Brain DSC MR Perfusion in Children: A Clinical Feasibility Study Using Different Technical Standards of Contrast Administration

References

1. 1.↵
   2. Cha S

   . Dynamic susceptibility-weighted contrast-enhanced perfusion MR imaging in pediatric patients. Neuroimaging Clin N Am 2006;16:137–47, ix doi:10.1016/j.nic.2005.11.006 pmid:16543089

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
2. 2.↵
   2. Huisman TA,
   3. Sorensen AG

   . Perfusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of the brain: techniques and application in children. Eur Radiol 2004;14:59–72 pmid:12827431

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
3. 3.↵
   2. Rosen BR,
   3. Belliveau JW,
   4. Vevea JM, et al

   . Perfusion imaging with NMR contrast agents. Magn Reson Med 1990;14:249–65 doi:10.1002/mrm.1910140211 pmid:2345506

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
4. 4.↵
   2. Østergaard L,
   3. Weisskoff RM,
   4. Chesler DA, et al

   . High resolution measurement of cerebral blood flow using intravascular tracer bolus passages, Part I: mathematical approach and statistical analysis. Magn Reson Med 1996;36:715–25 doi:10.1002/mrm.1910360510 pmid:8916022

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
5. 5.↵
   2. Boxerman JL,
   3. Schmainda KM,
   4. Weisskoff RM

   . Relative cerebral blood volume maps corrected for contrast agent extravasation significantly correlate with glioma tumor grade, whereas uncorrected maps do not. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2006;27:859–67 pmid:16611779

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
6. 6.↵
   2. Tombach B,
   3. Benner T,
   4. Reimer P, et al

   . Do highly concentrated gadolinium chelates improve MR brain perfusion imaging? Intraindividually controlled randomized crossover concentration comparison study of 0.5 versus 1.0 mol/L gadobutrol. Radiology 2003;226:880–88 doi:10.1148/radiol.2263011970 pmid:12601217

   CrossRefPubMed
7. 7.↵
   2. Essig M,
   3. Lodemann KP,
   4. Le-Huu M, et al

   . Intraindividual comparison of gadobenate dimeglumine and gadobutrol for cerebral magnetic resonance perfusion imaging at 1.5 T. Invest Radiol 2006;41:256–63 doi:10.1097/01.rli.0000191333.19068.6b pmid:16481908

   CrossRefPubMed
8. 8.↵
   2. Ho CY,
   3. Cardinal JS,
   4. Kamer AP, et al

   . Contrast leakage patterns from dynamic susceptibility contrast perfusion MRI in the grading of primary pediatric brain tumors. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2016;37:544–51 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4559 pmid:26564438

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
9. 9.↵
   2. Koob M,
   3. Girard N,
   4. Ghattas B, et al

   . The diagnostic accuracy of multiparametric MRI to determine pediatric brain tumor grades and types. J Neurooncol 2016;127:345–53 doi:10.1007/s11060-015-2042-4 pmid:26732081

   CrossRefPubMed
10. 10.↵
    2. Welker K,
    3. Boxerman J,
    4. Kalnin A, et al

    ; American Society of Functional Neuroradiology MR Perfusion Standards and Practice Subcommittee of the ASFNR Clinical Practice Committee. ASFNR recommendations for clinical performance of MR dynamic susceptibility contrast perfusion imaging of the brain. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2015;36:E41–51 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4341 pmid:25907520

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
11. 11.↵
    2. Ho CY,
    3. Cardinal JS,
    4. Kamer AP, et al

    . Relative cerebral blood volume from dynamic susceptibility contrast perfusion in the grading of pediatric primary brain tumors. Neuroradiology 2015;57:299–306 doi:10.1007/s00234-014-1478-0 pmid:25504266

    CrossRefPubMed
12. 12.↵
    2. Giesel FL,
    3. Mehndiratta A,
    4. Essig M

    . High-relaxivity contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance neuroimaging: a review. Eur Radiol 2010;20:2461–74 doi:10.1007/s00330-010-1805-8 pmid:20567832

    CrossRefPubMed
13. 13.↵
    2. Chiron C,
    3. Raynaud C,
    4. Mazière B, et al

    . Changes in regional cerebral blood flow during brain maturation in children and adolescents. J Nucl Med 1992;33:696–703 pmid:1569478

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
14. 14.↵
    2. Liu Y,
    3. Zhu X,
    4. Feinberg D, et al

    . Arterial spin labeling MRI study of age and gender effects on brain perfusion hemodynamics. Magn Reson Med 2012;68:912–22

    CrossRefPubMed
15. 15.↵
    2. Ghisleni C,
    3. Bollmann S,
    4. Biason-Lauber A, et al

    . Effects of steroid hormones on sex differences in cerebral perfusion. PLoS One 2015;10:e0135827 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0135827 pmid:26356576

    CrossRefPubMed
16. 16.↵
    2. Harreld JH,
    3. Helton KJ,
    4. Kaddoum RN, et al

    . The effects of propofol on cerebral perfusion MRI in children. Neuroradiology 2013;55:1049–56 doi:10.1007/s00234-013-1187-0 pmid:23673874

    CrossRefPubMed
17. 17.↵
    2. Radbruch A,
    3. Weberling LD,
    4. Kieslich PJ, et al

    . Gadolinium retention in the dentate nucleus and globus pallidus is dependent on the class of contrast agent. Radiology 2015;275:783–91 doi:10.1148/radiol.2015150337 pmid:25848905

    CrossRefPubMed
18. 18.↵
    2. Kanda T,
    3. Osawa M,
    4. Oba H, et al

    . High signal intensity in dentate nucleus on unenhanced T1-weighted MR images: association with linear versus macrocyclic gadolinium chelate administration. Radiology 2015;275:803–09 doi:10.1148/radiol.14140364 pmid:25633504

    CrossRefPubMed
19. 19.↵
    2. Robert P,
    3. Violas X,
    4. Grand S, et al

    . Linear gadolinium-based contrast agents are associated with brain gadolinium retention in healthy rats. Invest Radiol 2016;51:73–82 doi:10.1097/RLI.0000000000000241 pmid:26606549

    CrossRefPubMed
20. 20.↵
    2. Bjørnerud A,
    3. Vatnehol SA,
    4. Larsson C, et al

    . Signal enhancement of the dentate nucleus at unenhanced MR imaging after very high cumulative doses of the macrocyclic gadolinium-based contrast agent gadobutrol: an observational study. Radiology 2017;285:434–44 doi:10.1148/radiol.2017170391 pmid:28885891

    CrossRefPubMed
21. 21.↵
    2. Tibussek D,
    3. Rademacher C,
    4. Caspers J, et al

    . Gadolinium brain deposition after macrocyclic gadolinium administration: a pediatric case-control study. Radiology 2017;285:223–30 doi:10.1148/radiol.2017161151 pmid:28640695

    CrossRefPubMed
22. 22.↵
    2. Essig M,
    3. Shiroishi MS,
    4. Nguyen TB, et al

    . Perfusion MRI: the five most frequently asked technical questions. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2013;200:24–34 doi:10.2214/AJR.12.9543 pmid:23255738

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
23. 23.↵
    2. Leu K,
    3. Boxerman JL,
    4. Ellingson BM

    . Effects of MRI protocol parameters, preload injection dose, fractionation strategies, and leakage correction algorithms on the fidelity of dynamic-susceptibility contrast MRI estimates of relative cerebral blood volume in gliomas. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2017;38:478–84 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A5027 pmid:28034995

    Abstract/FREE Full Text