A New Aneurysm Occlusion Classification after the Impact of Flow Modification

References

1. 1.↵
   2. Molyneux A,
   3. Kerr R,
   4. Stratton I, et al

   ; International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) Collaborative Group. International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomised trial. Lancet 2002;360:1267–74 doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(02)11314-6 pmid:12414200

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
2. 2.↵
   2. McDougall CG,
   3. Spetzler RF,
   4. Zabramski JM, et al

   . The Barrow Ruptured Aneurysm Trial. J Neurosurg 2012;116:135–44 doi:10.3171/2011.8.JNS101767 pmid:22054213

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
3. 3.↵
   2. Campi A,
   3. Ramzi N,
   4. Molyneux AJ, et al

   . Retreatment of ruptured cerebral aneurysms in patients randomized by coiling or clipping in the International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT). Stroke 2007;38:1538–44 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.106.466987 pmid:17395870

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
4. 4.↵
   2. Molyneux AJ,
   3. Birks J,
   4. Clarke A, et al

   . The durability of endovascular coiling versus neurosurgical clipping of ruptured cerebral aneurysms: 18 year follow-up of the UK cohort of the International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT). Lancet 2015;385:691–97 doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60975-2 pmid:25465111

   CrossRefPubMed
5. 5.↵
   2. Johnston SC,
   3. Dowd CF,
   4. Higashida RT, et al

   ; CARAT Investigators. Predictors of rehemorrhage after treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysms: the Cerebral Aneurysm Rerupture After Treatment (CARAT) study. Stroke 2008;39:120–25 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.495747 pmid:18048860

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
6. 6.↵
   2. Molyneux AJ,
   3. Kerr RS,
   4. Birks J, et al

   ; ISAT Collaborators. Risk of recurrent subarachnoid haemorrhage, death, or dependence and standardised mortality ratios after clipping or coiling of an intracranial aneurysm in the International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT): long-term follow-up. Lancet Neurol 2009;8:427–33 doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(09)70080-8 pmid:19329361

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
7. 7.↵
   2. Crobeddu E,
   3. Lanzino G,
   4. Kallmes DF, et al

   . Review of 2 decades of aneurysm-recurrence literature, part 2: managing recurrence after endovascular coiling. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2013;34:481–85 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2958 pmid:22422182

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
8. 8.↵
   2. Fiorella D,
   3. Lylyk P,
   4. Szikora I, et al

   . Curative cerebrovascular reconstruction with the Pipeline embolization device: the emergence of definitive endovascular therapy for intracranial aneurysms. J Neurointerv Surg 2009;1:56–65 doi:10.1136/jnis.2009.000083 pmid:21994109

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
9. 9.↵
   2. Ding YH,
   3. Lewis DA,
   4. Kadirvel R, et al

   . The Woven EndoBridge: a new aneurysm occlusion device. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32:607–11 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2399 pmid:21330397

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
10. 10.↵
    2. Roy D,
    3. Milot G,
    4. Raymond J

    . Endovascular treatment of unruptured aneurysms. Stroke 2001;32:1998–2004 doi:10.1161/hs0901.095600 pmid:11546888

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
11. 11.↵
    2. Raymond J,
    3. Guilbert F,
    4. Weill A, et al

    . Long-term angiographic recurrences after selective endovascular treatment of aneurysms with detachable coils. Stroke 2003;34:1398–403 doi:10.1161/01.STR.0000073841.88563.E9 pmid:12775880

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
12. 12.↵
    2. Mascitelli JR,
    3. Moyle H,
    4. Oermann EK, et al

    . An update to the Raymond-Roy Occlusion Classification of intracranial aneurysms treated with coil embolization. J Neurointerv Surg 2015;7:496–502 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2014-011258 pmid:24898735

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
13. 13.↵
    2. Mascitelli JR,
    3. Oermann EK,
    4. De Leacy RA, et al

    . Angiographic outcome of intracranial aneurysms with neck remnant following coil embolization. J Neurointerv Surg 2015;7:484–89 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2014-011226 pmid:24792578

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
14. 14.↵
    2. O'Kelly CJ,
    3. Krings T,
    4. Fiorella D, et al

    . A novel grading scale for the angiographic assessment of intracranial aneurysms treated using flow diverting stents. Interv Neuroradiol 2010;16:133–37 doi:10.1177/159101991001600204 pmid:20642887

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
15. 15.↵
    2. Kamran M,
    3. Yarnold J,
    4. Grunwald IQ, et al

    . Assessment of angiographic outcomes after flow diversion treatment of intracranial aneurysms: a new grading schema. Neuroradiology 2011;53:501–08 doi:10.1007/s00234-010-0767-5 pmid:20838782

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
16. 16.↵
    2. Grunwald IQ,
    3. Kamran M,
    4. Corkill RA, et al

    . Simple measurement of aneurysm residual after treatment: the SMART scale for evaluation of intracranial aneurysms treated with flow diverters. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2012;154:21–26; discussion 26 doi:10.1007/s00701-011-1177-0 pmid:22002552

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
17. 17.↵
    2. Lubicz B,
    3. Klisch J,
    4. Gauvrit JY, et al

    . WEB-DL endovascular treatment of wide-neck bifurcation aneurysms: short- and midterm results in a European study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2014;35:432–38 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3869 pmid:24457823

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
18. 18.↵
    2. Saatci I,
    3. Yavuz K,
    4. Ozer C, et al

    . Treatment of intracranial aneurysms using the Pipeline flow-diverter embolization device: a single-center experience with long-term follow-up results. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33:1436–46 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3246 pmid:22821921

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
19. 19.↵
    2. Yavuz K,
    3. Geyik S,
    4. Saatci I, et al

    . Endovascular treatment of middle cerebral artery aneurysms with flow modification with the use of the Pipeline embolization device. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2014;35:529–35 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3692 pmid:24072620

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
20. 20.↵
    2. Dai D,
    3. Ding YH,
    4. Kadirvel R, et al

    . Patency of branches after coverage with multiple telescoping flow-diverter devices: an in vivo study in rabbits. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33:171–74 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2879 pmid:22158925

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
21. 21.↵
    2. Pierot L,
    3. Liebig T,
    4. Sychra V, et al

    . Intrasaccular flow-disruption treatment of intracranial aneurysms: preliminary results of a multicenter clinical study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33:1232–38 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3191 pmid:22678844

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
22. 22.↵
    2. Becske T,
    3. Kallmes DF,
    4. Saatci I, et al

    . Pipeline for uncoilable or failed aneurysms: results from a multicenter clinical trial. Radiology 2013;267:858–68 doi:10.1148/radiol.13120099 pmid:23418004

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
23. 23.↵
    2. Kadirvel R,
    3. Ding YH,
    4. Dai D, et al

    . Cellular mechanisms of aneurysm occlusion after treatment with a flow diverter. Radiology 2014;270:394–99 doi:10.1148/radiol.13130796 pmid:24086073

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
24. 24.↵
    2. Dai D,
    3. Ding YH,
    4. Rezek I, et al

    . Characterizing patterns of endothelialization following coil embolization: a whole-mount, dual immunostaining approach. J Neurointerv Surg 2015 Feb 2. [Epub ahead of print] doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2014-011513 pmid:25646129

    Abstract/FREE Full Text