Temporal and Spatial Variances in Arterial Spin-Labeling Are Inversely Related to Large-Artery Blood Velocity

REFERENCES

1. 1.↵
   2. Detre JA,
   3. Wang J,
   4. Wang Z, et al

   . Arterial spin-labeled perfusion MRI in basic and clinical neuroscience. Curr Opin Neurol 2009;22:348–55 doi:10.1097/WCO.0b013e32832d9505 pmid:19491678

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
2. 2.↵
   2. Williams DS,
   3. Detre JA,
   4. Leigh JS, et al

   . Magnetic resonance imaging of perfusion using spin inversion of arterial water. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1992;89:212–16 doi:10.1073/pnas.89.1.212 pmid:1729691

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
3. 3.↵
   2. Alsop DC,
   3. Detre JA,
   4. Golay X, et al

   . Recommended implementation of arterial spin-labeled perfusion MRI for clinical applications: a consensus of the ISMRM perfusion study group and the European consortium for ASL in dementia. Magn Reson Med 2015;73:102–16 doi:10.1002/mrm.25197 pmid:24715426

   CrossRefPubMed
4. 4.↵
   2. Bakker CJ,
   3. Hoogeveen RM,
   4. Viergever MA

   . Construction of a protocol for measuring blood flow by two-dimensional phase-contrast MRA. J Magn Reson Imaging 1999;9:119–27 pmid:10030659

   CrossRefPubMed
5. 5.↵
   2. Wu WC,
   3. St. Lawrence KS,
   4. Licht DJ, et al

   . Quantification issues in arterial spin labeling perfusion magnetic resonance imaging. Top Magn Reson Imaging 2010;21:65–73 doi:10.1097/RMR.0b013e31821e570a pmid:21613872

   CrossRefPubMed
6. 6.↵
   2. Jahanian H,
   3. Noll DC,
   4. Hernandez-Garcia L

   . B0 field inhomogeneity considerations in pseudo-continuous arterial spin labeling (pCASL): effects on tagging efficiency and correction strategy. NMR Biomed 2011;24:1202–09 doi:10.1002/nbm.1675 pmid:21387447

   CrossRefPubMed
7. 7.↵
   2. Dai W,
   3. Garcia De Bazelaire C, et al

   . Continuous flow-driven inversion for arterial spin labeling using pulsed radio frequency and gradient fields. Magn Reson Med 2008;60:1488–97 doi:10.1002/mrm.21790 pmid:19025913

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
8. 8.↵
   2. Aslan S,
   3. Xu F,
   4. Wang PL, et al

   . Estimation of labeling efficiency in pseudocontinuous arterial spin labeling. Magn Reson Med 2010;63:765–71 doi:10.1002/mrm.22245 pmid:20187183

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
9. 9.↵
   2. O'Gorman RL,
   3. Summers PE,
   4. Zelaya FO, et al

   . In vivo estimation of the flow-driven adiabatic inversion efficiency for continuous arterial spin labeling: a method using phase contrast magnetic resonance angiography. Magn Reson Med 2006;55:1291–97 doi:10.1002/mrm.20864 pmid:16673361

   CrossRefPubMed
10. 10.↵
    2. Vidorreta M,
    3. Wang Z,
    4. Rodríguez I, et al

    . Comparison of 2D and 3D single-shot ASL perfusion fMRI sequences. Neuroimage 2013;66:662–71 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.10.087 pmid:23142069

    CrossRefPubMed
11. 11.↵
    2. Dolui S,
    3. Wang Z,
    4. Wang DJ, et al

    . Comparison of noninvasive MRI measurements of cerebral blood flow in a large multisite cohort. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2016;36:1244–56 doi:10.1177/0271678X16646124 pmid:27142868

    CrossRefPubMed
12. 12.↵
    2. Bai CH,
    3. Chen JR,
    4. Chiu HC, et al

    . Lower blood flow velocity, higher resistance index, and larger diameter of extracranial carotid arteries are associated with ischemic stroke independently of carotid atherosclerosis and cardiovascular risk factors. J Clin Ultrasound 2007;35:322–30 doi:10.1002/jcu.20351 pmid:17471583

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
13. 13.↵
    2. Homma S,
    3. Sloop GD,
    4. Zieske AW

    . The effect of age and other atherosclerotic risk factors on carotid artery blood velocity in individuals ranging from young adults to centenarians. Angiology 2009;60:637–43 doi:10.1177/0003319708325447 pmid:19015163

    CrossRefPubMed
14. 14.↵
    2. Shirzadi Z,
    3. Crane DE,
    4. Robertson AD, et al

    . Automated removal of spurious intermediate cerebral blood flow volumes improves image quality among older patients: a clinical arterial spin labeling investigation. J Magn Reson Imaging 2015;42:1377–85 doi:10.1002/jmri.24918 pmid:25873287

    CrossRefPubMed
15. 15.↵
    2. Liu Y,
    3. Zhu X,
    4. Feinberg D, et al

    . Arterial spin labeling MRI study of age and gender effects on brain perfusion hemodynamics. Magn Reson Med 2012;68:912–22 doi:10.1002/mrm.23286 pmid:22139957

    CrossRefPubMed
16. 16.↵
    2. Nasel C,
    3. Boubela R,
    4. Kalcher K, et al

    . Normalised time-to-peak-distribution curves correlate with cerebral white matter hyperintensities: could this improve early diagnosis? J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2017;37:444–55 doi:10.1177/0271678X16629485 pmid:26823469

    CrossRefPubMed
17. 17.↵
    2. Mutsaerts HJ,
    3. Petr J,
    4. Václavů L, et al

    . The spatial coefficient of variation in arterial spin labeling cerebral blood flow images. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2017 Jan 1. [Epub ahead of print] doi:10.1177/0271678X16683690 pmid:28058975

    CrossRefPubMed
18. 18.↵
    2. Smith SM

    . Fast robust automated brain extraction. Hum Brain Mapp 2002;17:143–55 doi:10.1002/hbm.10062 pmid:12391568

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
19. 19.↵
    2. Zhang Y,
    3. Brady M,
    4. Smith S

    . Segmentation of brain MR images through a hidden Markov random field model and the expectation-maximization algorithm. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2001;20:45–57 doi:10.1109/42.906424 pmid:11293691

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
20. 20.↵
    2. Harper CG,
    3. Kril JJ,
    4. Daly JM

    . The specific gravity of the brains of alcoholic and control patients: a pathological study. Br J Addict 1987;82:1349–54 doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.1987.tb00438.x pmid:3480749

    CrossRefPubMed
21. 21.↵
    2. Gibson E,
    3. Gao F,
    4. Black SE, et al

    . Automatic segmentation of white matter hyperintensities in the elderly using FLAIR images at 3T. J Magn Reson 2010;31:1311–22 doi:10.1002/jmri.22004 pmid:20512882

    CrossRefPubMed
22. 22.↵
    2. Wu WC,
    3. Mazaheri Y,
    4. Wong EC

    . The effects of flow dispersion and cardiac pulsation in arterial spin labeling. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2007;26:84–92 doi:10.1109/TMI.2006.886807 pmid:17243587

    CrossRefPubMed
23. 23.↵
    2. Buxton RB,
    3. Frank LR,
    4. Wong EC, et al

    . A general kinetic model for quantitative perfusion imaging with arterial spin labeling. Magn Reson Med 1998;40:383–96 doi:10.1002/mrm.1910400308 pmid:9727941

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
24. 24.↵
    2. Bokkers RP,
    3. van der Worp HB,
    4. Mali WP, et al

    . Noninvasive MR imaging of cerebral perfusion in patients with a carotid artery stenosis. Neurology 2009;73:869–75 doi:10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181b7840c pmid:19752454

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
25. 25.↵
    2. MacIntosh BJ,
    3. Marquardt L,
    4. Schulz UG, et al

    . Hemodynamic alterations in vertebrobasilar large artery disease assessed by arterial spin-labeling MR imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33:1939–44 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3090 pmid:22555580

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
26. 26.↵
    2. Mutsaerts HJ,
    3. van Dalen JW,
    4. Heijtel DF, et al

    . Cerebral perfusion measurements in elderly with hypertension using arterial spin labeling. PLoS One 2015;10:e0133717 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0133717 pmid:26241897

    CrossRefPubMed
27. 27.↵
    2. Wu WC,
    3. Jiang SF,
    4. Yang SC, et al

    . Pseudocontinuous arterial spin labeling perfusion magnetic resonance imaging: a normative study of reproducibility in the human brain. Neuroimage 2011;56:1244–50 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.02.080 pmid:21385620

    CrossRefPubMed
28. 28.↵
    2. Guo L,
    3. Zhang Q,
    4. Ding L, et al

    . Pseudo-continuous arterial spin labeling quantifies cerebral blood flow in patients with acute ischemic stroke and chronic lacunar stroke. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2014;125:229–36 doi:10.1016/j.clineuro.2014.08.017 pmid:25203634

    CrossRefPubMed
29. 29.↵
    2. Firbank MJ,
    3. He J,
    4. Blamire AM, et al

    . Cerebral blood flow by arterial spin labeling in poststroke dementia. Neurology 2011;76:1478–84 doi:10.1212/WNL.0b013e318217e76a pmid:21518997

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
30. 30.↵
    2. van Es AC,
    3. van der Grond J,
    4. ten Dam VH, et al

    ; PROSPER Study Group. Associations between total cerebral blood flow and age related changes of the brain. PLoS One 2010;5:e9825 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0009825 pmid:20352115

    CrossRefPubMed
31. 31.↵
    2. Lu H,
    3. Clingman C,
    4. Golay X, et al

    . Determining the longitudinal relaxation time (T1) of blood at 3.0 Tesla. Magn Reson Med 2004;52:679–82 doi:10.1002/mrm.20178 pmid:15334591

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
32. 32.↵
    2. Lotz J,
    3. Meier C,
    4. Leppert A, et al

    . Cardiovascular flow measurement with phase-contrast MR imaging: basic facts and implementation. Radiographics 2002;22:651–71 doi:10.1148/radiographics.22.3.g02ma11651 pmid:12006694

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
33. 33.↵
    2. Tang C,
    3. Blatter DD,
    4. Parker DL

    . Correction of partial-volume effects in phase-contrast flow measurements. J Magn Reson Imaging 1995;5:175–80 doi:10.1002/jmri.1880050212 pmid:7766979

    CrossRefPubMed
34. 34.↵
    2. Wu B,
    3. Wang X,
    4. Guo J, et al

    . Collateral circulation imaging: MR perfusion territory arterial spin-labeling at 3T. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2008;29:1855–60 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A1259 pmid:18784211

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
35. 35.↵
    2. Chen Z,
    3. Zhang X,
    4. Yuan C, et al

    . Measuring the labeling efficiency of pseudocontinuous arterial spin labeling. Magn Reson Med 2017;77:1841–52 doi:10.1002/mrm.26266 pmid:27174204

    CrossRefPubMed