Bone-Subtracted Spinal CT Angiography Using Nonrigid Registration for Better Visualization of Arterial Feeders in Spinal Arteriovenous Fistulas

REFERENCES

1. 1.↵
   2. Krings T,
   3. Geibprasert S

   . Spinal dural arteriovenous fistulas. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2009;30:639–48 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A1485 pmid:19213818

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
2. 2.↵
   2. Ofran Y,
   3. Yovchev I,
   4. Hiller N, et al

   . Correlation between time to diagnosis and rehabilitation outcomes in patients with spinal dural arteriovenous fistula. J Spinal Cord Med 2013;36:200–06 doi:10.1179/2045772312Y.0000000029 pmid:23809589

   CrossRefPubMed
3. 3.↵
   2. Zampakis P,
   3. Santosh C,
   4. Taylor W, et al

   . The role of non-invasive computed tomography in patients with suspected dural fistulas with spinal drainage. Neurosurgery 2006;58:686–94; discussion 686–94 pmid:16575332

   CrossRefPubMed
4. 4.↵
   2. Lai PH,
   3. Weng MJ,
   4. Lee KW, et al

   . Multidetector CT angiography in diagnosing type I and type IVA spinal vascular malformations. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2006;27:813–17 pmid:16611770

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
5. 5.↵
   2. Yamaguchi S,
   3. Nagayama T,
   4. Eguchi K, et al

   . Accuracy and pitfalls of multidetector-row computed tomography in detecting spinal dural arteriovenous fistulas. J Neurosurg Spine 2010;12:243–48 doi:10.3171/2009.9.SPINE0971 pmid:20192621

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
6. 6.↵
   2. Oda S,
   3. Utsunomiya D,
   4. Hirai T, et al

   . Comparison of dynamic contrast-enhanced 3T MR and 64-row multidetector CT angiography for the localization of spinal dural arteriovenous fistulas. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2014;35:407–12 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3660 pmid:23907244

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
7. 7.↵
   2. Luetmer PH,
   3. Lane JI,
   4. Gilbertson JR, et al

   . Preangiographic evaluation of spinal dural arteriovenous fistulas with elliptic centric contrast-enhanced MR angiography and effect on radiation dose and volume of iodinated contrast material. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2005;26:711–18 pmid:15814910

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
8. 8.↵
   2. Takase K,
   3. Akasaka J,
   4. Sawamura Y, et al

   . Preoperative MDCT evaluation of the artery of Adamkiewicz and its origin. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2006;30:716–22 doi:10.1097/01.rct.0000228150.35410.45 pmid:16954917

   CrossRefPubMed
9. 9.↵
   2. Yoshioka K,
   3. Niinuma H,
   4. Ehara S, et al

   . MR angiography and CT angiography of the artery of Adamkiewicz: state of the art. Radiographics 2006;26(suppl 1):S63-73 doi:10.1148/rg.26si065506 pmid:17050520

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
10. 10.↵
    2. Jayakrishnan VK,
    3. White PM,
    4. Aitken D, et al

    . Subtraction helical CT angiography of intra- and extracranial vessels: technical considerations and preliminary experience. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2003;24:451–55 pmid:12637296

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
11. 11.↵
    2. Tomandl BF,
    3. Hammen T,
    4. Klotz E, et al

    . Bone-subtraction CT angiography for the evaluation of intracranial aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2006;27:55–59 pmid:16418356

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
12. 12.↵
    2. Lell MM,
    3. Ditt H,
    4. Panknin C, et al

    . Bone-subtraction CT angiography: evaluation of two different fully automated image-registration procedures for interscan motion compensation. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2007;28:1362–68 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A0558 pmid:17698541

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
13. 13.↵
    2. Fujiwara H,
    3. Momoshima S,
    4. Akiyama T, et al

    . Whole-brain CT digital subtraction angiography of cerebral dural arteriovenous fistula using 320-detector row CT. Neuroradiology 2013;55:837–43 doi:10.1007/s00234-013-1181-6 pmid:23588614

    CrossRefPubMed
14. 14.↵
    2. Crum WR,
    3. Hartkens T,
    4. Hill DL

    . Non-rigid image registration: theory and practice. Br J Radiol 2004;77(Spec No 2):S140-53 doi:10.1259/bjr/25329214 pmid:15677356

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
15. 15.↵
    2. Avants BB,
    3. Epstein CL,
    4. Grossman M, et al

    . Symmetric diffeomorphic image registration with cross-correlation: evaluating automated labeling of elderly and neurodegenerative brain. Med Image Anal 2008;12:26–41 doi:10.1016/j.media.2007.06.004 pmid:17659998

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
16. 16.↵
    2. Klein A,
    3. Andersson J,
    4. Ardekani BA, et al

    . Evaluation of 14 nonlinear deformation algorithms applied to human brain MRI registration. Neuroimage 2009;46:786–802 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.12.037 pmid:19195496

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
17. 17.↵
    2. Nishii T,
    3. Kono AK,
    4. Negi N, et al

    . The feasibility of a 64-slice MDCT for detection of the Adamkiewicz artery: comparison of the detection rate of intravenous injection CT angiography using a 64-slice MDCT versus intra-arterial and intravenous injection CT angiography using a 16-slice MDCT. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2013;29(suppl 2):127–33 doi:10.1007/s10554-013-0301-z pmid:24081485

    CrossRefPubMed
18. 18.↵
    2. Tanaka R,
    3. Yoshioka K,
    4. Muranaka K, et al

    . Improved evaluation of calcified segments on coronary CT angiography: a feasibility study of coronary calcium subtraction. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2013;29(suppl 2):75–81 doi:10.1007/s10554-013-0316-5 pmid:24158235

    CrossRefPubMed
19. 19.↵
    2. Venema HW,
    3. Hulsmans FJ,
    4. den Heeten GJ

    . CT angiography of the circle of Willis and intracranial internal carotid arteries: maximum intensity projection with matched mask bone elimination-feasibility study. Radiology 2001;218:893–98 doi:10.1148/radiology.218.3.r01mr30893 pmid:11230672

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
20. 20.↵
    2. Uotani K,
    3. Yamada N,
    4. Kono AK, et al

    . Preoperative visualization of the artery of Adamkiewicz by intra-arterial CT angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2008;29:314–18 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A0812 pmid:17974605

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
21. 21.↵
    2. Xia W,
    3. Gao X

    . A fast deformable registration method for 4D lung CT in hybrid framework. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 2014;9:523–33 doi:10.1007/s11548-013-0960-1 pmid:24263527

    CrossRefPubMed