T1ρ and T2 Mapping of the Intervertebral Disk: Comparison of Different Methods of Segmentation

REFERENCES

1. 1.↵
   2. Maus TP,
   3. Aprill CN

   . Lumbar diskogenic pain, provocation diskography, and imaging correlates. Radiol Clin North Am 2012;50:681–704

   CrossRefPubMed
2. 2.↵
   2. Wassenaar M,
   3. van Rijn RM,
   4. van Tulder MW, et al

   . Magnetic resonance imaging for diagnosing lumbar spinal pathology in adult patients with low back pain or sciatica: a diagnostic systematic review. Eur Spine J 2012;21:220–27

   CrossRefPubMed
3. 3.↵
   2. Lotz JC,
   3. Haughton V,
   4. Boden SD, et al

   . New treatments and imaging strategies in degenerative disease of the intervertebral disks. Radiology 2012;264:6–19

   CrossRefPubMed
4. 4.↵
   2. Majumdar S

   . Magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopy of the intervertebral disc. NMR Biomed 2006;19:894–903

   CrossRefPubMed
5. 5.↵
   2. Pham DL,
   3. Xu C,
   4. Prince JL

   . Current methods in medical image segmentation. Annu Rev Biomed Eng 2000;2:315–37

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
6. 6.↵
   2. Mwale F,
   3. Iatridis JC,
   4. Antoniou J

   Quantitative MRI as a diagnostic tool of intervertebral disc matrix composition and integrity. Eur Spine J 2008;17(suppl 4):432–40

   PubMedWeb of Science
7. 7.↵
   2. Marinelli NL,
   3. Haughton VM,
   4. Anderson PA

   . T2 relaxation times correlated with stage of lumbar intervertebral disk degeneration and patient age. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2010;31:1278–82

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
8. 8.↵
   2. Haneder S,
   3. Apprich SR,
   4. Schmitt B, et al

   . Assessment of glycosaminoglycan content in intervertebral discs using chemical exchange saturation transfer at 3.0 Tesla: preliminary results in patients with low-back pain. Eur Radiol 2013;23:861–68

   CrossRefPubMed
9. 9.↵
   2. Trattnig S,
   3. Stelzeneder D,
   4. Goed S, et al

   . Lumbar intervertebral disc abnormalities: comparison of quantitative T2 mapping with conventional MR at 3.0 T. Eur Radiol 2010;20:2715–22

   CrossRefPubMed
10. 10.↵
    2. Michopoulou S,
    3. Costaridou L,
    4. Vlychou M, et al

    . Texture-based quantification of lumbar intervertebral disc degeneration from conventional T2-weighted MRI. Acta Radiol 2011;52:91–98

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
11. 11.↵
    2. Chan WC,
    3. Sze KL,
    4. Samartzis D, et al

    . Structure and biology of the intervertebral disk in health and disease. Orthop Clin North Am 2011;42:447–64, vii

    CrossRefPubMed
12. 12.↵
    2. Blumenkrantz G,
    3. Li X,
    4. Han ET, et al

    . A feasibility study of in vivo T1rho imaging of the intervertebral disc. Magn Reson Imaging 2006;24:1001–07

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
13. 13.↵
    2. Auerbach JD,
    3. Johannessen W,
    4. Borthakur A, et al

    . In vivo quantification of human lumbar disc degeneration using T1(rho)-weighted magnetic resonance imaging. Eur Spine J 2006;15(suppl 3):S338–44

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
14. 14.↵
    2. Pfirrmann CW,
    3. Metzdorf A,
    4. Zanetti M, et al

    . Magnetic resonance classification of lumbar intervertebral disc degeneration. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2001;26:1873–78

    CrossRef
15. 15.↵
    2. Stelzeneder D,
    3. Welsch GH,
    4. Kovács BK, et al

    . Quantitative T2 evaluation at 3.0T compared to morphological grading of the lumbar intervertebral disc: a standardized evaluation approach in patients with low back pain. Eur J Radiol 2012;81:324–30

    CrossRefPubMed
16. 16.↵
    2. Sharma A,
    3. Parsons M,
    4. Pilgram T

    . Temporal interactions of degenerative changes in individual components of the lumbar intervertebral discs: a sequential magnetic resonance imaging study in patients less than 40 years of age. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2011;36:1794–800

    CrossRef
17. 17.↵
    2. Del Grande F,
    3. Maus TP,
    4. Carrino JA

    . Imaging the intervertebral disk: age-related changes, herniations, and radicular pain. Radiol Clin North Am 2012;50:629–49

    CrossRefPubMed
18. 18.↵
    2. Issy AC,
    3. Castania V,
    4. Castania M, et al

    . Experimental model of intervertebral disc degeneration by needle puncture in Wistar rats. Braz J MedBiol Res 2013;46:235–44

    CrossRef
19. 19.↵
    2. Antoniou J,
    3. Pike GB,
    4. Steffen T, et al

    . Quantitative magnetic resonance imaging in the assessment of degenerative disc disease. Magn Reson Med 1998;40:900–07

    CrossRefPubMed
20. 20.↵
    2. Zuo J,
    3. Joseph GB,
    4. Li X, et al

    . In vivo intervertebral disc characterization using magnetic resonance spectroscopy and T1ρ imaging: association with discography and Oswestry Disability Index and Short Form-36 Health Survey. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2012;37:214–21

    CrossRef
21. 21.↵
    2. Antoniou J,
    3. Epure LM,
    4. Michalek AJ, et al

    . Analysis of quantitative magnetic resonance imaging and biomechanical parameters on human discs with different grades of degeneration. J Magn Reson Imaging 2013;38:1402–14

    CrossRefPubMed
22. 22.↵
    2. Ding WY,
    3. Yang DL,
    4. Cao LZ, et al

    . Interverterbal disc degeneration and bone density in degenerative lumbar scoliosis: a comparative study between patients with degenerative lumbar scoliosis and patients with lumbar stenosis. Chin Med J (Engl) 2011;124:3875–78

    PubMed
23. 23.↵
    2. Homminga J,
    3. Lehr AM,
    4. Meijer GJ, et al

    . Posteriorly directed shear loads and disc degeneration affect the torsional stiffness of spinal motion segments: a biomechanical modeling study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2013;38:E1313–19

    CrossRef
24. 24.↵
    2. Gervais J,
    3. Périé D,
    4. Parent S, et al

    . MRI signal distribution within the intervertebral disc as a biomarker of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis and spondylolisthesis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2012;13:239

    CrossRefPubMed
25. 25.↵
    2. Igbinedion BO,
    3. Akhigbe A

    . Correlations of radiographic findings in patients with low back pain. Niger Med J 2011;52:28–34

    PubMed
26. 26.↵
    2. Iguchi T,
    3. Nishida K,
    4. Ozaki T, et al

    . Grade three disc degeneration is a critical stage for anterior spondylolisthesis in lumbar spine. Eur Spine J 2012;21:2134–39

    CrossRefPubMed
27. 27.↵
    2. Borthakur A,
    3. Maurer PM,
    4. Fenty M, et al

    . T1ρ magnetic resonance imaging and discography pressure as novel biomarkers for disc degeneration and low back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2011;36:2190–96

    CrossRef
28. 28.↵
    2. Stelzeneder D,
    3. Welsch GH,
    4. Kovács BK, et al

    . Quantitative T2 evaluation at 3.0T compared to morphological grading of the lumbar intervertebral disc: a standardized evaluation approach in patients with low back pain. Eur J Radiol 2012;81:324–30

    CrossRefPubMed
29. 29.↵
    2. Welsch GH,
    3. Trattnig S,
    4. Paternostro-Sluga T, et al

    . Parametric T2 and T2* mapping techniques to visualize intervertebral disc degeneration in patients with low back pain: initial results on the clinical use of 3.0 Tesla MRI. Skeletal Radiol 2011;40:543–51

    CrossRefPubMed
30. 30.↵
    2. Zobel BB,
    3. Vadalà G,
    4. Del Vescovo R, et al

    . T1ρ magnetic resonance imaging quantification of early lumbar intervertebral disc degeneration in healthy young adults. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2012;37:1224–30

    CrossRef
31. 31.↵
    2. Wang YX,
    3. Zhao F,
    4. Griffith JF, et al

    . T1rho and T2 relaxation times for lumbar disc degeneration: an in vivo comparative study at 3.0-Tesla MRI. Eur Radiol 2013;23:228–34

    CrossRefPubMed
32. 32.↵
    2. Wang YX,
    3. Zhao F,
    4. Yuan J, et al

    . Accelerated T1rho relaxation quantification in intervertebral disc using limited spin-lock times. Quant Imaging Med Surg 2013;3:54–58

    PubMed
33. 33.↵
    2. Pattappa G,
    3. Li Z,
    4. Peroglio M, et al

    . Diversity of intervertebral disc cells: phenotype and function. J Anat 2012;221:480–96

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
34. 34.↵
    2. Niu G,
    3. Yang J,
    4. Wang R, et al

    . MR imaging assessment of lumbar intervertebral disk degeneration and age-related changes: apparent diffusion coefficient versus T2 quantitation. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32:1617–23

    Abstract/FREE Full Text