Quantification of DTI in the Pediatric Spinal Cord: Application to Clinical Evaluation in a Healthy Patient Population

REFERENCES

1. 1.↵
   2. Hasan KM,
   3. Walimuni IS,
   4. Abid H, et al

   . A review of diffusion tensor magnetic resonance imaging computational methods and software tools. Comput Biol Med 2011;41:1062–72 doi:10.1016/j.compbiomed.2010.10.008 pmid:21087766

   CrossRefPubMed
2. 2.↵
   2. Le Bihan D,
   3. Mangin JF,
   4. Poupon C, et al

   . Diffusion tensor imaging: concepts and applications. J Magn Reson Imaging 2001;13:534–46 doi:10.1002/jmri.1076 pmid:11276097

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
3. 3.↵
   2. Martin AR,
   3. De Leener BD,
   4. Cohen-Adad J, et al

   . Clinically feasible microstructural MRI to quantify cervical spinal cord tissue injury using DTI, MT, and T2*-weighted imaging: assessment of normative data and reliability. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2017;38:1257–65 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A5163 pmid:28428213

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
4. 4.↵
   2. Oishi K,
   3. Faria AV,
   4. Yoshida S, et al

   . Quantitative evaluation of brain development using anatomical MRI and diffusion tensor imaging. Int J Dev Neurosci 2013;31:512–24 doi:10.1016/j.ijdevneu.2013.06.004 pmid:23796902

   CrossRefPubMed
5. 5.↵
   2. Carney O,
   3. Falzon A,
   4. MacKinnon AD

   . Diffusion-weighted MRI in paediatric neuroimaging. Clin Radiol 2018;73:999–1013 doi:10.1016/j.crad.2018.07.101 pmid:30122607

   CrossRefPubMed
6. 6.↵
   2. Clark CA,
   3. Hedehus M,
   4. Moseley ME

   . In vivo mapping of the fast and slow diffusion tensors in human brain. Magn Reson Med 2002;47:623–28 doi:10.1002/mrm.10118 pmid:11948721

   CrossRefPubMed
7. 7.↵
   2. By S,
   3. Smith AK,
   4. Dethrage LM, et al

   . Quantifying the impact of underlying measurement error on cervical spinal cord diffusion tensor imaging at 3T: error in cervical spinal cord DTI at 3T. J Magn Reson Imaging 2016;44:1608–18 doi:10.1002/jmri.25308 pmid:27192379

   CrossRefPubMed
8. 8.↵
   2. Smith SA,
   3. Jones CK,
   4. Gifford A, et al

   . Reproducibility of tract-specific magnetization transfer and diffusion tensor imaging in the cervical spinal cord at 3 Tesla. NMR Biomed 2010;23:207–17 doi:10.1002/nbm.1447 pmid:19924726

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
9. 9.↵
   2. Taso M,
   3. Girard OM,
   4. Duhamel G, et al

   . Tract-specific and age-related variations of the spinal cord microstructure: a multi-parametric MRI study using diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) and inhomogeneous magnetization transfer (ihMT). NMR Biomed 2016;29:817–32 doi:10.1002/nbm.3530 pmid:27100385

   CrossRefPubMed
10. 10.↵
    2. Singhi S,
    3. Tekes A,
    4. Thurnher M, et al

    . Diffusion tensor imaging of the maturing paediatric cervical spinal cord: from the neonate to the young adult. J Neuroradiol 2012;39:142–48 doi:10.1016/j.neurad.2011.05.002 pmid:21723608

    CrossRefPubMed
11. 11.↵
    2. Saksena S,
    3. Middleton DM,
    4. Krisa L, et al

    . Diffusion tensor imaging of the normal cervical and thoracic pediatric spinal cord. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2016;37:2150–57 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4883 pmid:27418470

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
12. 12.↵
    2. Alizadeh M,
    3. Fisher J,
    4. Saksena S, et al

    . Age related diffusion and tractography changes in typically developing pediatric cervical and thoracic spinal cord. Neuroimage Clin 2018;18:784–92 doi:10.1016/j.nicl.2018.03.014 pmid:29876264

    CrossRefPubMed
13. 13.↵
    2. Wilm BJ,
    3. Svensson J,
    4. Henning A, et al

    . Reduced field-of-view MRI using outer volume suppression for spinal cord diffusion imaging. Magn Reson Med 2007;57:625–30 doi:10.1002/mrm.21167 pmid:17326167

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
14. 14.↵
    2. Wheeler-Kingshott CA,
    3. Hickman SJ,
    4. Parker GJ, et al

    . Investigating cervical spinal cord structure using axial diffusion tensor imaging. Neuroimage 2002;16:93–102 doi:10.1006/nimg.2001.1022 pmid:11969321

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
15. 15.↵
    2. Cook PA,
    3. Bai Y,
    4. Nedjati-Gilani S, et al

    . Camino: Open-Source Diffusion-MRI Reconstruction and Processing. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Seattle, Washington. May 6–12, 2006;14:1
16. 16.↵
    2. Cohen J

    . Eta-squared and partial eta-squared in fixed factor ANOVA designs. Educational and Psychological Measurement 1973;33:107–12 doi:10.1177/001316447303300111

    CrossRefWeb of Science
17. 17.↵
    2. Hochberg Y,
    3. Tamhane AC

    . Multiple Comparison Procedures. New York: Wiley; 1987
18. 18.↵
    2. Engelbrecht V,
    3. Scherer A,
    4. Rassek M, et al

    . Diffusion-weighted MR imaging in the brain in children: findings in the normal brain and in the brain with white matter diseases. Radiology 2002;222:410–18 doi:10.1148/radiol.2222010492 pmid:11818607

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
19. 19.↵
    2. Faria AV,
    3. Zhang J,
    4. Oishi K, et al

    . Atlas-based analysis of neurodevelopment from infancy to adulthood using diffusion tensor imaging and applications for automated abnormality detection. Neuroimage 2010;52:415–28 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.04.238 pmid:20420929

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
20. 20.↵
    2. Löbel U,
    3. Sedlacik J,
    4. Güllmar D, et al

    . Diffusion tensor imaging: the normal evolution of ADC, RA, FA, and eigenvalues studied in multiple anatomical regions of the brain. Neuroradiology 2009;51:253–63 doi:10.1007/s00234-008-0488-1 pmid:19132355

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
21. 21.↵
    2. Yoshida S,
    3. Oishi K,
    4. Faria AV, et al

    . Diffusion tensor imaging of normal brain development. Pediatr Radiol 2013;43:15–27 doi:10.1007/s00247-012-2496-x pmid:23288475

    CrossRefPubMed
22. 22.↵
    2. Qiu A,
    3. Mori S,
    4. Miller MI

    . Diffusion tensor imaging for understanding brain development in early life. Annu Rev Psychol 2015;66:853–76 doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-010814-015340 pmid:25559117

    CrossRefPubMed
23. 23.↵
    2. Courchesne E,
    3. Chisum HJ,
    4. Townsend J, et al

    . Normal brain development and aging: quantitative analysis at in vivo MR imaging in healthy volunteers. Radiology 2000;216:672–82 doi:10.1148/radiology.216.3.r00au37672 pmid:10966694

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
24. 24.↵
    2. Paus T,
    3. Collins DL,
    4. Evans AC, et al

    . Maturation of white matter in the human brain: a review of magnetic resonance studies. Brain Res Bull 2001;54:255–66 doi:10.1016/S0361-9230(00)00434-2 pmid:11287130

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
25. 25.↵
    2. Dekaban AS,
    3. Sadowsky D

    . Changes in brain weights during the span of human life: relation of brain weights to body heights and body weights. Ann Neurol 1978;4:345–56 doi:10.1002/ana.410040410 pmid:727739

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
26. 26.↵
    2. Figley CR,
    3. Stroman PW

    . Investigation of human cervical and upper thoracic spinal cord motion: implications for imaging spinal cord structure and function. Magn Reson Med 2007;58:185–89 doi:10.1002/mrm.21260 pmid:17659610

    CrossRefPubMed
27. 27.↵
    2. Grabher P,
    3. Mohammadi S,
    4. Trachsler A, et al

    . Voxel-based analysis of grey and white matter degeneration in cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Sci Rep 2016;6:24636 doi:10.1038/srep24636 pmid:27095134

    CrossRefPubMed
28. 28.↵
    2. Rajasekaran S,
    3. Yerramshetty JS,
    4. Chittode VS, et al

    . The assessment of neuronal status in normal and cervical spondylotic myelopathy using diffusion tensor imaging. Spine 2014;39:1183–89 doi:10.1097/BRS.0000000000000369 pmid:24827523

    CrossRefPubMed
29. 29.↵
    2. Cui JL,
    3. Li X,
    4. Chan TY, et al

    . Quantitative assessment of column-specific degeneration in cervical spondylotic myelopathy based on diffusion tensor tractography. Eur Spine J 2015;24:41–47 doi:10.1007/s00586-014-3522-5 pmid:25150714

    CrossRefPubMed
30. 30.↵
    2. Junghanns H,
    3. Schmorl G

    . The Human Spine in Health and Disease. Philadelphia: Grune & Stratton; 1971
31. 31.↵
    2. Fontana PA,
    3. Barbeito CG,
    4. Goya RG, et al

    . Impact of very old age on the expression of cervical spinal cord cell markers in rats. J Chem Neuroanat 2009;37:98–104 doi:10.1016/j.jchemneu.2008.11.001 pmid:19059476

    CrossRefPubMed
32. 32.↵
    2. Farrell JAD,
    3. Landman BA,
    4. Jones CK, et al

    . Effects of signal-to-noise ratio on the accuracy and reproducibility of diffusion tensor imaging–derived fractional anisotropy, mean diffusivity, and principal eigenvector measurements at 1.5T. J Magn Reson Imaging 2007;26:756–67 doi:10.1002/jmri.21053 pmid:17729339

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
33. 33.↵
    2. Barakat N,
    3. Shah P,
    4. Faro SH, et al

    . Inter- and intra-rater reliability of diffusion tensor imaging parameters in the normal pediatric spinal cord. World J Radiol 2015;7:279–85 doi:10.4329/wjr.v7.i9.279 pmid:26435778

    CrossRefPubMed
34. 34.↵
    2. Prados F,
    3. Ashburner J,
    4. Blaiotta C, et al

    . Spinal cord grey matter segmentation challenge. Neuroimage 2017;152:312–29 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.03.010 pmid:28286318

    CrossRefPubMed