Evaluation of Thick-Slab Overlapping MIP Images of Contrast-Enhanced 3D T1-Weighted CUBE for Detection of Intracranial Metastases: A Pilot Study for Comparison of Lesion Detection, Interpretation Time, and Sensitivity with Nonoverlapping CUBE MIP, CUBE, and Inversion-Recovery-Prepared Fast-Spoiled Gradient Recalled Brain Volume

References

1. 1.↵
   2. Lam TC,
   3. Sahgal A,
   4. Chang EL, et al

   . Stereotactic radiosurgery for multiple brain metastases. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2014;14:1153–72 doi:10.1586/14737140.2014.940325 pmid:25034143

   CrossRefPubMed
2. 2.↵
   2. Tsao MN,
   3. Lloyd NS,
   4. Wong RKS, et al

   ; Supportive Care Guidelines Group of Cancer Care Ontario's Program in Evidence-Based Care. Radiotherapeutic management of brain metastases: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cancer Treat Rev 2005;31:256–73 doi:10.1016/j.ctrv.2005.04.007 pmid:15951117

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
3. 3.↵
   2. Sills AK

   . Current treatment approaches to surgery for brain metastases. Neurosurgery 2005;57(5 Suppl):S24–32; discusssion S1–S4 pmid:16237284

   PubMed
4. 4.↵
   2. Yamamoto M,
   3. Serizawa T,
   4. Shuto T, et al

   . Stereotactic radiosurgery for patients with multiple brain metastases (JLGK0901): a multi-institutional prospective observational study. Lancet Oncol 2014;15:387–95 doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(14)70061-0 pmid:24621620

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
5. 5.↵
   2. Serizawa T,
   3. Hirai T,
   4. Nagano O, et al

   . Gamma knife surgery for 1–10 brain metastases without prophylactic whole-brain radiation therapy: analysis of cases meeting the Japanese prospective multi-institute study (JLGK0901) inclusion criteria. J Neurooncol 2010;98:163–67 doi:10.1007/s11060-010-0169-x pmid:20411300

   CrossRefPubMed
6. 6.↵
   2. Park J,
   3. Kim J,
   4. Yoo E, et al

   . Detection of small metastatic brain tumors: comparison of 3D contrast-enhanced whole-brain black-blood imaging and MP-RAGE imaging. Invest Radiol 2012;47:136–41 doi:10.1097/RLI.0b013e3182319704 pmid:22104961

   CrossRefPubMed
7. 7.↵
   2. Majigsuren M,
   3. Abe T,
   4. Kageji T, et al

   . Comparison of brain tumor contrast-enhancement on T1-CUBE and 3D-SPGR Images. Magn Reson Med Sci 2016;15:34–40 doi:10.2463/mrms.2014-0129 pmid:26104076

   CrossRefPubMed
8. 8.↵
   2. Kato Y,
   3. Higano S,
   4. Tamura H, et al

   . Usefulness of contrast-enhanced T1-weighted sampling perfection with application-optimized contrasts by using different flip angle evolutions in detection of small brain metastasis at 3T MR imaging: comparison with magnetization-prepared rapid acquisition of gradient echo imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2009;30:923–29 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A1506 pmid:19213825

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
9. 9.↵
   2. Fukuoka H,
   3. Hirai T,
   4. Okuda T, et al

   . Comparison of the added value of contrast-enhanced 3D fluid-attenuated inversion recovery and magnetization-prepared rapid acquisition of gradient echo sequences in relation to conventional postcontrast T1-weighted images for the evaluation of leptomeningeal diseases at 3T. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2010;31:868–73 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A1937 pmid:20037130

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
10. 10.↵
    2. Komada T,
    3. Naganawa S,
    4. Ogawa H, et al

    . Contrast-enhanced MR imaging of metastatic brain tumor at 3 Tesla: utility of T(1)-weighted SPACE compared with 2D spin echo and 3D gradient echo sequence. Magn Reson Med Sci 2008;7:13–21 doi:10.2463/mrms.7.13 pmid:18460844

    CrossRefPubMed
11. 11.↵
    2. Takeda T,
    3. Takeda A,
    4. Nagaoka T, et al

    . Gadolinium-enhanced three-dimensional magnetization-prepared rapid gradient-echo (3D MP-RAGE) imaging is superior to spin-echo imaging in delineating brain metastases. Acta Radiol 2008;49:1167–73 doi:10.1080/02841850802477924 pmid:18979271

    CrossRefPubMed
12. 12.↵
    2. Yoshida A,
    3. Tha KK,
    4. Fujima N, et al

    . Detection of brain metastases by 3-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging at 3 T: comparison between T1-weighted volume isotropic turbo spin echo acquisition and 3-dimensional T1-weighted fluid-attenuated inversion recovery imaging. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2013;37:84–90 doi:10.1097/RCT.0b013e318271f216 pmid:23321838

    CrossRefPubMed
13. 13.↵
    2. Kwak HS,
    3. Hwang S,
    4. Chung GH, et al

    . Detection of small brain metastases at 3 T: comparing the diagnostic performances of contrast-enhanced T1-weighted SPACE, MPRAGE, and 2D FLASH imaging. Clin Imaging 2015;39:571–75 doi:10.1016/j.clinimag.2015.02.010 pmid:25770904

    CrossRefPubMed
14. 14.↵
    2. Valencia R,
    3. Denecke T,
    4. Lehmkuhl L, et al

    . Value of axial and coronal maximum intensity projection (MIP) images in the detection of pulmonary nodules by multislice spiral CT: comparison with axial 1-mm and 5-mm slices. Eur Radiol 2006;16:325–32 doi:10.1007/s00330-005-2871-1 pmid:16086181

    CrossRefPubMed
15. 15.↵
    2. Kilburn-Toppin F,
    3. Arthurs OJ,
    4. Tasker AD, et al

    . Detection of pulmonary nodules at paediatric CT: maximum intensity projections and axial source images are complementary. Pediatr Radiol 2013;43:820–26 doi:10.1007/s00247-012-2597-6 pmid:23344916

    CrossRefPubMed
16. 16.↵
    2. Jankowski A,
    3. Martinelli T,
    4. Timsit JF, et al

    . Pulmonary nodule detection on MDCT images: evaluation of diagnostic performance using thin axial images, maximum intensity projections, and computer-assisted detection. Eur Radiol 2007;17:3148–56 doi:10.1007/s00330-007-0727-6 pmid:17763856

    CrossRefPubMed
17. 17.↵
    2. Diederich S,
    3. Lentschig MG,
    4. Overbeck TR, et al

    . Detection of pulmonary nodules at spiral CT: comparison of maximum intensity projection sliding slabs and single-image reporting. Eur Radiol 2001;11:1345–50 doi:10.1007/s003300000787 pmid:11519541

    CrossRefPubMed
18. 18.↵
    2. Bae YJ,
    3. Choi BS,
    4. Lee KM, et al

    . Efficacy of maximum intensity projection of contrast-enhanced 3D turbo-spin echo imaging with improved motion-sensitized driven-equilibrium preparation in the detection of brain metastases. Korean J Radiol 2017;18:699–709 doi:10.3348/kjr.2017.18.4.699 pmid:28670165

    CrossRefPubMed
19. 19.↵
    2. Sepulveda F,
    3. Yáñez P,
    4. Carnevale MD, et al

    . MIP improves detection of brain metastases. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2016;40:997–1000 doi:10.1097/RCT.0000000000000466 pmid:27529685

    CrossRefPubMed
20. 20.↵
    2. Peloschek P,
    3. Sailer J,
    4. Weber M, et al

    . Pulmonary nodules: sensitivity of maximum intensity projection versus that of volume rendering of 3D multidetector CT data. Radiology 2007;243:561–69 doi:10.1148/radiol.2432052052 pmid:17456878

    CrossRefPubMed
21. 21.↵
    2. Landis JR,
    3. Koch GG

    . The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977;33:159–74 doi:10.2307/2529310 pmid:843571

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
22. 22.↵
    2. Bland JM,
    3. Altman DG

    . Multiple significance tests: the Bonferroni method. BMJ 1995;310:170 doi:10.1136/bmj.310.6973.170 pmid:7833759

    FREE Full Text