Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
  • Special Collections
    • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)
    • 2024 AJNR Journal Awards
    • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcast
    • AJNR Scantastics
    • Video Articles
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Author Policies
    • Fast publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Submit a Case for the Case Collection
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Other Publications
    • ajnr

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
  • Special Collections
    • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)
    • 2024 AJNR Journal Awards
    • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcast
    • AJNR Scantastics
    • Video Articles
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Author Policies
    • Fast publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Submit a Case for the Case Collection
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

Welcome to the new AJNR, Updated Hall of Fame, and more. Read the full announcements.


AJNR is seeking candidates for the position of Associate Section Editor, AJNR Case Collection. Read the full announcement.

 

Research ArticleFUNCTIONAL
Open Access

DTI Analysis of Presbycusis Using Voxel-Based Analysis

W. Ma, M. Li, F. Gao, X. Zhang, L. Shi, L. Yu, B. Zhao, W. Chen, G. Wang and X. Wang
American Journal of Neuroradiology November 2016, 37 (11) 2110-2114; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A4870
W. Ma
aFrom the Department of Otolaryngology (W.M., L.S.)
bthe Second Hospital of Shandong University, The Central Hospital of Jinan City (W.M., L.Y.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for W. Ma
M. Li
dCollege of Electronics and Information Engineering (M.L.), Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for M. Li
F. Gao
cShandong Medical Imaging Research Institute (F.G., X.Z., B.Z., G.W.), Shandong University, Jinan, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for F. Gao
X. Zhang
cShandong Medical Imaging Research Institute (F.G., X.Z., B.Z., G.W.), Shandong University, Jinan, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for X. Zhang
L. Shi
aFrom the Department of Otolaryngology (W.M., L.S.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for L. Shi
L. Yu
bthe Second Hospital of Shandong University, The Central Hospital of Jinan City (W.M., L.Y.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for L. Yu
B. Zhao
cShandong Medical Imaging Research Institute (F.G., X.Z., B.Z., G.W.), Shandong University, Jinan, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for B. Zhao
W. Chen
ePhilips Healthcare (W.C.), Shanghai, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for W. Chen
G. Wang
cShandong Medical Imaging Research Institute (F.G., X.Z., B.Z., G.W.), Shandong University, Jinan, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for G. Wang
X. Wang
fthe Department of Radiation Oncology (X.W.), University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for X. Wang
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Presbycusis is the most common sensory deficit in the aging population. A recent study reported using a DTI-based tractography technique to identify a lack of integrity in a portion of the auditory pathway in patients with presbycusis. The aim of our study was to investigate the white matter pathology of patients with presbycusis by using a voxel-based analysis that is highly sensitive to local intensity changes in DTI data.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifteen patients with presbycusis and 14 age- and sex-matched healthy controls were scanned on a 3T scanner. Fractional anisotropy, mean diffusivity, axial diffusivity, and radial diffusivity were obtained from the DTI data. Intergroup statistics were implemented on these measurements, which were transformed to Montreal Neurological Institute coordinates by using a nonrigid image registration method called large deformation diffeomorphic metric mapping.

RESULTS: Increased axial diffusivity, radial diffusivity, and mean diffusivity and decreased fractional anisotropy were found near the right-side hearing-related areas in patients with presbycusis. Increased radial diffusivity and mean diffusivity were also found near a language-related area (Broca area) in patients with presbycusis.

CONCLUSIONS: Our findings could be important for exploring reliable imaging evidence of presbycusis and could complement an ROI-based approach.

ABBREVIATIONS:

DA
axial diffusivity
dB HL
decibel hearing level
DR
radial diffusivity
FA
fractional anisotropy
MD
mean diffusivity
PTA
pure-tone average

Age-related hearing loss, also known as presbycusis, is the most common sensory deficit in the aging population. Presbycusis is usually characterized by progressive hearing loss at high frequencies, which are particularly important for speech recognition. Hypofunction of the inner ear is the main reason for the peripheral component of presbycusis.1 However, poor speech discrimination and deteriorated temporal sound processing reflect a possible central component of presbycusis.2,3 Moreover, many animal studies have showed the existence of a central component of presbycusis.4,5

Recent studies of multiple MR imaging modalities have demonstrated their capabilities of offering reliable imaging markers for recognizing presbycusis. In a structural MR imaging study, the volume and surface area were decreased in the auditory cortex areas of patients with presbycusis compared with young healthy controls.6 In a functional MR imaging study, patients with presbycusis showed higher blood oxygen level–dependent activation in response to acoustic stimuli in the temporal lobes compared with young healthy controls.7

The aforementioned imaging markers were mainly explored in gray matter, whereas white matter integrity, as one of the most sensitive indicators of axon damage or demyelination, requires further study. A widely used technique, DTI, has been considered as the most effective method for characterizing white matter organization. Multiple scalar measurements, including fractional anisotropy (FA), mean diffusivity (MD), axial diffusivity (DA), and radial diffusivity (DR), can be calculated from DTI data through tensor calculation. These measurements are useful indicators for characterizing various types of pathology in the human brain.

Many DTI studies have reported changes in the auditory pathway and auditory cortex in patients with sensorineural hearing loss.8,9 To our knowledge, only 1 study has reported a lack of white matter integrity in patients with mild presbycusis by applying an intergroup statistic on the ROI-based features, which was in the form of reconstructed auditory tracts.6 Besides that, the study showed no obvious differences in any measured DTI parameters between mild presbycusis and expressed presbycusis. Although promising, a more reliable imaging marker of presbycusis could be established by designing more sophisticated experiments. First, the reconstructed auditory pathway was partly obscured by the optic radiation. This so-called “fiber-crossing issue” could be mitigated by using probabilistic tractography; however, the “gold standard” for validating the tractography, especially in the fiber-crossing area, has not been established. In addition, though using the average characteristic with an ROI is an effective manner of dimensional reduction and noise filtering,10 a limitation is its reduced sensitivity to localized anatomic alterations that only affect parts of a predefined structure.11 Therefore, we used a voxel-based analysis, which might be considered as an alternative way to explore the imaging makers of presbycusis in the white matter.

Materials and Methods

Patients

This study was approved by the Shandong University institutional review board, and each participant provided informed consent. Fifteen patients with mild presbycusis (presbycusis group, 5 men and 10 women; mean age, 63.2 ± 2.6 years) who visited the department of otolaryngology of the central hospital of Jinan city were recruited in this study (Table). Hearing loss was defined as a speech-frequency pure-tone average (PTA) of thresholds at 0.5, 1, 2, and 4 kHz (air conduction) in the better-hearing ear, per the definition of hearing loss adjudicated by the World Health Organization. The PTA value of 25 decibel hearing level (dB HL) was accepted as the normal hearing threshold limit.12 Inclusion criteria were mild hearing loss (defined as 25 dB HL < PTA ≤ 40 dB HL in the better-hearing ear) and age ≥60 years. Exclusion criteria were ear diseases that affect hearing thresholds and sensorineural hearing losses other than presbycusis; history of otologic surgery, ototoxic drug therapy, noise exposure, or hearing aid use; asymmetric hearing loss with a difference in air conduction thresholds exceeding 20 dB in at least 2 frequencies between 0.5, 1, 2, and 4 KHz; conductive hearing loss (the mean air-bone differences at 0.5, 1, 2, and 4 KHz) >10 dB in 1 or both ears; and tinnitus, head trauma, lesions of the facial nerve, disorders of the cervical spine, or neurologic or psychiatric disease. The complete list of exclusion criteria was previously described.13

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup

Demographic and auditory function of the presbycusis and control groups

Fourteen age- and sex-matched healthy controls (control group, 6 men and 8 women; mean age, 62.4 ± 2.0 years; PTA ≤25 dB HL in the better-hearing ear) were recruited for this study. All controls were in good health and had no history of neurologic or psychiatric disease. Healthy controls were matched for education levels (Table).

None of the subjects were music professionals. All subjects were right-handed according to Li's Handedness Inventory, which was designed for Chinese populations.14,15

Assessment of Auditory Function

An otoscopic examination was performed in all patients to remove cerumen and confirm the presence of an intact tympanic membrane. The hearing abilities of all patients were evaluated by using pure-tone audiometry and tympanometry. The pure-tone audiometry was performed with a Madsen Electronics Midimate 622 Clinical/Diagnostic Audiometer (GN Otometrics, Taastrup, Denmark) coupled with Telephonics TDH-39P headphones (Telephonics, Farmingdale, New York). Bone conduction was measured at 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, and 4 KHz, and air conduction was measured at 0.125, 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 8 KHz. Hearing thresholds were detected with a resolution of 5 decibel steps. The PTA values of all patients' ears were calculated. The tympanometry was performed with a Madsen Electronics Zodiac 901 Middle Ear Analyzer (GN Otometrics) to confirm optimal middle-ear conditions.

DTI and Data Processing

All patients were scanned on a 3T scanner (Achieva TX; Philips Healthcare, Best, the Netherlands) using an 8-channel phased-array head coil as a receiver. The DTI dataset was acquired with a multisection, single-shot, EPI, spin-echo sequence (TR/TE = 6281/67 ms; sensitivity encoding factor = 2.5). Sixty-five transverse sections were acquired parallel to the line connecting the anterior commissure to the posterior commissure with no section gap and 2.2-mm nominal isotropic resolution. Diffusion weighting was applied along 32 directions with a b-value of 700 seconds/mm2. Five minimally weighted images (5 B0 with b=33 seconds/mm2) were acquired and averaged on the scanner as part of each DTI dataset.

The raw diffusion-weighted images were first coregistered to the B0 images and corrected for eddy current and patient motion with affine transformation by using Automated Image Registration (http://bishopw.loni.ucla.edu/air5/).16 The 6 elements of the diffusion tensor were calculated for each pixel with multivariate linear fitting by using DTIStudio (Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland).17 After diagonalization, 3 eigenvalues and eigenvectors, as well as FA, MD, DA, and DR, were obtained. A 2-step image transformation was used to warp the individual data to a standard template, JHU-MNI-ss (Johns Hopkins University, www.mristudio.org) in the ICBM-152/ICBM-DTI-81 space. First, affine transformation was used to globally adjust the brain position, rotation, and size. Next, a nonlinear transformation with large deformation diffeomorphic metric mapping18 was applied to accurately warp the local structures. The dual-contrast large deformation diffeomorphic metric mapping, in which both the B0 image and the FA map were applied simultaneously, was used. These procedures are reciprocal and provide forward (subject to atlas) and backward (atlas to subject) transformation matrices. FA, MD, DA, and DR images then were transformed to template space by using the forward matrix. After the registration, all images were smoothed using statistical parametric mapping by setting the full width at half maximum = [4 4 4].

Statistical Analysis

The 2-tailed Student t test was performed to test for differences in age, education levels, and PTA between patients with presbycusis and healthy controls. The differences in sex were evaluated by a 2-tailed Pearson χ2 test. The threshold of significance was set at P = .05. Statistical analyses were performed by using the SPSS version 18.0 software package (IBM, Armonk, New York).

Intergroup statistics were implemented (voxel by voxel) to several DTI indices, including FA, MD, DA, and DR, which had been transformed to the standard space. The results were obtained from SPM8 (http://www.fil.ion.ucl.ac.uk/spm/) by the application of multiple comparisons and the setting of thresholds of P < .001 (uncorrected) at voxel level and P < .05 (family-wise error–corrected) at cluster level. The minimum cluster size was 100 voxels. The results were visualized by using a Matlab (MathWorks, Natick, Massachusetts) toolbox named xjview (http://www.alivelearn.net/xjview).

Results

All patients had a type-A curve on tympanometry, which indicated normal middle-ear function. There was no significant difference in PTA between the left and right ears in the presbycusis group (P = .49) or the control group (P = .10); therefore, the thresholds of both ears were averaged in each group. The PTA was significantly higher in patients with presbycusis than in healthy patients (P < .001 [Table]). In the control group, the mean hearing thresholds were <20 dB HL at all frequencies; in the presbycusis group, the mean hearing thresholds were >20 dB HL at 1 kHz and reached 46.8 dB HL at 4 kHz and 55.2 dB HL at 8 kHz (Fig 1).

Fig 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 1.

Results of pure-tone audiometry from 125 Hz to 8000 Hz (air conduction). Hearing thresholds from both ears are averaged (mean ± standard deviation) in the presbycusis (PC) and healthy control (NC) groups.

The results of voxel-based analyses are shown in Fig 2. The presbycusis group showed increased DA near the right-side Heschl gyrus and increased DR near the right-side Heschl gyrus and the left-side inferior frontal gyrus. The presbycusis group showed decreased FA near the right-side angular gyrus and inferior frontal gyrus and decreased FA near the right-side temporal pole and middle temporal gyrus, which were partly overlapped with acoustic radiation. The presbycusis group also showed increased MD near the right-side Heschl gyrus and the left-side inferior frontal gyrus. The On-line Table specifies the above-mentioned areas distributed in the brain image as voxel clusters with detailed information, including the peak coordinates in the Montreal Neurological Institute space, cluster-level P value, and peak T-value of each cluster.

Fig 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 2.

Voxel-based analysis results. The DA, DR, and MD were significantly increased and the FA was significantly decreased in the presbycusis group compared with the healthy control group (P < .001 at voxel level, uncorrected; P < .05 at cluster level, family-wise error–corrected). Each cluster contains more than 100 adjacency voxels that show significant variation of those diffusion parameters. For example, DA cluster 1 denotes the first group of voxels that show significant intergroup difference of DA, whereas DR cluster 1 denotes the first group of voxels that show significant intergroup difference of DR. The significant voxels are displayed with their T-values. The ascending T-values are shown from darkness to brightness. Each panel displays a single cluster with its location indicated by a blue section marker.

Discussion

Our study demonstrated altered DA, DR, FA, and MD near the right-side hearing-related areas of patients with presbycusis compared with age- and sex-matched healthy controls. Increased DR and MD were also observed in a language-related area (Broca area) of patients with presbycusis. To our knowledge, this is the first in vivo demonstration of presbycusis-related changes over the entire brain in a DTI fashion by using a voxel-based analysis.

The scalar measurements of DTI were capable of characterizing various white matter pathologies. Among all of these measurements, FA was sensitive to various microstructural changes19; MD was considered the inverse measure of the membrane attenuation and fluid viscosity20; DA was considered highly sensitive to axonal degeneration; and DR was sensitive to demyelination.21 DTI technique was introduced to study the macroscopic architecture of white matter. However, several animal studies have shown changes of DTI parameters, including MD, DA, and DR, in gray matter areas because of neuron loss. FA did not account for those contributions because the dendrites are only partially coherently organized and the axons are not homogeneously distributed and might be myelinated or unmyelinated in gray matter.22,23 When overlaid to the statistical parametric mapping–integrated T1 template, the changes were seen mostly within the subcortical white matter areas with a small portion of voxels overlapped with cortex. Because it is difficult to separate the white matter and gray matter with DTI contrast, the results are elaborated with “gyrus” (which contain both subcortical white matter and cortex) as its units. In our study, increased DA, DR, and MD were found near the right-side Heschl gyrus in patients with presbycusis; decreased FA was also seen in white matter areas that partly overlapped with the right-side acoustic radiation. To further examine the functional representation of the clusters shown in the On-line Table, we overlaid the Brodmann atlas to our results and found that changes overlapped with superior temporal gyrus and angular gyrus were close to Brodmann area 41, which refers to the auditory cortex. These results could indicate a dysfunctional auditory pathway in presbycusis. This is consistent with previous studies where the DTI-based parameters were changed at the Heschl gyrus, superior temporal gyrus, lateral lemniscus, auditory radiation, and inferior colliculus in patients with sensorineural hearing loss.9,24,25 Two possible explanations for the alteration shown in the right-side hearing-related areas are as follows: 1) Presbycusis is most often characterized by a decline in frequency audibility toward high frequencies, which is crucial for pitch perception. One study has demonstrated that the right hemisphere was the dominant hemisphere involved in pitch perception26; and 2) Another study found a clear rightward asymmetry in the white matter under the auditory cortex in patients with presbycusis.6

To our knowledge, only 1 study has used a DTI-based technique to investigate microstructural changes in the white matter of patients with presbycusis.6 In that study, the DA value was increased in the right-side auditory pathway of patients with mild presbycusis compared with young healthy controls. Therefore, the altered integrity of the auditory pathway might be mainly caused by aging. In our study, age-matched healthy patients served as controls, so we determined the altered integrity of the white matter in the right-side Heschl gyrus is mainly driven by hearing loss. However, there were no differences in any measured DTI parameters between patients with mild presbycusis and expressed presbycusis in the previous study.6 Except for the selection of ROI sizes (the minimal size of an ROI is a single voxel), as mentioned in the introduction, the contradiction in results might be explained by differences in the patient populations.

Apart from the findings along the auditory pathway, our results also showed changes in a language-related area within the inferior frontal gyrus (near the Broca area). This finding is consistent with previous studies: decreased audibility in patients with presbycusis influences speech processing, especially in noisy environments.3 The inability to clearly detect temporal cues is a possible reason for decreased speech understanding in patients with presbycusis.2,27 The processing of temporal cues, which mainly occurs in the auditory cortex,28 might be influenced by age-related changed inhibition.29,30 Gamma-aminobutyric acid is the main inhibitory neurotransmitter in the central auditory system. One MR spectroscopy study demonstrated that gamma-aminobutyric acid concentrations were reduced in the auditory cortex of patients with presbycusis.31 The inhibition-deficit hypothesis is also considered the reason for the decline in several other cognitive domains, such as reading.32 Altered DTI parameters were also found near the insula in patients with presbycusis. This is consistent with functional imaging studies that have shown that the insula plays an important role in auditory processing.33

Voxel-based analysis, which is capable of localizing very subtle anatomic changes, suffers from 2 major limitations. First, it searches for the group differences in a hypothesis-independent way.34 However, disease-related changes can be distributed in a complex fashion. Therefore, the voxel-based analysis is not sensitive for the detection of small and widely distributed changes in image intensities. Second, voxel-based analysis is sensitive to registration accuracy, which is not reliable enough when based on DTI. This is because DTI does not contain enough structural information compared with T1WI. The registration errors could be reduced by using a more sophisticated approach to further improve accuracy of voxel-based analysis. In addition, DTI is itself limited because it often has to pay a penalty of a higher SNR and higher sensitivity to measurement artifacts such as patient motion and eddy current.35,36 Finally, our study was further limited by the small sample size; hence, it should be viewed as a preliminary study and requires confirmation in larger samples.

Conclusions

Using a voxel-based analysis, this study revealed presbycusis-related changes of DTI parameters along the auditory pathway and a language-related area. Our findings could be important for exploring more reliable imaging evidence of presbycusis and could complement the ROI-based approach or studies by using different patient populations.

Footnotes

  • W. Ma and M. Li contributed equally to this work.

  • This project was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grants 81171380/H1807 and 81371534), Shandong Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (grant BS2015YY003), and Shandong Provincial Medical and Healthy Technology Development Program of China (grant 2015WS0176).

Indicates open access to non-subscribers at www.ajnr.org

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Schuknecht HF,
    2. Gacek MR
    . Cochlear pathology in presbycusis. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1993;102(1 Pt 2):1–16 pmid:8420477
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    1. Mazelová J,
    2. Popelar J,
    3. Syka J
    . Auditory function in presbycusis: peripheral vs. central changes. Exp Gerontol 2003;38:87–94 doi:10.1016/S0531-5565(02)00155-9 pmid:12543265
    CrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Snell KB,
    2. Frisina DR
    . Relationships among age-related differences in gap detection and word recognition. J Acoust Soc Am 2000;107:1615–26 doi:10.1121/1.428446 pmid:10738815
    CrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Suta D,
    2. Rybalko N,
    3. Pelánová J, et al
    . Age-related changes in auditory temporal processing in the rat. Exp Gerontol 2011;46:739–46 doi:10.1016/j.exger.2011.05.004 pmid:21609757
    CrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Ouda L,
    2. Druga R,
    3. Syka J
    . Changes in parvalbumin immunoreactivity with aging in the central auditory system of the rat. Expl Gerontol 2008;43:782–89 doi:10.1016/j.exger.2008.04.001 pmid:18486384
    CrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Profant O,
    2. Škoch A,
    3. Balogová Z, et al
    . Diffusion tensor imaging and MR morphometry of the central auditory pathway and auditory cortex in aging. Neuroscience 2014;260:87–97 doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2013.12.010 pmid:24333969
    CrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Profant O,
    2. Tintěra J,
    3. Balogová Z, et al
    . Functional changes in the human auditory cortex in ageing. PloS One 2015;10:e0116692 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0116692 pmid:25734519
    CrossRefPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    1. Wu CM,
    2. Ng SH,
    3. Liu TC
    . Diffusion tensor imaging of the subcortical auditory tract in subjects with long-term unilateral sensorineural hearing loss. Audiol Neurootol 2009;14:248–53 doi:10.1159/000191282 pmid:19145076
    CrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    1. Lin Y,
    2. Wang J,
    3. Wu C, et al
    . Diffusion tensor imaging of the auditory pathway in sensorineural hearing loss: changes in radial diffusivity and diffusion anisotropy. J Magn Reson Imaging 2008;28:598–603 doi:10.1002/jmri.21464 pmid:18777540
    CrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. Miller MI,
    2. Faria AV,
    3. Oishi K, et al
    . High-throughput neuro-imaging informatics. Front Neuroinform 2013;7:31 doi:10.3389/fninf.2013.00031 pmid:24381556
    CrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. Oishi K,
    2. Mielke MM,
    3. Albert M, et al
    . DTI analyses and clinical applications in Alzheimer's disease. J Alz Dis 2011;26 Suppl 3:287–96 doi:10.3233/JAD-2011-0007
    CrossRef
  12. 12.↵
    1. Lin FR,
    2. Thorpe R,
    3. Gordon-Salant S, et al
    . Hearing loss prevalence and risk factors among older adults in the United States. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2011;66:582–90 doi:10.1093/gerona/glr002 pmid:21357188
    CrossRefPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    1. Van Eyken E,
    2. Van Laer L,
    3. Fransen E, et al
    . KCNQ4: a gene for age-related hearing impairment? Hum Mutat 2006;27:1007–16 doi:10.1002/humu.20375 pmid:16917933
    CrossRefPubMed
  14. 14.↵
    1. Gong G,
    2. Jiang T,
    3. Zhu C, et al
    . Side and handedness effects on the cingulum from diffusion tensor imaging. Neuroreport 2005;16:1701–05 doi:10.1097/01.wnr.0000183327.98370.6a pmid:16189481
    CrossRefPubMed
  15. 15.↵
    1. Hatta T
    . Handedness and the brain: a review of brain-imaging techniques. Magn Reson Med Sci 2007;6:99–112 doi:10.2463/mrms.6.99 pmid:17690540
    CrossRefPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    1. Woods RP,
    2. Grafton ST,
    3. Holmes CJ, et al
    . Automated image registration: I. General methods and intrasubject, intramodality validation. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1998;22:139–52 doi:10.1097/00004728-199801000-00027 pmid:9448779
    CrossRefPubMed
  17. 17.↵
    1. Jiang H,
    2. van Zijl PC,
    3. Kim J, et al
    . DtiStudio: resource program for diffusion tensor computation and fiber bundle tracking. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 2006;81:106–16 doi:10.1016/j.cmpb.2005.08.004 pmid:16413083
    CrossRefPubMed
  18. 18.↵
    1. Ceritoglu C,
    2. Oishi K,
    3. Li X, et al
    . Multi-contrast large deformation diffeomorphic metric mapping for diffusion tensor imaging. Neuroimage 2009;47:618–27 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.04.057 pmid:19398016
    CrossRefPubMed
  19. 19.↵
    1. Beaulieu C
    . The basis of anisotropic water diffusion in the nervous system - a technical review. NMR Biomed 2002;15:435–55 doi:10.1002/nbm.782 pmid:12489094
    CrossRefPubMed
  20. 20.↵
    1. Alexander AL,
    2. Hurley SA,
    3. Samsonov AA, et al
    . Characterization of cerebral white matter properties using quantitative magnetic resonance imaging stains. Brain Connect 2011;1:423–46 doi:10.1089/brain.2011.0071 pmid:22432902
    CrossRefPubMed
  21. 21.↵
    1. Alexander AL,
    2. Lee JE,
    3. Lazar M, et al
    . Diffusion tensor imaging of the brain. Neurotherapeutics 2007;4:316–29 doi:10.1016/j.nurt.2007.05.011 pmid:17599699
    CrossRefPubMed
  22. 22.↵
    1. Song SK,
    2. Kim JH,
    3. Lin SJ, et al
    . Diffusion tensor imaging detects age-dependent white matter changes in a transgenic mouse model with amyloid deposition. Neurobiol Dis 2004;15:640–47 doi:10.1016/j.nbd.2003.12.003 pmid:15056472
    CrossRefPubMed
  23. 23.↵
    1. Zerbi V,
    2. Kleinnijenhuis M,
    3. Fang X, et al
    . Gray and white matter degeneration revealed by diffusion in an Alzheimer mouse model. Neurobiol Aging 2013;34:1440–50 doi:10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2012.11.017 pmid:23273575
    CrossRefPubMed
  24. 24.↵
    1. Lutz J,
    2. Hemminger F,
    3. Stahl R, et al
    . Evidence of subcortical and cortical aging of the acoustic pathway: a diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) study. Acad Radiol 2007;14:692–700 doi:10.1016/j.acra.2007.02.014 pmid:17502259
    CrossRefPubMed
  25. 25.↵
    1. Chang Y,
    2. Lee SH,
    3. Lee YJ, et al
    . Auditory neural pathway evaluation on sensorineural hearing loss using diffusion tensor imaging. Neuroreport 2004;15:1699–703 doi:10.1097/01.wnr.0000134584.10207.1a pmid:15257130
    CrossRefPubMed
  26. 26.↵
    1. Zatorre RJ,
    2. Evans AC,
    3. Meyer E, et al
    . Lateralization of phonetic and pitch discrimination in speech processing. Science 1992;256:846–49 doi:10.1126/science.1589767 pmid:1589767
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  27. 27.↵
    1. Goŕdon-Salant S,
    2. Fitzgibbons PJ
    . Temporal factors and speech recognition performance in young and elderly listeners. J Speech Hear Res 1993;36:1276–85 doi:10.1044/jshr.3606.1276 pmid:8114494
    CrossRefPubMed
  28. 28.↵
    1. Bao S,
    2. Chang EF,
    3. Woods J, et al
    . Temporal plasticity in the primary auditory cortex induced by operant perceptual learning. Nat Neurosci 2004;7:974–81 doi:10.1038/nn1293 pmid:15286790
    CrossRefPubMed
  29. 29.↵
    1. Caspary DM,
    2. Schatteman TA,
    3. Hughes LF
    . Age-related changes in the inhibitory response properties of dorsal cochlear nucleus output neurons: role of inhibitory inputs. J Neurosci 2005;25:10952–59 doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2451-05.2005 pmid:16306408
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  30. 30.↵
    1. Burkard RF,
    2. Sims D
    . The human auditory brainstem response to high click rates: aging effects. Am J Audiol 2001;10:53–61 doi:10.1044/1059-0889(2001/008) pmid:11808720
    CrossRefPubMed
  31. 31.↵
    1. Gao F,
    2. Wang G,
    3. Ma W, et al
    . Decreased auditory GABA+ concentrations in presbycusis demonstrated by edited magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Neuroimage 2015;106:311–16 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.11.023 pmid:25463460
    CrossRefPubMed
  32. 32.↵
    1. Manly JJ,
    2. Touradji P,
    3. Tang MX, et al
    . Literacy and memory decline among ethnically diverse elders. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 2003;25:680–90 doi:10.1076/jcen.25.5.680.14579 pmid:12815505
    CrossRefPubMed
  33. 33.↵
    1. Bamiou DE,
    2. Musiek FE,
    3. Luxon LM
    . The insula (Island of Reil) and its role in auditory processing. Literature review. Brain Res Brain Res Rev 2003;42:143–54 doi:10.1016/S0165-0173(03)00172-3 pmid:12738055
    CrossRefPubMed
  34. 34.↵
    1. Qin YY,
    2. Li MW,
    3. Zhang S, et al
    . In vivo quantitative whole-brain diffusion tensor imaging analysis of APP/PS1 transgenic mice using voxel-based and atlas-based methods. Neuroradiology 2013;55:1027–38 doi:10.1007/s00234-013-1195-0 pmid:23644540
    CrossRefPubMed
  35. 35.↵
    1. Jones DK,
    2. Cercignani M
    . Twenty-five pitfalls in the analysis of diffusion MRI data. NMR Biomed 2010;23:803–20 doi:10.1002/nbm.1543 pmid:20886566
    CrossRefPubMed
  36. 36.↵
    1. Tournier JD,
    2. Mori S,
    3. Leemans A
    . Diffusion tensor imaging and beyond. Magn Reson Med 2011;65:1532–56 doi:10.1002/mrm.22924 pmid:21469191
    CrossRefPubMed
  • Received January 28, 2016.
  • Accepted after revision May 9, 2016.
  • © 2016 by American Journal of Neuroradiology
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 37 (11)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 37, Issue 11
1 Nov 2016
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
DTI Analysis of Presbycusis Using Voxel-Based Analysis
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
W. Ma, M. Li, F. Gao, X. Zhang, L. Shi, L. Yu, B. Zhao, W. Chen, G. Wang, X. Wang
DTI Analysis of Presbycusis Using Voxel-Based Analysis
American Journal of Neuroradiology Nov 2016, 37 (11) 2110-2114; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A4870

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
DTI Analysis of Presbycusis Using Voxel-Based Analysis
W. Ma, M. Li, F. Gao, X. Zhang, L. Shi, L. Yu, B. Zhao, W. Chen, G. Wang, X. Wang
American Journal of Neuroradiology Nov 2016, 37 (11) 2110-2114; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A4870
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Purchase

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • ABBREVIATIONS:
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusions
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Age-related auditory nerve deficits propagate central gain throughout the auditory system: Associations with cortical microstructure and speech recognition
  • Dysconnectivity between auditory-cognitive network associated with auditory GABA and glutamate levels in presbycusis patients
  • Macrostructural Changes of the Acoustic Radiation in Humans with Hearing Loss and Tinnitus Revealed with Fixel-Based Analysis
  • Crossref (22)
  • Google Scholar

This article has been cited by the following articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

  • Associations between modifiable risk factors and white matter of the aging brain: insights from diffusion tensor imaging studies
    Thomas M. Wassenaar, Kristine Yaffe, Ysbrand D. van der Werf, Claire E. Sexton
    Neurobiology of Aging 2019 80
  • Hearing impairment is associated with cognitive decline, brain atrophy and tau pathology
    Hui-Fu Wang, Wei Zhang, Edmund T. Rolls, Yuzhu Li, Linbo Wang, Ya-Hui Ma, Jujiao Kang, Jianfeng Feng, Jin-Tai Yu, Wei Cheng
    eBioMedicine 2022 86
  • Age‐related hearing loss and cognitive decline: MRI and cellular evidence
    Zahra Jafari, Bryan E. Kolb, Majid H. Mohajerani
    Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 2021 1500 1
  • Diffusion Tensor Imaging of Central Auditory Pathways in Patients with Sensorineural Hearing Loss: A Systematic Review
    Osama Tarabichi, Elliott D. Kozin, Vivek V. Kanumuri, Samuel Barber, Satra Ghosh, Kevin R. Sitek, Katherine Reinshagen, Barbara Herrmann, Aaron K. Remenschneider, Daniel J. Lee
    Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery 2018 158 3
  • Neuroanatomical changes associated with age-related hearing loss and listening effort
    Stephanie Rosemann, Christiane M. Thiel
    Brain Structure and Function 2020 225 9
  • Presbycusis Disrupts Spontaneous Activity Revealed by Resting-State Functional MRI
    Yu-Chen Chen, Huiyou Chen, Liang Jiang, Fan Bo, Jin-Jing Xu, Cun-Nan Mao, Richard Salvi, Xindao Yin, Guangming Lu, Jian-Ping Gu
    Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience 2018 12
  • Directed functional connectivity of the hippocampus in patients with presbycusis
    Yu-Chen Chen, Wei Yong, Chunhua Xing, Yuan Feng, Nasir Ahmad Haidari, Jin-Jing Xu, Jian-Ping Gu, Xindao Yin, Yuanqing Wu
    Brain Imaging and Behavior 2020 14 3
  • Hearing loss and microstructural integrity of the brain in a dementia‐free older population
    Pauline H. Croll, Meike W. Vernooij, Robert I. Reid, André Goedegebure, Melinda C. Power, Stephanie C. Rigters, A. Richey Sharrett, Robert J. Baatenburg de Jong, Thomas H. Mosley, Marius de Groot, Frank R. Lin, Jennifer A. Deal
    Alzheimer's & Dementia 2020 16 11
  • Macrostructural Changes of the Acoustic Radiation in Humans with Hearing Loss and Tinnitus Revealed with Fixel-Based Analysis
    Elouise A. Koops, Shereif Haykal, Pim van Dijk
    The Journal of Neuroscience 2021 41 18
  • Brain Frequency-Specific Changes in the Spontaneous Neural Activity Are Associated With Cognitive Impairment in Patients With Presbycusis
    Fuxin Ren, Wen Ma, Wei Zong, Ning Li, Xiao Li, Fuyan Li, Lili Wu, Honghao Li, Muwei Li, Fei Gao
    Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience 2021 13

More in this TOC Section

  • Glutaric Aciduria Type 1: DK vs. Conventional MRI
  • Kurtosis and Epileptogenic Tubers: A Pilot Study
  • WM Neuroaxonal Loss in Type 1 Diabetes
Show more Functional

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editors Choice
  • Fellow Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

Special Collections

  • Special Collections

Resources

  • News and Updates
  • Turn around Times
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Author Policies
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Submit a Case
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • Get Peer Review Credit from Publons

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcast
  • AJNR SCANtastic
  • Video Articles

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Alerts
  • Feedback
  • Advertise with us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Permissions
  • Terms and Conditions

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire