Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
  • Special Collections
    • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)
    • 2024 AJNR Journal Awards
    • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcast
    • AJNR Scantastics
    • Video Articles
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Author Policies
    • Fast publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Submit a Case for the Case Collection
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Other Publications
    • ajnr

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
  • Special Collections
    • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)
    • 2024 AJNR Journal Awards
    • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcast
    • AJNR Scantastics
    • Video Articles
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Author Policies
    • Fast publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Submit a Case for the Case Collection
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

Welcome to the new AJNR, Updated Hall of Fame, and more. Read the full announcements.


AJNR is seeking candidates for the position of Associate Section Editor, AJNR Case Collection. Read the full announcement.

 

Getting new auth cookie, if you see this message a lot, tell someone!
Research ArticleInterventional

Pipeline Diameter Significantly Impacts the Long-Term Fate of Jailed Side Branches during Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysms

T.R. Miller, M.J. Kole, E.J. Le, G. Cannarsa, S. Jones, A.P. Wessell, G. Jindal, E.F. Aldrich, J.M. Simard and D. Gandhi
American Journal of Neuroradiology December 2018, 39 (12) 2270-2277; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A5863
T.R. Miller
aFrom the Departments of Diagnostic Radiology (T.R.M., G.J., D.G.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for T.R. Miller
M.J. Kole
cNeurosurgery (M.J.K., E.J.L., G.C., S.J., A.P.W., G.J., E.F.A., J.M.S., D.G.), University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, Maryland.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for M.J. Kole
E.J. Le
cNeurosurgery (M.J.K., E.J.L., G.C., S.J., A.P.W., G.J., E.F.A., J.M.S., D.G.), University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, Maryland.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for E.J. Le
G. Cannarsa
cNeurosurgery (M.J.K., E.J.L., G.C., S.J., A.P.W., G.J., E.F.A., J.M.S., D.G.), University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, Maryland.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for G. Cannarsa
S. Jones
cNeurosurgery (M.J.K., E.J.L., G.C., S.J., A.P.W., G.J., E.F.A., J.M.S., D.G.), University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, Maryland.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for S. Jones
A.P. Wessell
cNeurosurgery (M.J.K., E.J.L., G.C., S.J., A.P.W., G.J., E.F.A., J.M.S., D.G.), University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, Maryland.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for A.P. Wessell
G. Jindal
aFrom the Departments of Diagnostic Radiology (T.R.M., G.J., D.G.)
bNeuroradiology (G.J., D.G.)
cNeurosurgery (M.J.K., E.J.L., G.C., S.J., A.P.W., G.J., E.F.A., J.M.S., D.G.), University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, Maryland.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for G. Jindal
E.F. Aldrich
cNeurosurgery (M.J.K., E.J.L., G.C., S.J., A.P.W., G.J., E.F.A., J.M.S., D.G.), University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, Maryland.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for E.F. Aldrich
J.M. Simard
cNeurosurgery (M.J.K., E.J.L., G.C., S.J., A.P.W., G.J., E.F.A., J.M.S., D.G.), University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, Maryland.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for J.M. Simard
D. Gandhi
aFrom the Departments of Diagnostic Radiology (T.R.M., G.J., D.G.)
bNeuroradiology (G.J., D.G.)
cNeurosurgery (M.J.K., E.J.L., G.C., S.J., A.P.W., G.J., E.F.A., J.M.S., D.G.), University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, Maryland.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for D. Gandhi
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Fig 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 1.

    Global and magnified lateral views (A and B) of pre-PED right internal carotid artery angiography demonstrating gross patency of the right ophthalmic artery (straight arrows). The target paraophthalmic and cavernous aneurysms (curved arrows, B) are also visualized. Conventional angiography performed 6 months following PED deployment (C and D) demonstrates occlusion of the target aneurysms; however, the ophthalmic artery is also occluded (straight arrows). The patient was asymptomatic, and the ophthalmic artery was found to fill retrogradely on external carotid artery injections (not shown).

  • Fig 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 2.

    Anteroposterior magnified view (A) of pre-PED right internal carotid artery angiography demonstrating gross patency of the A1 segment of the right anterior cerebral artery (straight arrows). The target, irregular right anterior choroidal artery aneurysm is only partially visualized (curved arrow). On conventional angiography performed 6 months following PED deployment (B), the A1 segment of the right anterior cerebral artery no longer fills on right internal carotid artery injection. The target aneurysm is closed (curved arrow). The patient was asymptomatic, and the bilateral anterior cerebral arteries are noted to be filling via the left A1 segment on left internal carotid artery injections (not shown).

  • Fig 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 3.

    Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve demonstrating the diagnostic accuracy for parent vessel diameter to predict branch vessel occlusion in the entire cohort. The reference line is depicted as the solid line along the middle of the plot.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1:

    Cohort demographics

    Demographics
    No. of patients137
    No. of PED treatments148
    Average patient age (yr)54.7
    % Male per treatment6.6%
    No. of aneurysms treated178
    Average aneurysm size (mm)5.2
    % Aneurysms treated acutely/subacutely after rupture3.3%
    % Aneurysms with branch vessel incorporation35%
    Mean No. of PEDs per treatment1.07
    % Aneurysms adjunctively coiled9.2%
    % Treatments using J-tip microcatheter17%
    % Treatments using balloon angioplasty6.1%
    % Treatments requiring abciximab4.8%
    Mean length of DSA follow-up (mo)18.4
    • View popup
    Table 2:

    Branch vessel outcomes by type

    TypeNo.PatentStenoticOccluded
    Ophthalmic artery12572%22%5.8%
    PcomA3956.7%10%33.3%
    Anterior choroidal artery3196.8%0%3.2%
    A1 arterial segment1128%36%36%
    PICA333.4%66.6%0%
    AcomA333.4%0%66.6%
    Othera580%0%20%
    • Note:—PcomA indicates posterior communicating artery; AcomA, anterior communicating artery.

    • ↵a Detailed in Results section.

    • View popup
    Table 3:

    Factors impacting branch vessel patency—entire cohorta

    Patent Branch VesselOccluded Branch VesselUnivariate P ValueMultivariate P ValueOR (95% CI)
    Mean patient age (yr)54.4 ± 12.259.3 ± 10.2.04.1791.03 (0.99–1.07)
    Male26 (13.8%)4 (13.8%).996
    Acutely ruptured target lesion7/188 (3.7%)1/29 (3%).942
    Mean max aneurysm sac size5.6 ± 3.84.2 ± 2.3.067.1170.87 (0.73–1.04)
    Mean aneurysm neck size3.4 ± 1.73.0 ± 1.2.139
    Mean procedural time (min)206 ± 66214 ± 60.513
    Mean fluoroscopy time (min)64 ± 3662 ± 27.764
    >1 PED deployed17/188 (9.0%)1/29 (3.4%).309
    % PED classic107/125 (86%)18/29 (62.1%).601
    Balloon angioplasty13/188 (7%)1/29 (7%).479
    Mean PED diameter (mm)4.0 ± 0.53.5 ± 0.5<0.001.0010.16 (0.06–0.45)
    Mean Δmax size of parent vessel and PED0.22 ± 0.190.26 ± 0.26.405
    Mean Δmin size of parent vessel and PED0.77 ± 0.410.67 ± 0.40.230
    Branch vessel incorporation into aneurysm sac52/188 (28%)9/29 (31%).707
    Mean periprocedural P2Y12127 ± 68122 ± 80.379
    Intraprocedural administration of abciximab17/188 (9.0%)3/29 (10.3%).821
    Presence of endothelial hyperplasia43/185 (23%)10/29 (34%).192
    Mean length of DSA follow-up (mo)18.3 ± 9.920.1 ± 8.8.351
    A1 ACA7/11 (63.6%)4/11 (36.3%).021.8131.29 (0.16–10.56)
    Anterior choroidal artery30/31 (96.8%)1/31 (3.2%).073.0920.10 (0.01–1.46)
    PcomA26/39 (66.6%)13/39 (33.3%)<.001.2053.26 (0.52–20.28)
    Ophthalmic artery118/125 (94%)8/125 (6%)<.0010.4490.49 (0.08–3.07)
    • Note:—ACA indicates anterior cerebral artery; max, maximum; min, minimum; PcomA, posterior communicating artery.

    • ↵a Percentages reflect analysis per branch vessel.

    • View popup
    Table 4:

    Factors impacting branch vessel patency—ophthalmic arterya

    Patent Branch VesselOccluded Branch VesselUnivariate P ValueMultivariate P ValueOR (95% CI)
    Mean patient age (yr)53.860.1.119
    Male15 (12.7%)0 (0%).283
    Mean max aneurysm sac5.9 ± 3.85.8 ± 3.3.977
    Mean aneurysm neck size3.6 ± 1.63.6 ± 0.5.998
    Acutely ruptured target lesion4/118 (3.7%)0/7 (0%).597
    Prior coiling29/118 (24.6%)1/7 (14.3%).438
    Mean procedural time (min)200 ± 63212 ± 60.628
    Mean fluoroscopy time (min)63 ± 3753 ± 28.429
    >1 PED deployed10/118 (8.5%)0/7 (0%).391
    % PED classic70/75 (93.3%)5/75 (6.7%).859
    Balloon angioplasty9/118 (7.6%)0/7 (0%).418
    Mean PED diameter (mm)4.1 ± 0.53.4 ± 0.6<0.001<.0010.10 (0.04–0.21)
    Mean Δmax size of parent vessel and PED0.23 ± 0.180.24 ± 0.21.887
    Mean Δmin size of parent vessel and PED0.79 ± 0.410.79 ± 0.48.979
    Branch vessel incorporation into aneurysm sac31/118 (26.3%)2/7 (29%).937
    Mean periprocedural P2Y12136 ± 68150 ± 63.597
    Intraprocedural administration of abciximab5/118 (4.2%)2/7 (29%).013.1944.09 (0.49–34.19)
    Presence of endothelial hyperplasia26/115 (22.6%)3/7 (43%).337
    Mean length of DSA follow-up (mo)17.9 ± 9.921.4 ± 13.8.682
    • ↵a Percentages reflect analysis per branch vessel.

    • View popup
    Table 5:

    Factors impacting branch vessel patency vs occluded plus stenotic—entire cohorta

    Patent Branch VesselOccluded/Stenotic Branch VesselUnivariate P ValueMultivariate P ValueOR (95% CI)
    Mean patient age (yr)54.6 ± 12.656.0 ± 10.9.426
    Male19/148 (12.8%)11/69 (15.9%).537
    Mean max aneurysm sac size6.0 ± 4.05.6 ± 3.7.096.4150.94 (0.82–1.09)
    Mean aneurysm neck size3.6 ± 1.73.4 ± 1.2.054.5340.91 (0.67–1.22)
    Acutely ruptured target lesion4/148 (2.7%)4/69 (5.8%).260
    Mean procedural time (min)205 ± 65210 ± 66.658
    Mean fluoroscopy time (min)65 ± 3760 ± 30.365
    >1 PED deployed14/148 (9.5%)4/69 (5.8%).362
    % PED classic60/148 (40.5%)32/69 (46.3%).418
    Balloon angioplasty12/148 (8.1%)2/69 (2.9%).146
    Mean PED diameter (mm)4.0 ± 0.53.8 ± 0.5.013.0290.46 (0.23–0.92)
    Mean Δmax size of parent vessel and PED0.21 ± 0.170.27 ± 0.25.057.1423.60 (0.65–19.89)
    Mean Δmin size of parent vessel and PED0.78 ± 0.40.70 ± 0.42.226
    Branch vessel incorporation into aneurysm sac42/148 (28.3%)16/69 (27.5%).898
    Mean periprocedural P2Y12127 ± 68125 ± 74.855
    Intraprocedural administration of abciximab9/148 (6.1%)11/69 (15.9%).019.0304.26 (1.15–15.78)
    Presence of endothelial hyperplasia31/146 (21.2%)22/68 (32.4%).079.5041.31 (0.59–2.94)
    Mean length of DSA follow-up (mo)18.8 ± 19.418.0 ± 8.2.584
    A1 ACA3/11 (27.2%)8/11 (72.7%)0.003.1143.12 (0.76–12.81)
    Anterior choroidal artery30/31 (96.8%)1/31 (3.2%)<.001.0030.04 (0.004–0.32)
    PcomA22/39 (56.4%)17/39 (43.6%).081.2481.57 (0.73–3.40)
    Ophthalmic artery90/125 (71.2%)36/125 (28.8%).23
    • Note:—PcomA indicates posterior communicating artery; AcomA, anterior communicationg.

    • ↵a Percentages reflect analysis per branch vessel.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 39 (12)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 39, Issue 12
1 Dec 2018
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Pipeline Diameter Significantly Impacts the Long-Term Fate of Jailed Side Branches during Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysms
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
T.R. Miller, M.J. Kole, E.J. Le, G. Cannarsa, S. Jones, A.P. Wessell, G. Jindal, E.F. Aldrich, J.M. Simard, D. Gandhi
Pipeline Diameter Significantly Impacts the Long-Term Fate of Jailed Side Branches during Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysms
American Journal of Neuroradiology Dec 2018, 39 (12) 2270-2277; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A5863

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
Pipeline Diameter Significantly Impacts the Long-Term Fate of Jailed Side Branches during Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysms
T.R. Miller, M.J. Kole, E.J. Le, G. Cannarsa, S. Jones, A.P. Wessell, G. Jindal, E.F. Aldrich, J.M. Simard, D. Gandhi
American Journal of Neuroradiology Dec 2018, 39 (12) 2270-2277; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A5863
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Purchase

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • ABBREVIATION:
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusions
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Correlation of Flow Diverter Malapposition at the Aneurysm Neck with Incomplete Aneurysm Occlusion in Patients with Small Intracranial Aneurysms: A Single-Center Experience
  • The utility of platelet inhibition testing in patients undergoing Pipeline embolization of intracranial aneurysms
  • Pipeline embolization device diameter is an important factor determining the efficacy of flow diversion treatment of small intracranial saccular aneurysms
  • Crossref (14)
  • Google Scholar

This article has been cited by the following articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

  • Flow Diversion for Intracranial Aneurysm Treatment: Trials Involving Flow Diverters and Long-Term Outcomes
    Bree Chancellor, Eytan Raz, Maksim Shapiro, Omar Tanweer, Erez Nossek, Howard A Riina, Peter Kim Nelson
    Neurosurgery 2020 86 Supplement_1
  • The p48MW Flow Diverter—Initial Human Experience
    P. Bhogal, C. Bleise, J. Chudyk, I. Lylyk, R. Viso, N. Perez, H. Henkes, P. Lylyk
    Clinical Neuroradiology 2021 31 1
  • Pipeline embolization device diameter is an important factor determining the efficacy of flow diversion treatment of small intracranial saccular aneurysms
    Matthew James Kole, Timothy Ryan Miller, Gregory Cannarsa, Aaron Wessell, Salazar Jones, Elizabeth Le, Gaurav Jindal, François Aldrich, J Marc Simard, Dheeraj Gandhi
    Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery 2019 11 10
  • Safety and Long-term Efficacy of Stent-assisted Coiling for the Treatment of Complex Posterior Cerebral Artery Aneurysms
    Gaici Xue, Haishuang Tang, Peng Liu, Qiao Zuo, Pengfei Yang, Yu Zhou, Qiang Li, Yibin Fang, Qinghai Huang, Bo Hong, Yi Xu, Rui Zhao, Jianmin Liu
    Clinical Neuroradiology 2021 31 1
  • Patency of Branch Vessels After Pipeline Embolization: Comparison of Various Branches
    Xinzhi Wu, Zhongbin Tian, Wenqiang Li, Jian Liu, Yisen Zhang, Ying Zhang, Yangyang Zhou, Xinjian Yang, Shiqing Mu
    Frontiers in Neurology 2019 10
  • The utility of platelet inhibition testing in patients undergoing Pipeline embolization of intracranial aneurysms
    Timothy R Miller, Aaron Wessell, Gaurav Jindal, Ajay Malhotra, J Marc Simard, Dheeraj Gandhi
    Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery 2022 14 1
  • The p48 flow diverter: First clinical results in 25 aneurysms in three centers
    FRA Van den Bergh, T De Beule, WJ van Rooij, MH Voormolen, T Van der Zijden, L Stockx, WH van Zwam, H Fransen
    Interventional Neuroradiology 2021 27 3
  • Correlation of Flow Diverter Malapposition at the Aneurysm Neck with Incomplete Aneurysm Occlusion in Patients with Small Intracranial Aneurysms: A Single-Center Experience
    Shuhai Long, Shuailong Shi, Qi Tian, Zhuangzhuang Wei, Ji Ma, Ye Wang, Jie Yang, Xinwei Han, Tengfei Li
    American Journal of Neuroradiology 2024 45 1
  • Impact of Design and Deployment Technique on the Hydrodynamic Resistance of Flow Diverters
    Dániel Gyürki, Benjamin Csippa, György Paál, István Szikora
    Clinical Neuroradiology 2022 32 1
  • Endovascular Treatment and Angiographic Characteristics of Aneurysms at the Origin of the Anterior Choroidal Artery
    Yiheng Wang, Jinlu Yu
    Frontiers in Neurology 2022 13

More in this TOC Section

  • SAVE vs. Solumbra Techniques for Thrombectomy
  • CT Perfusion&Reperfusion in Acute Ischemic Stroke
  • Delayed Reperfusion Post-Thrombectomy&Thrombolysis
Show more Interventional

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editors Choice
  • Fellow Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

Special Collections

  • Special Collections

Resources

  • News and Updates
  • Turn around Times
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Author Policies
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Submit a Case
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • Get Peer Review Credit from Publons

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcast
  • AJNR SCANtastic
  • Video Articles

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Alerts
  • Feedback
  • Advertise with us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Permissions
  • Terms and Conditions

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire