Comparison of Carotid Plaque Ulcer Detection Using Contrast-Enhanced and Time-of-Flight MRA Techniques

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Hennerici MG

   . The unstable plaque. Cerebrovasc Dis 2004;17:17–22

   CrossRefPubMed
2. 2.↵
   1. Rothwell PM,
   2. Gibson R,
   3. Warlow CP

   . Interrelation between plaque surface morphology and degree of stenosis on carotid angiograms and the risk of ischemic stroke in patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis. On behalf of the European Carotid Surgery Trialists' Collaborative Group. Stroke 2000;31:615–21

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
3. 3.↵
   1. Eliasziw M,
   2. Streifler JY,
   3. Fox AJ,
   4. et al

   . Significance of plaque ulceration in symptomatic patients with high-grade carotid stenosis. North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial. Stroke 1994;25:304–08

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
4. 4.↵
   1. Imbesi SG,
   2. Kerber CW

   . Why do ulcerated atherosclerotic carotid artery plaques embolize? A flow dynamics study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1998;19:761–66

   Abstract
5. 5.↵
   1. Streifler JY,
   2. Eliasziw M,
   3. Fox AJ,
   4. et al

   . Angiographic detection of carotid plaque ulceration. Comparison with surgical observations in a multicenter study. North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial. Stroke 1994;25:1130–32

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
6. 6.↵
   1. Edwards JH,
   2. Kricheff II,
   3. Riles T,
   4. et al

   . Angiographically undetected ulceration of the carotid bifurcation as a cause of embolic stroke. Radiology 1979;132:369–73

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
7. 7.↵
   1. Eikelboom BC,
   2. Riles TR,
   3. Mintzer R,
   4. et al

   . Inaccuracy of angiography in the diagnosis of carotid ulceration. Stroke 1983;14:882–85

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
8. 8.↵
   1. Randoux B,
   2. Marro B,
   3. Koskas F,
   4. et al

   . Carotid artery stenosis: prospective comparison of CT, three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR, and conventional angiography. Radiology 2001;220:179–85

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
9. 9.↵
   1. Nederkoorn PJ,
   2. van der Graaf Y,
   3. Hunink MG

   . Duplex ultrasound and magnetic resonance angiography compared with digital subtraction angiography in carotid artery stenosis: a systematic review. Stroke 2003;34:1324–32

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
10. 10.↵
    1. Nederkoorn PJ,
    2. Mali WP,
    3. Eikelboom BC,
    4. et al

    . Preoperative diagnosis of carotid artery stenosis: accuracy of noninvasive testing. Stroke 2002;33:2003–08

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
11. 11.↵
    1. U-King-Im JM,
    2. Trivedi R,
    3. Cross J,
    4. et al

    . Conventional digital subtraction x-ray angiography versus magnetic resonance angiography in the evaluation of carotid disease: patient satisfaction and preferences. Clin Radiol 2004;59:358–63

    CrossRefPubMed
12. 12.↵
    1. Leclerc X,
    2. Godefroy O,
    3. Pruvo J,
    4. et al

    . Computed tomographic angiography for the evaluation of carotid artery stenosis. Stroke 1995;26:1577–81

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
13. 13.↵
    1. Chappell FM,
    2. Wardlaw JM,
    3. Young GR,
    4. et al

    . Carotid artery stenosis: accuracy of noninvasive tests individual patient data meta-analysis. Radiology 2009;251:493–502

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
14. 14.↵
    1. Wardlaw JM,
    2. Chappell FM,
    3. Best JJ,
    4. et al

    . Non-invasive imaging compared with intra-arterial angiography in the diagnosis of symptomatic carotid stenosis: a meta-analysis. Lancet 2006;367:1503–12

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
15. 15.↵
    1. Fellner C,
    2. Lang W,
    3. Janka R,
    4. et al

    . Magnetic resonance angiography of the carotid arteries using three different techniques: accuracy compared with intraarterial x-ray angiography and endarterectomy specimens. J Magn Reson Imaging 2005;21:424–31

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
16. 16.↵
    1. Muhs BE,
    2. Gagne P,
    3. Wagener J,
    4. et al

    . Gadolinium-enhanced versus time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography: what is the benefit of contrast enhancement in evaluating carotid stenosis? Ann Vasc Surg 2005;19:823–28

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
17. 17.↵
    1. Slosman F,
    2. Stolpen AH,
    3. Lexa FJ,
    4. et al

    . Extracranial atherosclerotic carotid artery disease: evaluation of non-breath-hold three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1998;170:489–95

    PubMed
18. 18.↵
    1. Wutke R,
    2. Lang W,
    3. Fellner C,
    4. et al

    . High-resolution, contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography with elliptical centric k-space ordering of supra-aortic arteries compared with selective x-ray angiography. Stroke 2002;33:1522–29

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
19. 19.↵
    1. Nederkoorn PJ,
    2. van der Graaf Y,
    3. Eikelboom BC,
    4. et al

    . Time-of-flight MR angiography of carotid artery stenosis: does a flow void represent severe stenosis? AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2002;23:1779–84

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
20. 20.↵
    1. Ahn KJ,
    2. You WJ,
    3. Lee JH,
    4. et al

    . Re-circulation artefact at the carotid bulb can be differentiated from true stenosis. Br J Radiol 2004;77:551–56

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
21. 21.↵
    1. Wasserman BA,
    2. Astor BC,
    3. Sharrett AR,
    4. et al

    . MRI measurements of carotid plaque in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study: methods, reliability and descriptive statistics. J Magn Reson Imaging 2010;31:406–15

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
22. 22.↵
    1. Troyer A,
    2. Saloner D,
    3. Pan XM,
    4. et al

    . Major carotid plaque surface irregularities correlate with neurologic symptoms. J Vasc Surg 2002;35:741–47

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
23. 23.↵
    1. Polak JF,
    2. O'Leary DH,
    3. Kronmal RA,
    4. et al

    . Sonographic evaluation of carotid artery atherosclerosis in the elderly: relationship of disease severity to stroke and transient ischemic attack. Radiology 1993;188:363–70

    PubMedWeb of Science
24. 24.↵
    1. Anderson GB,
    2. Ashforth R,
    3. Steinke DE,
    4. et al

    . CT angiography for the detection and characterization of carotid artery bifurcation disease. Stroke 2000;31:2168–74

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
25. 25.↵
    1. Yu W,
    2. Underhill HR,
    3. Ferguson MS,
    4. et al

    . The added value of longitudinal black-blood cardiovascular magnetic resonance angiography in the cross sectional identification of carotid atherosclerotic ulceration. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2009;18:31
26. 26.↵
    1. Edwards JH,
    2. Kricheff II,
    3. Gorstein F,
    4. et al

    . Atherosclerotic subintimal hematoma of the carotid artery. Radiology 1979;133:123–29

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
27. 27.↵
    Beneficial effect of carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients with high-grade carotid stenosis. North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Collaborators. N Engl J Med 1991;325:445–53

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
28. 28.↵
    1. Fleiss J

    . Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions. 2nd ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1981; p. 218
29. 29.↵
    1. Steinman DA,
    2. Poepping TL,
    3. Tambasco M,
    4. et al

    . Flow patterns at the stenosed carotid bifurcation: effect of concentric versus eccentric stenosis. Ann Biomed Eng 2000;28:415–23

    CrossRefPubMed
30. 30.↵
    1. Wong EY,
    2. Nikolov HN,
    3. Thorne ML,
    4. et al

    . Clinical Doppler ultrasound for the assessment of plaque ulceration in the stenosed carotid bifurcation by detection of distal turbulence intensity: a matched model study. Eur Radiol 2009;19:2739–49

    CrossRefPubMed
31. 31.↵
    1. Tambasco M,
    2. Steinman DA

    . Path-dependent hemodynamics of the stenosed carotid bifurcation. Ann Biomed Eng 2003;31:1054–65

    CrossRefPubMed
32. 32.↵
    1. Lovett JK,
    2. Gallagher PJ,
    3. Hands LJ,
    4. et al

    . Histological correlates of carotid plaque surface morphology on lumen contrast imaging. Circulation 2004;110:2190–97

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
33. 33.↵
    1. de Weert TT,
    2. Cretier S,
    3. Groen HC,
    4. et al

    . Atherosclerotic plaque surface morphology in the carotid bifurcation assessed with multidetector computed tomography angiography. Stroke 2009;40:1334–40

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
34. 34.↵
    1. Lovett JK,
    2. Rothwell PM

    . Site of carotid plaque ulceration in relation to direction of blood flow: an angiographic and pathological study. Cerebrovasc Dis 2003;16:369–75

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
35. 35.↵
    1. Saba L,
    2. Caddeo G,
    3. Sanfilippo R,
    4. et al

    . CT and ultrasound in the study of ulcerated carotid plaque compared with surgical results: potentialities and advantages of multidetector row CT angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2007;28:1061–66

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
36. 36.↵
    1. Shankar PN,
    2. Deshpande MD

    . Fluid mechanics in the driven cavity. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 2000;32:93–136

    CrossRefWeb of Science