Cerebral CTA with Low Tube Voltage and Low Contrast Material Volume for Detection of Intracranial Aneurysms

References

1. 1.↵
   2. van Gijn J,
   3. Kerr RS,
   4. Rinkel GJ

   . Subarachnoid haemorrhage. Lancet 2007;369:306–18 doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60153-6 pmid:17258671

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
2. 2.↵
   2. Vlak MH,
   3. Algra A,
   4. Brandenburg R, et al

   . Prevalence of unruptured intracranial aneurysms, with emphasis on sex, age, comorbidity, country, and time period: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Neurol 2011;10:626–36 doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(11)70109-0 pmid:21641282

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
3. 3.↵
   2. Rabinstein AA,
   3. Lanzino G,
   4. Wijdicks EF

   . Multidisciplinary management and emerging therapeutic strategies in aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage. Lancet Neurol 2010;9:504–19 doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(10)70087-9 pmid:20398858

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
4. 4.↵
   2. Lu L,
   3. Zhang LJ,
   4. Poon CS, et al

   . Digital subtraction CT angiography for detection of intracranial aneurysms: comparison with three-dimensional digital subtraction angiography. Radiology 2012;262:605–12 doi:10.1148/radiol.11110486 pmid:22143927

   CrossRefPubMed
5. 5.↵
   2. Moran CJ

   . Aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: DSA versus CT angiography—is the answer available? Radiology 2011;258:15–17 doi:10.1148/radiol.101911 pmid:21183489

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
6. 6.↵
   2. Chen W,
   3. Xing W,
   4. Peng Y, et al

   . Cerebral aneurysms: accuracy of 320-detector row nonsubtracted and subtracted volumetric CT angiography for diagnosis. Radiology 2013;269:841–49 doi:10.1148/radiol.13130191 pmid:24009353

   CrossRefPubMed
7. 7.↵
   2. Westerlaan HE,
   3. van Dijk J,
   4. Jansen-van der Weide MC, et al

   . Intracranial aneurysms in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage: CT angiography as a primary examination tool for diagnosis—systematic review and meta-analysis. Radiology 2011;258:134–45 doi:10.1148/radiol.10092373 pmid:20935079

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
8. 8.↵
   2. Luo S,
   3. Zhang LJ,
   4. Meinel FG, et al

   . Low tube voltage and low contrast material volume cerebral CT angiography. Eur Radiol 2014;24:1677–85 doi:10.1007/s00330-014-3184-z pmid:24792591

   CrossRefPubMed
9. 9.↵
   2. Millon D,
   3. Derelle AL,
   4. Omoumi P, et al

   . Nontraumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage management: evaluation with reduced iodine volume at CT angiography. Radiology 2012;264:203–09 doi:10.1148/radiol.12111384 pmid:22627598

   CrossRefPubMed
10. 10.↵
    2. Ramgren B,
    3. Björkman-Burtscher IM,
    4. Holtås S, et al

    . CT angiography of intracranial arterial vessels: impact of tube voltage and contrast media concentration on image quality. Acta Radiol 2012;53:929–34 doi:10.1258/ar.2012.120218 pmid:22903017

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
11. 11.↵
    2. Sun G,
    3. Ding J,
    4. Lu Y, et al

    . Comparison of standard-and low-tube voltage 320-detector row volume CT angiography in detection of intracranial aneurysms with digital subtraction angiography as gold standard. Acad Radiol 2012;19:281–88 doi:10.1016/j.acra.2011.11.004 pmid:22206609

    CrossRefPubMed
12. 12.↵
    2. Tang K,
    3. Li R,
    4. Lin J, et al

    . The value of cerebral CT angiography with low tube voltage in detection of intracranial aneurysms. Biomed Res Int 2015;2015:876796 doi:10.1155/2015/876796 pmid:25710034

    CrossRefPubMed
13. 13.↵
    2. Cho ES,
    3. Chung TS,
    4. Oh DK, et al

    . Cerebral computed tomography angiography using a low tube voltage (80 kVp) and a moderate concentration of iodine contrast material: a quantitative and qualitative comparison with conventional computed tomography angiography. Invest Radiol 2012;47:142–47 doi:10.1097/RLI.0b013e31823076a4 pmid:22104960

    CrossRefPubMed
14. 14.↵
    2. Furtado A,
    3. Adraktas D,
    4. Brasic N, et al

    . The triple rule-out for acute ischemic stroke: imaging the brain, carotid arteries, aorta, and heart. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2010;31:1290–96 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2075 pmid:20360341

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
15. 15.↵
    2. Chen GZ,
    3. Zhang LJ,
    4. Schoepf UJ, et al

    . Radiation dose and image quality of 70 kVp cerebral CT angiography with optimized sinogram-affirmed iterative reconstruction: comparison with 120 kVp cerebral CT angiography. Eur Radiol 2015;25:1453–63 doi:10.1007/s00330-014-3533-y pmid:25636415

    CrossRefPubMed
16. 16.↵
    2. Söderman M,
    3. Holmin S,
    4. Andersson T, et al

    . Image noise reduction algorithm for digital subtraction angiography: clinical results. Radiology 2013;269:553–60 doi:10.1148/radiol.13121262 pmid:23737536

    CrossRefPubMed
17. 17.↵
    2. Szucs-Farkas Z,
    3. Bensler S,
    4. Torrente JC, et al

    . Nonlinear three-dimensional noise filter with low-dose CT angiography: effect on the detection of small high-contrast objects in a phantom model. Radiology 2011;258:261–69 doi:10.1148/radiol.10100760 pmid:21062921

    CrossRefPubMed
18. 18.↵
    2. Zhang WL,
    3. Li M,
    4. Zhang B, et al

    . CT angiography of the head-and-neck vessels acquired with low tube voltage, low iodine, and iterative image reconstruction: clinical evaluation of radiation dose and image quality. PLoS One 2013;8:e81486 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0081486 pmid:24339936

    CrossRefPubMed
19. 19.↵
    2. McCollough CH,
    3. Primak AN,
    4. Braun N, et al

    . Strategies for reducing radiation dose in CT. Radiol Clin North Am 2009;47:27–40 doi:10.1016/j.rcl.2008.10.006 pmid:19195532

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
20. 20.↵
    2. Zhao H,
    3. Wang J,
    4. Liu X, et al

    . Assessment of carotid artery atherosclerotic disease by using three-dimensional fast black-blood MR imaging: comparison with DSA. Radiology 2015;274:508–16 doi:10.1148/radiol.14132687 pmid:25286322

    CrossRefPubMed
21. 21.↵
    2. Smith AB,
    3. Dillon WP,
    4. Gould R, et al

    . Radiation dose reduction strategies for neuroradiology CT protocols. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2007;28:1628–32 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A0814 pmid:17893208

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
22. 22.↵
    2. Graser A,
    3. Wintersperger BJ,
    4. Suess C, et al

    . Dose reduction and image quality in MDCT colonography using tube current modulation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2006;187:695–701 doi:10.2214/AJR.05.0662 pmid:16928932

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
23. 23.↵
    2. Hérin E,
    3. Gardavaud F,
    4. Chiaradia M, et al

    . Use of Model-Based Iterative Reconstruction (MBIR) in reduced-dose CT for routine follow-up of patients with malignant lymphoma: dose savings, image quality and phantom study. Eur Radiol 2015;25:2362–70 doi:10.1007/s00330-015-3656-9 pmid:25749813

    CrossRefPubMed
24. 24.↵
    2. Geyer LL,
    3. Schoepf UJ,
    4. Meinel FG, et al

    . State of the art: iterative CT reconstruction techniques. Radiology 2015;276:339–57 doi:10.1148/radiol.2015132766 pmid:26203706

    CrossRefPubMed
25. 25.↵
    2. Pereira BJA,
    3. Holanda VM,
    4. de Holanda CVM, et al

    . Intracranial aneurysm arising from infundibular dilation. BMJ Case Rep 2013;2013:pii: bcr2013200115 doi:10.1136/bcr-2013-200115 pmid:23904431

    CrossRefPubMed
26. 26.↵
    2. Donmez H,
    3. Serifov E,
    4. Kahriman G, et al

    . Comparison of 16-row multislice CT angiography with conventional angiography for detection and evaluation of intracranial aneurysms. Eur J Radiol 2011;80:455–61 doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2010.07.012 pmid:20729022

    CrossRefPubMed
27. 27.↵
    2. Korn A,
    3. Bender B,
    4. Fenchel M, et al

    . Sinogram affirmed iterative reconstruction in head CT: improvement of objective and subjective image quality with concomitant radiation dose reduction. Eur J Radiol 2013;82:1431–35 doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2013.03.011 pmid:23587902

    CrossRefPubMed
28. 28.↵
    2. Moscariello A,
    3. Takx RA,
    4. Schoepf UJ, et al

    . Coronary CT angiography: image quality, diagnostic accuracy, and potential for radiation dose reduction using a novel iterative image reconstruction technique—comparison with traditional filtered back projection. Eur Radiol 2011;21:2130–38 doi:10.1007/s00330-011-2164-9 pmid:21611758

    CrossRefPubMed