Mind the Gap: Impact of Computational Fluid Dynamics Solution Strategy on Prediction of Intracranial Aneurysm Hemodynamics and Rupture Status Indicators

REFERENCES

1. 1.↵
   1. Krings T,
   2. Mandell DM,
   3. Kiehl TR,
   4. et al

   . Intracranial aneurysms: from vessel wall pathology to therapeutic approach. Nat Rev Neurol 2011;7:547–59

   CrossRefPubMed
2. 2.↵
   1. Xiang J,
   2. Natarajan SK,
   3. Tremmel M,
   4. et al

   . Hemodynamic-morphologic discriminants for intracranial aneurysm rupture. Stroke 2011;42:144–52

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
3. 3.↵
   1. Cebral JR,
   2. Mut F,
   3. Weir J,
   4. et al

   . Quantitative characterization of the hemodynamic environment in ruptured and unruptured brain aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32:145–51

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
4. 4.↵
   1. Miura Y,
   2. Ishida F,
   3. Umeda Y,
   4. et al

   . Low wall shear stress is independently associated with the rupture status of middle cerebral artery aneurysms. Stroke 2013;44:519–21

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
5. 5.↵
   1. Kallmes DF

   . Point: CFD—computational fluid dynamics or confounding factor dissemination. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33:395–96

   FREE Full Text
6. 6.↵
   1. Cebral JR,
   2. Meng H

   . Counterpoint: realizing the clinical utility of computational fluid dynamics—closing the gap. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33:396–98

   FREE Full Text
7. 7.↵
   1. Robertson AM,
   2. Watton PN

   . Computational fluid dynamics in aneurysm research: critical reflections, future directions. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33:992–95

   FREE Full Text
8. 8.↵
   1. Hodis S,
   2. Uthamaraj S,
   3. Smith AL,
   4. et al

   . Grid convergence errors in hemodynamic solution of patient-specific cerebral aneurysms. J Biomech 2012;45:2907–13

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
9. 9.↵
   Anysys Fluent 14.0: User's Guide. Canonsburg, Pennsylvania: Ansys Inc; 2011:p. 1317
10. 10.↵
    CCM Tutorials, Star-CD 4.02. Melville, NY: CD-adapco; 2006:p. 10–18
11. 11.↵
    1. Cebral JR,
    2. Mut F,
    3. Raschi M,
    4. et al

    . Aneurysm rupture following treatment with flow-diverting stents: computational hemodynamics analysis of treatment. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32:27–33

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
12. 12.↵
    1. Steinman DA

    . Computational modeling and flow diverters: a teaching moment. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32:981–83

    FREE Full Text
13. 13.↵
    1. Fiorella D,
    2. Sadasivan C,
    3. Woo HH,
    4. et al

    . Regarding “Aneurysm rupture following treatment with flow-diverting stents: computational hemodynamics analysis of treatment.” AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32:E95–97, author reply E98–100

    FREE Full Text
14. 14.↵
    1. Cebral JR,
    2. Mut F,
    3. Weir J,
    4. et al

    . Association of hemodynamic characteristics and cerebral aneurysm rupture. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32:264–70

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
15. 15.↵
    1. Baek H,
    2. Jayaraman MV,
    3. Richardson PD,
    4. et al

    . Flow instability and wall shear stress variation in intracranial aneurysms. J R Soc Interface 2010;7:967–88

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
16. 16.↵
    1. Ford MD,
    2. Piomelli U

    . Exploring high frequency temporal fluctuations in the terminal aneurysms of the basilar bifurcation. J Biomech Eng 2012;134:091003
17. 17.↵
    1. Valen-Sendstad K,
    2. Mardal KA,
    3. Mortensen M,
    4. et al

    . Direct numerical simulation of transitional flow in a patient-specific intracranial aneurysm. J Biomech 2011;44:2826–32

    CrossRefPubMed
18. 18.↵
    1. Valen-Sendstad K,
    2. Mardal KA,
    3. Steinman DA

    . High-resolution CFD detects high-frequency velocity fluctuations in bifurcation, but not sidewall, aneurysms. J Biomech 2013;46:402–07

    CrossRefPubMed
19. 19.↵
    1. Ferguson GG

    . Turbulence in human intracranial saccular aneurysms. J Neurosurg 1970;33:485–97

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
20. 20.↵
    1. Steinman DA,
    2. Hoi Y,
    3. Fahy P,
    4. et al

    . Variability of computational fluid dynamics solutions for pressure and flow in a giant aneurysm: the ASME 2012 Summer Bioengineering Conference CFD Challenge. J Biomech Eng 2013;135:021016
21. 21.↵
    1. Logg A,
    2. Mardal KA,
    3. Wells G

    . Automated Solution of Differential Equations by the Finite Element Method: The FEniCS Book. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer-Verlag; 2012
22. 22.↵
    1. Mahesh K,
    2. Constantinescu G,
    3. Moin P

    . A numerical method for large-eddy simulation in complex geometries. J Comput Phys 2004;197:215–40

    CrossRefWeb of Science
23. 23.↵
    1. Hoi Y,
    2. Wasserman BA,
    3. Xie YJ,
    4. et al

    . Characterization of volumetric flow rate waveforms at the carotid bifurcations of older adults. Physiol Meas 2010;31:291–302

    CrossRefPubMed
24. 24.↵
    1. Krejza J,
    2. Mariak Z,
    3. Walecki J,
    4. et al

    . Transcranial color Doppler sonography of basal cerebral arteries in 182 healthy subjects: age and sex variability and normal reference values for blood flow parameters. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1999;172:213–18

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
25. 25.↵
    1. Alastruey J,
    2. Parker KH,
    3. Peiro J,
    4. et al

    . Modelling the circle of Willis to assess the effects of anatomical variations and occlusions on cerebral flows. J Biomech 2007;40:1794–805

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
26. 26.↵
    1. Piccinelli M,
    2. Steinman DA,
    3. Hoi Y,
    4. et al

    . Automatic neck plane detection and 3D geometric characterization of aneurysmal sacs. Ann Biomed Eng 2012;40:2188–211

    CrossRefPubMed
27. 27.↵
    1. Baharoglu MI,
    2. Lauric A,
    3. Gao BL,
    4. et al

    . Identification of a dichotomy in morphological predictors of rupture status between sidewall- and bifurcation-type intracranial aneurysms. J Neurosurg 2012;116:871–81

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
28. 28.↵
    1. Simkins TE,
    2. Stehbens WE

    . Vibrational behavior of arterial aneurysms. Lett Appl Engr Sci 1973;1:85–100
29. 29.↵
    1. Yagi T,
    2. Sato A,
    3. Shinke M,
    4. et al

    . Experimental insights into flow impingement in cerebral aneurysm by stereoscopic particle image velocimetry: transition from a laminar regime. J R Soc Interface 2013;10:20121031

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
30. 30.↵
    1. Prakash S,
    2. Ethier CR

    . Requirements for mesh resolution in 3D computational hemodynamics. J Biomech Eng 2001;123:134–44

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
31. 31.↵
    1. Venugopal P,
    2. Valentino D,
    3. Schmitt H,
    4. et al

    . Sensitivity of patient-specific numerical simulation of cerebal aneurysm hemodynamics to inflow boundary conditions. J Neurosurg 2007;106:1051–60

    CrossRefPubMed
32. 32.↵
    1. Xiang J,
    2. Tremmel M,
    3. Kolega J,
    4. et al

    . Newtonian viscosity model could overestimate wall shear stress in intracranial aneurysm domes and underestimate rupture risk. J Neurointerv Surg 2012;4:351–57

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
33. 33.↵
    1. Torii R,
    2. Oshima M,
    3. Kobayashi T,
    4. et al

    . Influencing factors in image-based fluid-structure interaction computation of cerebral aneurysms. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids 2011;65:324–40

    CrossRef
34. 34.↵
    1. Geers AJ,
    2. Larrabide I,
    3. Radaelli AG,
    4. et al

    . Patient-specific computational hemodynamics of intracranial aneurysms from 3D rotational angiography and CT angiography: an in vivo reproducibility study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32:581–86

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
35. 35.↵
    1. Schneiders JJ,
    2. Marquering HA,
    3. Antiga L,
    4. et al

    . Intracranial aneurysm neck size overestimation with 3D rotational angiography: the impact on intra-aneurysmal hemodynamics simulated with computational fluid dynamics. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2013;34:121–28

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
36. 36.↵
    1. Kulcsár Z,
    2. Ugron A,
    3. Marosfoi M,
    4. et al

    . Hemodynamics of cerebral aneurysm initiation: the role of wall shear stress and spatial wall shear stress gradient. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32:587–94

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
37. 37.↵
    1. Takao H,
    2. Murayama Y,
    3. Otsuka S,
    4. et al

    . Hemodynamic differences between unruptured and ruptured intracranial aneurysms during observation. Stroke 2012;43:1436–39

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
38. 38.↵
    1. Baharoglu MI,
    2. Schirmer CM,
    3. Hoit DA,
    4. et al

    . Aneurysm inflow-angle as a discriminant for rupture in sidewall cerebral aneurysms: morphometric and computational fluid dynamic analysis. Stroke 2010;41:1423–30

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
39. 39.↵
    1. Chien A,
    2. Sayre J,
    3. Vinuela F

    . Quantitative comparison of the dynamic flow waveform changes in 12 ruptured and 29 unruptured ICA-ophthalmic artery aneurysms. Neuroradiology 2013;55:313–20

    CrossRefPubMed
40. 40.↵
    1. Brinjikji W,
    2. Cloft H,
    3. Lanzino G,
    4. et al

    . Comparison of 2D digital subtraction angiography and 3D rotational angiography in the evaluation of dome-to-neck ratio. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2009;30:831–34

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
41. 41.↵
    1. Antiga L,
    2. Steinman DA

    . Rethinking turbulence in blood. Biorheology 2009;46:77–81

    PubMed