Research ArticleNeurointervention
Interobserver Agreement after Pipeline Embolization Device Implantation
S.H. Suh, H.J. Cloft, G. Lanzino, K. Woodward and D.F. Kallmes
American Journal of Neuroradiology June 2013, 34 (6) 1215-1218; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A3371
S.H. Suh
aFrom the Department of Radiology, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea (S.H.S.)
H.J. Cloft
bDepartments of Radiology (H.J.C., D.F.K.)
G. Lanzino
cNeurosurgery (G.L.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
K. Woodward
dDepartment of Radiology (K.W.), Fort Sanders Regional Medical Center, Knoxville, Tennessee.
D.F. Kallmes
bDepartments of Radiology (H.J.C., D.F.K.)

Submit a Response to This Article
Jump to comment:
No eLetters have been published for this article.
In this issue
Advertisement
S.H. Suh, H.J. Cloft, G. Lanzino, K. Woodward, D.F. Kallmes
Interobserver Agreement after Pipeline Embolization Device Implantation
American Journal of Neuroradiology Jun 2013, 34 (6) 1215-1218; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A3371
Jump to section
Related Articles
- No related articles found.
Cited By...
- Imaging Follow-Up of Intracranial Aneurysms Treated by Endovascular Means: Why, When, and How?
- Evaluation of the Angiographic Grading Scale in Aneurysms Treated with the WEB Device in 80 Rabbits: Correlation with Histologic Evaluation
- Interobserver variability in the assessment of aneurysm occlusion with the WEB aneurysm embolization system
- Is Visual Evaluation of Aneurysm Coiling a Reliable Study End Point?: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
This article has not yet been cited by articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.
More in this TOC Section
Similar Articles
Advertisement