Virtual-versus-Real Implantation of Flow Diverters: Clinical Potential and Influence of Vascular Geometry

References

1. 1.↵
   2. Brinjikji W,
   3. Kallmes DF,
   4. Kadirvel R

   . Mechanisms of healing in coiled intracranial aneurysms: a review of the literature. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2015;36:1216–22 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4175 pmid:25430855

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
2. 2.↵
   2. Becske T,
   3. Kallmes DF,
   4. Saatci I, et al

   . Pipeline for uncoilable or failed aneurysms: results from a multicenter clinical trial. Radiology 2013;267:858–68 doi:10.1148/radiol.13120099 pmid:23418004

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
3. 3.↵
   2. Turjman F,
   3. Levrier O,
   4. Combaz X, et al

   . EVIDENCE trial: design of a phase 2, randomized, controlled, multicenter study comparing flow diversion and traditional endovascular strategy in unruptured saccular wide-necked intracranial aneurysms. Neuroradiology 2015;57:49–54 doi:10.1007/s00234-014-1439-7 pmid:25280445

   CrossRefPubMed
4. 4.↵
   2. Pereira VM,
   3. Kelly M,
   4. Vega P, et al

   . New Pipeline Flex device: initial experience and technical nuances. J Neurointerv Surg 2015;7:920–25 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2014-011347 pmid:25280568

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
5. 5.↵
   2. Pereira VM,
   3. Bonnefous O,
   4. Ouared R, et al

   . A DSA-based method using contrast-motion estimation for the assessment of the intra-aneurysmal flow changes induced by flow-diverter stents. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2013;34:808–15 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3322 pmid:23124641

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
6. 6.↵
   2. Pereira VM,
   3. Brina O,
   4. Delattre BM, et al

   . Assessment of intra-aneurysmal flow modification after flow diverter stent placement with four-dimensional flow MRI: a feasibility study. J Neurointerv Surg 2015;7:913–19 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2014-011348 pmid:25280571

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
7. 7.↵
   2. Ferns SP,
   3. Sprengers ME,
   4. van Rooij WJ, et al

   . Coiling of intracranial aneurysms a systematic review on initial occlusion and reopening and retreatment rates. Stroke 2009;40:E523–29 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.553099 pmid:19520984

   CrossRefPubMed
8. 8.↵
   2. Zhou Y,
   3. Yang PF,
   4. Fang YB, et al

   . A novel flow-diverting device (Tubridge) for the treatment of 28 large or giant intracranial aneurysms: a single-center experience. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2014;35:2326–33 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3925 pmid:24722307

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
9. 9.↵
   2. Brinjikji W,
   3. Murad MH,
   4. Lanzino G, et al

   . Endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms with flow diverters: a meta-analysis. Stroke 2013;44:442–47 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.112.678151 pmid:23321438

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
10. 10.↵
    2. Heller RS,
    3. Malek AM

    . Parent vessel size and curvature strongly influence risk of incomplete stent apposition in Enterprise intracranial aneurysm stent coiling. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32:1714–20 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2584 pmid:21816918

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
11. 11.↵
    2. Bing F,
    3. Darsaut TE,
    4. Salazkin I, et al

    . Stents and flow diverters in the treatment of aneurysms: device deformation in vivo may alter porosity and impact efficacy. Neuroradiology 2013;55:85–92 doi:10.1007/s00234-012-1082-0 pmid:22895818

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
12. 12.↵
    2. Makoyeva A,
    3. Bing F,
    4. Darsaut TE, et al

    . The varying porosity of braided self-expanding stents and flow diverters: an experimental study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2013;34:596–602 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3234 pmid:22878007

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
13. 13.↵
    2. Mut F,
    3. Cebral JR

    . Effects of flow-diverting device oversizing on hemodynamics alteration in cerebral aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33:2010–16 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3080 pmid:22555581

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
14. 14.↵
    2. Ouared R,
    3. Larrabide I,
    4. Brina O, et al

    . Computational fluid dynamics analysis of flow reduction induced by flow-diverting stents in intracranial aneurysms: a patient-unspecific hemodynamics change perspective. J Neurointerv Surg 2016 Feb 15. [Epub ahead of print] doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2015-012154 pmid:26880724

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
15. 15.↵
    2. Kulcsár Z,
    3. Augsburger L,
    4. Reymond P, et al

    . Flow diversion treatment: intra-aneurismal blood flow velocity and WSS reduction are parameters to predict aneurysm thrombosis. Acta Neurochir 2012;154:1827–34 doi:10.1007/s00701-012-1482-2 pmid:22926629

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
16. 16.↵
    2. Mut F,
    3. Raschi M,
    4. Scrivano E, et al

    . Association between hemodynamic conditions and occlusion times after flow diversion in cerebral aneurysms. J Neurointerv Surg 2015;7:286–90 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2013-011080 pmid:24696500

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
17. 17.↵
    2. Bouillot P,
    3. Brina O,
    4. Ouared R, et al

    . Geometrical deployment for braided stent. Med Imag Anal 2016;30:85–94 doi:10.1016/j.media.2016.01.006 pmid:26891065

    CrossRefPubMed
18. 18.↵
    2. Kim JH,
    3. Kang TJ,
    4. Yu WR

    . Mechanical modeling of self-expandable stent fabricated using braiding technology. J Biomech 2008;41:3202–12 doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2008.08.005 pmid:18804764

    CrossRefPubMed
19. 19.↵
    2. Ma D,
    3. Dumont TM,
    4. Kosukegawa H, et al

    . High fidelity virtual stenting (HiFiVS) for intracranial aneurysm flow diversion: in vitro and in silico. Ann Biomed Eng 2013;41:2143–56 doi:10.1007/s10439-013-0808-4 pmid:23604850

    CrossRefPubMed
20. 20.↵
    2. Bernardini A,
    3. Larrabide I,
    4. Petrini L

    , al. Deployment of self-expandable stents in aneurysmatic cerebral vessels: comparison of different computational approaches for interventional planning. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin 2012;15:303–11 doi:10.1080/10255842.2010.527838 pmid:21491256

    CrossRefPubMed
21. 21.↵
    2. De Bock S,
    3. Iannaccone F,
    4. De Santis G, et al

    . Our capricious vessels: the influence of stent design and vessel geometry on the mechanics of intracranial aneurysm stent deployment. J Biomech 2012;45:1353–59 doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2012.03.012 pmid:22483228

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
22. 22.↵
    2. Janiga G,
    3. Rössl C,
    4. Skalej M, et al

    . Realistic virtual intracranial stenting and computational fluid dynamics for treatment analysis. J Biomech 2013;46:7–12 doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2012.08.047 pmid:23063770

    CrossRefPubMed
23. 23.↵
    2. Appanaboyina S,
    3. Mut F,
    4. Löhner R, et al

    . Simulation of intracranial aneurysm stenting: techniques and challenges. Comput Method Appl M 2009;198:3567–82 doi:10.1016/j.cma.2009.01.017

    CrossRefWeb of Science
24. 24.↵
    2. Larrabide I,
    3. Kim M,
    4. Augsburger L, et al

    . Fast virtual deployment of self-expandable stents: method and in vitro evaluation for intracranial aneurysmal stenting. Med Imag Anal 2012;16:721–30 doi:10.1016/j.media.2010.04.009 pmid:20627664

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
25. 25.↵
    2. Spranger K,
    3. Ventikos Y

    . Which spring is the best? Comparison of methods for virtual stenting. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2014;61:1998–2010 doi:10.1109/TBME.2014.2311856 pmid:24956618

    CrossRefPubMed
26. 26.↵
    2. Flórez-Valencia L,
    3. Orkisz M,
    4. Montagnat J

    . 3D graphical models for vascular-stent pose simulation. Machine Graphics & Vision 2004;13:235–48
27. 27.↵
    2. Kizilkilic O,
    3. Kocer N,
    4. Metaxas GE, et al

    . Utility of VasoCT in the treatment of intracranial aneurysm with flow-diverter stents. J Neurosurg 2012;117:45–49 doi:10.3171/2012.4.JNS111660 pmid:22559846

    CrossRefPubMed
28. 28.↵
    2. Higgins WE,
    3. Ojard EJ

    . Interactive morphological watershed analysis for 3D medical images. Comput Med Imaging Graph 1993;17:387–95 doi:10.1016/0895-6111(93)90033-J pmid:8306314

    CrossRefPubMed
29. 29.↵
    2. Meyer F

    . Topographic distance and watershed lines. Signal Process 1994;38:113–25 doi:10.1016/0165-1684(94)90060-4

    CrossRefWeb of Science
30. 30.↵
    2. Antiga L,
    3. Piccinelli M,
    4. Botti L, et al

    . An image-based modeling framework for patient-specific computational hemodynamics. Med Biol Eng Comput 2008;46:1097–112 doi:10.1007/s11517-008-0420-1 pmid:19002516

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
31. 31.↵
    2. Bouillot P,
    3. Brina O,
    4. Ouared R, et al

    . Particle imaging velocimetry evaluation of intracranial stents in sidewall aneurysm: hemodynamic transition related to the stent design. PLoS One 2014;9:e113762 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0113762 pmid:25470724

    CrossRefPubMed
32. 32.↵
    2. King RM,
    3. Chueh JY,
    4. van der Bom IM, et al

    . The effect of intracranial stent implantation on the curvature of the cerebrovasculature. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33:1657–62 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3062 pmid:22538075

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
33. 33.↵
    2. Gascou G,
    3. Lobotesis K,
    4. Brunel H, et al

    . Extra-aneurysmal flow modification following Pipeline embolization device implantation: focus on regional branches, perforators, and the parent vessel. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2015;36:725–31 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4191 pmid:25523592

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
34. 34.↵
    2. Kulcsár Z,
    3. Houdart E,
    4. Bonafé A, et al

    . Intra-aneurysmal thrombosis as a possible cause of delayed aneurysm rupture after flow-diversion treatment. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32:20–25 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2370 pmid:21071538

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
35. 35.↵
    2. Zanaty M,
    3. Chalouhi N,
    4. Tjoumakaris SI, et al

    . Flow-diversion panacea or poison? Front Neurol 2014;5:21 doi:10.3389/fneur.2014.00021 pmid:24592254

    CrossRefPubMed
36. 36.↵
    2. Reymond P,
    3. Bohraus Y,
    4. Perren F, et al

    . Validation of a patient-specific one-dimensional model of the systemic arterial tree. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2011;301:H1173–82 doi:10.1152/ajpheart.00821.2010 pmid:21622820

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
37. 37.↵
    2. Estrade L,
    3. Makoyeva A,
    4. Darsaut TE, et al

    . In vitro reproduction of device deformation leading to thrombotic complications and failure of flow diversion. Interv Neuroradiol 2013;19:432–37 pmid:24355146

    Abstract/FREE Full Text