Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

AJNR Awards, New Junior Editors, and more. Read the latest AJNR updates

Research ArticleAdult Brain

Topographic Diagnosis of Craniopharyngiomas: The Accuracy of MRI Findings Observed on Conventional T1 and T2 Images

R. Prieto, J.M. Pascual and L. Barrios
American Journal of Neuroradiology November 2017, 38 (11) 2073-2080; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A5361
R. Prieto
aFrom the Department of Neurosurgery (R.P.), Puerta de Hierro University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for R. Prieto
J.M. Pascual
bDepartment of Neurosurgery (J.M.P.), La Princesa University Hospital, Madrid Spain
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for J.M. Pascual
L. Barrios
cStatistics Department (L.B.), Computing Center, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, Madrid, Spain.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for L. Barrios
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Fig 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 1.

    Preoperative MR imaging assessment to accurately define the 5 major CP topographies. The upper images correspond to midsagittal and transinfundibular-coronal T1-weighted MR images from a healthy adult. Ch indicates chiasm; Ch cs, chiasm cistern; MB, mammillary body. The middle (1, sagittal) and lower (2, coronal) rows show MR images of the 5 CP topographic categories considered. A, Sellar-suprasellar CP: the Ch cistern is occupied by a round tumor, the PS is not visible, the chiasm is stretched upward, and the hypothalamus (arrows) is above the tumor. B, Pseudointraventricular CP: the sella, the Ch cistern, and the 3V are occupied by a multilobulated tumor. The PS is not visible, the MBA is obtuse, and the hypothalamus (arrows) is over the upper third of the tumor. C, Secondary intraventricular CP: the Ch cistern and the 3V are occupied by the tumor, the PS is not visible, the chiasm is stretched forward, and the hypothalamus (arrows) is around the midthird of the tumor. D, Infundibulo-tuberal or not strictly intraventricular CP: the Ch cistern is partially occupied by tumor, the PS is amputated, the chiasm is compressed forward, the MBA is hyperacute, and the hypothalamus (arrows) is around the midthird of the tumor. E, Strictly intraventricular CP: the Ch cistern is tumor-free, the PS is entirely visible, the chiasm is compressed downward, and the hypothalamus (arrows) is below the lower third of the tumor. The Table summarizes the most typical MR imaging characteristics for each topographic category. T indicates tumor.

  • Fig 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 2.

    MR imaging predictors of CP topography. This growing decision tree shows the variables selected in a multivariate model to define the CP topography. The appearance of the pituitary stalk on preoperative MR imaging was chosen in the first step. The occupation of the chiasmatic cistern (Ch Cistern), the position of the hypothalamus regarding the tumor (Hypoth-CP level), the MBA, the tumor shape (CP shape), and the chiasm distortion (Chiasm) were selected in the following steps. Note that the probability for the not strictly intraventricular category (3V-Not Strict) significantly increased when the PS was either amputated or infiltrated, the Hypoth-CP level was not in the lower third of the tumor, the Ch cistern was occupied by tumor, and the Chiasm was compressed forward (nodes 2, 6, 10, 16). In contrast, the probability of the strictly intraventricular category (3V-Strict) significantly increased when the Ch cistern was free of tumor (node 3). The probability of the pseudointraventricular topography (Pseudo) significantly increased when the PS cistern was not visible, the Ch cistern was occupied by tumor, the MBA was obtuse (>90°), and the tumor had a multilobulated or pearlike shape (nodes 1, 4, 7, 12). Among the cases with an MBA of <90° (node 8), the position of the hypothalamus above the upper third of the tumor indicated the sellar-suprasellar category (Sellar-SS), whereas its position around the middle portion of the tumor suggested a secondary intraventricular topography (Secondary, nodes 13, 14). Correct prediction of CP topography with this multivariate model, including 6 categoric variables studied on preoperative MR imaging, reached 83.8%.

  • Fig 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 3.

    Multivariate model of CP topography for CPs: A 2D plot showing the multiple correspondence analysis between CP topographic categories (black circles) and the appearance of the pituitary stalk, the hypothalamus level in relation to the tumor (HYP), and the occupation of the chiasmatic cistern (CHc) (gray triangles). Dimension 1 separates the intraventricular topographies (strictly and not strictly) from the remaining variables, whereas dimension 2 mostly separates the strictly intraventricular CPs (3V-Strict) from the not strictly ones (3V-Not-Strict). Note that the position of the secondary intraventricular category (Secondary), the most difficult to define preoperatively, is in the trajectory between the 3V-Not-Strict and the sellar-suprasellar (SS) or pseudointraventricular (Pseudo-3V) categories, owing to the radiologic signs that these lesions share with the other topographies. A visible PS, a lower position of the hypothalamus, and a free chiasmatic cistern typically characterize the 3V-Strict group. In contrast, the 3V-Not-Strict category is defined by amputation or infiltration of the stalk, a position of the hypothalamus around the middle-third of the tumor, and a partial occupation of the chiasmatic cistern. Lack of visualization of the pituitary stalk was a sign common to the remaining 3 categories. However, the hypothalamus is typically observed at the upper third of the tumor in the sellar-SS and Pseudo-3V groups, whereas it is around the middle third in the Secondary-3V category. The variance of CP topography explained only by these 3 radiologic variables was 76.3%.

  • Fig 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 4.

    Diagnostic accuracy of CP topography quantified with likelihood ratios after using the 7 radiologic variables showing the strongest association (variables included in the Table). The higher the positive likelihood ratio (LR+, gray bars), the more reliable the topographic diagnosis is for the category considered. The lower the negative likelihood ratio (LR−, black line), the more reliable it is to rule out the category considered. Note that all topographic categories were associated with LR+ values higher than 10, though the highest figures were observed for the sellar-suprasellar (Sellar-SS), pseudointraventricular (Pseudo-3V), and strictly intraventricular (3V-Strict) categories. LR− was lower than 0.2 for all topographic categories except the secondary intraventricular one (Secondary-3V). Thus, the highest accuracy of the multivariate model of topographic diagnosis, including 7 MR imaging variables, was for the Sellar-SS, Pseudo3V, and 3V-Strict categories, and the lowest accuracy was for the Secondary-3V category.

Tables

  • Figures
  • Bivariate relationships between the variables analyzed on preoperative MRI and CP topography

    MRI VariablesaP ValueSpecific Relationships
    3V occupation<.001Free: highest rate in Sellar-SS (57%)
    Occupied: in 100% of Pseudo-3V, Secondary, 3V-Not-Strict, and 3V-Strict cases
    Stalk visualization<.001Visible (wholly identifiable): highest rate in 3V-Strict (79%)
    Infiltrated: highest rate in 3V-Not-Strict (23%)
    Amputated (lower half visible): highest rate in 3V-Not-Strict (68%)
    Not visible: highest rates in Sellar-SS (92%%), Pseudo-3V (100%), and Secondary-3V (92%)
    Hypothalamus level relative to the CP<.001Lower third: highest rate in 3V-Strict (82%)
    Middle: highest rates in 3V-Not-Strict (91%) and Secondary-3V (77%)
    Upper third: highest rates in Sellar-SS (100%) and Pseudo-3V (91%)
    Chiasmatic cistern<.001Free: highest rate in 3V-Strict (98%)
    Partially occupied: highest rate in 3V-Not-Strict (54%)
    Wholly occupied: highest rates in Sellar-SS (86.5%), Pseudo-3V (97%), and Secondary-3V (75%)
    MBA<.001<30°: highest rate in 3V-Not-Strict (43%)
    30°–59°: highest rates in Secondary-3V (58%) and 3V-Strict (55%)
    60°–89°: highest rate in Sellar-SS (64%)
    ≥90°: highest rate in Pseudo-3V (89%)
    Chiasm distortion<.001Compressed downward: highest rates in 3V-Strict (66%) and 3V-Not-Strict (33%)
    Compressed forward: highest rate in 3V-Not-Strict (40%)
    Stretched forward: highest rate in Secondary-3V (50%)
    Stretched upward: highest rates in Sellar-SS (81%) and Pseudo-3V (70%)
    Tumor shape<.001Round: highest rate in 3V-Strict (76%)
    Elliptical: highest rate in 3V-Not-Strict (37%)
    Multilobulated: highest rates in Pseudo-3V (62.5%) and Secondary-3V (62.5%)
    Pearlike: highest rates in Sellar-SS (30%) and Pseudo-3V (19%)
    Dumbbell: highest rates in Sellar-SS (13.5%)
    • Note:—SS indicates suprasellar; 3V-Not-Strict, not strictly intraventricular or infundibulo-tuberal; Pseudo-3V, suprasellar pseudointraventricular; Secondary-3V, secondary intraventricular category; 3V-Strict, strictly intraventricular.

    • ↵a Only the 7 variables included in the multivariate predictive model are shown.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 38 (11)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 38, Issue 11
1 Nov 2017
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Topographic Diagnosis of Craniopharyngiomas: The Accuracy of MRI Findings Observed on Conventional T1 and T2 Images
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
R. Prieto, J.M. Pascual, L. Barrios
Topographic Diagnosis of Craniopharyngiomas: The Accuracy of MRI Findings Observed on Conventional T1 and T2 Images
American Journal of Neuroradiology Nov 2017, 38 (11) 2073-2080; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A5361

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
Topographic Diagnosis of Craniopharyngiomas: The Accuracy of MRI Findings Observed on Conventional T1 and T2 Images
R. Prieto, J.M. Pascual, L. Barrios
American Journal of Neuroradiology Nov 2017, 38 (11) 2073-2080; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A5361
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Purchase

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • ABBREVIATIONS:
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusions
    • Acknowledgments
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Duct-like Recess in the Infundibular Portion of Third Ventricle Craniopharyngiomas: An MRI Sign Identifying the Papillary Type
  • Crossref
  • Google Scholar

This article has not yet been cited by articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

More in this TOC Section

  • Diagnostic Neuroradiology of Monoclonal Antibodies
  • Clinical Outcomes After Chiari I Decompression
  • Segmentation of Brain Metastases with BLAST
Show more Adult Brain

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editor's Choice
  • Fellows' Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Video Articles

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

More from AJNR

  • Trainee Corner
  • Imaging Protocols
  • MRI Safety Corner
  • Book Reviews

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcasts
  • AJNR Scantastics

Resources

  • Turnaround Time
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Submit a Video Article
  • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Statistical Tips
  • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Author Policies
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • News and Updates

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Board Alumni
  • Alerts
  • Permissions
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Advertise with Us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Feedback
  • Terms and Conditions
  • AJNR Editorial Board Alumni

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire