Comparison of High-Resolution MR Imaging and Digital Subtraction Angiography for the Characterization and Diagnosis of Intracranial Artery Disease

References

1. 1.↵
   2. Bang OY

   . Intracranial atherosclerosis: current understanding and perspectives. J Stroke 2014;16:27–35 doi:10.5853/jos.2014.16.1.27 pmid:24741562

   CrossRefPubMed
2. 2.↵
   2. Sacco RL,
   3. Boden-Albala B,
   4. Gan R, et al

   . Stroke incidence among white, black, and Hispanic residents of an urban community: the Northern Manhattan Stroke Study. Am J Epidemiol 1998;147:259–68 doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009445 pmid:9482500

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
3. 3.↵
   2. Li ML,
   3. Xu WH,
   4. Song L, et al

   . Atherosclerosis of middle cerebral artery: evaluation with high-resolution MR imaging at 3T. Atherosclerosis 2009;204:447–52 doi:10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2008.10.019 pmid:19041971

   CrossRefPubMed
4. 4.↵
   Warfarin-Aspirin Symptomatic Intracranial Disease (WASID) Trial Investigators. Design, progress and challenges of a double-blind trial of warfarin versus aspirin for symptomatic intracranial arterial stenosis. Neuroepidemiology 2003;22:106–17 doi:10.1159/000068744 pmid:12656117

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
5. 5.↵
   2. Chimowitz MI,
   3. Lynn MJ,
   4. Howlett-Smith H, et al

   ; Warfarin-Aspirin Symptomatic Intracranial Disease Trial Investigators. Comparison of warfarin and aspirin for symptomatic intracranial arterial stenosis. N Engl J Med 2005;352:1305–16 doi:10.1056/NEJMoa043033 pmid:15800226

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
6. 6.↵
   2. Wang Y,
   3. Lou X,
   4. Li Y, et al

   . Imaging investigation of intracranial arterial dissecting aneurysms by using 3 T high-resolution MRI and DSA: from the interventional neuroradiologists' view. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2014;156:515–25 doi:10.1007/s00701-013-1989-1 pmid:24420008

   CrossRefPubMed
7. 7.↵
   2. Leng X,
   3. Wong KS,
   4. Liebeskind DS

   . Evaluating intracranial atherosclerosis rather than intracranial stenosis. Stroke 2014;45:645–51 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.002491 pmid:24399377

   FREE Full Text
8. 8.↵
   2. Liu Q,
   3. Huang J,
   4. Degnan AJ, et al

   . Comparison of high-resolution MRI with CT angiography and digital subtraction angiography for the evaluation of middle cerebral artery atherosclerotic steno-occlusive disease. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2013;29:1491–98 doi:10.1007/s10554-013-0237-3 pmid:23686460

   CrossRefPubMed
9. 9.↵
   2. Kaufmann TJ,
   3. Huston J 3rd.,
   4. Mandrekar JN, et al

   . Complications of diagnostic cerebral angiography: evaluation of 19,826 consecutive patients. Radiology 2007;243:812–19 doi:10.1148/radiol.2433060536 pmid:17517935

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
10. 10.↵
    2. Chung TS,
    3. Joo JY,
    4. Lee SK, et al

    . Evaluation of cerebral aneurysms with high-resolution MR angiography using a section-interpolation technique: correlation with digital subtraction angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1999;20:229–35 pmid:10094343

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
11. 11.↵
    2. Soize S,
    3. Bouquigny F,
    4. Kadziolka K, et al

    . Value of 4D MR angiography at 3T compared with DSA for the follow-up of treated brain arteriovenous malformation. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2014;35:1903–09 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3982 pmid:24904052

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
12. 12.↵
    2. Xu WH,
    3. Li ML,
    4. Niu JW, et al

    . Intracranial artery atherosclerosis and lumen dilation in cerebral small-vessel diseases: a high-resolution MRI study. CNS Neurosci Ther 2014;20:364–67 doi:10.1111/cns.12224 pmid:24423003

    CrossRefPubMed
13. 13.↵
    2. Hui FK,
    3. Zhu X,
    4. Jones SE, et al

    . Early experience in high-resolution MRI for large vessel occlusions. J Neurointerv Surg 2015;7:509–16 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2014-011142 pmid:24827065

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
14. 14.↵
    2. Mandell DM,
    3. Matouk CC,
    4. Farb RI, et al

    . Vessel wall MRI to differentiate between reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome and central nervous system vasculitis: preliminary results. Stroke 2012;43:860–62 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.626184 pmid:22156692

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
15. 15.↵
    2. Kim YJ,
    3. Lee DH,
    4. Kwon JY, et al

    . High resolution MRI difference between moyamoya disease and intracranial atherosclerosis. Eur J Neurol 2013;20:1311–18 doi:10.1111/ene.12202 pmid:23789981

    CrossRefPubMed
16. 16.↵
    2. Zhu XJ,
    3. Du B,
    4. Lou X, et al

    . Morphologic characteristics of atherosclerotic middle cerebral arteries on 3T high-resolution MRI. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2013;34:1717–22 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3573 pmid:23639560

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
17. 17.↵
    2. Obusez EC,
    3. Hui F,
    4. Hajj-Ali RA, et al

    . High-resolution MRI vessel wall imaging: spatial and temporal patterns of reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome and central nervous system vasculitis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2014;35:1527–32 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3909 pmid:24722305

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
18. 18.↵
    2. Ryoo S,
    3. Cha J,
    4. Kim SJ, et al

    . High-resolution magnetic resonance wall imaging findings of Moyamoya disease. Stroke 2014;45:2457–60 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.114.004761 pmid:24947295

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
19. 19.↵
    2. Mossa-Basha M,
    3. Hwang WD,
    4. De Havenon A, et al

    . Multicontrast high-resolution vessel wall magnetic resonance imaging and its value in differentiating intracranial vasculopathic processes. Stroke 2015;46:1567–73 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.009037 pmid:25953365

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
20. 20.↵
    2. Choi YJ,
    3. Jung SC,
    4. Lee DH

    . Vessel wall imaging of the intracranial and cervical carotid arteries. J Stroke 2015;17:238–55 doi:10.5853/jos.2015.17.3.238 pmid:26437991

    CrossRefPubMed
21. 21.↵
    2. Kim YS,
    3. Lim SH,
    4. Oh KW, et al

    . The advantage of high-resolution MRI in evaluating basilar plaques: a comparison study with MRA. Atherosclerosis 2012;224:411–16 doi:10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2012.07.037 pmid:22920240

    CrossRefPubMed
22. 22.↵
    2. Qiao Y,
    3. Anwar Z,
    4. Intrapiromkul J, et al

    . Patterns and implications of intracranial arterial remodeling in stroke patients. Stroke 2016;47:434–40 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.009955 pmid:26742795

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
23. 23.↵
    2. Lou X,
    3. Ma N,
    4. Shen H, et al

    . Noninvasive visualization of the basilar artery wall and branch ostia with high-resolution three-dimensional black-blood sequence at 3 Tesla. J Magn Reson Imaging 2014;39:911–16 doi:10.1002/jmri.24222 pmid:24783241

    CrossRefPubMed
24. 24.↵
    2. Chimowitz MI,
    3. Kokkinos J,
    4. Strong J, et al

    . The Warfarin-Aspirin Symptomatic Intracranial Disease Study. Neurology 1995;45:1488–93 pmid:7644046

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
25. 25.↵
    2. Huang J,
    3. Degnan AJ,
    4. Liu Q, et al

    . Comparison of NASCET and WASID criteria for the measurement of intracranial stenosis using digital subtraction and computed tomography angiography of the middle cerebral artery. J Neuroradiol 2012;39:342–45 doi:10.1016/j.neurad.2011.11.005 pmid:22197402

    CrossRefPubMed
26. 26.↵
    2. Swartz RH,
    3. Bhuta SS,
    4. Farb RI, et al

    . Intracranial arterial wall imaging using high-resolution 3-Tesla contrast-enhanced MRI. Neurology 2009;72:627–34 doi:10.1212/01.wnl.0000342470.69739.b3 pmid:19221296

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
27. 27.↵
    2. Maruyama H,
    3. Nagoya H,
    4. Kato Y, et al

    . Spontaneous cervicocephalic arterial dissection with headache and neck pain as the only symptom. J Headache Pain 2012;13:247–53 doi:10.1007/s10194-012-0420-2 pmid:22350749

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
28. 28.↵
    2. Suzuki J,
    3. Takaku A

    . Cerebrovascular “moyamoya” disease: disease showing abnormal net-like vessels in base of brain. Arch Neurol 1969;20:288–99 doi:10.1001/archneur.1969.00480090076012 pmid:5775283

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
29. 29.↵
    2. Fukui M

    . Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of spontaneous occlusion of the circle of Willis (‘moyamoya’ disease): Research Committee on Spontaneous Occlusion of the Circle of Willis (Moyamoya Disease) of the Ministry of Health and Welfare, Japan. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 1997;99(suppl 2):S238–40 pmid:9409446

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
30. 30.↵
    2. Kuroda S,
    3. Houkin K

    . Moyamoya disease: current concepts and future perspectives. Lancet Neurol 2008;7:1056–66 doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(08)70240-0 pmid:18940695

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
31. 31.↵
    2. Scott RM,
    3. Smith ER

    . Moyamoya disease and moyamoya syndrome. N Engl J Med 2009;360:1226–37 doi:10.1056/NEJMra0804622 pmid:19297575

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
32. 32.↵
    2. Gomes LJ

    . The role of imaging in the diagnosis of central nervous system vasculitis. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep 2010;10:163–70 doi:10.1007/s11882-010-0102-6 pmid:20425011

    CrossRefPubMed
33. 33.↵
    2. Hajj-Ali RA,
    3. Calabrese LH

    . Diagnosis and classification of central nervous system vasculitis. J Autoimmun 2014;48–49:149–52 doi:10.1016/j.jaut.2014.01.007 pmid:24491822

    CrossRefPubMed
34. 34.↵
    2. Kwak HS,
    3. Hwang SB,
    4. Chung GH, et al

    . High-resolution magnetic resonance imaging of symptomatic middle cerebral artery dissection. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2014;23:550–53 doi:10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2013.03.019 pmid:23635923

    CrossRefPubMed
35. 35.↵
    2. Bley TA,
    3. Uhl M,
    4. Carew J, et al

    . Diagnostic value of high-resolution MR imaging in giant cell arteritis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2007;28:1722–27 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A0638 pmid:17885247

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
36. 36.↵
    2. Choi CG,
    3. Lee DH,
    4. Lee JH, et al

    . Detection of intracranial atherosclerotic steno-occlusive disease with 3D time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography with sensitivity encoding at 3T. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2007;28:439–46 pmid:17353309

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
37. 37.↵
    2. Boussion N,
    3. Soulez G,
    4. De Guise JA, et al

    . Geometrical accuracy and fusion of multimodal vascular images: a phantom study. Med Phys 2004;31:1434–43 doi:10.1118/1.1751124 pmid:15259646

    CrossRefPubMed
38. 38.↵
    2. Katsuno M,
    3. Kobayashi S

    . Diagnosis of vertebral artery dissection with basiparallel anatomical scanning magnetic resonance imaging. J Nippon Med Sch 2011;78:367–73 doi:10.1272/jnms.78.367 pmid:22197869

    CrossRefPubMed