Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
  • Special Collections
    • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)
    • 2024 AJNR Journal Awards
    • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcast
    • AJNR Scantastics
    • Video Articles
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Author Policies
    • Fast publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Submit a Case for the Case Collection
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Other Publications
    • ajnr

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
  • Special Collections
    • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)
    • 2024 AJNR Journal Awards
    • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcast
    • AJNR Scantastics
    • Video Articles
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Author Policies
    • Fast publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Submit a Case for the Case Collection
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

Welcome to the new AJNR, Updated Hall of Fame, and more. Read the full announcements.


AJNR is seeking candidates for the position of Associate Section Editor, AJNR Case Collection. Read the full announcement.

 

Research ArticleExtracranial Vascular
Open Access

MR Imaging–Detected Carotid Plaque Hemorrhage Is Stable for 2 Years and a Marker for Stenosis Progression

R.J. Simpson, S. Akwei, A.A. Hosseini, S.T. MacSweeney, D.P. Auer and N. Altaf
American Journal of Neuroradiology June 2015, 36 (6) 1171-1175; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A4267
R.J. Simpson
aFrom the Radiological Sciences Group (R.J.S., S.A., A.A.H., D.P.A., N.A.), Division of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom
bDepartment of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery (R.J.S., S.T.M., N.A.), Nottingham University Hospitals National Health Service Trust, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
S. Akwei
aFrom the Radiological Sciences Group (R.J.S., S.A., A.A.H., D.P.A., N.A.), Division of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
A.A. Hosseini
aFrom the Radiological Sciences Group (R.J.S., S.A., A.A.H., D.P.A., N.A.), Division of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
S.T. MacSweeney
bDepartment of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery (R.J.S., S.T.M., N.A.), Nottingham University Hospitals National Health Service Trust, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
D.P. Auer
aFrom the Radiological Sciences Group (R.J.S., S.A., A.A.H., D.P.A., N.A.), Division of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
N. Altaf
aFrom the Radiological Sciences Group (R.J.S., S.A., A.A.H., D.P.A., N.A.), Division of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom
bDepartment of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery (R.J.S., S.T.M., N.A.), Nottingham University Hospitals National Health Service Trust, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: MR imaging–detected carotid plaque hemorrhage is associated with an increased risk of recurrent ischemic cerebrovascular events and could be an indicator of disease progression; however, there are limited data regarding the dynamics of the MR imaging–detected carotid plaque hemorrhage signal. We assessed the temporal change of this signal and its impact on carotid disease progression.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-seven symptomatic patients with 54 carotid stenoses of >30% on sonography underwent serial MR imaging during 24 months. A signal-intensity ratio of >1.5 between the carotid plaque and adjacent muscle was defined as plaque hemorrhage, and a change in signal-intensity ratio of >0.31 between time points was considered significant. Sixteen patients underwent ≥2 carotid sonography scans to determine the peak systolic velocities and degree of stenosis with time.

RESULTS: Of the 54 carotids, 28 had the presence of hyperintense signal on an MR imaging sequence (PH+) and 26 had the absence of hyperintense signal on an MR imaging sequence (PH−) at baseline. The signal-intensity ratio was stable in 33/54 carotid plaques, but 39% showed a change. Plaque hemorrhage classification did not change in 87% of carotid plaques, but 4 became PH+, and 3, PH−. As a group, PH+ carotids did not change significantly in signal-intensity ratio (P = .585), whereas PH− showed an increased signal-intensity ratio at 24.5 months (P = .02). In PH+ plaques, peak systolic velocities significantly increased by 22 ± 39.8 cm/s from baseline to last follow-up sonography (Z = 2.427, P = .013).

CONCLUSIONS: During 2 years, MR imaging–detected carotid plaque hemorrhage status remained stable in most (87%) cases with 4 (7%) incident plaque hemorrhages. PH+ plaques were associated with increased flow velocity during the follow-up period.

ABBREVIATIONS:

MR imaging-PH
MR imaging–detected plaque hemorrhage
PH
plaque hemorrhage
PH+
presence of hyperintense signal on an MR imaging sequence
PH−
absence of hyperintense signal on an MR imaging sequence
PSV
peak systolic velocity
SIR
signal-intensity ratio

Currently, the degree of ICA stenosis is the principal criterion on the basis of which the decision for carotid intervention is made. This is based on strong evidence from randomized controlled trials that carotid endarterectomy reduces stroke risk in patients with severe carotid artery stenosis.1,2 However, those studies also showed that a significant proportion of patients with symptomatic carotid disease will not have a recurrence. Subsequently, much research is focused on the identification of high-risk subgroups,3 especially for those with moderate or asymptomatic carotid stenosis.

Plaque hemorrhage (PH) is implicated in carotid plaque vulnerability4 and is detectable by MR imaging.5,6 A recent longitudinal follow-up study and meta-analysis7 demonstrated that MR imaging–detected plaque hemorrhage (MR imaging-PH) strongly predicts recurrent ischemic events. The MR imaging-PH signal seems to be stable for 12 months,8 but stability of MR imaging-PH features beyond 12 months remains unclear. Knowledge of longer term stability of MR imaging-PH would be helpful if it is to be used to assist decision-making in interventions and to determine the need for follow-up imaging.

Plaque volume progression on sonography recently has been shown to predict cerebrovascular events9; however, this measure was not used in the current study. Carotid stenosis progression has been suggested to be a better predictor of subsequent TIA/stroke than a single measurement.10 Although general carotid sonography surveillance may not be cost-effective,11 this situation may well be different for a subgroup of patients with a higher risk for stenosis progression. It is conceivable that MR imaging-PH is also an indicator of disease progression12 and, therefore, may be useful in this regard.

The aim of this study was to determine MR imaging signal changes in the carotid artery plaque during 2 years and whether the presence of MR imaging-PH at baseline is associated with stenosis progression.

Materials and Methods

Eligible patients presenting with a recent history of nondisabling stroke, hemispheric transient ischemic attack, or amaurosis fugax and ipsilateral carotid stenosis of >30% measured by sonography were recruited into this study from a TIA clinic. Peak systolic velocity (PSV) and end diastolic velocity measurements were recorded from the common, internal, and external carotids bilaterally. Established grading criteria were used to assess the percentage stenosis (Table 1), which was taken from the Carotid and Vertebral Artery Transluminal Angioplasty Study13,14 and was based on the NASCET angiographic method.2 A planned carotid intervention and atrial fibrillation were exclusion criteria. In addition, contralateral carotid plaques were included if a stenosis of >30% was observed. Patients were scheduled to undergo serial MR imaging and sonography. MRI and clinical assessment to determine evidence of recurrence were performed at baseline and at 4, 12, and 24 months.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1:

Velocity grading criteria based on the NASCET angiographic method13,14

All patients continued to receive routine clinical care independent of their MR imaging findings. The local research ethics committee approved the study, and all patients gave written informed consent at the point of recruitment. The data regarding recurrence have been published previously.15,16

MR Imaging Protocol and Image Analysis

MR carotid imaging was undertaken on a 1.5T Magnetom Vision scanner (Siemens, Erlangen, Germany) by using a receive-only quadrature neck array coil. The MR imaging, previously described,6 was a coronal T1-weighted magnetization-prepared 3D gradient-echo sequence incorporating a selective number of partitions, a water-excitation pulse, and a TI chosen to null the signal from blood and fat (TR, 10.3 ms; TE, 4.0 ms; flip angle, 15°; TI, 20 ms; FOV, 350 × 300 mm; matrix, 256 × 140; 140 partitions; volume thickness, 120–150 mm). This sequence detects subacute-to-chronic hemorrhage because methemoglobin has a hyperintense signal.

MR imaging analysis was performed on standard reformatted axial images by using Java imaging software (www.xinapse.com), by 3 reviewers with 1- to 3-years' carotid image-analysis experience, blinded to clinical data and images from other time points. As previously described,15⇓–17 the highest intensity in the carotid artery wall within 1 cm from the bifurcation was compared with all of the immediately adjacent sternocleidomastoid muscle (signal-intensity [SI] ratio [SIR] = SIplaque/SImuscle). The presence of MR imaging-PH was diagnosed if the normalized SIR between the 2 was at least 1.5 (PH+). Inter- and intraobserver agreements were assessed by analyzing all the images 5 months after the initial analysis. The minimum detectable change applied to the SIR is considered the minimal amount of change in SIR to exceed an estimated error due to variation in measurement. Thus a change in SIR is only considered a real change if it is larger than the threshold set at ±0.31, defined as twice the pooled SD of intraobserver test-retest data. A change in PH status from PH− (normalized SIR of <1.5) to PH+ was noted only when the SIR rose above the 1.5 threshold and vice versa.

Sonography

All carotid sonography (baseline and follow-up) was performed by 1 of 2 accredited Clinical Vascular Scientists by using a Logiq 9 sonography machine (GE Healthcare, Milwaukee, Wisconsin). The ultrasound grading criteria in the follow-up stage were identical to that of the recruitment stage, as detailed above. Change in peak systolic velocity in the internal carotid artery from baseline to the last follow-up sonography scan was used as the primary marker of progressive carotid disease.18 Categoric progression of stenosis, where there was an increase by at least 1 category, was also reported.

Statistical Analysis

SIR inter-/intraobserver agreement was analyzed by using the Cronbach α. The SIR at different time points was analyzed with repeated-measures analysis of variance, in which if the Mauchly test of sphericity was not significant, then the Geenhouse-Geisser adjustment was reported. The χ2 test was used to compare the prevalence of PH+ at baseline between symptomatic and asymptomatic carotids. The Fisher exact test was used to determine the association between disease progression and both the presence of PH and the recurrence of symptoms. The Wilcoxon signed rank test was used to test the effect of PH on PSV of the ICA. All analyses were performed with SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 19.0 (IBM, Armonk, New York). P < .05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Sixty-four participants were recruited during a 2-year period, but 27 were excluded because they did not undergo subsequent MR imaging (18 with claustrophobia, 3 with bilateral stenosis <30%, 6 “other”). Therefore, 37 patients were included in this study; their demographics can be seen in Table 2, and carotid stenosis at baseline, in Table 3.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2:

Patient characteristics

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 3:

Degree of carotid stenosis at baselinea

At baseline, 28/54 (52%) carotid arteries were PH+ (mean SIR, 2.02 ± 0.39). The mean SIR of those without MR imaging-PH was 1.31 ± 0.13. PH was detected in 22/37 (59%) symptomatic carotid arteries, compared with 6/17 (35%) in the asymptomatic group; however, this difference was not significant (χ2 = 2.7, P = .1).

Thirty-seven patients with 54 carotid plaques with >30% stenosis (37 symptomatic and 17 asymptomatic) underwent serial MR imaging. The mean times for follow-up scans from baseline were T1 (4.5 ± 3.1 months), T2 (14.5 ± 3.1 months), and T3 (24.6 ± 2.6 months). Suitable images were available for all carotid arteries at T0 (baseline), but only 46, 47, and 34 at T1, T2, and T3, respectively, due to loss to follow-up and uninterpretable images. Thus, 84% (181/216) of the potential images were included in the analysis.

Temporal Stability of MR Imaging PH

The carotid muscle SIR was stable with time in 33 of the 54 carotid arteries (61%). Thus, 21 carotid plaques (16 PH+ and 5 PH−) underwent a detectable change in SIR of >0.31 absolute difference at some point during follow-up. Most of the detectable changes (14/21) resulted in an increase in SIR; of these, 13 PH+ plaques remained PH+ (SIR > 1.5), while 1 PH− plaque remained PH− (SIR < 1.5), despite the change. This means that PH status remained the same in 47/54 plaques (87%). The 7 plaques demonstrating categoric change included 4 of 26 (7%) previously PH− plaques that became PH+, while 3 of 28 (5%) with PH+ reverted to PH−.

At the group level, SIR change did not differ with symptom status at baseline. SIR significantly increased during a mean of 24.5 ± 2.56 months (P = .02, repeated-measures ANOVA) in PH− plaques (Figure). However, SIR did not significantly increase during the follow-up period in PH+ plaques (P = .585). Quantitative assessment of SIR showed excellent reliability on both interobserver (Cronbach α = 0.99) and intraobserver (Cronbach α = 0.99) assessment.

Figure.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure.

Trend of SIR during 24.5 months based on baseline PH status.

Recurrent Events

As previously reported,15 11 patients (30%) had recurrent symptoms (stroke, 7; amaurosis fugax, 2; TIA, 2) during follow-up or within 6 months of their final scan. Most, 9/11 (82%), recurrent symptoms occurred in the previously symptomatic carotid artery. Five events occurred in carotid plaques that had undergone detectable positive change in SIR. No events occurred in plaques with new PH+. There was, however, a significant association between recurrent events and baseline plaque hemorrhage status. Nine (82%) events occurred in the 28 carotid arteries that were PH+ at baseline compared with 2 events in the 26 PH− carotid arteries at baseline, (χ2, P = .026).

Carotid Stenosis Progression

A subgroup of 16 patients with ≥30% ipsilateral stenosis and variable contralateral disease were followed up with carotid sonography during a mean of 40.2 months (range, 20–91 months; 46 sonograms). However, due to limited access to the sonography machine, it was not possible to scan all patients. The mean scan intervals from baseline were the following: T1 (26.1 ± 13.01 months), T2 (34.1 ± 10.19 months), and T3 (55.3 ± 26.85 months). At the group level, there was a significant progression of ICA-PSV in PH+ carotid arteries, with a mean increase of 22 ± 39.8 cm/s from baseline (147 cm/s) to last follow-up (169 cm/s) sonogram (Z = 2.427, P = .013). No such association was seen in plaques without MR imaging-PH (−5.5 ± 55.4 cm/s). Symptomatic carotid stenoses were not associated with an increase in ICA PSV.

Stenosis progression according to predefined grades was seen in 9 of the 32 carotid arteries (28%), giving an annualized progression rate of 8.4%. However, no significant differences were seen in the grade progression between symptomatic (5/16) and asymptomatic (4/16) plaques or between PH+ (6/22) and PH− (3/10) disease.

Discussion

MR imaging-PH–positive carotid plaques showed no change in SIR during 24 months but demonstrated a significant increase in peak systolic velocities. In contrast, there was no progression of velocities but a mild increase in MR imaging signal intensity in PH− plaques.

In 28 PH+ plaques, there was no change in relative MR imaging signal intensity during 24 months, providing further evidence of the stability of PH. The observed prolonged elevation of signal suggests persistence of methemoglobin, in line with previous reports on MR imaging-PH for up to 18 months.8,19,20 We also showed stable plaque signal in asymptomatic plaques, which corroborates a small study in 14 asymptomatic patients with PH signs for 54 months.21 However, selection bias in that study should be noted because only those plaques with MR imaging-PH on the most recent scan were included.

Quantitative assessment of plaque intensities revealed a small but significant increase in previously plaque hemorrhage–negative plaques. In contrast to our findings, Wang et al22 recently reported a reduction in SIR during 19 months in asymptomatic plaques. These differences may be explained by differences in the selection of asymptomatic patients with carotid disease between studies. We defined an asymptomatic plaque as contralateral to the symptomatic artery and symptom-free for >6 months, whereas Wang et al22 selected patients who had never had any symptoms of cerebrovascular disease. Evidence suggests that differences exist between these 2 groups, in that truly asymptomatic plaques appear to be more stable.23 Conversely, the overall SIR increase in PH plaques is corroborated by the individual classification showing that 15% of PH plaques converted during the follow-up of 2 years. The most likely explanation is the incident plaque hemorrhage in a higher risk patient group than in a completely asymptomatic patient cohort.

Although the MR imaging signal intensity due to intracranial hemorrhage is subject to rapid change,24 carotid MR imaging-PH and thus methemoglobin have been shown to be more persistent.19 The temporal stability of MR imaging-PH may be due to the inherent stability of methemoglobin or because its breakdown is balanced by continued production of methemoglobin from continued hemorrhage from a fragile plaque vasa vasorum.25 Our results indicating temporal stability of the MR imaging-PH signal, together with previous work that reported MR imaging-PH, strongly predict recurrent stroke/TIA7 and raise the possibility that all plaques found to be PH+ reflect a cumulative high risk regardless of how recent the PH may have been. This is particularly pertinent for delayed presentations of TIA and stroke. The evidence of incident PH certainly suggests that carotid disease merits surveillance; however, the natural history of newly formed PH in carotid plaques remains uncertain.

We found an increase in PSV in PH+ but not in PH− carotid arteries, which did, however, not translate into a preferential progression in the categoric degree of stenosis. Although clinically useful, the categorization of blood flow velocities and ratios (Table 1) has the effect of reducing the statistical power to detect the relationship among variables.26 Thus, plaque area/volume, PSV, and other continuous variables may be more sensitive to changes in disease progression than grades of stenosis. Our findings, while preliminary, suggest that PH may be a maker of stenosis progression. This would be in line with a previous study that showed21 that the presence of MR imaging-PH increased the rate of plaque progression determined by wall volume. Histologic evidence from coronary artery plaques also supports the notion that the presence of PH increases atheroma progression.12

Study Limitations

Our study is limited by its sample size; thus, there were a relatively small number of carotid plaques that changed PH status or progressed during the follow-up. This finding was further confounded by the exclusion bias for patients scheduled for carotid intervention, meaning that our cohort either had minor carotid disease or those with more severe disease had declined or were turned down for surgery. The small sample size has resulted in wide SD for the mean changes in internal carotid artery peak systolic velocity. A number of scans were not available for analysis due to loss to follow-up and poor-quality images, despite multiple invitations for the non-attenders. In this study, we used a single T1-weighted imaging sequence to detect PH, to optimize its clinical applicability. This has meant that we did not use multisequence imaging to determine the age of the PH, as used by Chu et al27 and Wang et al.22 We also did not measure the volume of the MR imaging-PH with time, due to the limited resolution of the images at 1.5T. Although sonography-derived plaque volume is also a marker of vulnerability,9 no measurement of volume was made in our study. In addition, quantification of plaque volume has been demonstrated recently by using serial CT angiography.28

Conclusions

These results demonstrate the temporal stability of carotid MR imaging-PH, supporting its value as a risk marker beyond the acute presentation. We also provide preliminary evidence that PH may be a marker for stenosis progression as measured by PSV.

Footnotes

  • R.J.S. and S.A. contributed equally to this work.

  • Disclosures: Richard J. Simpson—RELATED: Grant: Stroke Association,* National Institute for Health Research,* Comments: Junior Research Training Fellowship, National Institute for Health Research–Research for Patient Benefit program. Solomon Akwei—UNRELATED: Travel/Accommodations/Meeting Expenses Unrelated to Activities Listed: Nottingham Vascular Research Fund, Comments: covered expenses incurred for attending the Vascular Society Meeting, Brighton, UK, November 2010. Akram A. Hosseini—RELATED: Grant: National Institute for Health Research,* Comments: National Institute for Health Research Clinical Research Fellowship. Dorothee P. Auer—RELATED: Grant: Stroke Association, UK,* Comments: paid for Richard Simpson's fellowship; Support for Travel to Meetings for the Study or Other Purposes: Stroke Association, UK,* Comments: travel and consumables for Richard Simpson; UNRELATED: Grants/Grants Pending: National Institute of Health Research–Research for Patient Benefit program,* MS Society,* Parkinson's UK,* Medical Research Council,* Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council,* Arthritis Research UK,* Cancer Research UK.* *Money paid to the institution.

  • This work was supported by the National Institute for Health Research under its Research for Patient Benefit Programme (grant reference number PB-PG-0107-11438). Financial support was also provided by the Stroke Association Junior Research Training Fellowship, London, United Kingdom; the Nottingham Vascular Surgery Research Fund, Nottingham, United Kingdom; and The Health Foundation, London, United Kingdom.

  • The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the National Health Service, the National Institute for Health Research, or the Department of Health.

  • Paper previously presented at: UK Stroke Forum 2011, November 29–December 1, 2011; Glasgow, United Kingdom.

Indicates open access to non-subscribers at www.ajnr.org

References

  1. 1.↵
    European Carotid Surgery Trialists' Collaborative Group. MRC European Carotid Surgery Trial: interim results for symptomatic patients with severe (70–99%) or with mild (0–29%) carotid stenosis. Lancet 1991;337:1235–43
    CrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Collaborators. Beneficial effect of carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients with high-grade carotid stenosis. N Engl J Med 1991;325:445–53
    CrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. U-King-Im J,
    2. Young V,
    3. Gillard JH
    . Carotid-artery imaging in the diagnosis and management of patients at risk of stroke. Lancet Neurol 2009;8:569–80
    CrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Stary HC,
    2. Chandler AB,
    3. Dinsmore RE, et al
    . A definition of advanced types of atherosclerotic lesions and a histological classification of atherosclerosis: a report from the Committee on Vascular Lesions of the Council on Arteriosclerosis, American Heart Association. Circulation 1995;92:1355–74
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵
    1. Moody AR,
    2. Allder S,
    3. Lennox G, et al
    . Direct magnetic resonance imaging of carotid artery thrombus in acute stroke. Lancet 1999;353:122–23
    CrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Moody AR,
    2. Murphy RE,
    3. Morgan PS, et al
    . Characterization of complicated carotid plaque with magnetic resonance direct thrombus imaging in patients with cerebral ischemia. Circulation 2003;107:3047–52
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  7. 7.↵
    1. Hosseini AA,
    2. Kandiyil N,
    3. Macsweeney ST, et al
    . Carotid plaque hemorrhage on magnetic resonance imaging strongly predicts recurrent ischemia and stroke. Ann Neurol 2013;73:774–84
    CrossRefPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    1. Kwee RM,
    2. van Oostenbrugge RJ,
    3. Mess WH, et al
    . Carotid plaques in transient ischemic attack and stroke patients: one-year follow-up study by magnetic resonance imaging. Invest Radiol 2010;45:803–09
    CrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    1. van Engelen A,
    2. Wannarong T,
    3. Parraga G, et al
    . Three-dimensional carotid ultrasound plaque texture predicts vascular events. Stroke 2014;45:2695–701
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  10. 10.↵
    1. Bertges DJ,
    2. Muluk V,
    3. Whittle J, et al
    . Relevance of carotid stenosis progression as a predictor of ischemic neurological outcomes. Arch Intern Med 2003;163:2285–89
    CrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. Cull DL,
    2. Cole T,
    3. Miller B, et al
    . The value of a carotid duplex surveillance program for stroke prevention. Ann Vasc Surg 2011;25:887–94
    CrossRefPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    1. Kolodgie FD,
    2. Gold HK,
    3. Burke AP, et al
    . Intraplaque hemorrhage and progression of coronary atheroma. N Engl J Med 2003;349:2316–25
    CrossRefPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    1. McCabe DJ,
    2. Pereira AC,
    3. Clifton A, et al
    . Restenosis after carotid angioplasty, stenting, or endarterectomy in the Carotid and Vertebral Artery Transluminal Angioplasty Study (CAVATAS). Stroke 2005;36:281–86
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  14. 14.↵
    1. Sidhu PS,
    2. Allan PL
    . Ultrasound assessment of internal carotid artery stenosis. Clin Radiol 1997;52:654–58
    CrossRefPubMed
  15. 15.↵
    1. Altaf N,
    2. Daniels L,
    3. Morgan PS, et al
    . Detection of intraplaque hemorrhage by magnetic resonance imaging in symptomatic patients with mild to moderate carotid stenosis predicts recurrent neurological events. J Vasc Surg 2008;47:337–42
    CrossRefPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    1. Kandiyil N,
    2. Altaf N,
    3. Hosseini AA, et al
    . Lower prevalence of carotid plaque hemorrhage in women, and its mediator effect on sex differences in recurrent cerebrovascular events. PLoS One 2012;7:e47319
    CrossRefPubMed
  17. 17.↵
    1. Altaf N,
    2. MacSweeney ST,
    3. Gladman J, et al
    . Carotid intraplaque hemorrhage predicts recurrent symptoms in patients with high-grade carotid stenosis. Stroke 2007;38:1633–35
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  18. 18.↵
    1. Schillinger M,
    2. Exner M,
    3. Mlekusch W, et al
    . Inflammation and Carotid Artery–Risk for Atherosclerosis Study (ICARAS). Circulation 2005;111:2203–09
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  19. 19.↵
    1. Takaya N,
    2. Yuan C,
    3. Chu B, et al
    . Presence of intraplaque hemorrhage stimulates progression of carotid atherosclerotic plaques: a high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging study. Circulation 2005;111:2768–75
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  20. 20.↵
    1. Saam T,
    2. Yuan C,
    3. Chu B, et al
    . Predictors of carotid atherosclerotic plaque progression as measured by noninvasive magnetic resonance imaging. Atherosclerosis 2007;194:e34–42
    CrossRefPubMed
  21. 21.↵
    1. Sun J,
    2. Underhill HR,
    3. Hippe DS, et al
    . Sustained acceleration in carotid atherosclerotic plaque progression with intraplaque hemorrhage: a long-term time course study. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2012;5:798–804
    CrossRefPubMed
  22. 22.↵
    1. Wang Q,
    2. Wang Y,
    3. Cai J, et al
    . Differences of signal evolution of intraplaque hemorrhage and associated stenosis between symptomatic and asymptomatic atherosclerotic carotid arteries: an in vivo high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging follow-up study. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2010;26:323–32
    PubMed
  23. 23.↵
    1. van Lammeren GW,
    2. den Hartog AG,
    3. Pasterkamp G, et al
    . Asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis: identification of subgroups with different underlying plaque characteristics. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2012;43:632–36
    CrossRefPubMed
  24. 24.↵
    1. Bradley WG Jr.
    . MR appearance of hemorrhage in the brain. Radiology 1993;189:15–26
    CrossRefPubMed
  25. 25.↵
    1. Virmani R,
    2. Kolodgie FD,
    3. Burke AP, et al
    . Atherosclerotic plaque progression and vulnerability to rupture: angiogenesis as a source of intraplaque hemorrhage. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2005;25:2054–61
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  26. 26.↵
    1. Altman DG,
    2. Royston P
    . The cost of dichotomising continuous variables. BMJ 2006;332:1080
    FREE Full Text
  27. 27.↵
    1. Chu B,
    2. Kampschulte A,
    3. Ferguson MS, et al
    . Hemorrhage in the atherosclerotic carotid plaque: a high-resolution MRI study. Stroke 2004;35:1079–84
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  28. 28.↵
    1. van Gils MJ,
    2. Vukadinovic D,
    3. van Dijk AC, et al
    . Carotid atherosclerotic plaque progression and change in plaque composition over time: a 5-year follow-up study using serial CT angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33:1267–73
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  • Received October 14, 2014.
  • Accepted after revision November 12, 2014.
  • © 2015 by American Journal of Neuroradiology
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 36 (6)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 36, Issue 6
1 Jun 2015
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
MR Imaging–Detected Carotid Plaque Hemorrhage Is Stable for 2 Years and a Marker for Stenosis Progression
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
R.J. Simpson, S. Akwei, A.A. Hosseini, S.T. MacSweeney, D.P. Auer, N. Altaf
MR Imaging–Detected Carotid Plaque Hemorrhage Is Stable for 2 Years and a Marker for Stenosis Progression
American Journal of Neuroradiology Jun 2015, 36 (6) 1171-1175; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A4267

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
MR Imaging–Detected Carotid Plaque Hemorrhage Is Stable for 2 Years and a Marker for Stenosis Progression
R.J. Simpson, S. Akwei, A.A. Hosseini, S.T. MacSweeney, D.P. Auer, N. Altaf
American Journal of Neuroradiology Jun 2015, 36 (6) 1171-1175; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A4267
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Purchase

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • ABBREVIATIONS:
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusions
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Long-Term Carotid Plaque Progression and the Role of Intraplaque Hemorrhage: A Deep Learning-Based Analysis of Longitudinal Vessel Wall Imaging
  • Roadmap Consensus on Carotid Artery Plaque Imaging and Impact on Therapy Strategies and Guidelines: An International, Multispecialty, Expert Review and Position Statement
  • Carotid Intraplaque Hemorrhage and Stenosis: At What Stage of Plaque Progression Does Intraplaque Hemorrhage Occur, and When is It Most Likely to Be Associated with Symptoms?
  • Differential Features of Culprit Intracranial Atherosclerotic Lesions: A Whole-Brain Vessel Wall Imaging Study in Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke
  • Blood Pressure Is a Major Modifiable Risk Factor Implicated in Pathogenesis of Intraplaque Hemorrhage: An In Vivo Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study
  • Crossref (31)
  • Google Scholar

This article has been cited by the following articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

  • Temporal shifts in clinical presentation and underlying mechanisms of atherosclerotic disease
    Gerard Pasterkamp, Hester M. den Ruijter, Peter Libby
    Nature Reviews Cardiology 2017 14 1
  • Differential Features of Culprit Intracranial Atherosclerotic Lesions: A Whole‐Brain Vessel Wall Imaging Study in Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke
    Fang Wu, Qingfeng Ma, Haiqing Song, Xiuhai Guo, Marcio A. Diniz, Shlee S. Song, Nestor R. Gonzalez, Xiaoming Bi, Xunming Ji, Debiao Li, Qi Yang, Zhaoyang Fan
    Journal of the American Heart Association 2018 7 15
  • Roadmap Consensus on Carotid Artery Plaque Imaging and Impact on Therapy Strategies and Guidelines: An International, Multispecialty, Expert Review and Position Statement
    L. Saba, W. Brinjikji, J.D. Spence, M. Wintermark, M. Castillo, G.J. de Borst, Q. Yang, C. Yuan, A. Buckler, M. Edjlali, T. Saam, D. Saloner, B.K. Lal, D. Capodanno, J. Sun, N. Balu, R. Naylor, A.v.d. Lugt, B.A. Wasserman, M.E. Kooi, J. Wardlaw, J. Gillard, G. Lanzino, U. Hedin, D. Mikulis, A. Gupta, J.K. DeMarco, C. Hess, J.V. Goethem, T. Hatsukami, P. Rothwell, M.M. Brown, A.R. Moody
    American Journal of Neuroradiology 2021 42 9
  • Sensitive magnetic particle imaging of haemoglobin degradation for the detection and monitoring of intraplaque haemorrhage in atherosclerosis
    Wei Tong, Yingqian Zhang, Hui Hui, Xin Feng, Bin Ning, Tengfei Yu, Wei Wang, Yaxin Shang, Guanghao Zhang, Suhui Zhang, Feng Tian, Wen He, Yundai Chen, Jie Tian
    eBioMedicine 2023 90
  • Blood Pressure Is a Major Modifiable Risk Factor Implicated in Pathogenesis of Intraplaque Hemorrhage
    Jie Sun, Gador Canton, Niranjan Balu, Daniel S. Hippe, Dongxiang Xu, Jin Liu, Thomas S. Hatsukami, Chun Yuan
    Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology 2016 36 4
  • The effects of statin therapy on carotid plaque composition and volume: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Waleed Brinjikji, Vance T. Lehman, David F. Kallmes, Alejandro A. Rabinstein, Giuseppe Lanzino, Mohammad H. Murad, Sharon Mulvagh, James Klaas, Jonathan Graff-Radford, Kevin J. DeMarco, John Huston III
    Journal of Neuroradiology 2017 44 4
  • Carotid Intraplaque Hemorrhage Imaging with Quantitative Vessel Wall T1 Mapping: Technical Development and Initial Experience
    Haikun Qi, Jie Sun, Huiyu Qiao, Shuo Chen, Zechen Zhou, Xinlei Pan, Yishi Wang, Xihai Zhao, Rui Li, Chun Yuan, Huijun Chen
    Radiology 2018 287 1
  • Ipsilateral plaques display higher T1 signals than contralateral plaques in recently symptomatic patients with bilateral carotid intraplaque hemorrhage
    Xianling Wang, Jie Sun, Xihai Zhao, Daniel S. Hippe, Thomas S. Hatsukami, Jin Liu, Rui Li, Gador Canton, Yan Song, Chun Yuan
    Atherosclerosis 2017 257
  • Cervical Carotid Plaque MRI
    John C. Benson, Heidi Cheek, Marie C. Aubry, Giuseppe Lanzino, John Huston III, Alejandro Rabinstein, Waleed Brinjikji
    Clinical Neuroradiology 2021 31 2
  • Semi-automatic carotid intraplaque hemorrhage detection and quantification on Magnetization-Prepared Rapid Acquisition Gradient-Echo (MP-RAGE) with optimized threshold selection
    Jin Liu, Niranjan Balu, Daniel S. Hippe, Marina S. Ferguson, Vanesa Martinez-Malo, J. Kevin DeMarco, David C. Zhu, Hideki Ota, Jie Sun, Dongxiang Xu, William S. Kerwin, Thomas S. Hatsukami, Chun Yuan
    Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance 2016 18 1

More in this TOC Section

  • Proximal Vertebral Artery Variants and Embryology
  • High-Risk Plaque Features in Carotid MRI
  • Nonstenotic Carotid Plaques and Stroke Review
Show more Extracranial Vascular

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editors Choice
  • Fellow Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

Special Collections

  • Special Collections

Resources

  • News and Updates
  • Turn around Times
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Author Policies
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Submit a Case
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • Get Peer Review Credit from Publons

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcast
  • AJNR SCANtastic
  • Video Articles

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Alerts
  • Feedback
  • Advertise with us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Permissions
  • Terms and Conditions

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire