Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

AJNR Awards, New Junior Editors, and more. Read the latest AJNR updates

Getting new auth cookie, if you see this message a lot, tell someone!
Research ArticleADULT BRAIN

Measurement of Cortical Thickness and Volume of Subcortical Structures in Multiple Sclerosis: Agreement between 2D Spin-Echo and 3D MPRAGE T1-Weighted Images

A. Vidal-Jordana, D. Pareto, J. Sastre-Garriga, C. Auger, E. Ciampi, X. Montalban and A. Rovira
American Journal of Neuroradiology February 2017, 38 (2) 250-256; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A4999
A. Vidal-Jordana
aFrom the Department of Neurology-Neuroimmunology and Multiple Sclerosis Centre of Catalonia (A.V.-J., J.S.-G., E.C., X.M.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for A. Vidal-Jordana
D. Pareto
bMagnetic Resonance Unit (D.P., C.A., A.R.), Radiology Department, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for D. Pareto
J. Sastre-Garriga
aFrom the Department of Neurology-Neuroimmunology and Multiple Sclerosis Centre of Catalonia (A.V.-J., J.S.-G., E.C., X.M.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for J. Sastre-Garriga
C. Auger
bMagnetic Resonance Unit (D.P., C.A., A.R.), Radiology Department, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for C. Auger
E. Ciampi
aFrom the Department of Neurology-Neuroimmunology and Multiple Sclerosis Centre of Catalonia (A.V.-J., J.S.-G., E.C., X.M.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for E. Ciampi
X. Montalban
aFrom the Department of Neurology-Neuroimmunology and Multiple Sclerosis Centre of Catalonia (A.V.-J., J.S.-G., E.C., X.M.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for X. Montalban
A. Rovira
bMagnetic Resonance Unit (D.P., C.A., A.R.), Radiology Department, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for A. Rovira
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Fig 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 1.

    FreeSurfer and FIRST outputs from 3D-GE and 2D-SE T1-weighted images. The 2D-SE and 3D-GE T1-weighted image inputs for the same patient (A and E, respectively), the cortical parcellation and subcortical segmentation obtained with FreeSurfer for each input (B and F), and the subcortical segmentation overlaid onto the original T1-weighted images obtained with FIRST for each input (C, D, G, and H) are shown.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1:

    Intraclass correlation coefficients for 2D-SE and 3D-GE cortical thickness estimates using FreeSurfera

    StructureICCStructureICC
    None≥0.81L supramarginal0.395
    R superior temporal0.663R parahippocampal0.393
    R temporal pole0.605L inferior parietal0.391
    L superior temporal0.59L superior frontal0.363
    R inferior temporal0.589R lateral orbitofrontal0.35
    R superior parietal0.58R postcentral0.343
    L superior parietal0.54R isthmus cingulate0.342
    L inferior temporal0.519L precuneus0.334
    L fusiform0.512L precentral0.329
    R rostral middle frontal0.508R insula0.328
    R inferior parietal0.503L temporal pole0.327
    L lingual0.501L isthmus cingulate0.325
    L pars orbitalis0.489R entorhinal0.324
    R frontal pole0.483L parahippocampal0.322
    L middle temporal0.481R lateral occipital0.319
    R mean thickness0.479L transverse temporal0.305
    L caudal middle frontal0.476L lateral occipital0.299
    L pars triangularis0.473L entorhinal0.293
    L pars opercularis0.465R posterior cingulate0.281
    R pars opercularis0.465R caudal anterior cingulate0.274
    R caudal middle frontal0.462L pericalcarine0.265
    R fusiform0.46L posterior cingulate0.251
    R middle temporal0.442R medial orbitofrontal0.248
    R precuneus0.439L bankssts0.223
    L mean thickness0.438R pericalcarine0.199
    L rostral middle frontal0.431L paracentral0.179
    R supramarginal0.431L frontal pole0.177
    R pars orbitalis0.429R lingual0.16
    R precentral0.428R paracentral0.159
    L lateral orbitofrontal0.418R rostral anterior cingulate0.156
    L cuneus0.409L insula0.128
    R superior frontal0.405L rostral anterior cingulate0.12
    R pars triangularis0.402L medial orbitofrontal0.103
    L postcentral0.401R transverse temporal0.04
    R bankssts0.399L caudal anterior cingulate0.016
    R cuneus0.399
    • Note:—L indicates left; R, right; bankssts, banks of the superior temporal sulcus.

    • ↵a ICCs for 2D-SE and 3D-GE cortical thickness estimates using FreeSurfer are shown. The ICC values are grouped in 5 categories. Zero percent of the structures had almost perfect agreement, 1.4% had substantial agreement, 40% had a moderate agreement, 42.9% had fair agreement, and 15.7% had slight agreement.

    • View popup
    Table 2:

    Intraclass correlation coefficients for 2D-SE and 3D-GE subcortical volume estimates using FreeSurfer and FIRSTa

    FreeSurfer SoftwareFIRST Software
    StructureICCStructureICC
    Estimated TIV0.942R caudate0.914
    Subcortical gray volume0.93L caudate0.899
    R thalamus0.903L hippocampus0.864
    Brain stem0.865R thalamus0.85
    L putamen0.861L putamen0.826
    L caudate0.833R putamen0.815
    R putamen0.82R hippocampus0.814
    L ventral diencephalon0.801Brain stem0.784
    R ventral diencephalon0.765L pallidum0.781
    R pallidum0.762L thalamus0.773
    R caudate0.743R pallidum0.605
    L thalamus0.737R amygdala0.456
    L pallidum0.71L amygdala0.406
    R accumbens0.694L accumbens0.25
    R hippocampus0.654TIVb0.175
    R cerebellum cortex0.616R accumbens0.009
    L cerebellum cortex0.579
    L hippocampus0.568
    L accumbens0.511
    R amygdala0.397
    L amygdala0.321
    • Note:—L indicates left; R, right.

    • ↵a The ICCs for 2D-SE and 3D-GE subcortical volume estimates using FreeSurfer and FIRST are shown. The ICC values are grouped in 5 categories: 33.3% and 43.8% of the structures with an almost perfect agreement using FreeSurfer and FIRST respectively, 42.9% and 25% of the structures with a substantial agreement using FreeSurfer and FIRST respectively, 14.3% and 12.5% of the structures with a moderate agreement using FreeSurfer and FIRST respectively, 9.5% and 6.25% of the structures with a fair agreement using FreeSurfer and FIRST respectively, and 0% and 12.5% of the structures with a slight agreement using FreeSurfer and FIRST respectively.

    • ↵b FIRST total intracranial volume was calculated with the following formula: (FIRST template volume/matrix determinant) × 1000.

    • View popup
    Table 3:

    Clinicoradiologic correlation using 3D-GE and 2D-SE normalized subcortical structure values obtained with FreeSurfer software

    Subcortical StructureFreeSurfer 3D-GEFreeSurfer 2D-SE
    Disease DurationEDSSDisease DurationEDSS
    rPρPrPρP
    Brain stem−0.258.123−0.408a.012a−0.143.400−0.545a<.001a
    L thalamus−0.249.137−0.268.109−0.301.070−0.313b.059b
    L caudate−0.304b.068b−0.285b.088b−0.316b.057b−0.283.090
    L putamen−0.443a.006a−0.494a.002a−0.466a.004a−0.510a.001a
    L pallidum−0.489a.002a−0.409a.012a−0.315b.057b−0.404a.013a
    L hippocampus−0.191.256−0.122.472−0.144.397−0.085.615
    L amygdala−0.083.627−0.335a.043a0.001.997−0.141.404
    L accumbens−0.332a.045a−0.418a.010a−0.358a.030a−0.096.571
    R thalamus−0.409a.012a−0.402a.014a−0.386a.018a−0.376a.022a
    R caudate−0.455a.005a−0.365a.02a−0.29b.074b−0.230.171
    R putamen−0.505a.001a−0.490a.002a−0.472a.003a−0.494a.002a
    R pallidum−0.459a.004a−0.395a.016a−0.220.192−0.28b.093b
    R hippocampus−0.262.118−0.302b.069b−0.238.157−0.220.190
    R amygdala−0.181.285−0.294b.077b−0.183.279−0.323b.051b
    R accumbens−0.330a.046a−0.416a.011a−0.215.202−0.216.199
    • Note:—r indicates the Pearson correlation coefficient; ρ, the Spearman correlation coefficient; L, left; R, right.

    • ↵a Significant correlations.

    • ↵b Trend toward a significant correlation.

    • View popup
    Table 4:

    Clinicoradiologic correlation using 3D-GE and 2D-SE normalized subcortical structure values obtained with FIRST software

    Subcortical StructureFIRST 3D-GEFIRST 2D-SE
    Disease DurationEDSSDisease DurationEDSS
    rPρPrPρP
    Brain stem−0.133.433−0.160.3450.079.674−0.150.420
    L thalamus−0.424a.009a−0.226.1700.053.7770.080.671
    L caudate−0.410a.012a−0.302b.069b−0.297.105−0.065.728
    L putamen−0.383a.019a−0.364a.027a−0.056.767−0.262.154
    L pallidum−0.308b.063b−0.430a.008a−0.073.696−0.002.991
    L hippocampus−0.429a.008a−0.170.313−0.226.222−0.083.658
    L amygdala−0.276b.098b−0.029.8640.195.2940.230.213
    L accumbens−0.234.164−0.30b.071b0.384a.033a0.023.901
    R thalamus−0.496a.002a−0.235.162−0.022.905−0.092.621
    R caudate−0.501a.002a−0.270a.106a−0.419a.019a−0.188.310
    R putamen−0.406a.013a−0.454a.005a−0.043.817−0.286.119
    R pallidum−0.288b.08b−0.36b.029b−0.005.9800.013.945
    R hippocampus−0.384a.019a−0.002.988−0.082.662−0.064.731
    R amygdala−0.253.1310.046.7850.027.8870.331.069
    R accumbens−0.316b.057b−0.322.0520.233.208−0.014.941
    • Note:—L indicates left; R, right; r, the Pearson correlation coefficient; ρ, the Spearman correlation coefficient.

    • ↵a Significant correlations.

    • ↵b Trend toward a significant correlation.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 38 (2)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 38, Issue 2
1 Feb 2017
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Measurement of Cortical Thickness and Volume of Subcortical Structures in Multiple Sclerosis: Agreement between 2D Spin-Echo and 3D MPRAGE T1-Weighted Images
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
A. Vidal-Jordana, D. Pareto, J. Sastre-Garriga, C. Auger, E. Ciampi, X. Montalban, A. Rovira
Measurement of Cortical Thickness and Volume of Subcortical Structures in Multiple Sclerosis: Agreement between 2D Spin-Echo and 3D MPRAGE T1-Weighted Images
American Journal of Neuroradiology Feb 2017, 38 (2) 250-256; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A4999

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
Measurement of Cortical Thickness and Volume of Subcortical Structures in Multiple Sclerosis: Agreement between 2D Spin-Echo and 3D MPRAGE T1-Weighted Images
A. Vidal-Jordana, D. Pareto, J. Sastre-Garriga, C. Auger, E. Ciampi, X. Montalban, A. Rovira
American Journal of Neuroradiology Feb 2017, 38 (2) 250-256; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A4999
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Purchase

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • ABBREVIATIONS:
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusions
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Machine Learning-Based Reconstruction of 2D MRI for Quantitative Morphometry in Epilepsy
  • Crossref
  • Google Scholar

This article has not yet been cited by articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

More in this TOC Section

  • Diagnostic Neuroradiology of Monoclonal Antibodies
  • Clinical Outcomes After Chiari I Decompression
  • Segmentation of Brain Metastases with BLAST
Show more Adult Brain

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editor's Choice
  • Fellows' Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Video Articles

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

More from AJNR

  • Trainee Corner
  • Imaging Protocols
  • MRI Safety Corner
  • Book Reviews

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcasts
  • AJNR Scantastics

Resources

  • Turnaround Time
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Submit a Video Article
  • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Statistical Tips
  • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Author Policies
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • News and Updates

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Board Alumni
  • Alerts
  • Permissions
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Advertise with Us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Feedback
  • Terms and Conditions
  • AJNR Editorial Board Alumni

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire