3.0 Tesla. Magn Reson Med 2004;52:679–82

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
27. 27.↵
    1. Hendrikse J,
    2. van der Grond J,
    3. Lu H,
    4. et al

    . Flow territory mapping of the cerebral arteries with regional perfusion MRI. Stroke 2004;35:882–87

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
28. 28.↵
    1. Gauvrit JY,
    2. Delmaire C,
    3. Henon H,
    4. et al

    . Diffusion/perfusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging after carotid angioplasty and stenting. J Neurol 2004;251:1060–67

    PubMedWeb of Science
29. 29.↵
    1. Adel JG,
    2. Sherma AK,
    3. Carroll TJ,
    4. et al

    . The use of quantitative magnetic resonance perfusion for assessment of CBF in the perioperative management of carotid stenosis: case illustration. The Open Neurosurgery Journal 2008;1:1–5

    CrossRef
30. 30.↵
    1. Wilkinson ID,
    2. Griffiths PD,
    3. Hoggard N,
    4. et al

    . Short-term changes in cerebral microhemodynamics after carotid stenting. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2003;24:1501–07

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
31. 31.↵
    1. Bozzao A,
    2. Fasoli F,
    3. Finocchi V,
    4. et al

    . Long-term evaluation of brain perfusion with magnetic resonance in high flow extracranial-intracranial saphenous graft bypass. Eur Radiol 2007;17:33–38

    PubMed
32. 32.↵
    1. Garrett MC,
    2. Komotar RJ,
    3. Merkow MB,
    4. et al

    . The Extracranial-Intracranial Bypass Trial: implications for future investigations. Neurosurg Focus 2008;24:E4

    PubMed
33. 33.↵
    1. Horn P,
    2. Vajkoczy P,
    3. Schmiedek P,
    4. et al

    . Evaluation of extracranial-intracranial arterial bypass function with magnetic resonance angiography. Neuroradiology 2004;46:723–29

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
34. 34.↵
    1. Paley R

    . On orthogonal matrices. J Math Phys 1933;12:311–20