Deep Learning in Neuroradiology

References

1. 1.↵
   2. LeCun Y,
   3. Bengio Y,
   4. Hinton G

   . Deep learning. Nature 2015;521:436–44 doi:10.1038/nature14539 pmid:26017442

   CrossRefPubMed
2. 2.↵
   2. Krizhevsky A,
   3. Sutskever I,
   4. Hinton G

   . ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks. http://www.cs.toronto.edu/~fritz/absps/imagenet.pdf. Accessed January 23, 2018.
3. 3.↵
   2. Mwangi B,
   3. Soares JC,
   4. Hasan KM

   . Visualization and unsupervised predictive clustering of high-dimensional multimodal neuroimaging data. J Neurosci Methods 2014;236:19–25 doi:10.1016/j.jneumeth.2014.08.001 pmid:25117552

   CrossRefPubMed
4. 4.↵
   2. Hassabis D,
   3. Kumaran D,
   4. Summerfield C, et al

   . Neuroscience-inspired artificial intelligence. Neuron 2017;95:245–58 doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2017.06.011 pmid:28728020

   CrossRefPubMed
5. 5.↵
   2. Hubel D,
   3. Wiesel T

   . Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture of the cat's visual cortex. J Physiol (London) 1962;160:106–54 doi:10.1113/jphysiol.1962.sp006837 pmid:14449617

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
6. 6.↵
   2. Wang Z,
   3. Bovik A,
   4. Sheikh H, et al

   . Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity. IEEE Trans Image Process 2004;13:600–12 doi:10.1109/TIP.2003.819861 pmid:15376593

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
7. 7.↵
   2. Zhou H,
   3. Gallo O,
   4. Frosio I, et al

   . Loss functions for image restoration with neural networks. IEEE Transactions on Computational Imaging 2017;3:47–57 doi:10.1109/TCI.2016.2644865

   CrossRef
8. 8.↵
   2. Goodfellow I,
   3. Pouget-Abadie J,
   4. Mirza M, et al

   . Generative adversarial nets. https://papers.nips.cc/paper/5423-generative-adversarial-nets.pdf. Accessed January 23, 2018.
9. 9.↵
   2. Srivastava N,
   3. Hinton G,
   4. Krizhevsky A, et al

   . Dropout: a simple way to prevent neural networks from overfitting. J Machine Learning Research 2014;15:1929–58
10. 10.↵
    2. Zhu B,
    3. Liu JZ,
    4. Rosen BR, et al

    . Image reconstruction by domain transform manifold learning. https://arxiv.org/pdf/1704.08841.pdf. Accessed January 23, 2018.
11. 11.↵
    2. Schlemper J,
    3. Caballero J,
    4. Hajnal JV, et al

    . A deep cascade of convolutional neural networks for dynamic MR image reconstruction. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2018;37:491–503 doi:10.1109/TMI.2017.2760978 pmid:29035212

    CrossRefPubMed
12. 12.↵
    2. Yang Y,
    3. Sun J,
    4. Li H, et al

    . Deep admm-net for compressive sensing MRI. In: Proceedings of the 30th Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, Barcelona, Spain. December 6–10, 2016
13. 13.↵
    2. Wang S,
    3. Su Z,
    4. Ying L, et al

    . Accelerating magnetic resonance imaging via deep learning. In: Proceedings of the IEEE 13th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging, Prague, Czech Republic. April 9–16, 2016
14. 14.↵
    2. Dong C,
    3. Loy C,
    4. He K, et al

    . Learning a deep convolutional network for image super-resolution. In: Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision, Zurich, Switzerland. September 6–12, 2014
15. 15.↵
    2. Chen H,
    3. Zhang Y,
    4. Kalra MK, et al

    . Low-dose CT with a residual encoder-decoder convolutional neural network (RED-CNN). https://arxiv.org/pdf/1702.00288.pdf. Accessed January 23, 2018.
16. 16.↵
    2. Bahrami K,
    3. Shi F,
    4. Zong X, et al

    . Reconstruction of 7T-like images from 3T MRI. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2016;35:2085–97 doi:10.1109/TMI.2016.2549918 pmid:27046894

    CrossRefPubMed
17. 17.↵
    2. Golkov V,
    3. Dosovitskiy A,
    4. Sperl JI, et al

    . Q-space deep learning: twelve-fold shorter and model-free diffusion MRI scans. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2016;35:1344–51 doi:10.1109/TMI.2016.2551324 pmid:27071165

    CrossRefPubMed
18. 18.↵
    2. Gong E,
    3. Pauly J,
    4. Zaharchuk G

    . Boosting SNR and/or resolution of arterial spin label (ASL) imaging using multi-contrast approaches with multi-lateral guided filter and deep networks. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Honolulu, Hawaii. April 22–27, 2017
19. 19.↵
    1. Zhou S,
    2. Greenspan H,
    3. Shen D

    2. Vemulapalli R,
    3. Nguyen H,
    4. Zhou S

    . Deep networks and mutual information maximization for cross-modal medical image synthesis. In: Zhou S, Greenspan H, Shen D, eds. Deep Learning for Medical Image Analysis. London: Elsevier; 2017
20. 20.↵
    2. Liu F,
    3. Jang H,
    4. Kijowski R, et al

    . Deep learning MR-based attenuation correction for PET/MRI. Radiology 2018;286:676–84 doi:10.1148/radiol.2017170700 pmid:28925823

    CrossRefPubMed
21. 21.↵
    2. Han X

    . MR-based synthetic CT generation using a deep convolutional neural network method. Med Phys 2017;44:1408–19 doi:10.1002/mp.12155 pmid:28192624

    CrossRefPubMed
22. 22.↵
    2. Li R,
    3. Zhang W,
    4. Suk HI, et al

    . Deep learning based imaging data completion for improved brain disease diagnosis. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention, Boston, Massachusetts. September 14–18, 2014;17:305–12
23. 23.↵
    2. Wachinger C,
    3. Reuter M,
    4. Klein T

    . DeepNAT: deep convolutional neural network for segmenting neuroanatomy. Neuroimage 2018;170:434–45 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.02.035 pmid:28223187

    CrossRefPubMed
24. 24.↵
    2. Mehta R,
    3. Majumdar A,
    4. Sivaswamy J

    . BrainSegNet: a convolutional neural network architecture for automated segmentation of human brain structures. J Med Imaging (Bellingham) 2017;4:024003 doi:10.1117/1.JMI.4.2.024003 pmid:28439524

    CrossRefPubMed
25. 25.↵
    2. Chen H,
    3. Dou Q,
    4. Yu L, et al

    . VoxResNet: deep voxelwise residual networks for brain segmentation from 3D MR images. Neuroimage 2018;170:446–55 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.04.041 pmid:28445774

    CrossRefPubMed
26. 26.↵
    2. Dou Q,
    3. Chen H,
    4. Yu L, et al

    . Automatic detection of cerebral microbleeds from MR images via 3D convolutional neural networks. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2016;35:1182–95 doi:10.1109/TMI.2016.2528129 pmid:26886975

    CrossRefPubMed
27. 27.↵
    2. Chen L,
    3. Bentley P,
    4. Rueckert D

    . Fully automatic acute ischemic lesion segmentation in DWI using convolutional neural networks. Neuroimage Clin 2017;15:633–43 doi:10.1016/j.nicl.2017.06.016 pmid:28664034

    CrossRefPubMed
28. 28.↵
    2. Maier O,
    3. Schröder C,
    4. Forkert ND, et al

    . Classifiers for ischemic stroke lesion segmentation: a comparison study. PloS One 2015;10:e0145118 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0145118 pmid:26672989

    CrossRefPubMed
29. 29.↵
    2. Nielsen A,
    3. Mouridsen K,
    4. Hansen M, et al

    . Deep learning: utilizing the potential in data bases to predict individual outcome in acute stroke. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Honolulu, Hawaii. April 22–27, 2017;5665
30. 30.↵
    2. Menze BH,
    3. Jakab A,
    4. Bauer S, et al

    . The multimodal brain tumor image segmentation benchmark (BRATS). IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2015;34:1993–2024 doi:10.1109/TMI.2014.2377694 pmid:25494501

    CrossRefPubMed
31. 31.↵
    2. Chang P

    . Fully convolutional deep residual neural networks for brain tumor segmentation. In: Proceedings of the International Workshop on Brain Lesion: Glioma, Multiple Sclerosis, Stroke and Traumatic Brain Injuries, Athens, Greece. October 17, 2016;108–18
32. 32.↵
    2. Korfiatis P,
    3. Kline TL,
    4. Erickson BJ

    . Automated segmentation of hyperintense regions in FLAIR MRI using deep learning. Tomography 2016;2:334–40 doi:10.18383/j.tom.2016.00166 pmid:28066806

    CrossRefPubMed
33. 33.↵
    2. Gao XW,
    3. Hui R,
    4. Tian Z

    . Classification of CT brain images based on deep learning networks. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 2017;138:49–56 doi:10.1016/j.cmpb.2016.10.007 pmid:27886714

    CrossRefPubMed
34. 34.↵
    2. Shi J,
    3. Zheng X,
    4. Li Y, et al

    . Multimodal neuroimaging feature learning with multimodal stacked deep polynomial networks for diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease. IEEE J Biomed Health Inform 2018;22:173–83 doi:10.1109/JBHI.2017.2655720 pmid:28113353

    CrossRefPubMed
35. 35.↵
    2. Suk HI,
    3. Lee SW,
    4. Shen D

    ; Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative. Deep sparse multi-task learning for feature selection in Alzheimer's disease diagnosis. Brain Struct Funct 2016;221:2569–87 doi:10.1007/s00429-015-1059-y pmid:25993900

    CrossRefPubMed
36. 36.↵
    2. Scherer M,
    3. Cordes J,
    4. Younsi A, et al

    . Development and validation of an automatic segmentation algorithm for quantification of intracerebral hemorrhage. Stroke 2016;47:2776–82 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.013779 pmid:27703089

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
37. 37.↵
    2. Al-Ayyoub M,
    3. Alawad D,
    4. Al-Darabsah K, et al

    . Automatic detection and classification of brain hemorrhages. WSEAS Transactions on Computers 2013;10:395–405
38. 38.↵
    2. Phong T,
    3. Duong H,
    4. Nguyen H, et al

    . Brain hemorrhage diagnosis by using deep learning. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Machine Learning and Soft Computing, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam. January 13–16, 2017
39. 39.↵
    2. Esteva A,
    3. Kuprel B,
    4. Novoa RA, et al

    . Dermatologist-level classification of skin cancer with deep neural networks. Nature 2017;542:115–18 doi:10.1038/nature21056 pmid:28117445

    CrossRefPubMed
40. 40.↵
    2. Plis SM,
    3. Hjelm DR,
    4. Salakhutdinov R, et al

    . Deep learning for neuroimaging: a validation study. Front Neurosci 2014;8:229 doi:10.3389/fnins.2014.00229 pmid:25191215

    CrossRefPubMed
41. 41.↵
    2. Lee JH,
    3. Wong E,
    4. Bandettini P

    . Temporal-autoencoding neural network revealed the underlying functional dynamics of fMRI data: evaluation using the Human Connectome Project data. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Honolulu, Hawaii. April 22–27, 2017
42. 42.↵
    2. Zhang Z,
    3. Xie Y,
    4. Xing F, et al

    . MDNet: a semantically and visually interpretable medical image diagnosis network. http://arxiv.org/pdf/1707.02485.pdf. Accessed January 23, 2018.