Qualitative Assessment and Reporting Quality of Intracranial Vessel Wall MR Imaging Studies: A Systematic Review

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Arenillas JF,
   2. Dieleman N,
   3. Bos D.

   Intracranial arterial wall imaging: techniques, clinical applicability, and future perspectives. Int J Stroke 2019;14:564–73 doi:10.1177/1747493019840942 pmid:30982434

   CrossRefPubMed
2. 2.↵
   1. Lindenholz A,
   2. van der Kolk AG,
   3. Zwanenburg JJM, et al

   . The use and pitfalls of intracranial vessel wall imaging: how we do it. Radiology 2018;286:12–28 doi:10.1148/radiol.2017162096 pmid:29261469

   CrossRefPubMed
3. 3.↵
   1. Mandell DM,
   2. Mossa-Basha M,
   3. Qiao Y, et al

   . Intracranial vessel wall MRI: principles and expert consensus recommendations of the American Society of Neuroradiology. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2017;38:218–29 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4893 pmid:27469212

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
4. 4.↵
   1. von Elm E,
   2. Altman DG,
   3. Egger M, et al

   . The strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Lancet 2007;370:1453–57 doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61602-X pmid:18064739

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
5. 5.↵
   1. Vandenbroucke JP,
   2. von Elm E,
   3. Altman DG, et al

   . Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE): explanation and elaboration. Epidemiology 2007;18:805–35 doi:10.1097/EDE.0b013e3181577511 pmid:18049195

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
6. 6.↵
   1. Seo HJ,
   2. Kim SY,
   3. Lee YJ, et al

   . A newly developed tool for classifying study designs in systematic reviews of interventions and exposures showed substantial reliability and validity. J Clin Epidemiol 2016;70:200–25 doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.09.013 pmid:26408805

   CrossRefPubMed
7. 7.↵
   1. Song JW,
   2. Chung KC.

   Observational studies: cohort and case-control studies. Plast Reconstr Surg 2010;126:2234–42 doi:10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181f44abc pmid:20697313

   CrossRefPubMed
8. 8.↵
   1. Grimes DA,
   2. Schulz KF.

   An overview of clinical research: the lay of the land. Lancet 2002;359:57–61 doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(02)07283-5 pmid:11809203

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
9. 9.↵
   1. Rutjes AW,
   2. Reitsma JB,
   3. Vandenbroucke JP, et al

   . Case-control and two-gate designs in diagnostic accuracy studies. Clin Chem 2005;51:1335–41 doi:10.1373/clinchem.2005.048595 pmid:15961549

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
10. 10.↵
    1. Kitanaka C,
    2. Tanaka J,
    3. Kuwahara M, et al

    . Magnetic resonance imaging study of intracranial vertebrobasilar artery dissections. Stroke 1994;25:571–75 doi:10.1161/01.str.25.3.571 pmid:8128509

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
11. 11.↵
    1. Aoki S,
    2. Shirouzu I,
    3. Sasaki Y, et al

    . Enhancement of the intracranial arterial wall at MR imaging: relationship to cerebral atherosclerosis. Radiology 1995;194:477–81 doi:10.1148/radiology.194.2.7824729 pmid:7824729

    CrossRefPubMed
12. 12.↵
    1. Natori T,
    2. Sasaki M,
    3. Miyoshi M, et al

    . Detection of vessel wall lesions in spontaneous symptomatic vertebrobasilar artery dissection using T1-weighted 3-dimensional imaging. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2014;23:2419–24 doi:10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2014.05.019 pmid:25174566

    CrossRefPubMed
13. 13.↵
    1. Urbach H,
    2. Meyer-Lindenberg A,
    3. Bendszus M, et al

    . Dissections of the basilar artery [in German]. Rofo 1998;169:170–74 doi:10.1055/s-2007-1015069 pmid:9739368

    CrossRefPubMed
14. 14.↵
    1. Ishitsuka K,
    2. Sakaki Y,
    3. Sakai S, et al

    . Diagnosis and follow-up of posterior inferior cerebellar artery dissection complicated with ischemic stroke assisted by T1-VISTA: a report of two cases. BMC Neurol 2016;16:121 doi:10.1186/s12883-016-0637-9 pmid:27474010

    CrossRefPubMed
15. 15.↵
    1. Sakurai K,
    2. Miura T,
    3. Sagisaka T, et al

    . Evaluation of luminal and vessel wall abnormalities in subacute and other stages of intracranial vertebrobasilar artery dissections using the volume isotropic turbo-spin-echo acquisition (VISTA) sequence: a preliminary study. J Neuroradiol 2013;40:19–28 doi:10.1016/j.neurad.2012.02.005 pmid:22633047

    CrossRefPubMed
16. 16.↵
    1. Choi JW,
    2. Han M,
    3. Hong JM, et al

    . Feasibility of improved motion-sensitized driven-equilibrium (iMSDE) prepared 3D T1-weighted imaging in the diagnosis of vertebrobasilar artery dissection. J Neuroradiol 2018;45:186–91 doi:10.1016/j.neurad.2017.11.006 pmid:29273530

    CrossRefPubMed
17. 17.↵
    1. Wang Y,
    2. Lou X,
    3. Li Y, et al

    . Imaging investigation of intracranial arterial dissecting aneurysms by using 3 T high-resolution MRI and DSA: from the interventional neuroradiologists' view. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2014;156:515–25 doi:10.1007/s00701-013-1989-1 pmid:24420008

    CrossRefPubMed
18. 18.↵
    1. Kwon JY,
    2. Kim N,
    3. Suh DC, et al

    . Intracranial and extracranial arterial dissection presenting with ischemic stroke: lesion location and stroke mechanism. J Neurol Sci 2015;358:371–76 doi:10.1016/j.jns.2015.09.368 pmid:26434614

    CrossRefPubMed
19. 19.↵
    1. Hirai T,
    2. Korogi Y,
    3. Murata Y, et al

    . Intracranial artery dissections: serial evaluation with MR imaging, MR angiography, and source images of MR angiography. Radiat Med 2003;21:86–93 pmid:12816356

    PubMed
20. 20.↵
    1. Kim T,
    2. Choi HS,
    3. Koo J, et al

    . Intramural hematoma detection by susceptibility-weighted imaging in intracranial vertebral artery dissection. Cerebrovasc Dis 2013;36:292–98 doi:10.1159/000354811 pmid:24135546

    CrossRefPubMed
21. 21.↵
    1. Mascalchi M,
    2. Bianchi MC,
    3. Mangiafico S, et al

    . MRI and MR angiography of vertebral artery dissection. Neuroradiology 1997;39:329–40 doi:10.1007/s002340050418 pmid:9189877

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
22. 22.↵
    1. Takano K,
    2. Yamashita S,
    3. Takemoto K, et al

    . MRI of intracranial vertebral artery dissection: evaluation of intramural haematoma using a black blood, variable-flip-angle 3D turbo spin-echo sequence. Neuroradiology 2013;55:845–51 doi:10.1007/s00234-013-1183-4 pmid:23619699

    CrossRefPubMed
23. 23.↵
    1. Park KJ,
    2. Jung SC,
    3. Kim HS, et al

    . Multi-contrast high-resolution magnetic resonance findings of spontaneous and unruptured intracranial vertebral artery dissection: qualitative and quantitative analysis according to stages. Cerebrovasc Dis 2016;42:23–31 doi:10.1159/000444315 pmid:26950228

    CrossRefPubMed
24. 24.↵
    1. Jung SC,
    2. Kim HS,
    3. Choi C, et al

    . Spontaneous and unruptured chronic intracranial artery dissection: high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging findings. Clin Neuroradiol 2018;28:171–81 doi:10.1007/s00062-016-0544-x pmid:27677627

    CrossRefPubMed
25. 25.↵
    1. Yun SY,
    2. Heo YJ,
    3. Jeong HW, et al

    . Spontaneous intracranial vertebral artery dissection with acute ischemic stroke: high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging findings. Neuroradiol J 2018;31:262–69 doi:10.1177/1971400918764129 pmid:29565222

    CrossRefPubMed
26. 26.↵
    1. Madokoro Y,
    2. Sakurai K,
    3. Kato D, et al

    . Utility of T1- and T2-weighted high-resolution vessel wall imaging for the diagnosis and follow up of isolated posterior inferior cerebellar artery dissection with ischemic stroke: report of 4 cases and review of the literature. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2017;26:2645–51 doi:10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2017.06.038 pmid:28864037

    CrossRefPubMed
27. 27.↵
    1. Mizutani T.

    A fatal, chronically growing basilar artery: a new type of dissecting aneurysm. J Neurosurg 1996;84:962–71 doi:10.3171/jns.1996.84.6.0962 pmid:8847591

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
28. 28.↵
    1. Edjlali M,
    2. Gentric J,
    3. Régent-Rodriguez C, et al

    . Does aneurysmal wall enhancement on vessel wall MRI help to distinguish stable from unstable intracranial aneurysms? Stroke 2014;45:3704–06 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.114.006626 pmid:25325912

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
29. 29.↵
    1. Park JK,
    2. Lee CS,
    3. Sim KB, et al

    . Imaging of the walls of saccular cerebral aneurysms with double inversion recovery black-blood sequence. J Magn Reson Imaging 2009;30:1179–83 doi:10.1002/jmri.21942 pmid:19856452

    CrossRefPubMed
30. 30.↵
    1. Boussel L,
    2. Wintermark M,
    3. Martin A, et al

    . Monitoring serial change in the lumen and outer wall of vertebrobasilar aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2008;29:259–64 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A0796 pmid:17974611

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
31. 31.↵
    1. Martin AJ,
    2. Hetts SW,
    3. Dillon WP, et al

    . MR imaging of partially thrombosed cerebral aneurysms: characteristics and evolution. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32:346–51 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2298 pmid:21087941

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
32. 32.↵
    1. Omodaka S,
    2. Endo H,
    3. Niizuma K, et al

    . Quantitative assessment of circumferential enhancement along the wall of cerebral aneurysms using MR imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2016;37:1262–66 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4722 pmid:26939634

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
33. 33.↵
    1. Blankena R,
    2. Kleinloog R,
    3. Verweij BH, et al

    . Thinner regions of intracranial aneurysm wall correlate with regions of higher wall shear stress: a 7T MRI study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2016;37:1310–17 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4734 pmid:26892986

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
34. 34.↵
    1. Matouk CC,
    2. Mandell DM,
    3. Günel M, et al

    . Vessel wall magnetic resonance imaging identifies the site of rupture in patients with multiple intracranial aneurysms: proof of principle. Neurosurgery 2013;72:492–96 doi:10.1227/NEU.0b013e31827d1012 pmid:23151622

    CrossRefPubMed
35. 35.↵
    1. Kleinloog R,
    2. Korkmaz E,
    3. Zwanenburg JJM, et al

    . Visualization of the aneurysm wall: a 7.0-Tesla magnetic resonance imaging study. Neurosurgery 2014;75:614–22 doi:10.1227/NEU.0000000000000559 pmid:25255252

    CrossRefPubMed
36. 36.↵
    1. Nagahata S,
    2. Nagahata M,
    3. Obara M, et al

    . Wall enhancement of the intracranial aneurysms revealed by magnetic resonance vessel wall imaging using three-dimensional turbo spin-echo sequence with motion-sensitized driven-equilibrium: a sign of ruptured aneurysm? Clin Neuroradiol 2016;26:277–83 doi:10.1007/s00062-014-0353-z pmid:25332151

    CrossRefPubMed
37. 37.↵
    1. Cheng-Ching E,
    2. Jones S,
    3. Hui FK, et al

    . High-resolution MRI vessel wall imaging in varicella zoster virus vasculopathy. J Neurol Sci 2015;351:168–73 doi:10.1016/j.jns.2015.02.017 pmid:25732801

    CrossRefPubMed
38. 38.↵
    1. Ide S,
    2. Kakeda S,
    3. Miyata M, et al

    . Intracranial vessel wall lesions in patients with systematic lupus erythematosus: vessel wall lesions in SLE patients. J Magn Reson Imaging 2018;48:1237–46 doi:10.1002/jmri.25966 pmid:29473985

    CrossRefPubMed
39. 39.↵
    1. Berkefeld J,
    2. Enzensberger W,
    3. Lanfermann H.

    MRI in human immunodeficiency virus-associated cerebral vasculitis. Neuroradiology 2000;42:526–28 doi:10.1007/s002340000328 pmid:10952187

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
40. 40.↵
    1. Thaler C,
    2. Kaufmann-Bühler A,
    3. Gansukh T, et al

    . Neuroradiologic characteristics of primary angiitis of the central nervous system according to the affected vessel size. Clin Neuroradiol 2019;29:37–44 doi:10.1007/s00062-017-0622-8 pmid:28875326

    CrossRefPubMed
41. 41.↵
    1. Schuster S,
    2. Bachmann H,
    3. Thom V, et al

    . Subtypes of primary angiitis of the CNS identified by MRI patterns reflect the size of affected vessels. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2017;88:749–55 doi:10.1136/jnnp-2017-315691 pmid:28705900

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
42. 42.↵
    1. Küker W,
    2. Gaertner S,
    3. Nagele T, et al

    . Vessel wall contrast enhancement: a diagnostic sign of cerebral vasculitis. Cerebrovasc Dis 2008;26:23–29 doi:10.1159/000135649 pmid:18511868

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
43. 43.↵
    1. Han C,
    2. Li M,
    3. Xu Y, et al

    . Adult Moyamoya-atherosclerosis syndrome: clinical and vessel wall imaging features. J Neurol Sci 2016;369:181–84 doi:10.1016/j.jns.2016.08.020 pmid:27653886

    CrossRefPubMed
44. 44.↵
    1. Muraoka S,
    2. Araki Y,
    3. Taoka T, et al

    . Prediction of intracranial arterial stenosis progression in patients with Moyamoya vasculopathy: contrast-enhanced high-resolution magnetic resonance vessel wall imaging. World Neurosurg 2018;116:e1114–21 doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2018.05.181 pmid:29864569

    CrossRefPubMed
45. 45.↵
    1. Yu L,
    2. He H,
    3. Zhao J, et al

    . More precise imaging analysis and diagnosis of Moyamoya disease and Moyamoya syndrome using high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging. World Neurosurg 2016;96:252–60 doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2016.08.083 pmid:27576769

    CrossRefPubMed
46. 46.↵
    1. Wang M,
    2. Yang Y,
    3. Zhou F, et al

    . The contrast enhancement of intracranial arterial wall on high-resolution MRI and its clinical relevance in patients with Moyamoya vasculopathy. Sci Rep 2017;7:44264 doi:10.1038/srep44264 pmid:28276529

    CrossRefPubMed
47. 47.↵
    1. Seo W,
    2. Oh K,
    3. Suh S, et al

    . Clinical significance of wall changes after recanalization therapy in acute stroke: high-resolution vessel wall imaging. Stroke 2017;48:1077–80 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.015429 pmid:28258254

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
48. 48.↵
    1. Power S,
    2. Matouk C,
    3. Casaubon LK, et al

    . Vessel wall magnetic resonance imaging in acute ischemic stroke: effects of embolism and mechanical thrombectomy on the arterial wall. Stroke 2014;45:2330–34 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.114.005618 pmid:24964050

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
49. 49.↵
    1. Abraham P,
    2. Scott Pannell J,
    3. Santiago-Dieppa D, et al

    . Vessel wall signal enhancement on 3-T MRI in acute stroke patients after stent retriever thrombectomy. Neurosurg Focus 2017;42:E20 doi:10.3171/2017.1.FOCUS16492 pmid:28366071

    CrossRefPubMed
50. 50.↵
    1. Chen C,
    2. Chen S,
    3. Fuh J, et al

    . Vascular wall imaging in reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome: a 3-T contrast-enhanced MRI study. J Headache Pain 2018;19:74 doi:10.1186/s10194-018-0906-7 pmid:30167985

    CrossRefPubMed
51. 51.↵
    1. Jiang Y,
    2. Zhu C,
    3. Peng W, et al

    . Ex-vivo imaging and plaque type classification of intracranial atherosclerotic plaque using high resolution MRI. Atherosclerosis 2016;249:10–16 doi:10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2016.03.033 pmid:27062404

    CrossRefPubMed
52. 52.↵
    1. Jiang W,
    2. Yu W,
    3. Ma N, et al

    . High resolution MRI guided endovascular intervention of basilar artery disease. J Neurointerv Surg 2011;3:375–78 doi:10.1136/jnis.2010.004291 pmid:21990448

    CrossRefPubMed
53. 53.↵
    1. Ma N,
    2. Jiang WJ,
    3. Lou X, et al

    . Arterial remodeling of advanced basilar atherosclerosis: a 3-Tesla MRI study. Neurology 2010;75:253–58 doi:10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181e8e714 pmid:20644151

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
54. 54.↵
    1. Zhang X,
    2. Zhu C,
    3. Peng W, et al

    . Scan-rescan reproducibility of high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging of atherosclerotic plaque in the middle cerebral artery. PLoS One 2015;10:e0134913 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0134913 pmid:26247869

    CrossRefPubMed
55. 55.↵
    1. Whelton PK,
    2. Carey RM,
    3. Aronow WS, et al

    . 2017 ACC/AHA/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/AGS/APhA/ASH/ASPC/NMA/PCNA guideline for the prevention, detection, evaluation, and management of high blood pressure in adults: executive summary—a Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Hypertension 2018;71:1269–324 doi:10.1161/HYP.0000000000000066 pmid:29133354

    CrossRefPubMed
56. 56.↵
    1. Xu W,
    2. Li M,
    3. Niu J, et al

    . Intracranial artery atherosclerosis and lumen dilation in cerebral small-vessel diseases: a high-resolution MRI study. CNS Neurosci Ther 2014;20:364–67 doi:10.1111/cns.12224 pmid:24423003

    CrossRefPubMed
57. 57.↵
    1. Kim J,
    2. Jung K,
    3. Sohn C, et al

    . Intracranial plaque enhancement from high resolution vessel wall magnetic resonance imaging predicts stroke recurrence. Int J Stroke 2016;11:171–79 doi:10.1177/1747493015609775 pmid:26783308

    CrossRefPubMed
58. 58.↵
    1. Kim YS,
    2. Lim S,
    3. Oh K, et al

    . The advantage of high-resolution MRI in evaluating basilar plaques: a comparison study with MRA. Atherosclerosis 2012;224:411–16 doi:10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2012.07.037 pmid:22920240

    CrossRefPubMed
59. 59.↵
    1. Ahn S,
    2. Lee J,
    3. Kim Y, et al

    . Isolated MCA disease in patients without significant atherosclerotic risk factors: a high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging study. Stroke 2015;46:697–703 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.114.008181 pmid:25628303

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
60. 60.↵
    1. Niu P,
    2. Yu Y,
    3. Zhou H, et al

    . Vessel wall differences between middle cerebral artery and basilar artery plaques on magnetic resonance imaging. Sci Rep 2016;6:38534 doi:10.1038/srep38534 pmid:27917937

    CrossRefPubMed
61. 61.↵
    1. Dieleman N,
    2. Yang W,
    3. Abrigo JM, et al

    . Magnetic resonance imaging of plaque morphology, burden, and distribution in patients with symptomatic middle cerebral artery stenosis. Stroke 2016;47:1797–802 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.013007 pmid:27301944

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
62. 62.↵
    1. Qiao Y,
    2. Anwar Z,
    3. Intrapiromkul J, et al

    . Patterns and implications of intracranial arterial remodeling in stroke patients. Stroke 2016;47:434–40 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.009955 pmid:26742795

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
63. 63.↵
    1. Langan S,
    2. Schmitt J,
    3. Coenraads PJ, et al

    . The reporting of observational research studies in dermatology journals: a literature-based study. Arch Dermatol 2010;146:534–41 doi:10.1001/archdermatol.2010.87 pmid:20479302

    CrossRefPubMed
64. 64.↵
    1. Fung AE,
    2. Palanki R,
    3. Bakri SJ, et al

    . Applying the CONSORT and STROBE statements to evaluate the reporting quality of neovascular age-related macular degeneration studies. Ophthalmology 2009;116:286–96 doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2008.09.014 pmid:19091408

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
65. 65.↵
    1. Papaioannou TG,
    2. Soulis D,
    3. Tousoulis D.

    Reversibility of hypertension-induced subclinical vascular changes: do the new ACC/AHA 2017 blood pressure guidelines and heart rate changes make a difference? J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich) 2019;21:1242 doi:10.1111/jch.13602

    CrossRef
66. 66.↵
    1. Muntner P,
    2. Carey RM,
    3. Gidding S, et al

    . Potential US population impact of the 2017 ACC/AHA high blood pressure guideline. Circulation 2018;137:109–18 doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.032582 pmid:29133599

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
67. 67.↵
    1. Hall KL,
    2. Vogel AL,
    3. Huang GC, et al

    . The science of team science: a review of the empirical evidence and research gaps on collaboration in science. Am Psychol 2018;73:532–48 doi:10.1037/amp0000319 pmid:29792466

    CrossRefPubMed