Porcine In Vivo Validation of a Virtual Contrast Model: The Influence of Contrast Agent Properties and Vessel Flow Rates

References

1. 1.↵
   2. Brisman JL,
   3. Song JK,
   4. Newell DW

   . Cerebral aneurysms. N Engl J Med 2006;355:928–39 doi:10.1056/NEJMra052760 pmid:16943405

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
2. 2.↵
   2. Sforza DM,
   3. Putman CM,
   4. Cebral JR

   . Hemodynamics of cerebral aneurysms. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 2009;41:91–107 doi:10.1146/annurev.fluid.40.111406.102126.Hemodynamics pmid:19784385

   CrossRefPubMed
3. 3.↵
   2. Xu J,
   3. Yu Y,
   4. Wu X, et al

   . Morphological and hemodynamic analysis of mirror posterior communicating artery aneurysms. PLoS One 2013;8:e55413 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0055413 pmid:23383184

   CrossRefPubMed
4. 4.↵
   2. Steinman D,
   3. Milner JS,
   4. Norley CJ, et al

   . Image-based computational simulation of flow dynamics in a giant intracranial aneurysm. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2003;24:559–66 pmid:12695182

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
5. 5.↵
   2. Chung B,
   3. Cebral JR

   . CFD for evaluation and treatment planning of aneurysms: review of proposed clinical uses and their challenges. Ann Biomed Eng 2015;43:122–38 doi:10.1007/s10439-014-1093-6 pmid:25186432

   CrossRefPubMed
6. 6.↵
   2. Kallmes DF

   . Point: CFD–computational fluid dynamics or confounding factor dissemination. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2012;33:395–96 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2993 pmid:22268081

   FREE Full Text
7. 7.↵
   2. Cebral JR,
   3. Meng H

   . Counterpoint: realizing the clinical utility of computational fluid dynamics—closing the gap. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33:396–98 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2994 pmid:22282452

   FREE Full Text
8. 8.↵
   2. Ventikos Y

   . Resolving the issue of resolution. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2014;35:544–45 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3894 pmid:24503558

   FREE Full Text
9. 9.↵
   2. Robertson AM,
   3. Watton PN

   . Computational fluid dynamics in aneurysm research: critical reflections, future directions. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33:992–95 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3192 pmid:22653325

   FREE Full Text
10. 10.↵
    2. Strother CM,
    3. Jiang J

    . Intracranial aneurysms, cancer, x-rays, and computational fluid dynamics. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33:991–92 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3163 pmid:22555572

    FREE Full Text
11. 11.↵
    2. Sadasivan C,
    3. Cesar L,
    4. Seong J, et al

    . An original flow diversion device for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms: evaluation in the rabbit elastase-induced model. Stroke 2009;40:952–58 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.533760 pmid:19150864

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
12. 12.↵
    2. Cebral JR,
    3. Vazquez M,
    4. Sforza DM, et al

    . Analysis of hemodynamics and wall mechanics at sites of cerebral aneurysm rupture. J Neurointerv 2015;7:530–36 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2014-011247 pmid:24827066

    CrossRefPubMed
13. 13.↵
    2. Gester K,
    3. Lüchtefeld I,
    4. Büsen M, et al

    . In vitro evaluation of intra-aneurysmal, flow-diverter-induced thrombus formation: a feasibility study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2016;37:490–96 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4555 pmid:26450536

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
14. 14.↵
    2. Ford MD,
    3. Stuhne GR,
    4. Nikolov HN, et al

    . Virtual angiography for visualization and validation of computational models of aneurysm hemodynamics. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2005;24:1586–92 doi:10.1109/TMI.2005.859204 pmid:16350918

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
15. 15.↵
    2. Endres J,
    3. Kowarschik M,
    4. Redel T, et al

    . A workflow for patient-individualized virtual angiogram generation based on CFD simulation. Comput Math Methods Med 2012;2012:306765 doi:10.1155/2012/306765 pmid:23193428

    CrossRefPubMed
16. 16.↵
    2. Cebral JR,
    3. Pergolizzi RS Jr.,
    4. Putman CM

    . Computational fluid dynamics modeling of intracranial aneurysms: qualitative comparison with cerebral angiography. Acad Radiol 2007;14:804–13 doi:10.1016/j.acra.2007.03.008 pmid:17574131

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
17. 17.↵
    2. Wang ZJ,
    3. Hoffmann KR,
    4. Wang Z, et al

    . Contrast settling in cerebral aneurysm angiography. Phys Med Biol 2005;50:3171–81 doi:10.1088/0031-9155/50/13/014 pmid:15972988

    CrossRefPubMed
18. 18.↵
    2. German W,
    3. Black S

    . Experimental production of carotid aneurysms. N Engl J Med 1954;250:104–06 doi:10.1056/NEJM195401212500303 pmid:13119853

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
19. 19.↵
    2. Saadatmand M,
    3. Ishikawa T,
    4. Matsuki N, et al

    . Fluid particle diffusion through high-hematocrit blood flow within a capillary tube. J Biomech 2011;44:170–75 doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2010.09.004 pmid:20887991

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
20. 20.↵
    2. Perktold K,
    3. Resch M,
    4. Florian H

    . Pulsatile non-Newtonian flow characteristics in a three-dimensional human carotid bifurcation model. J Biomech Eng 1991;113:464–75 doi:10.1115/1.2895428 pmid:1762445

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
21. 21.↵
    2. Valencia AA,
    3. Guzmán AM,
    4. Finol EA, et al

    . Blood flow dynamics in saccular aneurysm models of the basilar artery. J Biomech Eng 2006;128:516–26 doi:10.1115/1.2205377 pmid:16813443

    CrossRefPubMed
22. 22.↵
    2. Reymond P,
    3. Vardoulis O,
    4. Stergiopulos N

    . Generic and patient-specific models of the arterial tree. J Clin Monit Comput 2012;26:375–82 doi:10.1007/s10877-012-9382-9 pmid:22843240

    CrossRefPubMed