Interobserver Agreement after Pipeline Embolization Device Implantation

REFERENCES

1. 1.↵
   1. Byrne JV,
   2. Sohn MJ,
   3. Molyneux AJ,
   4. et al

   . Five-year experience in using coil embolization for ruptured intracranial aneurysms: outcomes and incidence of late rebleeding. J Neurosurg 1999;90:656–63

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
2. 2.↵
   1. Cognard C,
   2. Weill A,
   3. Spelle L,
   4. et al

   . Long-term angiographic follow-up of 169 intracranial berry aneurysms occluded with detachable coils. Radiology 1999;212:348–56

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
3. 3.↵
   1. Kuether TA,
   2. Nesbit GM,
   3. Barnwell SL

   . Clinical and angiographic outcomes, with treatment data, for patients with cerebral aneurysms treated with Guglielmi detachable coils: a single-center experience. Neurosurgery 1998;43:1016–25

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
4. 4.↵
   1. Meyers PM,
   2. Schumacher HC,
   3. Higashida RT,
   4. et al

   . Reporting standards for endovascular repair of saccular intracranial cerebral aneurysms. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2009;20:S435–50

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
5. 5.↵
   1. Murayama Y,
   2. Nien YL,
   3. Duckwiler G,
   4. et al

   . Guglielmi detachable coil embolization of cerebral aneurysms: 11 years' experience. J Neurosurg 2003;98:959–66

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
6. 6.↵
   1. Murayama Y,
   2. Viñuela F,
   3. Duckwiler GR,
   4. et al

   . Embolization of incidental cerebral aneurysms by using the Guglielmi detachable coil system. J Neurosurg 1999;90:207–14

   PubMedWeb of Science
7. 7.↵
   1. Raymond J,
   2. Roy D,
   3. Bojanowski M,
   4. et al

   . Endovascular treatment of acutely ruptured and unruptured aneurysms of the basilar bifurcation. J Neurosurg 1997;86:211–19

   PubMedWeb of Science
8. 8.↵
   1. Roy D,
   2. Raymond J,
   3. Bouthillier A,
   4. et al

   . Endovascular treatment of ophthalmic segment aneurysms with Guglielmi detachable coils. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1997;18:1207–15

   Abstract
9. 9.↵
   1. Thornton J,
   2. Debrun GM,
   3. Aletich VA,
   4. et al

   . Follow-up angiography of intracranial aneurysms treated with endovascular placement of Guglielmi detachable coils. Neurosurgery 2002;50:239–49; discussion 249–50

   PubMedWeb of Science
10. 10.↵
    1. Cloft HJ,
    2. Kaufmann T,
    3. Kallmes DF

    . Observer agreement in the assessment of endovascular aneurysm therapy and aneurysm recurrence. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2007;28:497–500

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
11. 11.↵
    1. Tollard E,
    2. Darsaut TE,
    3. Bing F,
    4. et al

    . Outcomes of endovascular treatments of aneurysms: observer variability and implications for interpreting case series and planning randomized trials. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33:626–31

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
12. 12.↵
    1. Daugherty WP,
    2. Rad AE,
    3. White JB,
    4. et al

    . Observer agreement regarding the necessity of retreatment of previously coiled recurrent cerebral aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32:566–69

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
13. 13.↵
    1. Berge J,
    2. Biondi A,
    3. Machi P,
    4. et al

    . Flow-diverter Silk stent for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms: 1-year follow-up in a multicenter study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33:1150–55

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
14. 14.↵
    1. Byrne JV,
    2. Beltechi R,
    3. Yarnold JA,
    4. et al

    . Early experience in the treatment of intra-cranial aneurysms by endovascular flow diversion: a multicentre prospective study. PloS One 2010;5
15. 15.↵
    1. Lubicz B,
    2. Collignon L,
    3. Raphaeli G,
    4. et al

    . Flow-diverter stent for the endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms: a prospective study in 29 patients with 34 aneurysms. Stroke 2010;41:2247–53

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
16. 16.↵
    1. Nelson PK,
    2. Lylyk P,
    3. Szikora I,
    4. et al

    . The Pipeline embolization device for the intracranial treatment of aneurysms trial. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32:34–40

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
17. 17.↵
    1. Brinjikji W,
    2. Cloft HJ,
    3. Fiorella D,
    4. et al

    . Estimating the proportion of intracranial aneurysms likely to be amenable to treatment with the Pipeline embolization device. J Neurointerv Surg 2013;5:45–98

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
18. 18.↵
    1. Crobeddu E,
    2. Lanzino G,
    3. Kallmes DF,
    4. et al

    . Marked decrease in coil and stent utilization following introduction of flow diversion technology. J Neurointerv Surg 2012 Apr 27 [Epub ahead of print]
19. 19.↵
    1. Rosner B

    , ed. Fundamentals of Biostatistics. Belmont, California: Duxbury Press; 2005
20. 20.↵
    1. Sampat MP,
    2. Whitman GJ,
    3. Stephens TW,
    4. et al

    . The reliability of measuring physical characteristics of spiculated masses on mammography. Br J Radiol 2006;79 Spec No 2:S134–40

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
21. 21.↵
    1. Feinstein AR,
    2. Cicchetti DV

    . High agreement but low kappa: I. The problems of two paradoxes. J Clin Epidemiol 1990;43:543–49

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
22. 22.↵
    1. Feinstein AR

    . Misguided efforts and future challenges for research on “diagnostic tests”. J Epidemiol Community Health 2002;56:330–32

    Abstract/FREE Full Text