Bone Subtraction Iodine Imaging Using Area Detector CT for Evaluation of Skull Base Invasion by Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma

References

1. 1.↵
   2. Amin MB,
   3. Edge SB,
   4. Greene FL, et al

   . AJCC Cancer Staging Manual. 8th ed. New York: Springer-Verlag; 2017
2. 2.↵
   2. Peng G,
   3. Wang T,
   4. Yang KY, et al

   . A prospective, randomized study comparing outcomes and toxicities of intensity-modulated radiotherapy vs. conventional two-dimensional radiotherapy for the treatment of nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Radiother Oncol 2012;104:286–93 doi:10.1016/j.radonc.2012.08.013 pmid:22995588

   CrossRefPubMed
3. 3.↵
   2. Lee AW,
   3. Ng WT,
   4. Chan LL, et al

   . Evolution of treatment for nasopharyngeal cancer: success and setback in the intensity-modulated radiotherapy era. Radiother Oncol 2014;110:377–84 doi:10.1016/j.radonc.2014.02.003 pmid:24630534

   CrossRefPubMed
4. 4.↵
   2. Mukherji SK,
   3. Pillsbury HR,
   4. Castillo M

   . Imaging squamous cell carcinomas of the upper aerodigestive tract: what clinicians need to know. Radiology 1997;205:629–46 doi:10.1148/radiology.205.3.9393513 pmid:9393513

   CrossRefPubMed
5. 5.↵
   2. Dubrulle F,
   3. Souillard R,
   4. Hermans R

   . Extension patterns of nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Eur Radiol 2007;17:2622–30 doi:10.1007/s00330-007-0616-z pmid:17404741

   CrossRefPubMed
6. 6.↵
   2. King AD,
   3. Bhatia KS

   . Magnetic resonance imaging staging of nasopharyngeal carcinoma in the head and neck. World J Radiol 2010;2:159–65 doi:10.4329/wjr.v2.i5.159 pmid:21161030

   CrossRefPubMed
7. 7.↵
   2. Abdel Razek AA,
   3. King A

   . MRI and CT of nasopharyngeal carcinoma. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2012;198:11–18 doi:10.2214/AJR.11.6954 pmid:22194474

   CrossRefPubMed
8. 8.↵
   2. Chong VF,
   3. Fan YF

   . Skull base erosion in nasopharyngeal carcinoma: detection by CT and MRI. Clin Radiol 1996;51:625–31 doi:10.1016/S0009-9260(96)80056-0 pmid:8810691

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
9. 9.↵
   2. Zhang SX,
   3. Han PH,
   4. Zhang GQ, et al

   . Comparison of SPECT/CT, MRI and CT in diagnosis of skull base bone invasion in nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Biomed Mater Eng 2014;24:1117–24 doi:10.3233/BME-130911 pmid:24212004

   CrossRefPubMed
10. 10.↵
    2. Ng SH,
    3. Chang TC,
    4. Ko SF, et al

    . Nasopharyngeal carcinoma: MRI and CT assessment. Neuroradiology 1997;39:741–46 doi:10.1007/s002340050499 pmid:9351114

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
11. 11.↵
    2. Liao XB,
    3. Mao YP,
    4. Liu LZ, et al

    . How does magnetic resonance imaging influence staging according to AJCC staging system for nasopharyngeal carcinoma compared with computed tomography? Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2008;72:1368–77 doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.03.017 pmid:18455329

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
12. 12.↵
    2. Gondim Teixeira PA,
    3. Hossu G,
    4. Lecocq S, et al

    . Bone marrow edema pattern identification in patients with lytic bone lesions using digital subtraction angiography-like bone subtraction on large-area detector computed tomography. Invest Radiol 2014;49:156–64 doi:10.1097/RLI.0000000000000007 pmid:24220254

    CrossRefPubMed
13. 13.↵
    2. Gondim Teixeira PA,
    3. Gervaise A,
    4. Louis M, et al

    . Musculoskeletal wide detector CT: principles, techniques and applications in clinical practice and research. Eur J Radiol 2015;84:892–900 doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2014.12.033 pmid:25656096

    CrossRefPubMed
14. 14.↵
    2. Kuno H,
    3. Sekiya K,
    4. Chapman MN, et al

    . Miscellaneous and emerging applications of dual-energy computed tomography for the evaluation of intracranial pathology. Neuroimaging Clin N Am 2017;27:411–27 doi:10.1016/j.nic.2017.03.005 pmid:28711202

    CrossRefPubMed
15. 15.↵
    1. Edge SE,
    2. Byrd DR,
    3. Compton CC, et al.

    , eds. AJCC Cancer Staging Manual. 7th ed. New York: Springer-Verlag; 2009
16. 16.↵
    2. Crum WR,
    3. Hill DL,
    4. Hawkes DJ

    . Information theoretic similarity measures in non-rigid registration. Inf Process Med Imaging 2003;18:378–87 pmid:15344473

    PubMed
17. 17.↵
    2. Chen L,
    3. Liu LZ,
    4. Mao YP, et al

    . Grading of MRI-detected skull-base invasion in nasopharyngeal carcinoma and its prognostic value. Head Neck 2011;33:1309–14 doi:10.1002/hed.21606 pmid:21837701

    CrossRefPubMed
18. 18.↵
    2. Li YZ,
    3. Cai PQ,
    4. Xie CM, et al

    . Nasopharyngeal cancer: impact of skull base invasion on patients prognosis and its potential implications on TNM staging. Eur J Radiol 2013;82:e107–11 doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2012.10.016 pmid:23181975

    CrossRefPubMed
19. 19.↵
    2. Nishioka T,
    3. Shirato H,
    4. Kagei K, et al

    . Skull-base invasion of nasopharyngeal carcinoma: magnetic resonance imaging findings and therapeutic implications. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2000;47:395–400 doi:10.1016/S0360-3016(00)00459-4 pmid:10802365

    CrossRefPubMed
20. 20.↵
    2. Lu JC,
    3. Wei Q,
    4. Zhang YQ, et al

    . Influence of MRI abnormality in skull base bone on prognosis of nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Cancer Radiother 2004;8:230–33 doi:10.1016/j.canrad.2004.04.005 pmid:15450516

    CrossRefPubMed
21. 21.↵
    2. Wang H,
    3. Zhang ZQ,
    4. Huang LL, et al

    . MR imaging prediction of local control of nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated with radiation therapy and chemotherapy. Br J Radiol 2014;87:20130657 doi:10.1259/bjr.20130657 pmid:24827376

    CrossRefPubMed
22. 22.↵
    2. Genders TS,
    3. Spronk S,
    4. Stijnen T, et al

    . Methods for calculating sensitivity and specificity of clustered data: a tutorial. Radiology 2012;265:910–16 doi:10.1148/radiol.12120509 pmid:23093680

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
23. 23.↵
    2. Sim J,
    3. Wright CC

    . The kappa statistic in reliability studies: use, interpretation, and sample size requirements. Phys Ther 2005;85:257–68 pmid:15733050

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
24. 24.↵
    2. Roh JL,
    3. Sung MW,
    4. Kim KH, et al

    . Nasopharyngeal carcinoma with skull base invasion: a necessity of staging subdivision. Am J Otolaryngol 2004;25:26–32 doi:10.1016/j.amjoto.2003.09.011 pmid:15011203

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
25. 25.↵
    2. Shatzkes DR,
    3. Meltzer DE,
    4. Lee JA, et al

    . Sclerosis of the pterygoid process in untreated patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Radiology 2006;239:181–86 doi:10.1148/radiol.2391042176 pmid:16507751

    CrossRefPubMed
26. 26.↵
    2. Becker M,
    3. Zbären P,
    4. Delavelle J, et al

    . Neoplastic invasion of the laryngeal cartilage: reassessment of criteria for diagnosis at CT. Radiology 1997;203:521–32 doi:10.1148/radiology.203.2.9114116 pmid:9114116

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
27. 27.↵
    2. Muñoz A,
    3. Ramos A,
    4. Ferrando J, et al

    . Laryngeal carcinoma: sclerotic appearance of the cricoid and arytenoid cartilage—CT-pathologic correlation. Radiology 1993;189:433–37 doi:10.1148/radiology.189.2.8210372 pmid:8210372

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
28. 28.↵
    2. Kaup M,
    3. Wichmann JL,
    4. Scholtz JE, et al

    . Dual-energy CT-based display of bone marrow edema in osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: impact on diagnostic accuracy of radiologists with varying levels of experience in correlation to MR imaging. Radiology 2016;280:510–19 doi:10.1148/radiol.2016150472 pmid:26928067

    CrossRefPubMed
29. 29.↵
    2. Pache G,
    3. Krauss B,
    4. Strohm P, et al

    . Dual-energy CT virtual noncalcium technique: detecting posttraumatic bone marrow lesions—feasibility study. Radiology 2010;256:617–24 doi:10.1148/radiol.10091230 pmid:20551186

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
30. 30.↵
    2. Kellock TT,
    3. Nicolaou S,
    4. Kim SSY, et al

    . Detection of bone marrow edema in nondisplaced hip fractures: utility of a virtual noncalcium dual-energy CT application. Radiology 2017;284:798–805 doi:10.1148/radiol.2017161063 pmid:28301779

    CrossRefPubMed
31. 31.↵
    2. Thomas C,
    3. Schabel C,
    4. Krauss B, et al

    . Dual-energy CT: virtual calcium subtraction for assessment of bone marrow involvement of the spine in multiple myeloma. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2015;204:W324–31 doi:10.2214/AJR.14.12613 pmid:25714318

    CrossRefPubMed
32. 32.↵
    2. Gupta R,
    3. Phan CM,
    4. Leidecker C, et al

    . Evaluation of dual-energy CT for differentiating intracerebral hemorrhage from iodinated contrast material staining. Radiology 2010;257:205–11 doi:10.1148/radiol.10091806 pmid:20679449

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
33. 33.↵
    2. Kuno H,
    3. Onaya H,
    4. Iwata R, et al

    . Evaluation of cartilage invasion by laryngeal and hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma with dual-energy CT. Radiology 2012;265:488–96 doi:10.1148/radiol.12111719 pmid:22984188

    CrossRefPubMed
34. 34.↵
    2. Becker M,
    3. Zbären P,
    4. Casselman JW, et al

    . Neoplastic invasion of laryngeal cartilage: reassessment of criteria for diagnosis at MR imaging. Radiology 2008;249:551–59 doi:10.1148/radiol.2492072183 pmid:18936314

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science