Lesion-Specific Language Network Alterations in Temporal Lobe Epilepsy

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Blumcke I,
   2. Spreafico R,
   3. Haaker G, et al

   . Histopathological findings in brain tissue obtained during epilepsy surgery. N Engl J Med 2017;377:1648–56 doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1703784 pmid:29069555

   CrossRefPubMed
2. 2.↵
   1. Helmstaedter C

   . Cognitive outcomes of different surgical approaches in temporal lobe epilepsy. Epileptic Disord 2013;15:221–39 doi:10.1684/epd.2013.0587 pmid:23899718

   CrossRefPubMed
3. 3.↵
   1. Helmstaedter C,
   2. Petzold I,
   3. Bien CG

   . The cognitive consequence of resecting nonlesional tissues in epilepsy surgery–results from MRI- and histopathology-negative patients with temporal lobe epilepsy. Epilepsia 2011;52:1402–08 doi:10.1111/j.1528-1167.2011.03157.x pmid:21740419

   CrossRefPubMed
4. 4.↵
   1. Oyegbile TO,
   2. Dow C,
   3. Jones J, et al

   . The nature and course of neuropsychological morbidity in chronic temporal lobe epilepsy. Neurology 2004;62:1736–42 doi:10.1212/01.WNL.0000125186.04867.34 pmid:15159470

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
5. 5.↵
   1. Bartha-Doering L,
   2. Trinka E

   . The interictal language profile in adult epilepsy. Epilepsia 2014;55:1512–25 doi:10.1111/epi.12743 pmid:25110150

   CrossRefPubMed
6. 6.↵
   1. Austermuehle A,
   2. Cocjin J,
   3. Reynolds R, et al

   . Language functional MRI and direct cortical stimulation in epilepsy preoperative planning. Ann Neurol 2017;81:526–37 doi:10.1002/ana.24899 pmid:28220524

   CrossRefPubMed
7. 7.↵
   1. Black DF,
   2. Vachha B,
   3. Mian A, et al

   . American Society of Functional Neuroradiology-Recommended fMRI paradigm algorithms for presurgical language assessment. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2017;38:E65–73 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A5345 pmid:28860215

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
8. 8.↵
   1. Poeppel D

   . The neuroanatomic and neurophysiological infrastructure for speech and language. Curr Opin Neurobiol 2014;28:142–49 doi:10.1016/j.conb.2014.07.005 pmid:25064048

   CrossRefPubMed
9. 9.↵
   1. Friston KJ

   . Functional and effective connectivity: a review. Brain Connect 2011;1:13–36 doi:10.1089/brain.2011.0008 pmid:22432952

   CrossRefPubMed
10. 10.↵
    1. Biswal B,
    2. Yetkin FZ,
    3. Haughton VM, et al

    . Functional connectivity in the motor cortex of resting human brain using echo-planar MRI. Magn Reson Med 1995;34:537–41 doi:10.1002/mrm.1910340409 pmid:8524021

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
11. 11.↵
    1. Rosazza C,
    2. Ghielmetti F,
    3. Minati L, et al

    . Preoperative language lateralization in temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) predicts peri-ictal, pre- and post-operative language performance: an fMRI study. Neuroimage Clin 2013;3:73–83 doi:10.1016/j.nicl.2013.07.001 pmid:24179851

    CrossRefPubMed
12. 12.↵
    1. Kaestner E,
    2. Reyes A,
    3. Macari AC, et al

    . Identifying the neural basis of a language-impaired phenotype of temporal lobe epilepsy. Epilepsia 2019;60:1627–38 doi:10.1111/epi.16283 pmid:31297795

    CrossRefPubMed
13. 13.↵
    1. Louis DN,
    2. Ohgaki H,
    3. Wiestler OD, et al

    . The 2007 WHO classification of tumours of the central nervous system. Acta Neuropathol 2007;114:97–109 doi:10.1007/s00401-007-0243-4 pmid:17618441

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
14. 14.↵
    1. Louis DN,
    2. Perry A,
    3. Reifenberger G, et al

    . The 2016 World Health Organization Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System: a summary. Acta Neuropathol 2016;131:803–20 doi:10.1007/s00401-016-1545-1 pmid:27157931

    CrossRefPubMed
15. 15.↵
    1. Kaplan E,
    2. Goodglass H,
    3. Weintraub S

    . Boston Naming Test. Philadelpia: Lea & Febiger; 1983
16. 16.↵
    1. Aschenbrenner A,
    2. Tucha O,
    3. Lange K

    . RWT: Regensburger Wortflüssigkeits-Test. Göttingen: Hogrefe; 2000
17. 17.↵
    1. Friston KJ,
    2. Holmes AP,
    3. Worsley KJ, et al

    . Statistical parametric maps in functional imaging: a general linear approach. Hum Brain Mapp 1994;2:189–210 doi:10.1002/hbm.460020402

    CrossRef
18. 18.↵
    1. Wilke M,
    2. Lidzba K

    . LI-tool: a new toolbox to assess lateralization in functional MR-data. J Neurosci Methods 2007;163:128–36 doi:10.1016/j.jneumeth.2007.01.026 pmid:17386945

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
19. 19.↵
    1. Whitfield-Gabrieli S,
    2. Nieto-Castanon A

    . Conn: a functional connectivity toolbox for correlated and anticorrelated brain networks. Brain Connect 2012;2:125–41 doi:10.1089/brain.2012.0073 pmid:22642651

    CrossRefPubMed
20. 20.↵
    1. Seghier ML

    . Laterality index in functional MRI: methodological issues. Magn Reson Imaging 2008;26:594–601 doi:10.1016/j.mri.2007.10.010 pmid:18158224

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
21. 21.↵
    1. Fair DA,
    2. Schlaggar BL,
    3. Cohen AL, et al

    . A method for using blocked and event-related fMRI data to study “resting state” functional connectivity. Neuroimage 2007;35:396–405 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.11.051 pmid:17239622

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
22. 22.↵
    1. Behzadi Y,
    2. Restom K,
    3. Liau J, et al

    . A component based noise correction method (CompCor) for BOLD and perfusion-based fMRI. Neuroimage 2007;37:90–101 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.04.042 pmid:17560126

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
23. 23.↵
    1. Ganger S,
    2. Hahn A,
    3. Kublbock M, et al

    . Comparison of continuously acquired resting state and extracted analogues from active tasks. Hum Brain Mapp 2015;36:4053–63 doi:10.1002/hbm.22897 pmid:26178250

    CrossRefPubMed
24. 24.↵
    1. Shah LM,
    2. Cramer JA,
    3. Ferguson MA, et al

    . Reliability and reproducibility of individual differences in functional connectivity acquired during task and resting state. Brain Behav 2016;6:e00456 doi:10.1002/brb3.456 pmid:27069771

    CrossRefPubMed
25. 25.↵
    1. Davey CE,
    2. Grayden DB,
    3. Egan GF, et al

    . Filtering induces correlation in fMRI resting state data. Neuroimage 2013;64:728–40 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.08.022 pmid:22939874

    CrossRefPubMed
26. 26.↵
    1. Zalesky A,
    2. Fornito A,
    3. Bullmore ET

    . Network-based statistic: identifying differences in brain networks. Neuroimage 2010;53:1197–1207 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.06.041 pmid:20600983

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
27. 27.↵
    1. Blumcke I,
    2. Thom M,
    3. Aronica E, et al

    . International consensus classification of hippocampal sclerosis in temporal lobe epilepsy: a Task Force Report from the ILAE Commission on Diagnostic Methods. Epilepsia 2013;54:1315–29 doi:10.1111/epi.12220 pmid:23692496

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
28. 28.↵
    1. Bonilha L,
    2. Edwards JC,
    3. Kinsman SL, et al

    . Extrahippocampal gray matter loss and hippocampal deafferentation in patients with temporal lobe epilepsy. Epilepsia 2010;51:519–28 doi:10.1111/j.1528-1167.2009.02506.x pmid:20163442

    CrossRefPubMed
29. 29.↵
    1. Coan AC,
    2. Campos BM,
    3. Yasuda CL, et al

    . Frequent seizures are associated with a network of gray matter atrophy in temporal lobe epilepsy with or without hippocampal sclerosis. PLoS One 2014;9:e85843 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0085843 pmid:24475055

    CrossRefPubMed
30. 30.↵
    1. Haneef Z,
    2. Lenartowicz A,
    3. Yeh HJ, et al

    . Functional connectivity of hippocampal networks in temporal lobe epilepsy. Epilepsia 2014;55:137–45 doi:10.1111/epi.12476 pmid:24313597

    CrossRefPubMed
31. 31.↵
    1. de Campos BM,
    2. Coan AC,
    3. Lin Yasuda C, et al

    . Large-scale brain networks are distinctly affected in right and left mesial temporal lobe epilepsy. Hum Brain Mapp 2016;37:3137–52 doi:10.1002/hbm.23231 pmid:27133613

    CrossRefPubMed
32. 32.↵
    1. Covington NV,
    2. Duff MC

    . Expanding the language network: direct contributions from the hippocampus. Trends Cogn Sci 2016;20:869–70 doi:10.1016/j.tics.2016.10.006 pmid:27814958

    CrossRefPubMed
33. 33.↵
    1. Vaughan DN,
    2. Rayner G,
    3. Tailby C, et al

    . MRI-negative temporal lobe epilepsy: a network disorder of neocortical connectivity. Neurology 2016;87:1934–42 doi:10.1212/WNL.0000000000003289 pmid:27694267

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
34. 34.↵
    1. Blumcke I,
    2. Aronica E,
    3. Urbach H, et al

    . A neuropathology-based approach to epilepsy surgery in brain tumors and proposal for a new terminology use for long-term epilepsy-associated brain tumors. Acta Neuropathol 2014;128:39–54 doi:10.1007/s00401-014-1288-9 pmid:24858213

    CrossRefPubMed
35. 35.↵
    1. Giulioni M,
    2. Marucci G,
    3. Martinoni M, et al

    . Epilepsy associated tumors: review article. World J Clin Cases 2014;2:623–41 doi:10.12998/wjcc.v2.i11.623 pmid:25405186

    CrossRefPubMed
36. 36.↵
    1. Noll KR,
    2. Sullaway C,
    3. Ziu M, et al

    . Relationships between tumor grade and neurocognitive functioning in patients with glioma of the left temporal lobe prior to surgical resection. Neuro Oncol 2015;17:580–87 doi:10.1093/neuonc/nou233 pmid:25227126

    CrossRefPubMed
37. 37.↵
    1. Briganti C,
    2. Sestieri C,
    3. Mattei PA, et al

    . Reorganization of functional connectivity of the language network in patients with brain gliomas. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33:1983–90 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3064 pmid:22555573

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
38. 38.↵
    1. Ghinda CD,
    2. Duffau H

    . Network plasticity and intraoperative mapping for personalized multimodal management of diffuse low-grade gliomas. Front Surg 2017;4:3 doi:10.3389/fsurg.2017.00003 pmid:28197403

    CrossRefPubMed
39. 39.↵
    1. Muhlhofer W,
    2. Tan YL,
    3. Mueller SG, et al

    . MRI-negative temporal lobe epilepsy: what do we know? Epilepsia 2017;58:727–42 doi:10.1111/epi.13699 pmid:28266710

    CrossRefPubMed
40. 40.↵
    1. Weber B,
    2. Wellmer J,
    3. Reuber M, et al

    . Left hippocampal pathology is associated with atypical language lateralization in patients with focal epilepsy. Brain 2006;129:346–51 doi:10.1093/brain/awh694 pmid:16330504

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
41. 41.↵
    1. Mazoyer B,
    2. Zago L,
    3. Jobard G, et al

    . Gaussian mixture modeling of hemispheric lateralization for language in a large sample of healthy individuals balanced for handedness. PLoS One 2014;9:e101165 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0101165 pmid:24977417

    CrossRefPubMed
42. 42.↵
    1. Pravata E,
    2. Sestieri C,
    3. Mantini D, et al

    . Functional connectivity MR imaging of the language network in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32:532–40 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2311 pmid:21163879

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
43. 43.↵
    1. Briellmann RS,
    2. Labate A,
    3. Harvey AS, et al

    . Is language lateralization in temporal lobe epilepsy patients related to the nature of the epileptogenic lesion? Epilepsia 2006;47:916–20 doi:10.1111/j.1528-1167.2006.00513.x pmid:16686657

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
44. 44.↵
    1. Fox MD,
    2. Raichle ME

    . Spontaneous fluctuations in brain activity observed with functional magnetic resonance imaging. Nat Rev Neurosci 2007;8:700–11 doi:10.1038/nrn2201 pmid:17704812

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
45. 45.↵
    1. Teghipco A,
    2. Hussain A,
    3. Tivarus ME

    . Disrupted functional connectivity affects resting state based language lateralization. Neuroimage Clin 2016;12:910–27 doi:10.1016/j.nicl.2016.10.015 pmid:27882297

    CrossRefPubMed
46. 46.↵
    1. Doucet GE,
    2. Pustina D,
    3. Skidmore C, et al

    . Resting-state functional connectivity predicts the strength of hemispheric lateralization for language processing in temporal lobe epilepsy and normals. Hum Brain Mapp 2015;36:288–303 doi:10.1002/hbm.22628 pmid:25187327

    CrossRefPubMed
47. 47.↵
    1. Trimmel K,
    2. van Graan AL,
    3. Caciagli L, et al

    . Left temporal lobe language network connectivity in temporal lobe epilepsy. Brain 2018;141:2406–18 doi:10.1093/brain/awy164 pmid:29939211

    CrossRefPubMed