Topographic Diagnosis of Craniopharyngiomas: The Accuracy of MRI Findings Observed on Conventional T1 and T2 Images

References

1. 1.↵
   2. Pascual JM,
   3. González-Llanos F,
   4. Barrios L, et al

   . Intraventricular craniopharyngiomas: topographical classification and surgical approach selection based on an extensive overview. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2004;146:785–802 pmid:15254801

   PubMed
2. 2.↵
   2. Pascual JM,
   3. Prieto R,
   4. Castro-Dufourny I, et al

   . Topographic diagnosis of papillary craniopharyngiomas: the need for an accurate MRI-surgical correlation. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2015;36:E55–56 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4441 pmid:26113067

   FREE Full Text
3. 3.↵
   2. Pascual JM,
   3. Carrasco R,
   4. Prieto R, et al

   . Craniopharyngioma classification. J Neurosurg 2008;109:1180–82; author reply 1182–83 doi:10.3171/JNS.2008.109.12.1180 pmid:19035739

   CrossRefPubMed
4. 4.↵
   2. Pascual JM,
   3. Prieto R,
   4. Carrasco R

   . Infundibulo-tuberal or not strictly intraventricular craniopharyngioma: evidence for a major topographical category. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2011;153:2403–25; discussion 2426 doi:10.1007/s00701-011-1149-4 pmid:21918833

   CrossRefPubMed
5. 5.↵
   2. Prieto R,
   3. Pascual JM,
   4. Rosdolsky M, et al

   . Craniopharyngioma adherence: a comprehensive topographical categorization and outcome-related risk stratification model based on the methodical examination of 500 tumors. Neurosurg Focus 2016;41:E13 doi:10.3171/2016.9.FOCUS16304 pmid:27903121

   CrossRefPubMed
6. 6.↵
   2. Pascual JM,
   3. Prieto R,
   4. Carrasco R, et al

   . Displacement of mammillary bodies by craniopharyngiomas involving the third ventricle: surgical-MRI correlation and use in topographical diagnosis. J Neurosurg 2013;119:381–405 doi:10.3171/2013.1.JNS111722 pmid:23540270

   CrossRefPubMed
7. 7.↵
   2. Prieto R,
   3. Pascual JM,
   4. Barrios L

   . Optic chiasm distortions caused by craniopharyngiomas: clinical and magnetic resonance imaging correlation and influence on visual outcome. World Neurosurg 2015;83:500–29 doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2014.10.002 pmid:25308925

   CrossRefPubMed
8. 8.↵
   2. Prieto R,
   3. Pascual JM,
   4. Castro-Dufourny I, et al

   . Craniopharyngioma: surgical outcome as related to the degree of hypothalamic involvement. World Neurosurg 2017;104:1006–10 doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2017.02.115 pmid:28732410

   CrossRefPubMed
9. 9.↵
   2. Pascual JM,
   3. Prieto R,
   4. Castro-Dufourny I, et al

   . Development of intracranial approaches for craniopharyngiomas: an analysis of the first 160 historical procedures. Neurosurg Focus 2014;36:E13 doi:10.3171/2014.2.FOCUS13567 pmid:24708228

   CrossRefPubMed
10. 10.↵
    2. Lubuulwa J,
    3. Lei T

    . Pathological and topographical classification of craniopharyngiomas: a literature review. J Neurol Surg Rep 2016;77:e121–127 doi:10.1055/s-0036-1588060 pmid:27556005

    CrossRefPubMed
11. 11.↵
    2. Saeki N,
    3. Murai H,
    4. Kubota M, et al

    . Heavily T2 weighted MR images of anterior optic pathways in patients with sellar and parasellar tumors: prediction of surgical anatomy. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2002;144:25–35 doi:10.1007/s701-002-8271-y pmid:11807644

    CrossRefPubMed
12. 12.↵
    2. Watanabe K,
    3. Kakeda S,
    4. Yamamoto J, et al

    . Delineation of optic nerves and chiasm in close proximity to large suprasellar tumors with contrast-enhanced FIESTA MR imaging. Radiology 2012;264:852–58 doi:10.1148/radiol.12111363 pmid:22771880

    CrossRefPubMed
13. 13.↵
    2. Xie T,
    3. Zhang XB,
    4. Yun H, et al

    . 3D-FIESTA MR images are useful in the evaluation of endoscopic expanded endonasal approach for midline skull-base lesions. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2011;153:12–18 doi:10.1007/s00701-010-0852-x pmid:21058034

    CrossRefPubMed
14. 14.↵
    2. Gu Y,
    3. Zhang X

    . Mamillary body angle and craniopharyngioma. J Neurosurg 2014;120:1241–43; author reply 1243–45 doi:10.3171/2013.11.JNS132343 pmid:24527817

    CrossRefPubMed