Macro- and Microstructural Changes in Patients with Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 6: Assessment of Phylogenetic Subdivisions of the Cerebellum and the Brain Stem

References

1. 1.↵
   2. Taroni F,
   3. DiDonato S

   . Pathways to motor incoordination: the inherited ataxias. Nat Rev Neurosci 2004;5:641–55

   PubMedWeb of Science
2. 2.↵
   2. Nagaoka U,
   3. Suzuki Y,
   4. Kawanami T, et al

   . Regional differences in genetic subgroup frequency in hereditary cerebellar ataxia, and a morphometrical study of brain MR images in SCA1, MJD and SCA6. J Neurol Sci 1999;164:187–94

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
3. 3.↵
   2. Eichler L,
   3. Bellenberg B,
   4. Hahn HK, et al

   . Quantitative assessment of brain stem and cerebellar atrophy in spinocerebellar ataxia types 3 and 6: impact on clinical status. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32:890–97

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
4. 4.↵
   2. Jacobi H,
   3. Hauser TK,
   4. Giunti P, et al

   . Spinocerebellar ataxia types 1, 2, 3 and 6: the clinical spectrum of ataxia and morphometric brainstem and cerebellar findings. Cerebellum 2012;11:155–66

   CrossRefPubMed
5. 5.↵
   2. Yagishita A

   . Imaging Diagnosis of Neurological Diseases [in Japanese]. Tokyo, Japan: Shujunsya; 2011:42
6. 6.↵
   2. Schulz JB,
   3. Borkert J,
   4. Wolf S, et al

   . Visualization, quantification and correlation of brain atrophy with clinical symptoms in spinocerebellar ataxia types 1, 3 and 6. Neuroimage 2010;49:158–68

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
7. 7.↵
   2. Jung BC,
   3. Choi SI,
   4. Du AX, et al

   . Principal component analysis of high resolution MRI defines disease-specific mode of cerebellar neurodegeneration in SCA types 2 and 6. Cerebellum 2012;11;887–95

   CrossRefPubMed
8. 8.↵
   2. Eccles JC

   . Circuits in the cerebellar control of movement. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1967;58:336–43

   FREE Full Text
9. 9.↵
   2. Grimaldi G,
   3. Manto M

   . Topography of cerebellar deficits in humans. Cerebellum 2012;11:336–51

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
10. 10.↵
    2. Fulton JF,
    3. Dow RS

    . The cerebellum: a summary of functional localization. Yale J Biol Med 1937;10:89–119

    PubMed
11. 11.↵
    2. Wang X,
    3. Wang H,
    4. Xia Y, et al

    . Spinocerebellar ataxia type 6: systematic patho-anatomical study reveals different phylogenetically defined regions of the cerebellum and neural pathways undergo different evolutions of the degenerative process. Neuropathology 2010;30:501–14
12. 12.↵
    2. Dietrichs E

    . Clinical manifestation of focal cerebellar disease as related to the organization of neural pathways. Acta Neurol Scand 2008;117:6–11

    CrossRefWeb of Science
13. 13.↵
    2. Mandelli ML,
    3. De Simone T,
    4. Minati L, et al

    . Diffusion tensor imaging of spinocerebellar ataxias types 1 and 2. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2007;28:1996–2000

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
14. 14.↵
    2. Prakash N,
    3. Hageman N,
    4. Hua X, et al

    . Patterns of fractional anisotropy changes in white matter of cerebellar peduncles distinguish spinocerebellar ataxia-1 from multiple system atrophy and other ataxia syndromes. Neuroimage 2009;47(suppl 2):T72–81

    PubMed
15. 15.↵
    2. Ying SH,
    3. Landman BA,
    4. Chowdhury S, et al

    . Orthogonal diffusion-weighted MRI measures distinguish region-specific degeneration in cerebellar ataxia subtypes. J Neurol 2009;256:1939–42

    CrossRefPubMed
16. 16.↵
    2. Du AX,
    3. Cuzzocreo JL,
    4. Landman BA, et al

    . Diffusion tensor imaging reveals disease-specific deep cerebellar nuclear changes in cerebellar degeneration. J Neurol 2010;257:1406–08

    CrossRefPubMed
17. 17.↵
    2. Trouillas P,
    3. Takayanagi T,
    4. Hallett M, et al

    . International Cooperative Ataxia Rating Scale for pharmacological assessment of the cerebellar syndrome: the Ataxia Neuropharmacology Committee of the World Federation of Neurology. J Neurol Sci 1997;145:205–11

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
18. 18.↵
    2. Jones DK,
    3. Horsfield MA,
    4. Simmons A

    . Optimal strategies for measuring diffusion in anisotropic systems by magnetic resonance imaging. Magn Reson Med 1999;42:515–25

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
19. 19.↵
    2. Mori S,
    3. Oishi K,
    4. Jiang H, et al

    . Stereotaxic white matter atlas based on diffusion tensor imaging in an ICBM template. Neuroimage 2008;40:570–82

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
20. 20.↵
    2. Oishi K

    . Atlas-based whole brain analysis using large deformation diffeomorphic metric mapping: application to normal elderly and Alzheimer's disease participants. Neuroimage 2009;46:486–99

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
21. 21.↵
    2. Woods RP,
    3. Grafton ST,
    4. Watson JD, et al

    . Automated image registration. II. Intersubject validation of linear and nonlinear models. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1998;22:153–65

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
22. 22.↵
    2. Beg MF,
    3. Miller MI,
    4. Trouve A, et al

    . Computing large deformation metric mappings via geodesic flows of diffeomorphisms. Int J Comput Vis 2005;61:139–57

    CrossRef
23. 23.↵
    2. Miller MI,
    3. Trouve A,
    4. Younes L

    . On the metrics and Euler-Lagrange equations of computational anatomy. Annu Rev Biomed Eng 2002;4:375–405

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
24. 24.↵
    2. Miller MI,
    3. Beg MF,
    4. Ceritoglu C, et al

    . Increasing the power of functional maps of the medial temporal lobe by using large deformation diffeomorphic metric mapping. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2005;102:9685–90

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
25. 25.↵
    2. Buckner RL,
    3. Krienen FM,
    4. Castellanos A, et al

    . The organization of the human cerebellum estimated by intrinsic functional connectivity. J Neurophysiol 2011;106:2322–45

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
26. 26.↵
    2. Faria AV,
    3. Zhang J,
    4. Oishi K, et al

    . Atlas-based analysis of neurodevelopment from infancy to adulthood using diffusion tensor imaging and applications for automated abnormality detection. Neuroimage 2010;52:415–28

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
27. 27.↵
    2. Seidel K,
    3. Siswanto S,
    4. Brunt ER, et al

    . Brain pathology of spinocerebellar ataxias. Acta Neuropathol 2012:124:1–21

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
28. 28.↵
    2. Basser PJ,
    3. Jones DK

    . Diffusion-tensor MRI: theory, experimental design and data analysis—a technical review. NMR Biomed 2002;15:456–67

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
29. 29.↵
    2. Le Bihan D,
    3. Turner R,
    4. Douek P, et al

    . Diffusion MR imaging: clinical applications. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1992;159:591–99

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
30. 30.↵
    2. Kang XJ,
    3. Herron TJ,
    4. Turken U, et al

    . Diffusion properties of cortical and pericortical tissue: regional variations, reliability and methodological issues. Magn Reson Imaging 2012;30:1111–22

    CrossRefPubMed
31. 31.↵
    2. Iwata NK,
    3. Ugawa Y

    . The effects of cerebellar stimulation on the motor cortical excitability in neurological disorders: a review. Cerebellum 2005;4:218–23

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
32. 32.↵
    2. Sasaki H,
    3. Kojima H,
    4. Yabe I, et al

    . Neuropathological and molecular studies of spinocerebellar ataxia type 6 (SCA6). Acta Neuropathol 1998;95:199–204

    CrossRefPubMed
33. 33.↵
    2. Yang Q,
    3. Hashizume Y,
    4. Yoshida M, et al

    . Morphological Purkinje cell changes in spinocerebellar ataxia type 6. Acta Neuropathol 2000;100:371–76

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
34. 34.↵
    2. Takahashi H,
    3. Ikeuchi T,
    4. Honma Y, et al

    . Autosomal dominant cerebellar ataxia (SCA6): clinical, genetic and neuropathological study in a family. Acta Neuropathol 1998;95:333–37

    CrossRefPubMed
35. 35.↵
    2. Le Bihan D,
    3. van Zijl P

    . From the diffusion coefficient to the diffusion tensor. NMR Biomed 2002;15:431–34

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
36. 36.↵
    2. Mori S,
    3. Zhang J

    . Principles of diffusion tensor imaging and its applications to basic neuroscience research. Neuron 2006;51:527–39

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
37. 37.↵
    2. Tievsky AL,
    3. Ptak T,
    4. Farkas J

    . Investigation of apparent diffusion coefficient and diffusion tensor anisotropy in acute and chronic multiple sclerosis lesions. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1999;20:1491–99

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
38. 38.↵
    2. Takagi T,
    3. Nakamura M,
    4. Yamada M, et al

    . Visualization of peripheral nerve degeneration and regeneration: monitoring with diffusion tensor tractography. Neuroimage 2009;44:884–92

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science