Enhancing Brain Lesions after Endovascular Treatment of Aneurysms

REFERENCES

1. 1.↵
   2. Molyneux AJ,
   3. Kerr RS,
   4. Birks J, et al

   . Risk of recurrent subarachnoid haemorrhage, death, or dependence and standardised mortality ratios after clipping or coiling of an intracranial aneurysm in the International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT): long-term follow-up. Lancet Neurol 2009;8:427–33

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
2. 2.↵
   2. Spetzler RF,
   3. McDougall CG,
   4. Albuquerque FC, et al

   . The Barrow ruptured aneurysm trial: 3-year results. J Neurosurg 2013;119:146–57

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
3. 3.↵
   2. Pierot L,
   3. Wakhloo AK

   . Endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms: current status. Stroke 2013;44:2046–54

   FREE Full Text
4. 4.↵
   2. Pierot L,
   3. Cognard C,
   4. Spelle L, et al

   . Safety and efficacy of balloon remodeling technique during endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms: critical review of the literature. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33:12–15

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
5. 5.↵
   2. Fanning NF,
   3. Willinsky RA,
   4. ter Brugge KG

   . Wall enhancement, edema, and hydrocephalus after endovascular coil occlusion of intradural cerebral aneurysms. J Neurosurg 2008;108:1074–86

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
6. 6.↵
   2. Horie N,
   3. Kitagawa N,
   4. Morikawa M, et al

   . Progressive perianeurysmal edema induced after endovascular coil embolization. Report of three cases and review of the literature. J Neurosurg 2007;106:916–20

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
7. 7.↵
   2. Marchan EM,
   3. Sekula RF Jr.,
   4. Ku A, et al

   . Hydrogel coil-related delayed hydrocephalus in patients with unruptured aneurysms. J Neurosurg 2008;109:186–90

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
8. 8.↵
   2. Fealey ME,
   3. Edwards WD,
   4. Giannini C, et al

   . Complications of endovascular polymers associated with vascular introducer sheaths and metallic coils in 3 patients, with literature review. Am J Surg Pathol 2008;32:1310–16

   CrossRefPubMed
9. 9.↵
   2. Mehta RI,
   3. Mehta RI,
   4. Fishbein MC, et al

   . Intravascular polymer material after coil embolization of a giant cerebral aneurysm. Hum Pathol 2009;40:1803–07

   CrossRefPubMed
10. 10.↵
    2. Mehta RI,
    3. Mehta RI,
    4. Solis OE, et al

    . Hydrophilic polymer emboli: an under-recognized iatrogenic cause of ischemia and infarct. Mod Pathol 2010;23:921–30

    CrossRefPubMed
11. 11.↵
    2. Shannon P,
    3. Billbao JM,
    4. Marotta T, et al

    . Inadvertent foreign body embolization in diagnostic and therapeutic cerebral angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2006;27:278–82

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
12. 12.↵
    2. Bendszus M,
    3. Koltzenburg M,
    4. Burger R, et al

    . Silent embolism in diagnostic cerebral angiography and neurointerventional procedures: a prospective study. Lancet 1999;354:1594–97

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
13. 13.↵
    2. Hill MD,
    3. Martin RH,
    4. Mikulis D, et al

    . Safety and efficacy of NA-1 in patients with iatrogenic stroke after endovascular aneurysm repair (ENACT): a phase 2, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet Neurol 2012;11:942–50

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
14. 14.↵
    2. Silberman J,
    3. Cravioto H,
    4. Feigin I

    . Foreign body emboli following cerebral angiography. Trans Am Neurol Assoc 1960;85:123–25

    PubMed
15. 15.↵
    2. Barnwell SL,
    3. D'Agostino AN,
    4. Shapiro SL, et al

    . Foreign bodies in small arteries after use of an infusion microcatheter. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1997;18:1886–89

    Abstract
16. 16.↵
    2. Hu YC,
    3. Deshmukh VR,
    4. Albuquerque FC, et al

    . Histopathological assessment of fatal ipsilateral intraparenchymal hemorrhages after the treatment of supraclinoid aneurysms with the Pipeline embolization device. J Neurosurg 2014;120:365–74

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
17. 17.↵
    2. Coley S,
    3. Sneade M,
    4. Clarke A, et al

    . Cerecyte coil trial: procedural safety and clinical outcomes in patients with ruptured and unruptured intracranial aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33:474–80

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
18. 18.↵
    2. White PM,
    3. Lewis SC,
    4. Gholkar A, et al

    . Hydrogel-coated coils versus bare platinum coils for the endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms (HELPS): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2011;377:1655–62

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
19. 19.↵
    2. AL-Okaili R,
    3. Patel SJ

    . Brain abscess after endovascular coiling of a saccular aneurysm: case report. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2002;23:697–99

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
20. 20.↵
    2. Jenkinson MD,
    3. Javadpour M,
    4. Nixon T, et al

    . Intracerebral abscess formation following embolisation of an internal carotid artery aneurysm using Guglielmi detachable coils. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2003;145:703–05; discussion 705–06

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
21. 21.↵
    2. Kirollos RW,
    3. Bosma JJ,
    4. Radhakrishnan J, et al

    . Endovascularly treated cerebral aneurysm using Guglielmi detachable coils acting as a nidus for brain abscess formation secondary to salmonella bacteremia: case report. Neurosurgery 2002;51:234–37; discussion 237–38

    CrossRefPubMed
22. 22.↵
    2. Jang SW,
    3. Kim SJ,
    4. Kim SM, et al

    . MR spectroscopy and perfusion MR imaging findings of intracranial foreign body granuloma: a case report. Korean J Radiol 2010;11:359–63

    CrossRefPubMed
23. 23.↵
    2. Kothbauer KF,
    3. Jallo GI,
    4. Siffert J, et al

    . Foreign body reaction to hemostatic materials mimicking recurrent brain tumor. Report of three cases. J Neurosurg 2001;95:503–06

    CrossRefPubMed
24. 24.↵
    2. Yoon MA,
    3. Kim E,
    4. Kwon BJ, et al

    . Muslinoma and muslin-induced foreign body inflammatory reactions after surgical clipping and wrapping for intracranial aneurysms: imaging findings and clinical features. J Neurosurg 2010;112:640–47

    CrossRefPubMed
25. 25.↵
    2. Cogliano MA,
    3. Tolerico PH

    . Nonhealing wound resulting from a foreign body to a radial arterial sheath and sterile inflammation associated with transradial catheterization and hydrophilic sheaths. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2004;63:104–05

    PubMedWeb of Science
26. 26.↵
    2. Ziakas A,
    3. Karkavelas G,
    4. Mochlas S

    . Sterile inflammation after transradial catheterization using a hydrophilic sheath: a case report. Int J Cardiol 2005;99:495–96

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
27. 27.↵
    2. Kozak M,
    3. Adams DR,
    4. Ioffreda MD, et al

    . Sterile inflammation associated with transradial catheterization and hydrophilic sheaths. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2003;59:207–13

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science