Characterizing the Location of Spinal and Vertebral Levels in the Human Cervical Spinal Cord

From left to right: T2-weighted MR image with the PMJ and superior (Sup.) and inferior (inf.) endplates of the C3 vertebral body marked with dashed white lines. Immediately adjacent to this, an artist's illustration demonstrates how person-specific markings are positioned relative to the individualized arc-length axis of the spinal cord (red line). Thus, distances can be compared across individuals along their personalized spinal cord axes. The T2-weighted coronal image depicts spinal rootlets (A) and the gap between adjacent segmental rootlets (B), delineated by dashed white lines. The far right artist's illustration depicts segmental rootlets and the formation of a spinal nerve root that emerges from the intervertebral foramen. To accurately localize segmental nerve rootlets, we followed the spinal nerve root that emerges from the intervertebral foramen of the respective vertebral body.

Nerve rootlet (NR, solid lines) and vertebral body (VB, dashed lines) distributions across our cohort of 20 individuals. The x-axis of this line graph represents the distance from the PMJ along the spinal cord axis, where zero is the PMJ and the increasing numbers are millimeter distances down the curved axis of the spinal cord to the midpoint of either the vertebral body or spinal cord segment as demarcated by nerve rootlets. The y-axis of the line graph represents the probability of finding either NR (solid line) or VB (dashed line) at a given distance down the curved spinal cord. The spinal cord segments and vertebral bodies represented by the colored lines are shown in the graph inset as distances in millimeters to the midpoint of either the vertebral bodies or spinal cord segments (as represented by nerve rootlets), projected orthogonally onto the spinal cord centerline, SDs, and range. The rostral-caudal extent of nerve rootlets corresponding to each spinal segment was relatively consistent across all spinal cord segments. The average length of spinal cord segments are the following: C3, 10.5 mm; C4, 9.9 mm; C5, 10.5 mm; C6, 9.7 mm; C7, 9.4 mm; and C8 9.6 mm.

Vertebral body and spinal cord segment location across 10 subjects enrolled in this study. Vertebral bodies are represented for each subject by light-shaded bars, whereas spinal cord segments are represented by colored bars (see graph inset).

Left: scaled relative distance of the C7 spinal cord segments (red bars) from the C6 (upper light-brown-shaded area) and C7 (lower light-brown-shaded area) vertebral bodies. When we visualize an individual's cervical spine MR imaging, we tend to hold the vertebral bodies constant. This figure illustrates that the position of the seventh cervical spinal cord segment varies relative to the position of the vertebral body across a cohort of individuals. If one were to assume that the C7 spinal segments are immediately adjacent to the C7 vertebral body, then 0% of the actual segments would be captured in such an analysis. Similarly, if one were to assume that the C7 spinal cord segments are 1 vertebral body length rostral to the C7 body, then one would capture 33% of the corresponding spinal segments for the 10 subjects shown, or 44% of the corresponding spinal segments across all 20 subjects. Depending on the goals of the imaging experiment, one should pay careful attention to the relative position of spinal segments and vertebral bodies across a cohort of individuals. Assuming that spinal segments are constant may lead to false-positive or false-negative results. Right: an artist's depiction shows the range in spinal cord segments relative to the vertebral bodies; light-shaded areas represent areas of population level overlap.