Radiologic-Pathologic Correlation of Tumor Thickness and Its Prognostic Importance in Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Oral Cavity: Implications for the Eighth Edition Tumor, Node, Metastasis Classification

References

1. 1.↵
   2. Asakage T,
   3. Yokose T,
   4. Mukai K, et al

   . Tumor thickness predicts cervical metastasis in patients with stage I/II carcinoma of the tongue. Cancer 1998;82:1443–48 doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19980415)82:8<1443::AID-CNCR2>3.0.CO%3B2-A pmid:9554518

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
2. 2.↵
   2. Fukano H,
   3. Matsuura H,
   4. Hasegawa Y, et al

   . Depth of invasion as a predictive factor for cervical lymph node metastasis in tongue carcinoma. Head Neck 1997;19:205–10 doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0347(199705)19:3<205::AID-HED7>3.0.CO%3B2-6 pmid:9142520

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
3. 3.↵
   2. Mohit-Tabatabai MA,
   3. Sobel HJ,
   4. Rush BF, et al

   . Relation of thickness of floor of mouth stage I and II cancers to regional metastasis. Am J Surg 1986;152:351–53 doi:10.1016/0002-9610(86)90303-X pmid:3766862

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
4. 4.↵
   2. Spiro RH,
   3. Huvos AG,
   4. Wong GY, et al

   . Predictive value of tumor thickness in squamous carcinoma confined to the tongue and floor of the mouth. Am J Surg 1986;152:345–50 doi:10.1016/0002-9610(86)90302-8 pmid:3766861

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
5. 5.↵
   2. Ebrahimi A,
   3. Gil Z,
   4. Amit M, et al

   . International Consortium for Outcome Research (ICOR) in Head and Neck Cancer. Primary tumor staging for oral cancer and a proposed modification incorporating depth of invasion: an international multicenter retrospective study. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2014;140:1138–48 doi:10.1001/jamaoto.2014.1548 pmid:25075712

   CrossRefPubMed
6. 6.↵
   2. Huang SH,
   3. Hwang D,
   4. Lockwood G, et al

   . Predictive value of tumor thickness for cervical lymph-node involvement in squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity: a meta-analysis of reported studies. Cancer 2009;115:1489–97 doi:10.1002/cncr.24161 pmid:19197973

   CrossRefPubMed
7. 7.↵
   2. Kane SV,
   3. Gupta M,
   4. Kakade AC, et al

   . Depth of invasion is the most significant histological predictor of subclinical cervical lymph node metastasis in early squamous carcinomas of the oral cavity. Eur J Surg Oncol 2006;32:795–803 pmid:16777368

   CrossRefPubMed
8. 8.↵
   2. Lydiatt WM,
   3. Patel SG,
   4. O'Sullivan B, et al

   . Head and neck cancers: major changes in the American Joint Committee on Cancer eighth edition Cancer Staging Manual. CA Cancer J Clin 2017;67:122–37 doi:10.3322/caac.21389 pmid:28128848

   CrossRefPubMed
9. 9.↵
   2. Amin M,
   3. Edge S,
   4. Greene F, et al

   . AJCC Cancer Staging Manual. 8th ed. New York: Springer-Verlag; 2017
10. 10.↵
    2. Brierley J,
    3. Gospodarowicz M,
    4. Wittekind C

    . UICC TNM Classification of Malignant Tumours. 8th ed. Southern Gate, Chichester, West Sussex, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 2017
11. 11.↵
    2. Iwai H,
    3. Kyomoto R,
    4. Ha-Kawa SK, et al

    . Magnetic resonance determination of tumor thickness as predictive factor of cervical metastasis in oral tongue carcinoma. Laryngoscope 2002;112:457–61 doi:10.1097/00005537-200203000-00010 pmid:12148854

    CrossRefPubMed
12. 12.↵
    2. Lam P,
    3. Au-Yeung KM,
    4. Cheng PW, et al

    . Correlating MRI and histologic tumor thickness in the assessment of oral tongue cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2004;182:803–08 doi:10.2214/ajr.182.3.1820803 pmid:14975989

    CrossRefPubMed
13. 13.↵
    2. Lwin CT,
    3. Hanlon R,
    4. Lowe D, et al

    . Accuracy of MRI in prediction of tumour thickness and nodal stage in oral squamous cell carcinoma. Oral Oncol 2012;48:149–54 doi:10.1016/j.oraloncology.2011.11.002 pmid:22154129

    CrossRefPubMed
14. 14.↵
    2. Preda L,
    3. Chiesa F,
    4. Calabrese L, et al

    . Relationship between histologic thickness of tongue carcinoma and thickness estimated from preoperative MRI. Eur Radiol 2006;16:2242–48 doi:10.1007/s00330-006-0263-9 pmid:16636800

    CrossRefPubMed
15. 15.↵
    2. Madana J,
    3. Laliberté F,
    4. Morand GB, et al

    . Computerized tomography based tumor-thickness measurement is useful to predict postoperative pathological tumor thickness in oral tongue squamous cell carcinoma. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2015;44:49 doi:10.1186/s40463-015-0089-z pmid:26573595

    CrossRefPubMed
16. 16.↵
    2. Dirven R,
    3. Ebrahimi A,
    4. Moeckelmann N, et al

    . Tumor thickness versus depth of invasion: analysis of the 8th edition American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging for oral cancer. Oral Oncol 2017;74:30–33 doi:10.1016/j.oraloncology.2017.09.007 pmid:29103748

    CrossRefPubMed
17. 17.↵
    2. Park JO,
    3. Jung SL,
    4. Joo YH, et al

    . Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the assessment of tumor invasion depth in oral/oropharyngeal cancer. Oral Oncol 2011;47:381–86 doi:10.1016/j.oraloncology.2011.03.012 pmid:21459662

    CrossRefPubMed
18. 18.↵
    2. Wong K,
    3. Huang SH,
    4. O'Sullivan B, et al

    . Point-of-care outcome assessment in the cancer clinic: audit of data quality. Radiother Oncol 2010;95:339–43 doi:10.1016/j.radonc.2010.03.015 pmid:20362349

    CrossRefPubMed
19. 19.↵
    2. Alsaffar HA,
    3. Goldstein DP,
    4. King EV, et al

    . Correlation between clinical and MRI assessment of depth of invasion in oral tongue squamous cell carcinoma. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2016;45:61 doi:10.1186/s40463-016-0172-0 pmid:27876067

    CrossRefPubMed
20. 20.↵
    2. Jung J,
    3. Cho NH,
    4. Kim J, et al

    . Significant invasion depth of early oral tongue cancer originated from the lateral border to predict regional metastases and prognosis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2009;38:653–60 doi:10.1016/j.ijom.2009.01.004 pmid:19231137

    CrossRefPubMed
21. 21.↵
    2. Goel V,
    3. Parihar PS,
    4. Parihar A, et al

    . Accuracy of MRI in prediction of tumour thickness and nodal stage in oral tongue and gingivobuccal cancer with clinical correlation and staging. J Clin Diagn Res 2016;10:TC01–05 doi:10.7860/JCDR/2016/17411.7905 pmid:27504375

    CrossRefPubMed