Pipeline Diameter Significantly Impacts the Long-Term Fate of Jailed Side Branches during Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysms

References

1. 1.↵
   2. Becske T,
   3. Kallmes DF,
   4. Saatci I, et al

   . Pipeline for uncoilable or failed aneurysms: results from a multicenter clinical trial. Radiology 2013;267:858–68 doi:10.1148/radiol.13120099 pmid:23418004

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
2. 2.↵
   2. Chiu AH,
   3. Cheung AK,
   4. Wenderoth JD, et al

   . Long-term follow-up results following elective treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms with the Pipeline Embolization Device. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2015;36:1728–34 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4329 pmid:25999412

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
3. 3.↵
   2. Fischer S,
   3. Vajda Z,
   4. Aguilar Perez M, et al

   . Pipeline embolization device (PED) for neurovascular reconstruction: initial experience in the treatment of 101 intracranial aneurysms and dissections. Neuroradiology 2012;54:369–82 doi:10.1007/s00234-011-0948-x pmid:21881914

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
4. 4.↵
   2. Kallmes DF,
   3. Hanel R,
   4. Lopes D, et al

   . International retrospective study of the Pipeline embolization device: a multicenter aneurysm treatment study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2015;36:108–15 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4111 pmid:25355814

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
5. 5.↵
   2. Saatci I,
   3. Yavuz K,
   4. Ozer C, et al

   . Treatment of intracranial aneurysms using the Pipeline flow-diverter embolization device: a single-center experience with long-term follow-up results. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33:1436–46 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3246 pmid:22821921

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
6. 6.↵
   2. Albuquerque FC,
   3. Park MS,
   4. Abla AA, et al

   . A reappraisal of the Pipeline Embolization Device for the treatment of posterior circulation aneurysms. J Neurointervent Surg 2015;7:641–45 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2014-011340 pmid:25092926

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
7. 7.↵
   2. Chalouhi N,
   3. Zanaty M,
   4. Whiting A, et al

   . Safety and efficacy of the Pipeline Embolization Device in 100 small intracranial aneurysms. J Neurosurg 2015;122:1498–502 doi:10.3171/2014.12.JNS14411 pmid:25635478

   CrossRefPubMed
8. 8.↵
   2. Pistocchi S,
   3. Blanc R,
   4. Bartolini B, et al

   . Flow diverters at and beyond the level of the circle of Willis for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms. Stroke 2012;43:1032–38 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.636019 pmid:22282890

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
9. 9.↵
   2. Colby GP,
   3. Bender MT,
   4. Lin LM, et al

   . Endovascular flow diversion for treatment of anterior communicating artery region cerebral aneurysms: a single-center cohort of 50 cases. J Neurointervent Surg 2017;9:679–85 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2016-012946 pmid:28130501

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
10. 10.↵
    2. Daou B,
    3. Valle-Giler EP,
    4. Chalouhi N, et al

    . Patency of the posterior communicating artery following treatment with the Pipeline Embolization Device. J Neurosurg 2017;126:564–69 doi:10.3171/2016.2.JNS152544 pmid:27153163

    CrossRefPubMed
11. 11.↵
    2. Chalouhi N,
    3. Daou B,
    4. Kung D, et al

    . Fate of the ophthalmic artery after treatment with the Pipeline Embolization Device. Neurosurgery 2015;77:581–84; discussion 584 doi:10.1227/NEU.0000000000000887 pmid:26191974

    CrossRefPubMed
12. 12.↵
    2. Rangel-Castilla L,
    3. Munich SA,
    4. Jaleel N, et al

    . Patency of anterior circulation branch vessels after Pipeline embolization: longer-term results from 82 aneurysm cases. J Neurosurg 2017;126:1064–69 doi:10.3171/2016.4.JNS16147 pmid:27285547

    CrossRefPubMed
13. 13.↵
    2. Raz E,
    3. Shapiro M,
    4. Becske T, et al

    . Anterior choroidal artery patency and clinical follow-up after coverage with the Pipeline Embolization Device. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2015;36:937–42 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4217 pmid:25572948

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
14. 14.↵
    2. Bhogal P,
    3. Ganslandt O,
    4. Bäzner H, et al

    . The fate of side branches covered by flow diverters: results from 140 patients. World Neurosurg 2017;103:789–98 doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2017.04.092 pmid:28438653

    CrossRefPubMed
15. 15.↵
    2. Shapiro M,
    3. Raz E,
    4. Becske T, et al

    . Variable porosity of the Pipeline embolization device in straight and curved vessels: a guide for optimal deployment strategy. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2014;35:727–33 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3742 pmid:24072622

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
16. 16.↵
    2. Ma D,
    3. Xiang J,
    4. Choi H, et al

    . Enhanced aneurysmal flow diversion using a dynamic push-pull technique: an experimental and modeling study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2014;35:1779–85 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3933 pmid:24763414

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
17. 17.↵
    2. Rouchaud A,
    3. Leclerc O,
    4. Benayoun Y, et al

    . Visual outcomes with flow-diverter stents covering the ophthalmic artery for treatment of internal carotid artery aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2015;36:330–36 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4129 pmid:25339649

    Abstract/FREE Full Text